the professional-track Gannon/GE Transportation System Embedded Software Graduate program. Page 25.755.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Improving upon Best Practices: FCAR 2.0AbstractThe Faculty Course Assessment Report (FCAR) presents a streamlined methodology that allowsinstructors to write assessment reports in a concise, standardized format conducive for use inboth course and student (program) outcomes assessment. The FCAR is a short one to two pageform completed by the instructor that taught the class. The FCAR is structured as a sequence ofstandardized
Tulsa, also in Mechanical Engineering. He currently teaches first-year engineering courses as well as various courses in Mechanical Engineering, primarily in the mechanics area. His pedagogical research areas include standards-based assessment and curriculum design, including the incorporation of entrepreneurial thinking into the engineering curriculum and especially as pertains to First-Year Engineering.Dr. Lawrence Funke, Ohio Northern University Dr. Funke received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Notre Dame in 2017. He is currently an assistant professor at Ohio Northern University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Exploring Impacts of a Flipped
Paper ID #30769Transforming an Engineering Design Course into an Engaging LearningExperience using ePortfoliosMiss Taylor Tucker, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Taylor Tucker graduated from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign with a Bachelor’s degree in engineering mechanics and is now pursuing a master’s in Curriculum and Instruction through the Digital Environments for Learning, Teaching, and Agency (DELTA) program. She is interested in engineering design and lends her technical background to her research with the Collaborative Learning Lab, exploring how to improve ill-structured tasks for
setup and boundary conditions. This greatly cuts down on the time requiredto troubleshoot an experimental apparatus and allows for a more efficient use of time. Since the design project is a continuation of all the past years of research, the saved timeallows for things such as automation and novel techniques to aid in the conducting of the currentresearch. Additionally, side research areas and problems can be developed that, at this point,should be entirely original and worthy of a graduate thesis. To this end, the senior level projectshould far exceed expectations and be at a leading level. Additionally, as there has beenextensive practice on technical writings through the writing of grants and publishable results, thetechnical reports
. Military Academy Lieutenant Colonel James Bluman is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. He has served the United States Army for the last 20 years as an officer and Army Aviator. He is a graduate of West Point (B.S. in Mechanical Engineering), Penn State (M.S. in Aerospace Engineering), and the Univ. of Alabama in Huntsville (Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering). His research interests are in the flight dynamics of VTOL aircraft and UAVs and innovative teaching methods.Dr. Gregory Martin Freisinger, United States Military Academy Greg Freisinger is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military
enough time todistract from their other courses. Student projects are sponsored by a faculty research advisor, andeither the faculty member or a post-doctoral researcher or graduate student mentor act as their day-to-day point of contact. By providing students with opportunities for immersive learning in their first college semester,FIRE seeks to engage freshmen in engineering in a more accessible manner, supplementing theirrequired coursework. The research projects are carefully selected and framed not only to cover abroad range of mechanical engineering topics (from biomechanics to combustion to 3D printing)but also to provide opportunities for undergraduate researchers to exercise creative problemsolving, design and hands-on skills, self
always have an impact on student retention or graduation rates. This finding isconsistent with the understanding that curriculum and instruction have strong impacts on retention.Students who build connections between theoretical academic aspects of the curriculum andprofessional engineering practice are more likely to be retained in engineering. Likewise, those whobuild connections with other students develop a sense of belonging and are less likely to changemajors.The American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) promotes practices and strategies forretaining students in engineering7. Based on best-practices submitted by College Deans from manyuniversities, a common theme was found: creating a “community” is important for student retention
in his department including; modified mastery learning in early engineering courses and a multi-year integrated system design (ISD) project for honors students. The ISD team currently has 50+ students working to design and build an electric bicycle and human powered vehi- cles. He is a mentor to mechanical engineering graduate teaching fellows. He is also active in technology adoption and support. Geoffrey holds a PhD in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics from Cornell University and Bachelor de- grees in Mechanical Engineering and Physics from Cedarville University. His research interests are fo- cused on best practices for student learning and student success.Dr. Michele J. Grimm, Michigan State University
AC 2011-2241: REVISITING COMMUNICATION EXPERIENCES TO PRE-PARE FOR PROFESSIONAL PRACTICEKathryn Mobrand, University of Washington Kathryn Mobrand is a doctoral candidate and research assistant in the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering at the University of Washington. She is working with Dr. Jennifer Turns on preparedness portfolios for engineering undergraduates; her focus is on the communication of practicing engineers.Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington Jennifer Turns is an Associate Professor in the Department of Human Centered Design and Engineering at the University of Washington. She is interested in all aspects of engineering education, including how to support engineering
, energy audits and condition surveys for various mechanical and electrical and systems. He has conducted several projects to reduce carbon dioxide and other building emission impacts by evaluating and improving the energy practices through the integration of sustainable systems with existing systems. His current research focuses on engaging and educating students in sustainable and green buildings’ design and energy conservation. He is currently investigating various ways to reduce energy consumption in office buildings. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Enhancing Teaching Practices for Fluid Power Class with Interactive Learning Exercises and its Impacts on Students
community proved important [25]. In short, the impact ofundergraduate research experience is tremendous on undergraduate students, graduate mentors,and faculty members. In all, evidence-based practices from previous successful programs and publishedresearch indicate the importance of integration of undergraduates, specially underrepresented andunderserved minority groups, in research to combat challenges to matriculation, retention,graduation, and enrollment in graduate school.ApproachTANMS Engineering Research Center developed a paid eight week research experience forURM and non-URM undergraduate students, suitable for implementation during the academicyear (semester or quarter systems) as well as during the summer months. The eight
. Page 15.361.3Design of Experiments (DOE) InclusionAccording to the current ABET Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, all engineeringprograms must demonstrate that graduating students have “an ability to design and conductexperiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data.” As a prelude to potential projectexperimentation or testing of project designs, students within our capstone research class areintroduced to several useful classes of experimental designs. Design of Experiments (DOE orDOX) can actually invoke or is often depicted as a stepwise methodology or strategy as chartedby Del Vecchio and presented as Figure 1. Often in a team approach to design orexperimentation, team members contribute via brainstorming of potential
versus goals is reviewed, and an action plan developed. In many cases, changeswithin a single course are sufficient to address an issue. Occasionally, the root cause may lie in aformative course that is part of a sequence, e.g. math, science or design, leading to multiplecourse improvements. The third source is program self-assessment which summarizes the actionsand results for Criteria 1-9 and is supplemental to the activities described above.PEO assessment is part of the ‘slow loop’ where changes typically occur over a period of years.For example, changes to the University, College, Department and Program mission statementsand strategic plans may impact one or more PEOs. Assessment and evaluation within the ‘fastloop’ may trigger the need for
suitable to the two-course sequence for ourcapstone senior project, ME400 – Mechanical Engineering Design and ME 412 – MechanicalEngineering Senior Project. The team drafted both the interim and final project status reports toaddress the specific needs of the sponsor. This project was presented at the 46th WKU AnnualStudent Research Conference, where their work was favorably reviewed by peers and otherfaculty within the university community. It was also presented to the Mechanical EngineeringAdvisory Board.The Western Kentucky University ME curriculum assures that program graduates haveexperienced the engineering profession and demonstrated the ability to perform in a professionalmanner. The team project demonstrated student competence in the
atcontinuous improvement of the mechanical engineering curriculum. Correspondingly, the resultsmay be considered anecdotal at best. Because the authors are all capstone design faculty, thereis an element of member-checking involved in the synthesis of results. A more robust process toensure trustworthiness of the results was not undertaken. Second, the results may be biasedtoward a positive impact of the Intro to ME course on student performance. As discussedpreviously, the mechanical engineering program implemented the Intro to ME course to bringthe CME Design Process forward in the curriculum and allow for greater practice and repetitionprior to the capstone design course in the senior year. Correspondingly, faculty may tend towarda confirmation
in two different categories: static inspectionand engineering design, and high-performance track dynamic events. While mainly conceived asa design activity, the Formula SAE competition has also provided opportunities for research. Page 12.1573.7 Table 2. Events and Competition Point Structure for the Formula SAE Challenge.6In recent years the Formula SAE rules have stipulated the use of an impact attenuation device tolessen the severity of a frontal impact. In 2006 the rules on the attenuator were modified andspecific performance requirements were mandated. The impact attenuator was required todecelerate a 661 lb mass with a velocity of
Gator Engineering) for eight years, helping UF engineering departments deliver online master’s degrees and certificates to thousands of students working in industry or serving in the military worldwide. Dr. Pamela Dickrell earned her B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Florida, with research specializing in Tribology. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Five-Minute Demonstrations: Minimal Faculty Investment for Maximum Learning ImpactThis work examines a systematic approach of designing five-minute course demonstrationsfor use in large engineering lectures for active learning and course concept retention within
learning. The labs aim to address the need for combiningmultidisciplinary theoretical knowledge with practical hands-on experience and are specificallyfocused on involving undergraduate students in research and preparing them for the capstonesenior design project class. Each of the labs is related to one or two recently published by thefaculty papers, which the students are asked to get familiar with before each lab session.Preliminary results on the learning outcomes, based on students’ perception were assessedthrough anonymous survey questions. Next, the desired learning outcomes from facultyviewpoint, regarding critical thinking, responsibility for one’s own learning and intellectualgrowth were assessed through anonymous survey. The latter
have some expectation from the new graduating engineers, known as “BestPractices”. The ME Capstone Design Course utilizes the knowledge learned by the studentsin different courses for solving practical engineering problems, and prepare them for the realengineering job. A survey tool was developed in order to determine how successful theCapstone Design Course (ME470 and ME475) were in preparing the new graduatingengineers. The graduating students were asked to rate on a scale of 1 to 4, the impact theybelieve the Mechanical Engineering Capstone Design Project had in preparing them for someof the “Best Practices” expected from New Graduating Mechanical Engineers, by theindustry. The survey results were compiled and averaged, and are plotted in
Paper ID #18468Impact of High-Performing Teams on Student LearningDr. Molly A. McVey, University of Kansas Dr. Molly A. McVey is a post-doctoral teaching fellow at the University of Kansas School of Engineering where she works with faculty to incorporate evidence-based and student-centered teaching methods, and to research the impacts of changes made to teaching on student learning and success. Dr. McVey earned her Ph.D in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Kansas in 2012.Dr. Carl W. Luchies, University of KansasAdrian Joseph Villicana, University of Kansas I am a graduate student in the Social Psychology
Paper ID #34660Creating a Communications Curriculum for the Modern EngineerDr. Geoffrey Recktenwald, Michigan State University Geoff Recktenwald is a member of the teaching faculty in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan State University. Geoff holds a PhD in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics from Cornell University and Bachelor degrees in Mechanical Engineering and Physics from Cedarville University. His research interests are focused on best practices for student learning and student success. He is currently developing and researching SMART assessment, a modified mastery learning pedagogy for problem
. Provide effective mentoring, career development and teaching opportunities for graduate students in engineering5. Impart social responsibility to participants to give back through WEP to encourage others to pursue engineering in college or to pursue engineering graduate schoolGLUE targets second and third year undergraduate women and second year and beyond graduatewomen. GLUE was founded by the Women in Engineering Program at UT Austin and isfacilitated with support from engineering faculty and the Associate Dean for Student Affairs.In a paper that specifically focuses on one of the GLUE participants, Rabindran and Berry3evaluate the impact of undergraduate research on the retention of students in the discipline ofengineering and the
teaching methods and study habits affect the absorption and long-term retention of class material in the hopes of best preparing students for their future as engineers. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work in Progress: Effect of Assessment Frequency on Long-Term Retention of Engineering ContentAbstractThis work-in-progress paper presents some preliminary data from a study investigating the effectof assessment frequency on students’ long-term retention of engineering course content. In thisstudy, a variety of hypotheses designed to identify the factors that impact students’ long-termretention of course content are tested. However
biomedical engineering capstone design sequence at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Glen’s educational research interests include student learning styles, increasing student engagement with hands- on activities, and more recently, creativity & design. He has received an NSF CAREER award and served as a Fellow at the National Effective Teaching Institute. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 A Foundational Engineering Science Course and Its Impact on Those Who Teach ItCurricular innovations are difficult to implement and sustain. Many innovations were developedthrough the NSF-funded Engineering Education Coalitions in the early 1990’s
engineering education. Kitana is an active member of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) at WSU, and serves as their Graduate Student Chair for the 2018-19 academic year.David B. Thiessen, Washington State University David B.Thiessen received his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Colorado in 1992 and has been at Washington State University since 1994. His research interests include fluid physics, acoustics, and engineering education.Prof. Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University Prof. Bernard J. Van Wie received his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D., and did his postdoctoral work at the University of Oklahoma where he also taught as a visiting lecturer. He has been on the Washington State
entire SUNY system. He has been twice elected as a member of the ASME Mechanisms and Robotics committee and served as the Program Chair for the 2014 ASME Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, as the Conference Chair for the 2015 ASME Mechanisms and Robotics Conference and has served as symposium and session chairs for many ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences. He was the general Conference Co-Chair for the 2016 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences (IDETC/CIE). He has won two SUNY Research Foundation Technology Accelerator Fund (TAF) awards, which helped bring a multifunctional Sit-to-Stand assistive device ( http://www.mobilityassist.net ) to the market. The device won
. This course covers single- and multi-degree of freedom systems, free and forcedvibrations, Fourier series, convolution integral, mass/stiffness matrices, and normal modes andalso includes a design project. The course is 4.0 units including 1.0 unit of design. The thirdcourse in the study is Introduction to Computer-Aided Engineering. This course covers thetheory and application of the finite element method to practical design issues. The course is also4.0 units and includes 2.0 design units. All three courses in this study required weeklysubmission of homework. With the exception of the 2011 version of the Vibrations class, thesame instructor taught each class for the three year period of the study. The courses aresummarized in the table below
Engineering at The Citadel in Charleston, SC. He received both his B.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from The University of Maryland – College Park. His primary research interests include Hydrodynamics, Turbulence, and Experimental Methods. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Students’ Perception of a Summer Undergraduate Research Experience: Across the DisciplinesIntroductionUndergraduate research is considered one of the high impact practices, which are routinely foundon college campuses today. The outcomes from undergraduate research range from increasing astudent’s retention in the major to increased numbers of students attending graduate school [1].In
which is a high-stake design-build-test whose themevaries from term to term. This paper describes three semesters of the course: Term 1 is Fall 2018, 1Term 2 is Spring 2019, and Term 3 is Fall 2019. The course currently underway is Spring 2020and referenced as Term 4.Students are tasked with a design-build-test of a mechanical device for the end-of-term“competition” to showcase their high-stake design project. This class employs a team of 20undergraduate teaching assistants (TAs) to help facilitate various aspects of the course and tostaff the laboratory around the clock during business hours. Two to three graduate TAs are alsoassigned to the course
too far from being true in undergraduate education in the United States wherein students arememorizing their way through most of the curriculum. In an US News and World Reportarticle2, “High School Students Need to Think, Not Memorize”, an Advanced Placement biologyteacher is quoted “Students go through the motions of their lab assignments without graspingwhy, and ‘the exam is largely a vocabulary test’”.David Perkins3, co-director of Harvard Project Zero, a research center for cognitivedevelopment, and senior research associate at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, pointsout several observations in his article on “Teaching for Understanding”. (1) “The student mightsimply be parroting the test and following memorized routines for stock