assessment, LCA), several guestspeakers on the topic of DEI, pedagogical methods (such as socio-technicalapproaches and the use of artifacts as examples), and discussion of meaningfulassessment approaches. The event was held away from the Engineering buildings in avenue with transformable seating and discussion formats tailored for each activity,facilitating full focus and involvement. Particular attention was paid to the daily lunchesas an opportunity to build community and demonstrate sustainability behaviors. Theworkshop culminated with planned course modifications that were to be implementedduring the following Spring and Fall semesters.The participants found the immersive experience powerful and motivating. However, thefour-day time commitment
Engineering Education include team learning, virtual teams, and team decision-making.Mr. Francisco Cima Francisco Cima is a PhD student of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering at Old Dominion University. He obtained his Masters in Business Planning and Regional Development from the Technological Institute of Merida. His areas of interest are innovDanielle Marie Rhemer, Old Dominion University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Reflections of Undergraduate Engineering Students Completing a Cross-Disciplinary Robotics Project with Pre-Service Teachers and Fifth Graders in an Electromechanical Systems CourseAbstract. Engineering is becoming increasingly cross
planning committee.Bennington J Willardson, Utah Valley UniversityJanis P Raje, Janis Raje is a free-lance technical writer for higher education programs. She received her B.A. from Brigham Young University and her M.A. from University of Maine in English. She has a particular interest in STEM programs at the baccalaureate and pre- baccalaureate levels. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Enhancing STEM Degree Completion: A Framework for the Work in Progress Civil and Mechanical Engineering (CAM) Scholarship ProjectAbstractThis paper presents the practical framework for implementing the Civil and MechanicalEngineering (CAM) Scholarship project, funded by a recently received grant
team-based work structures, perfor- mance management, quality management, research methodology, and engineering education.Mr. Francisco Cima, Old Dominion University Francisco Cima is a PhD student of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering at Old Dominion University. He obtained his Masters in Business Planning and Regional Development from the Techno- logical Institute of Merida. His areas of interest are innovDr. Krishnanand Kaipa, Old Dominion University Dr. Krishnanand Kaipa is an Assistant Professor and director of the Collaborative Robotics and Adaptive Machines (CRAM) Laboratory in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the Old Dominion University. Dr. Kaipa received his BE (Hons
include Sustainable Energy, Green Manufacturing, Quality Control, and Multi Objective Decision Making and Optimization as well as Engineering EducaDr. Michael Preuss, Exquiri Consulting, LLC Michael Preuss, EdD, is the Co-founder and Lead Consultant for Exquiri Consulting, LLC. His primary focus is providing assistance to grant project teams in planning and development, through research and external evaluation, and as publication support. Most of his work is completed for Minority-Serving Institutions and he publishes regarding findings on a regular basis.Dr. Mahesh Hosur, Texas A&M University-Kingsville Mahesh Hosur, PhD Associate Dean, Research and Graduate Affairs Mahesh Hosur received his education from India
, withone phase finished by one group and handed off to another group for continuation. Students thenprepare a brief written proposal, and a memorandum of understanding (MOU) is signed by boththe faculty advisor(s) and student(s). A second one-credit course is taken in the spring semester of the junior year when studentsdo a deeper dive into the relevant literature, develop a detailed plan for executing the projectduring their senior year, and prepare a poster on their project that is presented at a symposium.Two faculty members co-taught this course, with the symposium poster and written proposalcounting for 50 percent of their grade. This grade is given by the faculty advisor(s) who havesigned the MOU with students. In the senior year
. Ringleb received a B.S. in biomedical engineering from Case Western Reserve UniverMr. Francisco Cima Francisco Cima is a PhD student of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering at Old Dominion University. He obtained his Masters in Business Planning and Regional Development from the Technological Institute of Merida. His areas of interest are innovDr. Orlando M Ayala, Old Dominion University Dr. Ayala received his BS in Mechanical Engineering with honors (Cum Laude) from Universidad de Oriente (Venezuela) in 1995, MS in Mechanical Engineering in 2001 and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering in 2005, both from University of Delaware (USA). Dr. Ayala is currently serving as Associate Professor of Mechanical
progressof the CAM project in each of these areas during the first year.Scholarship AwardsThe CAM project planned to award scholarships to 12 students for the first year’s cohort. Theprocess for awarding the scholarships is outlined in a previous paper [1]. However, there wereseveral challenges which affected the number of scholarships that were awarded. The firstchallenge was the funding date for the grant. Officially funded in February of 2024, the projectteam faced an accelerated timeline of posting the scholarship in the University financial aidsystem as well as being able to advertise the scholarship to new, incoming students. To advertisethe scholarship, a website was created as well as flyers, posters and digital signage on campusthat
that demonstrates the complete problem solvingspectrum. So that's identify given information, write out more or less mathematically what you're trying tofind. Come up with the plan or and like, draw your freebody diagram. And dynamics is the most commonfirst step for a lot of problems. But really, it's figure out the correct suite of tools to apply to the problem,apply those and then justify that answer. That's the intent.While there were baseline characteristics of good assessment practices such as rubrics and scaffolding, hesaw that students’ approach to learning did not use those elements as he (and other faculty) perceivedthem. He described this as “just diving right into the problem solving and kind of missing all thescaffolding work and
can bring to a project 13. I appreciate the value that individuals with different strengths bring to a team 14. I recognize that people with different backgrounds from my own might have better ideas than I do 15. I am willing to learn from others who have different areas of expertise 16. I recognize the importance of other fields even if I don’t know much about them 17. I am willing to update my plans in response to new information Factor 3: Interest (In) 18. I tend to get involved in a variety of activities 19. I enjoy being involved in a variety of activities 20. I participate in a wide range of hobbies Factor 4: Altruism (Al) 21. The idea of tackling society’s biggest problems does not motivate me (reverse
(anxiety etc.).There have been many studies on gender differences. Jones [5] studied how gender differencesaffect student motivation constructs, achievement, and career plans, along with the interactionsamong them. Jones found that female students did have lower self-efficacy, but not necessarilyto a statistically significant level. In Hutchison et.al. [4], it was found that females who persist inSTEM have lower self- efficacy perceptions than their male colleagues. These were also brokendown by race and ethnicity. Fraley et.al. [3] assessed confidence and competency of first yearengineering students. It was found that many students enter class with a pre-conceived notion ofalready knowing the material. It was also found that female students
allows students to get very familiarwith these systems and learn to use them in an easier and more accessible way. [9]Using digital twins can also allow students to practice with industry machinery, without the schoolhaving to spend the money on the actual machinery. Digital twins can allow engineering studentspractical knowledge and practice with heavy machinery, planning construction sites, and evensoftware. [18] Using digital twins to simulate real life industry situations can help students learnto prioritize tasks and work on their decision making. [20], [24]5. Digital Twins Increasing Diversity and InclusionDiversity in the engineering field has increased over the last decade, and it is just as important tobe aware of as the actual academic
is all part of this understanding that students must attain. This is why visualaids seemed to be a necessity to enhance learning in the classroom.MethodsInitially, a storyboard was created that expressed a simple but comprehensive storyline thatexplained the role of dislocations in the process of strain hardening. The purpose of this storyboardwas to organize the effort of animating and to make sure students can easily follow the mainstoryline and that it is closely linked to the content covered in the lectures. In addition to this, the Figure 1: Plan for the current and future of the projectstoryboard outlines the figures and animations that will need to be developed such that the projectis done comprehensively
self-perceived coding abilities is promising since mechanicalengineering students generally have limited exposure to programming languages across theundergraduate curriculum. However, regardless of their plans after graduation (graduate schoolor corporate sector) and nature of work (computational vs experimental), most engineers canutilize programming proficiency to maximize their professional worth. Four out of sixparticipants agree that the instant feedback available from the autograders helped them remaininterested in the project goals and deliverables. Additionally, five out of six respondents agreethat the autograders reduced the time needed to debug their code. While this result can bedeemed to be positive from the point of view of
mechanisms and connect theoretical concepts to practical applications. Collectively, these efforts enabled a deeper comprehension of the course material and strengthened their grasp of key topics.3. Feedback for improvement. Students suggested incorporating lab-based assignments utilizing MotionGen earlier in the semester to better prepare for the project and aid in visualizing mechanisms. Additionally, they recommended assigning the project during the initial weeks of the class and providing the rubric upfront. These changes would allow for more time to plan and complete the project, accommodating the demands of other classes and commitments while enhancing their overall learning experience.Table 1. Sample quotes from participating
(ABET) is “anability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create acollaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives.”Teamwork skills are valued by future employers as an important skill set. However, teamwork isnot always well defined. Perusich et al [1] has defined teamwork as 1.) the ability to beinterdependent in tasks, 2.) to share responsibility for outcomes, and 3.) to work together as anintact social entity. Shuman et al [2] defined teamwork skills to include the ability to solicitinput from the team, the ability to build consensus and resolve conflicts, and leadership skills.Chowdhury and Murzi [3] defined teamwork by a set of attributes including: shared
courses. The second meeting focused on developing an actionable integration plan, andcommunity members spent the following month drafting at least one new assignment inpreparation for the third meeting. Below is a four-step framework we used to guide faculty indeveloping their new materials for enhancing student awareness.Step 1: Identify the ME Knowledge Domain. Before delving into the specific details of yourcourse, take a step back and begin by determining how your course aligns with the coreknowledge areas, as defined below: o Mechanical Systems o Thermal Fluid Systems o Design Concentrations o Embedded Labs (Hands-on components)Step 2: Select Awareness Areas. Based on the identified knowledge domains, choose a
different profiles can influences the load capacity of astructure without necessarily changing its weight. These profiles are clamped on one side andloaded by a point load at the free end for the static experiments. Due to the different bendingstiffnesses, different deflections are achieved with the different profiles, even though theyweigh the same. To convince the participating audience, these beams should be easilyremovable for weight comparison.Another topic of the planned workshops is the deliberate shift of the natural frequencies of astructure through a suitable selection of the profiles to avoid undesirable resonances whilemaintaining the weight of the structure. This is demonstrated by carrying out modal analyseswith the same cantilever
this gap througha dual approach: weekly lectures tailored to MET students, focusing on accessible tools andpractical applications, and senior projects specifically designed to apply AI/ML concepts to solveengineering problems. A comprehensive assessment plan, incorporating pre- and post-courseidentical quizzes, topic-specific quizzes, self-evaluations and reflections, demonstrated significantlearning gains. The successful completion of these AI-focused senior projects highlights theeffectiveness of this approach in equipping students with essential AI/ML skills. This innovativestrategy not only addresses the curriculum gap but also offers a scalable model for integratingemerging technologies into undergraduate engineering
also posed challenges. One student noted “procrastination kicksin without the strict deadlines.” They managed to submit all the work, “but was under lots ofstress towards the end.”. By the end of the semester, all students completed every assignment, andthe quality of their work remained consistent throughout. Survey results showed 61% of studentsfavored flexible deadlines to allow more time for planning and revisions, while 41% preferredstrict deadlines to avoid procrastination. Additionally, 49% wanted reminder emails frominstructors to monitor progress. (Students were allowed to select more than one option for thisquestion, resulting in a sum of all response rates of over 100 percent.)Self team formation for collaborative project: In ME 417
situations like the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) satellitemishap [36]. Table 2 lists several important modes of communication that engineers employ.Table 2: Modes of communication covered by the lecture. Mode Definition Design Reviews A way for teams to communicate their progress and concerns about a design Contain numerous photographs depicting an artifact to help the audience Inspections visualize an artifact's condition Presentations Verbally and graphically present designs/results to colleagues Public Meetings Communicate what plans or decisions are being made on a project Lab Reports Factual presentations of
? 3. What are you hoping to gain from this research experience? 4. How is your research going so far? 5. How do you plan to fit your research into your schedule?Data AnalysisA priori coding [16] was used to identify what students expected to learn, what they had learnedalready, and what challenges they had faced. In vivo subcodes were then applied in order toidentify what kinds of learning occurred and challenges that were encountered. The subcodeswithin each primary code were analyzed and grouped in order to identify themes that answeredeach research question. Coding was conducted primarily by Author 1, and coding checks wereconducted by Author 2.LimitationsThis study was conducted in one department at one university and hence
lecture. Additionally, the plan is to present this work as aworkshop at Lilly Conferences, which provides opportunities for the presentation of scholarshipof teaching and learning. With more historical background, this work could showcase thedevelopment within fluid mechanics against the backdrop of scientific progress.In April 2015, the University Faculty Senate at the Pennsylvania State University approved anew requirement for Integrative Studies within the General Education program. Theimplementation details for this requirement were approved in March 2016 and apply to studentswho started at the Pennsylvania State University during or after the summer of 2018. TheIntegrative Studies requirement offers two pathways for students to fulfill it
work and find classes tobe more useful [3]. ESE is also integral for the entry into engineering programs and thepersistence to continue [4]. EJ is an individual’s capacity to determine and execute tasks that willhave a predicted outcome [5, 6]. When engineers work in the real world, many times projectswill require the engineer to come up with solutions which cannot be found inside of codes ormanuals. When following a structural engineering firm, the engineers were able to analyzebuilding plans and make changes to designs based on previous knowledge [7]. An engineer maybe an expert when using codes and references but cannot be a competent engineer if lacking EJ[8]. During an engineering student’s curriculum, EJ should be developed incrementally
education, STEM education, and educational psychology. She has also served as a PI, co-PI, advisory board member, or external evaluator on several NSF-funded projects. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Exploring Intervention Research in Statics Courses: A Systematic Review ofASEE Publications from 2013 to 2023AbstractStatics is a foundational subject for many engineering students, exposing students tomathematics and physics of design and planning settings, which is vital for mechanical, civil,and aerospace engineers. This study systematically collected, analyzed, and reviewed the mostrecent 10-year ASEE conference papers about interventions in Statics courses. A total of 37papers were selected
Q22 Q23Figure 2. Who benefits from the design review process? Q22-impact of design review on project work, Q23-perception of initial CAD/design skills. Results shown with Likert scale: 1=strongly disagree and 5=strongly agree.In the open-ended questions, one comment noted that having feedback regarding manufacturing(3-D printing) would be helpful for design and suggested that their reviewer’s 3-D printingexperience could be noted on the design review form (Q18). One comment noted that thestructured process instilled a sense of planning insight for a better outcome and another statedthat they developed a sense of consistent reflection (Q20). While anecdotal, the comments wereseen more broadly in students by instructors and graduate TAs
, she felt the project was properly planned, and resulted in a textbook that can be extremelyuseful for students. She believes that incorporating student examples gives the students a chanceto develop and solve their own problems, which helps in the learning process. The opportunity tohave their work included in a textbook also incentivizes the students to want to participate and dotheir best work for the submissions. She recognizes that there is a range in the complexity andquality of submitted problems, but they are all useful to convey content. She encourages professorsto incorporate OERs and self-generated problems as it is financially economical for students andbeneficial for their learning.Student Researcher BStudent researcher B
, environmental, and societal contexts. 5. an ability to function effectively on a PBL is often conducted in small teams team whose members together provide working collaboratively. leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives. 6. an ability to develop and conduct PBL can be extended from conceptual to appropriate experimentation, analyze, and experimental, allowing students to evaluate interpret data, and use engineering their designs. judgment to draw conclusions. 7. an ability to acquire and apply new PBL does not follow textbook examples and knowledge as needed, using appropriate requires students to research
Geography in Higher Education, 45:3,319-341[23] Nedilsky, B. V. (2013). Lessons from the learner: A phenomenological study of student engagementAvailable from ERIC. (1826531105; ED565922).[24] L Rice, J., Long, J., & Levenda, A. (2022). Against climate apartheid: Confronting the persistentlegacies of expendability for climate justice. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 5(2),625-645. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848621999286[25] Marouli, C. (2021). Sustainability Education for the Future? Challenges and Implications forEducation and Pedagogy in the 21st Century. Sustainability.[26] Howlett, C., Ferreira, J., & Blomfield, J. (2016). Teaching Sustainable Development in HigherEducation: Building Critical, Reflective Thinkers through
it was an interesting class that I plan to go back at in the summer either through my notes or through the textbook.” “Taking multiple classes, having 16 hours made the course load difficult. At times the material did not make sense the first time around so having to take even more time to understand the concepts was very difficult. Moreover, this class was more challenging than any other course I had taken.” “I had not properly managed my time between work, school and personal family matters this semester, and as such I fell behind in this course. Unfortunately, I fell behind in many of my studies, however it was the dynamics course that received the least attention. The course material is very interesting, and every