the presentation of knowledge, application, andcorrection all occurred in a limited time frame it was possible for the student to examine andrestructure their thinking process before it solidified. Furthermore, this opportunity toimmediately organize and apply their knowledge often sent students back to the presentation ofinformation for further reflection in order to gain a deeper understanding.ConclusionsThe impact on the student learning environment of the involvement of students in the web-basedgame design process was one of the greatest outcomes of the project. The impact was at leastthreefold in terms of providing mechanisms for student learning through teaching, for fostering astudent learning environment that is manageable for
), 2006, pp.157-170.8. A. Dellar and P.B. Steif, Learning Modules for Statics, International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(23), 2006, pp.381-392.9. L. Glenn Kraige and D. Morris, Recent changes in engineering science and mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic and State University, International Journal of Engineering Education, 16(5), 2006, pp.436-440.10. I. E. Eronini, Multiple-feature/Multidisciplinary design project in an introductory engineering mechanic course, International Journal of Engineering Education, 16(5), 2006, 16(5), pp.417-422.11. M. Neghaban, Results of implementing a computer based mechanics readiness programs in Statics, International Journal of Engineering Education, 16(5), 2006, pp.408-416.12
-stress as the differential cube rotates,visualization is typically static. What is needed is a true 3D dynamic visualization tool thatpermits one to visualize an arbitrary state-of-stress from the perspective of continuously varyingand arbitrary 3D differential cube orientations, parameterized by a time varying rotation matrix,such as that driven by an Euler matrix with 3 time varying angles.The objective of this educational research project is to: (1) develop the mathematics that permitone to arbitrarily change the orientation of a differential cube and determine the stresses in thenew coordinate system (i.e. 3D tensor change of bases), (2) create a corresponding computer-aided-engineering (CAE) software tool using primarily MATLAB® and
, J., Goodrich, V., and Meyers, K. Teaching MATLAB in First-year Engineering: A GUI Tool Directed Approach, In 4th First Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference, pp 9-10.15. Koh, M.-S., Rodriguez-Marek, E., and Talarico, C. (2007) Class Projects with Graphic User Interfaces in Matlab, In 2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii.16. Pang, C. K., Wong, W. E., Li, C., and Al Mamun, A. (2008) A Toolkit with MATLAB GUI for Learning Position Error Signals in Data Storage Systems, International Journal of Engineering Education 24, 1242.17. Kim, K.-J. (2007) Computer-aided Instruction of Fundamental Mechanics Courses using Matlab, In 2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu
, he has not been able to get a single ballinto the 100-point hole. The 100-point hole is located 𝐿 = 3 ft from thebase of the skee ball machine’s backboard, which is angled at 𝛽 = 20∘with respect to the horizontal. If the end of the launch ramp is ℎ = 2 ftabove the backboard’s base and oriented at 𝜃 = 45∘ to ground, how fastshould Greg project a ball up the launch ramp so that it lands in the 100-point hole? How longdoes it take for the ball to reach the hole?Table 2 shows the assessment result with the percentage referred to correctness. Table 2 Assessment Result Problem Date Given/Find Equations Unknowns 1 Feb
in large-scale engineering classes have turned to using only onlinehomework-based systems such as Pearson’s Mastering, Wiley Plus, and/or McGraw Hill’sConnect to assess student learning. These systems provide content, grading and assessment ofstudent work, and feedback to students while solving problems. Previous research has shownthat students’ value both online and handwritten homework. Even students who disliked onlinehomework found it to be at least somewhat helpful. The current project investigates ifperformance on higher stake (e.g., more heavily weighted in overall grade) activities is betterthan on lower stake activities in a Dynamics class and a General Physics I class. In our researchonline homework, handwritten homework, and exams
: Analysis and Design of Systems in Motion, Wiley, 2010. 9. D.R. Woods, Problem-based learning: How to gain the most from PBL, Watertown, ON, 1994. 10. D. Pfahl, O. Laitenberger, G. Ruhe, J. Dorsch, and T. Krivobokova, “Evaluating the learning effectiveness of using simulations in software project management education: results from a twice replicated experiment.”, Information and Software Technology, Vol 46, pp. 127-147, 2004. 11. M.M.Waldrop, “The Science of Teaching Science”, Nature, Vol. 523, pp 272-274, 2015.Appendix 1Table 1: Rubric to measure student engagement (Total number of students two sectionscombined = 63. OEP stands for open-ended problems) How often have you done each of the following in Never 1 to 2 3 to 5
SEC number Dynamics class 1 36.8 17.0 19.8 2 70.1 22.0 48.1 3 46.0 6.0 40.0 Project Goals and Methods: In this study, we investigated whether the reordering of kineticsand kinematics topics in a traditional dynamics course, that is, a course that is not part of a largerintegrated framework, leads to improved student performance on single- and multi-conceptdynamics problems. We hypothesized that the larger conservation and accounting frameworkthat is incorporated at Rose-Hulman is not
made.Initial course design The statics course considered here is part of a typical calculus-based engineeringmechanics sequence. Topics in the course include force and moment vectors, equilibrium,structural analysis, friction, centroids, and moments of inertia. The class meets three times aweek for 50 minutes over 15 weeks. The course has weekly assignments, four unit exams, afinal exam, and a design project. Some small changes were made to this outline in order toaccommodate “flipping” the class as detailed below. A learning management website was utilized to “flip” the statics course. The course siteconsisted of videos and notes to be viewed by students before class. It also containedassignments and student grades. Students obtained
the nomenclature and design equations are developed for various typesof gears. There may be exposure to real gears in a mechanical engineering laboratory; moreoften, students may see gears passed around in class and as part of demonstrations. Hands onpragmatic exposure to gears and gear systems may improve student theoretical comprehensionand more realistically prepare students for industrial careers.Discovery Learning The term "discovery learning" covers a variety of instructional techniques, such as active,cooperative, collaborative, project-based, and inductive learning. In these student-centered peda-gogical methods, the focus of activity is shifted from the teacher to the learner. The student is notprovided with an exact answer or a
educationand industry collaboration councils such as ABET. The second key element is instructors(teachers). The third key element is students. The fourth key element is the delivery approachesor the pedagogies, which are the learning environments established between students andteachers.There are many successfully implemented educational pedagogies. In the traditional classroomapproach, instructors prepare and deliver lectures to students in classrooms. During lectures,there is limited interactive between students and instructors for large classes. Students learnthrough the lecture during classroom sessions and then complete the assignments such ashomework or projects outside of the classroom. With the advances in computer technology,worldwide
associate professor of electrical engineering at Kettering University. Dr. Finelli’s current research interests include student resistance to active learning, faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices, the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learning and success, and the impact of a flexible classroom space on faculty teaching and student learning. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Incorporating IMU Technology to Demonstrate Concepts in
Department of Mathematics at Hong Kong Baptist University (2010-2011) he focused on developing meshfree numerical methods. Given his multidisciplinary background, he was appointed as the director of research in the Construction Materials Institute (2011-2013) at the University of Tehran and assistant professor at Islamic Azad University. In that capacity, he had the opportunity of leading several industry-related research projects and mentoring graduate and undergraduate students. Over the span of his career, Dr. Libre has authored and co-authored over 17 peer-reviewed journal articles and over 50 conference papers. He has advised and co-advised 7 graduate students and mentored over 20 undergraduate students. He has
pedagogy for problem based courses. He created and co-teaches a multi-year integrated system design (ISD) project for mechanical engineering students. He is a mentor to mechanical engineering graduate teaching fellows and actively champions the adoption and use of teaching technologies.Dr. Michele J. Grimm, Michigan State University Michele J. Grimm is the Wielenga Creative Engineering Endowed Professor of Mechanical Engineering. In addition to her scientific research, Dr. Grimm has spent a large part of her career focused on curriculum development and enhancement of student learning in engineering. She served on the faculty of Wayne State University for 25 years, where she developed and implemented both undergraduate
Paper ID #30583Simple Lab Exercises Using Composite MaterialsDr. William E Howard, East Carolina University William E (Ed) Howard is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at East Carolina University. He was previously a faculty member at Milwaukee School of Engineering, following industrial experience as a design and project engineer with Thiokol Corporation, Spaulding Composites Company, and Sta-Rite Industries.Dr. Colleen Janeiro, East Carolina University Dr. Colleen Janeiro teaches engineering fundamentals such as Introduction to Engineering, Materials and Processes, and Mechanics of Materials. Her
. & Yoshida, M., Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching andlearning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 2004.2. Lewis, C., Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional improvement. Philadelphia: Research forBetter Schools, 2002.3. Cerbin, Bill and Kopp, Bryan, “University of Wisconsin – La Crosse Lesson Study Project,”http://www.uwlax.edu/sotl/lsp/ (Accessed January 2008) Page 13.847.9
in statics is a strong predictor of success in follow-onengineering courses and retention in the engineering majors. As a student’s introduction to therigors of engineering problem solving, statics creates a number of well-documented difficultiesfor many studentsv (Goldfinch, T., A. Carew, T. McCarthy, (2008)). A variety of strategies and interventions to improve retention of at-risk students andstudents in at-risk classes have been studied with active learning, project based learning, peerteaching and tutoring among them. Many of the techniques considered, however, have beendocumented in the literature as having mixed results. Most notable are conflicting studies thatindicate that traditional tutoring, problem solving sessions and
and skills. Likewise, instead ofpurchasing the computer board and software that accompanies the lumped mass apparatuses(which in this case was primarily developed for controls laboratory experiments), a world-classanalyzer (that includes computer software for control) was purchased so that the sensors andanalyzer can be used by students and faculty for research projects. This analyzer can also beused for acoustic measurements. A disadvantage is that the software that controls the analyzer isnot user friendly, and requires substantial setup time by the instructor. The laboratoryexperiments that were developed include the study of free vibration, forced vibration, 1 DOF,2DOF, and 3 DOF systems, dynamic absorber, modes of vibration, and the
discontinuity. The finite elementmethod is introduced in the lab session only as a hands-on approach to solve a structuralproblem. No theoretical or numerical treatments associated with the finite element method arediscussed. Instead, some of the modeling concepts involving symmetry features and boundaryconditions are highlighted. As evidenced by the end of semester student evaluations, thestudents felt it was a good opportunity to get exposed to a general purpose finite element codesuch as ANSYS and its ability to solve problems involving stress concentrations associated withtension and bending situations.BIBLIOGRAPHYANSYS 12 (2009), ANSYS, Inc, www.ansys.comCrone, W. C. (2002), “Using an Advanced Mechanics of Materials Design Project to Enhance
at Cal Poly Pomona, covering topics such as kinematics of particles, kinetics ofparticles, kinematics of rigid bodies, and kinetics of rigid bodies within a 10-week academic term.The rapid pace of the course means there often is not enough time to go through a sufficientnumber of examples in the classroom. The project discussed in this paper was intended to helpremedy these problems, ultimately increasing the retention rate of engineering students throughimprovements in their academic performance in Vector Dynamics.The authors created video tutorials and virtual simulations to help students visualize dynamicsconcepts, as well as relate the theory and math to engineering problems.1) The video tutorials were created for topics that students
criteria, and Work in groups to solve complex problems.Objectives are achieved using a series of demonstrations followed by hands-on activities thatrequire students to utilize a specific set of tools in the drafting software over the first ten weeksof the course. The remaining time is dedicated to an open-ended project that requires groups ofstudents to design a mechanism to solve an engineering problem. The problem includes a set ofconstraints that must be navigated to be successful. Students are also asked to produce the partdrawings needed to construct the mechanism and use the drawings to create a prototype.ENGR 200The objective of this course is to produce students that can: Create software to solve engineering problems using both
applications and engineering mechanics education.Dr. Tori Rhoulac Smith, Howard University Tori Rhoulac Smith began as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at Howard University in 2003. In this position, she served as an academic and research Advisor, instructor for a variety of undergraduate and graduate engineering courses, and researcher on traffic engineering and engineering education projects. Feeling an overwhelming desire to work more directly on identifying and meeting the needs of increased recruitment, retention, and achievement of traditionally-underrepresented minority students in engineering disciplines, she shifted her career focus and now serves as an instructor and undergraduate
from a statics class late in thesemester so they had completed nearly 13 weeks of the course by they time theyparticipated in the think-aloud sessions. To encourage participation, students wereoffered a credit of 1% towards their final grade. We do not believe that this skewedparticipation in the project because the instructor placed a cap on the total extra crediteach student could earn and this was a small extra credit opportunity amongst manyothers that were available throughout the semester for the students.Individually each student was asked to solve problems involving moments and couples.Students were also asked questions about moments and couples and about their problemsolving process. Because one of the goals of this study was to
) concept inventory research to uncover the underlyingcause of learning difficulty with the content,8 (d) development of active learning strategies foruse in the classroom, (e) project-based tasks for students to learn by doing, (f) peerteaching/learning and a (g) development of a more clearly articulated problem-solving approachhas been proposed specifically for Mechanics of Materials to improve student learning9. Among our personal efforts to improve learning of Mechanics of Materials, we observedthat students often miss the global connections of the many topics in the course, that students get“lost” in the midst of problem solutions, and that students have difficulty storing their knowledgein their memories. All too often, we have known
, which occur in a two-dimensional space. Although trusses can contain non-triangles, the problems explored in Mechanixand many introductory courses all contain only triangles, so we focus on recognizing trussescontaining only triangles.For the purposes of this project, we define a truss to have the following properties: 1. A connected graph 2. Made up of only triangles 3. Each triangle shares at least one side with anotherTrusses are recognized in the following four steps:Graph conversion: The first step in recognizing a truss is to convert the substrokes into a graph.Each substroke end is a possible node, and the substroke itself is an edge in the graph. If the endsare within a threshold Euclidean distance of 30 pixels from an existing
University of Newfoundland, graduating with distinction in 2013 with specializing in structural vibrations. Following completion of his PhD, he conducted an Industrial Post-doctoral Fellowship at Subsurface Imaging Technology on the feasibility study of excavating salt caverns in Newfoundland. In 2014, he joined Project neuroArm at the University of Calgary as a Post-doctoral Scholar, where he worked on four biomedical engineering research projects. He lectured as a Sessional Faculty at Memorial University in 2013 and at the University of Calgary in 2015 and 2016 before joining the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Calgary as an Instructor. Dr. Ghasemloonia teaches courses in the areas of applied
Spectrum of Active Learning Activities in Engineering Mechanics Keywords: Active learning, hands-on activities, learning styles, Myers-BriggsAbstractThe introduction of active learning exercises into a traditional lecture has been shown to improvestudent learning. Hands-on learning opportunities in labs and projects provide a primaryapproach in the active learning toolbox. This paper presents a series of innovative hands-onactive learning activities for mechanics of materials topics. These activities are based on aMethodology for Developing Hands-on Active Learning Activities, a systematic approach forefficient and effective activity development, and were robustly evaluated at three institutions ofhigher learning. These
Testing lab at Missouri S&T, teaches mechanics of materials and develops digital educational resources for the engineering students. He had the opportunity of leading several scientific and industrial research projects and mentoring graduate and undergraduate students. Over the span of his career, Dr. Libre authored and co-authored 3 chapter books, 17 peer-reviewed journal articles and over 60 conference papers. He has advised and co-advised 8 gradu- ate students and mentored over 30 undergraduate students. He has collaborated with scholars from several countries, including Iran, China, Slovenia, Canada, and the US. He also served as a reviewer for 6 journals and a committee member of 5 conferences. He is the
engineering majors would take MEEN 221 as their main staticsengineering course. Starting in the Fall 2015 term, the Mechanical Engineering Departmentdeveloped a new Statics course exclusively for MEEN students, MEEN 225. This new course wasdesigned to better prepare students for subsequent MEEN curriculum. Topics covered are verysimilar, however MEEN 225 uses group projects in addition to homework and major exams forassessment. The students must also attend a 3-hour recitation every week in MEEN 225.Since the Fall 2015 semester when the divergence of the MEEN 221 and MEEN 225 coursesbegan, the department has seen a much higher percentages of students earn a grade of a D, an F,or Q-drop in MEEN 221 creating higher DFQ rates. A Q-drop prevents a