resilient infrastructure, protective structures, and engineering education.Dr. James Ledlie Klosky, U.S. Military Academy Led Klosky is a Professor of Civil Engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point and a past winner of ASEE’s National Teaching Medal. He is a licensed professional engineer and works primarily in the areas of infrastructure, subsurface engineering and engineering education.Capt. Todd Mainwaring P.E., U. S. Military AcademyProf. Joseph P. Hanus, U.S. Military Academy Colonel Joseph Hanus is the Civil Engineering Program Director at the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, NY. He received his B.S. from the University of Wisconsin, Platteville; M.S. from the University of Minnesota, Twin
Cartesian coordinate system with the originat the initial position and upward as the positive 𝑦-direction.Example: The skier leaves the 20°surface at 10 m/s. Determine the distance 𝑑to the point where he lands [Example 13.7 in 3]. Table 1 Solution and Cognitive Load Analysis Solution Cognitive Load Analysis 𝑎𝑥 = 0, 𝑎𝑦 = −9.81 m/s2 Most students should be familiar with it so it will not be counted as a new item. 𝑣𝑥 = 10 ⋅ cos 20∘ m/s, No new item is introduced as most students should be able to figure
. Surveyresponse data was converted to a 100-point scale such that a response of all 3’s would yield anormalized score of 100% and a response of all 1’s would yield a normalized score of 0% asfollows: 𝑀𝑒𝑎𝑛𝑆𝑢𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑦𝑅𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒 − 1 𝑁𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑑𝑆𝑢𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑦𝑆𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒 = (100%) 2 100% KS0 KS1 Exam 1 KS2 Exam 2 90% 80% 70%Score (Percent) 60% 50% 40
Statics Homework Tools, Journal of Online Engineering Education 4.6. Bonham, S. W., Deardorff, D. L., and Beichner, R. J. (2003) Comparison of student performance using web and paper‐based homework in college‐level physics, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40, 1050-1071.7. Cheng, K. K., Thacker, B. A., Cardenas, R. L., and Crouch, C. (2004) Using an online homework system enhances students’ learning of physics concepts in an introductory physics course, American Journal of Physics 72, 1447-1453.8. Dillard-Eggers, J., Wooten, T., Childs, B., and Coker, J. (2008) Evidence on the Effectiveness of On-Line Homework, College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal 4, 9-16.9. Al-Masoud, N. (2006
the FBD instrument to be given in fall of 2017.Bibliography1. Gentner, D, & Stevens, A. L. (1983) Mental models, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.2. Reference (added once final information is included)3. Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography – Students' and teachers' conceptions and science education (STCSE), Retrieved January 17, 2011, from http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse4. Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3): 141- 151.5. Danielson, S., Kadlowec, J., Mehta, S., Masters, C., Magill, M., and Steadman, S. (2005). Work in progress – A statics skills inventory. Proceedings of the 2005 Frontiers in Education Conference.6. Steif, P. (2004
(s) despite the shortened timeline. Second attempts (or firstre-takes) were administered in the immediate post-class window mentioned above. Frequently,students were able to leave those sessions knowing if their work that day met the standard or ifthey would need a third attempt. Between a first and second attempt, students were left to theirown devices to determine how to remediate their understanding. They were welcome to seekextra instruction, but not required to do so. Between the second and third attempt, however, theywere required to discuss their particular issues with the instructor before continuing the examcycle. Institutional administrative constraints prevented dis-enrolling students from the course fornot demonstrating required
follow-on course Intermediate Dynamics (but might be included at the end of a semestercourse that includes three-dimensional kinetics). Here, we discuss results from the Pulley IBLAand the Rolling Cylinder IBLA.Table 2. IBLAs and their targeted principles. IBLA Targeted principle(s)Pulley Particle Newton’s Second LawImpact Pendulum Particle Work and Energy; Impulse and MomentumSpools Relationships between (a) net force and linear acceleration; (b) net moment and angular acceleration; (c) linear and angular accelerationsRolling Cylinders Effect of mass distribution on rolling; Rigid body work and energy.Gyroscope Three-dimensional
unwillingness to answer the question.Some students expressed frustration about the fact that even if they have already applied whatthey perceive are effective learning strategies, their performance in the class was stillunsatisfactory (“I don't know… I put more effort into learning this material than all of myclasses combined, and then some more. To say that I was disappointed in the results is anunderstatement.”) There are a select few, however, who chose to provide ambiguous responses(“Nothing”; “N/A”; “not applicable”) or expressed unwillingness to comment on their learningprocess as part of the survey (This is a bad question please stop asking it. It[’s] not relevant, Iget it I could [have] done more but that’s not point of the spot surveys”). The
thenames of every component [they] used.”Figure 8 suggests that students were able to grasp the core mechanics of arch stability afterconducting the activity. Students claimed that understanding how a hanging chain’s shape isdetermined from equilibrium helped solidify their understanding of how an arch is able to stand,and that a catenary is the optimal shape for an arch. Students also commented on theirunderstanding that the “[s]urface area of the blocks affects stability” and that “friction plays acrucial role in keeping the blocks together”.The Tanks and Culverts activity displayed positive results for understanding how granular mediabehaves in pipe structures. Most students seemed to grasp how gravity, in conjunction withfriction, produces the
model shows thebenefits this model incorporated into students’ learning.Introduction:With the advancement of the internet, the use of online modules as a form of learning has beendeveloping fast over the past decades. Some universities go with full online courses and othersgo to blended learning solutions. A flipped classroom is one way that allows for blendedlearning. Flipped classroom models have been widely used as an effective method to change theinteraction of the students and the instructor during lectures. Students learn the material at theirown time and at their own pace, and come to class prepared to interact and solve problems withthe instructor (R. Pierce and J. Fox , 2012; J. L. Bishop and M. A. Verleger, 2013; G. S. Masonet al
. Science Education, 78:527–554, 1994. [3] B. Chen, M. West, and C. Zilles. Do performance trends suggest wide-spread collaborative cheating on asynchronous exams? In Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, 2017. doi: 10.1145/3051457.3051465. [4] J. A. Kulik and C.-L. C. Kulik. Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58:79–97, 1988. [5] K. A. Lack. Current status of research on online learning in postsecondary education. Ithaka S+R, 2013. [6] McGraw-Hill. McGraw-Hill Connect. URL http://connect.mheducation.com/. [7] H. Pashler, N. J. Cepeda, J. T. Wixted, and D. Rohrer. When does feedback facilitate learning of words? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning
, “The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them,” Technical Report Cmap Tools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008, 2008.[2] J. C. Nesbit and O. O. Adesope, “Learning With Concept and Knowledge Maps: A Meta-Analysis,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 413 –448, 2006.[3] J. Clement, “Students’ Preconceptions in Introductory Mechanics,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 66–71, 1982.[4] D. Montfort, S. Brown, and D. Pollock, “An Investigation of Students’ Conceptual Understanding in Related Sophomore to Graduate-Level Engineering and Mechanics Courses,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 111–129, Apr. 2009.[5] L. C. McDermott, “Research on conceptual understanding in
first midterm.Table 4: Student Success of Those Who Took the First Test: Didn't take final Took Final Percent Total W F/U Drop D F/U D S C B A PassingFlipped 36 29 13 1 26 63 3 270 487 274 1202 86%CourseOnline-Only 3 4 6 0 2 4 0 11 14 4 48 60%13-14Online-Only 0 3 0 0 6 8 0 20 21 8 66 74%14-15* W = withdrew from the class, S & U = successful or unsuccessful
the time. These photos were posted in a private album for each group on a photoannotation and organization website, accompanied by written explanations about what studentshad decided to photograph and why. As a second step to the project, students were to use theannotation tools on the website to mark up the photos provided by the other student(s) in theirgroup, graphically identifying which members were subjected to the various loading conditionsof tension, compression, bending, or shear, and identifying the directions in which the forces ormoments were applied. This first minor project allowed students to communicate a little bitabout themselves as they worked together, in addition to providing them with some simple butcritical experience
Paper ID #19448Torsion Tests to Study Plastic Deformation in Ductile MaterialsProf. Somnath Chattopadhyay, University at Buffalo, SUNY Dr. Somnath Chattopadhyay teaches mechanics, manufacturing and design at the University at Buffalo. He has authored a text on Pressure Vessel s and till recently was an Associate Editor of the ASME Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology. His research interests are in the areas of fatigue and fracture of metals, carbon nanotubes, multi-scale material modeling and engineering education. He had a very successful industrial career with Westinghouse Electric where he directed and performed
Mechanical Engineering Design”, 10th Edition, McGraw Hill 2016.[3]. Brown, S., & Montfort, D., & Findley, K. (2007, June), Student Understanding Of States Of Stress In Mechanics Of Materials Paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii.[4]. Brown, S., & Lewis, D. (2010, June), Student Understanding Of Normal And Shear Stress And Deformations In Axially Loaded Members Paper presented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky.[5]. Coyle, M., & Keel, C. (2001, June), A Combined Stress Experiment Using A Hacksaw Paper presented at 2001 Annual Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico.[6]. Szaroletta, W. (2002, June), Enhancing Learning Opportunities In A Combined
, Louisville, Kentucky. https://peer.asee.org/16846 3. Abu-Mulaweh, H. (2003, June), Portable Experimental Apparatus For Demonstrating Heat Recovery Concepts. Paper presented at 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee. https://peer.asee.org/11901 4. Kunberger, T., & Csavina, K., & O'Neill, R. (2010, June), K’nexing Models To Examples In Engineering Mechanics. Paper presented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. https://peer.asee.org/16153 5. Kiefer, S. (2010, June), Real Life Examples In A Solid Mechanics Course. Paper presented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. https://peer.asee.org/15845 6. Palmer, M. (2003, June), Low Cost
on areas that theywere weak in based on performance on previous problems. Our hope was that this would helpdirect students’ study habits and improve overall learning. Also, for this semester the number ofin class quizzes was further reduced, with 4 quizzes for statics and 2 for dynamics. Also thestatics exam was given over 2 class periods, as a common time for both sections of students wasnot available due to the students’ schedules. Table 1: Description of courses included in the study ID Assessment Term Class Period Instructor(s) N* Homework Fall 2013 TR 8:00-10:45am A&B 37 TH Homework Spring 2014 TR 8