since there is no apparent reason to want toactively retain the information. All professors encounter this problem as depicted in Figure 1. Page 11.204.2 Professor, why didn’t you tell us that the material covered at the beginning of the semester was going to be really important for the work we needed to do ? Student views material Professor clearly sees in a disjointed fashion how pieces fit together
delivery.EquipmentA list of equipment with approximate costs is shown in Table 1. Table 1. Laboratory Equipment Single cylinder engines (5, $325 each) $1,625 Tool kits (4, $50 each) $200 Water brake dynamometer (1) $2,500 Laptop computer $1,500 Miscellaneous equipment $50 Total Cost $5,875The engines were Briggs and Stratton, Raptor 3 Racing Engines. They were 5 hp, singlecylinder, 4-stroke
earlier studies at M.I.T.1 and Georgia Tech2 that addressedstudent perceptions of cheating. This survey was administered in a number of required courses,with multiple sections that are typically offered every quarter at Cal Poly. The goal of this surveywas to determine the incidence rate of solution manual use and student perceptions on the ethicsand educational value of using the solution manuals when working homework assignments.Faculty perceptions were also tabulated using a similar survey. Quantitative results are presentedalong with an assessment of interactions between student perceptions and their use of thesolution manuals.IntroductionCalifornia Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly), San Luis Obispo’s College of Engineeringhas
be used as part of a comprehensive assessment process forProgram Outcomes and ABET EC-2000 Criterion 3. Descriptions of similar processes formechanical engineering programs 2,3, engineering programs 4 and technology programs5-7 havebeen previously described in the literature.ABET Course SyllabiPeriodically the “official” course syllabi for all undergraduate courses are reviewed by thefaculty currently teaching the courses, the topic area coordinators concerned, and theDepartment’s Undergraduate Academic Affairs Committee. Electronic and hard copies aremaintained on file. This activity is the starting point for the course assessment process. Anexample syllabus is shown in Table 1.The Course Surveys and Example ResultsBased on the syllabi for
virtual measurements and instrumentation into the lecture andlaboratory, (ii) coupling the lecture and laboratory more closely through an on-line coursemanual, (iii) providing additional course resources through WebCT to enhance student learning,and (iv) updating and/or developing several new laboratory exercises to demonstrate key courselearning objectives. An outline of the course before and after the course revisions will bepresented, significant course changes will be summarized, the impact these changes have onmechanical engineering undergraduate education at ISU will be assessed, and lessons learnedwill be outlined.1 Background Mechanical Engineering Measurements and Instrumentation, commonly referred to asME 370 at Iowa State
. Page 11.227.2Introduction Papers on new ways to teach thermodynamics are somewhat rare and tend tofocus on either the implementation of a new software package, such as presented byDixon 1, Chang et al 2 or on ways to present existing materials in more diverse and, dareone say, “fun” ways (e.g. Elliot 3). Papers that address how the basic laws are taught andin what type of progression concepts are introduced are, however, almost non-existent.An observer might conjecture therefore, that the subject is so well documented that anydeviation would result in inferior instruction and so should be avoided at all costs.Student feedback however does not support this and the subject is still continually seen asone of the most academically
teams.”1 In thebusiness environment, a team can be defined as: “A group of people with a full set of complementary skills required to complete a task, job, or project. Team members (1) operate with a high degree of interdependence, (2) share authority and responsibility for self-management, (3) are accountable for the collective performance, and (4) work toward a common goal and shared rewards(s). A team becomes more than just a collection of people when a strong sense of mutual commitment creates synergy, thus generating performance greater than the sum of the performance of its individual members.”2Thus, the purpose of a team is to accomplish a task that, in the end, results in a better, morecomplete
lower the window panes. The force required to adjust the windowsis often much too large for the nursing home tenants, making it very difficult for them to regulatetheir room temperature.Your team has been tasked with designing a device that will assist the elderly tenants withraising and lowering the building’s windows. You will produce a complete engineering designsolution for the client. Someone should be able to build the device from your solution withoutany questions. Since each window is not guaranteed to be located near an electrical socket, thisdevice should not rely on electric power.The building’s windows are double-hung, Figure 1. The double-hung window consists of anupper and lower sash that slide vertically in separate grooves in
results and describe opportunities forfuture work, encouraging continued involvement in research. Many FIRE students continue toparticipate in research after the program concludes and note that the program influenced theirdecision to attend UT Austin and confirmed their interest in the field of mechanical engineering.The general structure of the FIRE program is documented in this paper, along with investigationsof its impact on participants’ GPA, retention within the major, rate of participation in undergraduateresearch, and intention to pursue higher education. Student perceptions of the program andopportunities for improving it are also discussed. 1. Introduction Participation in undergraduate research provides students with
refers to educating adult, self-directed learners. A searchfor the two topics in the Journal for Engineering Education returns 277 articles associated withthe term pedagogy compared to 2 for andragogy, for a ratio of over 138:1. For the InternationalJournal of Engineering Education the ratio is 119:1. A similar search of all ASEE conferencearticles since 1996 returns over 104:1. The initial conclusion of these findings is that the topic ofandragogy is less prevalent than pedagogy in engineering education publications. This isproblematic considering these two learner orientations bring with them a set of conflictingunderlying assumptions regarding the learner themselves, with the pedagogical assumptions lessconsistent with ABET student outcomes
conducted data analysis. Through the research, studentsgained hands-on research experience and had a better understanding of the mechanical propertiesand their statistical descriptions of materials. Some students showed great interest in doingresearch in future. Through this research, it was shown that some fundamental commonquestions or topics raised by the students during their courses can be used as undergraduateresearch projects. Students benefit greatly from such research projects.1. IntroductionThe mechanical properties of materials gathered from tensile tests are critical strength data formechanical design. In the course MECH2500- Mechanics of Materials, tensile tests wereconducted on an Instron Universal Testing machine to obtain a stress
Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE), and for the entire lifecycle of theproduct or system (PLM – Siemens 2015). One of the factors that has justified many of the existingtrends and methodologies being currently used is the improvement of (engineering) designefficiency.Studies indicate that there is a potential for significant reduction in design cycle time (up to 45%,as stated in Thomas 2015) whenever reutilization of parts and models is carried out. Some datacollected when a particular application was implemented in the industrial setting indicates that,even when there is an increase in the number of assemblies and version as the product matures, areduction in the number of parts being utilized for such expansion is achieved (Figure 1). The useof
the substance condenses. Students should also understand that some substances rarelybehave as an ideal gas (H2O, Refrigerants), but in certain cases they can behave as ideal gases(superheated vapor at low pressures). It has been observed that some students will apply Pv = RTwhen it is not justified, and fail to use it when it is justified. 4In heat transfer students have difficulty applying the boundary conditions correctly when usingheat conduction equation when solving a conduction problem, under what condition the availableequations for one dimensional heat conduction can be used (e.g., why Bi must be << 1), underwhat conditions the lumped capacity solution can be used for a transient heat conduction problem,or under what conditions
. However, one concern is the student participation level given that the materials areoptional in the class.I. Introduction University education involves teaching and training students to be proficient in theirrespective fields, and successfully embrace challenges that may present themselves on the job.Accordingly, students are taught key skills that may be immediately required in the corporateworld along with fundamental concepts that supplement their primary roles in the workplace.This diversified training helps students in adapting to different types of job roles that may berequired of them after graduation. Recently, a greater emphasis is being placed on selectskills that are referred to as employability qualifications. Azami et al.1 studied
the most difficult,and which concepts best discriminate between high- and low-performing students. It isfound that in combined static loading cases, students are easily able to determine thecross sectional area to utilize when calculating an axial stress, but struggle to determinethe direction stresses act in or identify all of the types of stresses present at a point.Preliminary analysis suggests students who are able to identify the correct cross sectionalarea to calculate stresses with have a much higher final course grade than students whoare not able to do this. Interestingly, a student's ability to grasp a fundamental concept didnot seem to have a huge impact on whether or not they completed the MOOC.1. IntroductionThe goal of this
sophomore course entitled“Introduction to Mechanical Engineering Practice,” and is a required course for mechanicalengineering majors. The course comprised of three hour-long lectures every week along with agroup project in reverse engineering. The lecture classes were devoted to the basic elements ofmechanical engineering practice which came from a text entitled “An Introduction toMechanical Engineering.” [1] This text introduced the students to the vocabulary, skills, andapplications associated with the mechanical engineering profession. Chapter 1 of the textintroduces the profession of mechanical engineering, and the next seven chapters talk about thevarious disciplines within mechanical engineering with intent to develop useful design
developing new software that could potentially beused by any instructor to incorporate these small skills into their thermodynamics course. Thesoftware will incorporate the quizlet questions as well as techniques used by video gamedevelopers.The paper presents more details on the quizlet questions and assessment. It also describes thecurrent state of the new software and how it is being incorporated into a thermodynamics course.1. IntroductionRecent research shows that the traditional lecture-based course structure is not the most effectiveteaching method.2 Many instructors have been adding active learning to the classroom, with the“flipped” classroom becoming very popular. 3 The author has experimented with flippingclasses with mixed results
are called on to design a cycle to meet certain criteria. In the module we detail here, students are provided costs and operational data for sets of candidate components from which to construct a Rankine cycle. Students are provided with fuel cost and the market value for electricity, and asked to make recommenda- tions for the system’s return on investment. To perform their analysis, students are provided a Python code implementing the PYroMat package, which they modify and run to determine the performance of their design. We provide advice on implementation and resources to support the module in a sophmore-level class.1 IntroductionIn this paper, we propose a Problem-Based-Learning (PBL) module for
Table 1. This tool shows graduation date, engineering-relatedwork experiences (internships and coops), student organization involvement (activities), mode ofmatriculation and other pursuits of each ambassador. For the purposes of this paper, this chartalso shows the typical profile of our ambassadors. Due to space limitations, only seven of thenine ambassadors for this term are shown.Table 1: Ambassador Profiles Spring 2017 MEEN AMBASSADORS Lead Ambassador Ambassador Ambassador Ambassador Ambassador Ambassador NAME Ambassador 1 2 3 4 5 6 GRAD DATE
Equilibrium; Sheppard and Tongue [1] Vector Mechanics for Engineers, Statics and Mechanics; Beer, Johnston, Mazurek, Cornwell, and Self [2] Engineering Mechanics: Statics; Meriam and Kraige [3] Engineering Mechanics: Statics and Dynamics; Costanzo, Plesha, and Gray [4] Engineering Statics; Condoor [5] Engineering Mechanics: Statics and Dynamics; Hibbeler [6] Engineering Mechanics: Statics and Dynamics; Bedford and Fowler [7] Engineering Mechanics: Statics; Riley and Sturges [8] Although textbooks vary somewhat in their descriptions, a multi-member object containingat least one multi-force member would be appropriate for analysis by the methods presented in aframes and machines section of a textbook
, inquire about particular events, or simply reflect on why things happened the way they didin class. These are reflections-on-action. This collection of thinking about teaching can then beused to intentionally plan the next lesson, and begin the cycle again.For this paper, the Plan-Teach-Reflect-Apply Cycle that focuses on reflective teaching isextended to consider the larger Reflective Cycle of Course Development (Figure 1), and howreflection guided variations made in iterations of a senior level heat transfer course. Essentially,expanding the grain size of the cycle shifts from a lesson plan to a full course structure. Thus, thePlan stage references the teacher preparing and deciding on the course structure (content,routines, teaching methods
”. The course we have devised to meet this need has the followingfour learning objectives: (1) Given an experimental setup, know how to select an appropriatesensor based on characteristics and error (2) Given measurement results, be able to interpretmeasurements taken and experimental results with regard to sources of uncertainty, (3) Given ageneral product, system, or process, be able to formulate a testable hypothesis, and (4) Know howto utilize statistical experimental design to rigorously test a hypothesis. Each of these learningobjectives build upon one another, thus a scaffold approach is implemented to guide studentlearning [1-3].Within this work we aim to provide the reader with documentation of our scaffold approach andmetrics to
learningoutcomes of the projects are discussed.IntroductionSheet metal forming is generally referred to manufacturing processes in which sheet metal isdeformed plastically into a desired geometry of a product. Sheet metal forming has wideapplications in today’s industries such automotive, aerospace, defense, and so on. There areseveral sheet metal forming processes including stamping, hydroforming, deep drawing, rollforming, etc. The mechanics of sheet metal forming is mainly introduced in [1-2]. Formability isdefined as ability of sheet metal to be deformed plastically without any failure. In the recentyears, several studies have been conducted to characterize sheet metal formability [3-7]. Tocharacterize sheet metal formability, it is important to
) activities in the context of a sophomore dynamics class. The activities were developed inpartnership with an industry representative and have thus far been implemented in two iterations.Surveys conducted in Spring and Fall 2016 reveal how students experienced the activities. Thesurvey findings indicate that using PBL activities to complement a lecture-based approach indynamics provides an opportunity for students to connect abstract engineering principles to real-life situations, thereby increasing student motivation to learn and deepening conceptualunderstandings.IntroductionDynamics is taught as part of what the National Science Foundation [1] describes as theengineering “core” – i.e., the middle two years of the four year undergraduate experience
technology(1 section). The problems are available at no cost at the National Problem Library(webwork.maa.org/wiki/Open_Problem_Library) which is maintained by the MathematicalAssociation of America (MAA), the developers of WeBWorK, and the NSF.The WeBWorK system delivers unique homework problems to each student’s web browser bydisplaying a randomized set of parameters for each problem, driving unique solutions. Eachstudent is given fields in their browser where answers may be entered. The student is then givenfeedback on the correctness of the answers submitted. The system is highly customizable to meetvarious instructor preferences; one can easily limit the total number of responses allowed for aproblem, set due dates and times, set up partial
fluid power andstudent practice of entrepreneurial skills.IntroductionAt Lawrence Technological University (Lawrence Tech), faculty are engaged in a multiyearprocess to incorporate active and collaborative learning (ACL), problem-based learning (PBL),and entrepreneurially minded learning (EML) into the engineering curriculum [1, 2, 3]. Activelearning requires students to actively discuss issues or work problems in the classroom, ratherthan listening passively to a lecture. If students informally assist one another in this process, thetechnique is deemed collaborative learning [4]. A related approach, problem-based learning,introduces engaging real-world problems for students to solve, usually as part of a group [5]. Anew twist on problem-based
homework assignments with paper homework assignmentsfrom the textbook in an introductory statistics course and found that students who used thecomputer-based homework performed better. Reports of students preferring online homeworkand performing better on exams in physics,2,6 chemistry,7,8 and calculus 9,10 are available. Whileit seems online homework is superior, counter examples can also be found. For example,Bonham, et al., compared online homework to paper homework in an introductory physicscourse and found no statistical difference in student performance.11 Hauk and Segalla found nodifference between online homework and paper homework in an algebra course.1 Cheng, et. al,evaluated graded and non-graded paper and online homework along with
low-cost pipe flow experiments in large Mechanical Engineeringlecture classrooms to examine how hands-on active learning can supplement moretraditional lecture classes to deepen student understanding of engineering principles.The low-cost pipe flow experiment was fabricated using a four step approach: (1) thegeometry of the pipe flow experiment was defined using CAD software, (2) A plasticmold of the experiment was 3-D printed using rapid prototyping, (3) the experimentalgeometry was molded in thin plastic sheets using vacuum forming, and (4) the finalexperiment was assembled from the vacuum formed sheets to produce multiple copies ofthe experiment. The resulting experimental hardware was simple, robust and inexpensiveenough to distribute
includes comparison of average test and course grades betweencontrol groups and other terms with this project implemented. End-of-semester courseevaluation data and comments are also compiled and analyzed. Both quantitative and qualitativedata indicate a positive and compelling effect of the project.IntroductionThermodynamics is a challenging class,1 and is an important subject relevant to multipleengineering disciplines. An introduction to thermodynamics course, therefore, is typicallyrequired across majors. The diversity of student body in such a class presents unique challengesfor teaching and learning. The topics covered are mostly conceptual, such as property relations,heat, work, first and second laws, etc.2 and topics are usually presented
atraditional engineering second year course. A one-page demonstration design question flow-chart was created and followed in formation of the five-minute demonstrations. These tangiblebrief activities, which students can physically operate during the lecture based course, arestructured for students to develop a better engineering feel for the importance of theoreticalconcepts paralleled in the same lecture. With the need for innovative methods for engagingfuture engineers, these hands-on demonstrations are structured with the goal of realization ofpractical applications of mathematical based engineering course concepts [1]. Students haveopportunity to individually actuate the demonstrations shown by the instructor as they are passedaround the lecture