Conference Session

Teaching Dynamics

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

J. Shelley, United States Air Force

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

appear tobe unduly affecting the process. Page 15.1342.7 45 40 35 30 S tudents E nrolled 25 20 15 10 5 0 Fall 05 SP 06 Fall 06 Sp 07 Fall 07 Sp 08 Fall 08 SP 09 Fall 09 SemesterFigure 2: Dynamics Class Enrollment Over Nine Semesters Average course grades are shown in Figure 3 with the grade distributions

Conference Session

Teaching Dynamics

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Josue Njock-Libii, Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

40 0.747 to 0.824 0.801 2 40 0.792 to 0.830 0.811 3 40 0.796 to 0.821 0.810 All three 120 0.747 to 0.830 0.8074 Page 15.1331.13Tabl e 3 Ranges an d average va ues tIor the coe ffiICIents . 0 f restItutIOn 0 f new ba 11 s. Used Ball no Number of data samples Range of values Average value 1 40 0.780 to 0.834 0.813 2 40

Conference Session

Building Success in the Online Classroom

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Anu Osta, Rowan University; Jennifer Kadlowec, Baldwin Wallace University; Melanie Amadoro, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

are also grateful for the support received from the Mechanical EngineeringDepartment at Rowan University.References1. W. Cai, et al. "Tracking Coronavirus Cases at U.S. Colleges and Universities," NY Times, March 2, 20212. A. Nierenberg, "Interest Surges in Top Colleges, While Struggling Ones Scrape for Applicants," NY Times, Feb 20, 20213. S. Iglesias-Pradas, Á. Hernández-García, J. Chaparro-Peláez, J. Luis Prieto, "Emergency remote teaching and students’ academic performance in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 119, pp. 106713, 2021.4. B. Balakrishnan, C. Long, "An Effective Self-directed Personalized Learning Environment for Engineering Students During the COVID-19

Conference Session

MASS: Mastery, Assessment and Success of Students

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Christopher Papadopoulos, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Aidsa I. Santiago-Roman, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Edward Fritz Hillman, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Gerald Luciano Figueroa, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Isamarie Vega Morales, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

Conference Session

Hands-On in the Online Classroom

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College; Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Matthew Parsons Fuentes, Everett Community College

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

the views ofthe NSF.References[1] P. S. Steif and A. Dollár, "Reinventing the Teaching of Statics," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 723-729, 2005.[2] A. Dollár and P. S. Steif, "Learning modules for statics," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 22, pp. 381-392, 2006.[3] D. J. Pickel, G. W. Brodland and R. Al-Hammoud, "Hands-On Beam Models and Matching Spreadsheets Enhance Perceptual Learning of Beam Bending," in 123rd Annual ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[4] R. Welch and J. L. Klosky, "An Online Database and User Community for Physical Models in the Engineering Classroom," in Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition

Conference Session

Building Success in the Online Classroom

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Hayden K. Richards, US Air Force Academy; Phillip Cornwell, United States Air Force Academy

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

). Assignment P-value Group formation strategy 0.00041 Incoming GPA quartile 0.0099 ANOVA Interaction 0.70Next, we looked at how the grades this semester compared to historical averages. Figure 4 showshow the average score on the Tensile Test Lab for all the sections in the Spring of 2020compared to the historical average, and Figure 5 shows the results for the overall grade in theclass. From Figure 4, the sections in the Spring of 2020 performed slightly better on the TensileTest Lab than 2019’s course averages, and yet from Figure 5, the final grade in the course wasslightly lower than the historical averages. This may be due to the transition

Conference Session

Concept Inventories in Mechanics

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Phillip Cornwell, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

the DCIThe idea for a DCI began at a Mini-Conference on Undergraduate Education in Dynamics,Vibrations, and Strength of Materials that occurred in September 2002 [1]. The Force ConceptInventory (FCI) had been around since the early 1990’s and was recognized as beingsuccessful in spurring innovation in physics education [2]. At this meeting, participants agreedthat a Dynamics Concept Inventory could potentially provide the same benefits for dynamicsinstruction. A DCI team was formed and first met at the Concept Inventory Workshop at the2002 Frontiers in Education Conference in Boston (November 2002). The NSF-fundedFoundation Coalition was a key driver behind the development of the DCI and other conceptinventories.The DCI was developed using a

Conference Session

Learning Mechanics Through Experimentation

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ethan Hilton, Louisiana Tech University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

-5015.1046.[2] A. Walker and H. Leary, “A Problem Based Learning Meta Analysis: Differences Across Problem Types, Implementation Types, Disciplines, and Assessment Levels,” 2009.[3] R. M. Lima, D. Mesquita, and M. A. Flores, “Project Approaches in Interaction with Industry for the Development of Professional Competences.”[4] J. Boaler, “Open and closed mathematics: Student experiences and understandings,” J. Res. Math., vol. 29(1), pp. 41–62, 1998.[5] I. Bilgin, Y. Karakuyu, Y. A.-E. J. of Mathematics, U. Science, and U. 2015, “The effects of project based learning on undergraduate students’ achievement and self-efficacy beliefs towards science teaching,” academia.edu.[6] S. W. Recommended Citation Brown, K

Conference Session

Enhancing Mechanics Instruction

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gangbing Song, University of Houston; Mithun Singla, University of Houston; Christy Chang, University of Houston; Richard Bannerot, University of Houston

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

Free vibration 0.4 0.3 0.2 P os ition error 0.1 0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 -0.5 5 10 15 20 25 Time(S) Figure 6: Comparison of Beam in Free Vibration

Conference Session

Addressing the Human Dimension in Teaching Statics, Dynamics, Mechanics

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacob Preston Moore, Pennsylvania State University, Mont Alto; Chris Venters, East Carolina University; Tracey Carbonetto, Penn State University, Lehigh Valley

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

, “The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them,” Technical Report Cmap Tools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008, 2008.[2] J. C. Nesbit and O. O. Adesope, “Learning With Concept and Knowledge Maps: A Meta-Analysis,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 413 –448, 2006.[3] J. Clement, “Students’ Preconceptions in Introductory Mechanics,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 66–71, 1982.[4] D. Montfort, S. Brown, and D. Pollock, “An Investigation of Students’ Conceptual Understanding in Related Sophomore to Graduate-Level Engineering and Mechanics Courses,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 111–129, Apr. 2009.[5] L. C. McDermott, “Research on conceptual understanding in

Conference Session

Mechanics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julian Ly Davis, University of Southern Indiana; Tom McDonald, University of Southern Indiana; Jenna Kloosterman, University of Southern Indiana

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

these two learning tools to enhancestudent learning.References[1] D. M. Bunce, “Teaching Is More Than Lecturing and Learning Is More Than Memorizing 1 2007 James Flack Norris Award,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 86, no. 6, 2009.[2] J. E. Lewis and T. D. Rockaway, “Using MyEngineeringLab for Learning Reinforcement in a Mechanics 1 : Statics,” Am. Soc. Eng. Educ., 2017.[3] J. Penner, E. Kreuze, S. Langsam, and J. Kreuze, “Online Homework versus Pen and Pencil Homework: Do the bensfits outweigh the costs?,” 2010.[4] R. O’Neill, A. Badir, L. D. Nguyen, and D. J. Lura, “Homework methods in engineering mechanics, part two,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2016–June, 2016.[5] G. Kortemeyer, “Gender differences in the use of an

Conference Session

Mechanics Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Sonya Dick, California State Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo; Jay Tyler Davis II, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Bradley Wash, California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

pairingmechanical engineering and kinesiology students, to promote teamwork and interdisciplinaryskills.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by a grant from the W.M. Keck Foundation. Opinions, interpretations,conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors.References[1] P. Klein, S. Gröber, J. Kuhn, A. Fleischhauer, and A. Müller, "The right frame of reference makes it simple: an example of introductory mechanics supported by video analysis of motion," European Journal of Physics, vol. 36, p. 015004, 2014.[2] W. M. Wehrbein, "Using video analysis to investigate intermediate concepts in classical mechanics," American Journal of Physics, vol. 69, pp. 818-820, 2001.[3] P. Laws and H. Pfister, "Using digital video analysis in introductory

Conference Session

Mechanics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohammad Reza Hassanzadeh Gorakhki, Colorado State University; Daniel W. Baker Ph.D., P.E., Colorado State University; Stephanie F. Pilkington, Colorado State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

; Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.[3] Mithun, S. and Evancs, N. (2018). Impact of the flipped classroom on students’ learning andretention in teaching programming. 125th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City,UT.[4] Lee, L. S., Hackett, R. K., Estrada, H. (2015) Evaluation of a flipped classroom in Mechanicsof Materials. 122th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA.

Conference Session

Teaching & Learning Statics and Mechanics of Materials

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Somnath Chattopadhyay, University at Buffalo, SUNY

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

Paper ID #16398Analogy Methods to Address Warping and Plasticity in TorsionProf. Somnath Chattopadhyay, University at Buffalo, SUNY Dr. Somnath Chattopadhyay teaches mechanics, materials, manufacturing and design at University at Buffalo He has authored a text on Pressure Vessel s and till recently was an Associate Editor of the ASME Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology. His research interests are in the areas of fatigue and fracture of metals, carbon nanotubes, multi-scale material modeling and engineering education. He had a very successful industrial career with Westinghouse Electric where he directed and performed

Conference Session

Statics Online

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Devin R. Berg, University of Wisconsin, Stout

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

, opening theassignment to a greater variety of social media platforms such as Facebook or similar may lowerthe barrier to entry for the students. Additionally, making use of a teaching assistant or paststudent to model active participation may encourage more students in the course to follow theirexample. These techniques remain to be explored through further study.AcknowledgementsThe author would like to thank the engineering students at the University of Wisconsin-Stout fortheir photographic and textual contributions.References [1] Stephen B. Blessing, Jennifer S. Blessing, and Bethany K. B. Fleck. Using twitter to reinforce classroom concepts. Teaching of Psychology, 39(4):268–271, October 2012. ISSN 0098-6283, 1532-8023. doi: 10.1177

Conference Session

Statics Online

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jamie Douglas, University of Wisconsin Colleges Online

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

. Allen, I. E. and Seaman, J., Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States, Babson Survey Research Group, January 2013. 2. Angelino, L., Williams, F., and Natvig, D. “Strategies to Engage Online Students and Reduce Attrition Rates,” Journal of Educators Online, vol. 4:2, July 2007. 3. Dutton, J., Dutton, M., and Perry, J. “Do Online Students Perform as Well as Lecture Students?” Journal of Engineering Education, January 2001. 4. Haag, S. and Palais, J. “Engineering Online: Assessing Innovative Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, July 2002. 5. Hart, C. “Factors Associated With Student Persistence in an Online Program of Study: A Review of the Literature

Conference Session

Homework, Learning, and Problem Solving in Mechanics

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gina C Adam, National Institute of Microtechnologies, Romania; Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; James M Widmann, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Michael George, Student- California Polytechnic State University; Benjamin Kevin Kraw, California Polytechnic State University: San Luis Obispo, Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Student; Lindsey Chase, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

extracted and summarized during coding.The coding table was included in the annex. 1.Looking at the figure in scenario #X, if you pull on the string gently, which way do you predict the spool will move? Right _______ Left ______Won’t Move_______ 2.When pulling, which direction is the friction force? Right _______ Left ______There is no friction force _______ 3.What is the value of the friction force? f   k N _____ f   s N _____ f   s N ______ Scenario #1 Scenario #2 Scenario #3 Scenario #4 Figure 3. The four scenarios utilized for the IBLAFindingsThe students

Conference Session

Teaching Methods for Engineering Mechanics Courses

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carisa H. Ramming, Oklahoma State University; Rachel Mosier P.E., Oklahoma State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

0 0 5 4 3 2 1 student score time Figure 9In question 10, students are asked if they would perform more work if unlimited time wasprovided. The responses yielded similar percentages to question 9’s agree and strongly agreeand identical percentages to disagree and strongly disagree. The time remaining and the examaverages match what would be expected – the more time remaining, the higher the examaverages. Figure 10 reflects the breakdown of question 10

Conference Session

Learning Mechanics Through Experimentation

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kathleen Bieryla, University of Portland; Nikolene A. Schulz P.E., University of Portland; Rebecca D. Levison, University of Portland; Heather Dillon, University of Portland

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

the movement of the pendulum change from the position before? Spend time changing the object and/or the location on the pendulum. Place multiple objects on the pendulum. Write down the team’s observations below.”After approximately ten minutes, students were then provided with guided exploration, askingthem to increase or decrease the weight of the object attached to the pendulum and compare totheir first scenario. For example: “Choose an object(s) with a lighter mass than 1. Attach to the bottom of the pendulum. Compared to 1, the mass moment of inertia: Increased Decreased Same”The total time for this activity was approximately 20 minutes.Upon completion of the pendulum activity, students were

Conference Session

Learning Mechanics Through Experimentation

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

William E. Howard, East Carolina University; Colleen Janeiro, East Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

storage in a freezer wasrecommended. An alternative is to use wet-resin layup, where the liquid resin and hardener aremixed just prior to use and added to the dry fibers with paint brushes and rollers. This process isquite messy and time-consuming. For several years, specimens for the class were made as largepanels from prepreg materials and then cut into individual specimens with an abrasive saw. Thismethod was also time-consuming and did not involve the students in the fabrication process.The development of “out of autoclave” prepreg materials as a cost-saving measure in aerospaceapplications has been ongoing since the mid-1990’s [5]. As a result of these efforts, reasonablypriced small quantities of high-quality prepregs that can be oven-cured

Conference Session

Teaching Dynamics

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Ruhala, Southern Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

instrumentation - accelerometers Page 15.599.4and FFT analyzers – typically used for vibration analysis of vehicles and machines in industry orresearch. However, much more time is required if one designs and builds custom apparatuses,such as a rig for 2 DOF torsional system developed by Souza et al. 3 Also, with a customapparatus, custom instrumentation and transducers are required – which may or may not beresearch caliber instruments. One unique apparatus that the author experienced as a graduatestudent at The Pennsylvania State University in the 1990’s used an air-hockey like track toconnect mass elements with springs. It worked well, but a leaf

Conference Session

Mechanics Division Poster Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Somnath Chattopadhyay; Rajesh Kitey

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

a plate in plane stress. The geometry is created in ANSYS (ANSYS 12 (2009)). Aneight node quadrilateral element is used to model the bar quadrant. Isotropic material propertiesfor steel, namely the Young‟s modulus (207 GPa) and the Poisson‟s ratio (0.3) were introducedas inputs. Figure 7: Application of Loads and Boundary Conditions on the Quadrant Model Page 15.1137.7 Figure 8: Stress Profile for the X-StressFigure 7 shows the load applied and the applicable boundary conditions. Tensile load is appliedas a uniform pressure of 100 psi applied on the vertical edge to the right. The bottom edge ofthe quadrant is input

Conference Session

Teaching Dynamics

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul Morrow Nissenson, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Jaehoon Seong, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Chuan-Chiang Chen, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Peter A. Dashner, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Angela C. Shih, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

tutorials at least once received lower overall grades in the course than those who didwatch all the video tutorials at least once.It is possible that the video tutorials could be used in a more effective manner to increase studentperformance. Further work should be conducted on the best way to use the videos to enhanceexisting Vector Dynamics courses. In the meantime, the videos have been uploaded to theauthors’ department’s YouTube channel to so that instructors across the world can access to thecontent.45. AcknowledgmentsThe development of the video tutorials and simulations was funded by Cal Poly Pomona’sGraduation Initiative Program.6. References1. A. Kaw and S. Garapati. Development of Digital Audiovisual Lectures for an Engineering Course: A

Conference Session

New Teaching Pedagogies: Methods and Assessments

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Cavalli, University of North Dakota; Jeremiah J. Neubert, University of North Dakota; Dustin McNally, University of North Dakota; Debbie Jacklitch-Kuiken

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics

, J. L. and M. A. Verleger (2013). The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, ASEE. 3. Lage, M. J., G. J. Platt, et al. (2000). "Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment." Journal of Economic Education 31(1): 30-43. 4. Hamdan, N., P. McKnight, et al. (2013). A Review of Flipped Learning, Flipped Learning Network. 5. Swartz, B., S. B. Velegol, et al. (2013). Three Approaches to Flipping CE Courses: Faculty Perspectives and Suggestions. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, ASEE. 6. Rockland, R., L. Hirsch, et al. (2013). Learning Outside the Classroom - Flipping an Undergraduate Circuits Analysis

Conference Session

Mechanics Concepts I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Luciano Fleischfresser, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná; Mariana Nascimento Casarin, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná; Evandro Eizo Roncaglia Yabushita, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

learning – A systematic and critical review. Learning and Skills Research Centre, 2004.3. Felder, Richard M., Woods, Donald R., Stice, James E., and Rugarcia, Armando. The Future of EngineeringEducation II. Teaching Methods That Work. Chemical Engineering Education, 34(1), 26-39, 2000.4. Kipper, Hants, and Ruutmann, Tiia. Teaching Strategies for Direct and Indirect Instruction in TeachingEngineering. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy – Volume 1, Issue 3, October 2011. Available athttp://www.i-jep.org.5. Peercy, Paul S. and Cramer, Steven M. Redefining Quality in Engineering Education through HybridInstruction. Guest Editorial. Journal of Engineering Education. October 2011, Vol. 100, No. 4, pp. 625-629.American Society for Engineering

Conference Session

Teaching Dynamics

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brianno Coller, Northern Illinois University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

the Spring 2010 students the weekbefore their final project was due.To compare test scores from the two different groups of students, I formed quantities . Page 22.717.7Here, is the average item score(s) from students taking the course in Fall 2010 with the game,and is the same average over students in the non-game course in Spring 2010. The S is apooled standard deviation. Therefore, d is a normalized difference between game and non-gamegroups; it is a Cohen effect size. A positive value of d would indicate that the game groupperformed better, on average than the non-game

Conference Session

Innovations in Teaching: Mechanics

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

C.J. Egelhoff, U.S. Coast Guard Academy; K.L. Burns, U.S. Coast Guard Academy

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

helped improve this process over several years; we appreciate cadets Lauren Hohenberger, Nate Barnes and Kevin Stevens for allowing us to include their concept maps.References 1. Kadlowec, Jennifer, Paris von Lockette, Eric Constans, Beena Sukumaran and Douglas Cleary, “Hands-on Learning Tools for Engineering Mechanics,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2002 2. Ellis, Glenn W., Kathryn S. Lee and Alyssa Tham, “Learning Engineering Mechanics Through Video Production,” Proceedings of the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Savannah, GA, 2004 3. Holzer, Siegfried M. and Raul H. Andruet, “Learning Basic Mechanics with Multimedia,” Proceedings of the

Conference Session

Grading and Feedback Models in Mechanics

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Petros Sideris, Texas A&M University; Maria Koliou, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

Conference Session

Engaging the Online Classroom

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Matthew M. Barry, University of Pittsburgh; Samantha E. Wismer; Tony Lee Kerzmann, University of Pittsburgh; Lee Allen Dosse, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

collaborative activities among students and teachers throughthe use of Think-Pair-Share techniques,” International Journal of Computer Science Issues(IJCSI), 2010 Sep 1;7(5):18.[2] Kaddoura M. “Think pair share: A teaching learning strategy to enhance students' criticalthinking,” Educational Research Quarterly, 2013 Jun;36(4):3-24.[3] Stover S, Noel D, McNutt M, Heilmann SG. “Revisiting use of real-time polling for learningtransfer,” Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 2015 Jun 30:40-60.[4] Wilson SG. “The flipped class: A method to address the challenges of an undergraduatestatistics course,” Teaching of Psychology, 2013 Jul;40(3):193-9.[5] Love B, Hodge A, Grandgenett N, Swift AW. “Student learning and perceptions in a flippedlinear

Conference Session

Enhancing Instruction in Statics, Dynamics, Mechanics

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anna K. T. Howard, North Carolina State University; Matthew T. Stimpson, North Carolina State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

first midterm.Table 4: Student Success of Those Who Took the First Test: Didn't take final Took Final Percent Total W F/U Drop D F/U D S C B A PassingFlipped 36 29 13 1 26 63 3 270 487 274 1202 86%CourseOnline-Only 3 4 6 0 2 4 0 11 14 4 48 60%13-14Online-Only 0 3 0 0 6 8 0 20 21 8 66 74%14-15* W = withdrew from the class, S & U = successful or unsuccessful