- Conference Session
- Curriculum and Instruction in Engineering Mechanics
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Peter H. Carnell P.E., University of Georgia; Nathaniel J. Hunsu, University of Georgia; Davis F. Ray, University of Georgia; Nicola W. Sochacka, University of Georgia
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Mechanics
. 17, no. 4, pp. 264-280, 2013/10/01 2013.[16] A. J. Martin and H. W. Marsh, “Academic buoyancy: Towards an understanding of students’ everyday academic resilience,” Journal of School Psychology, vol. 46, no. 1, p. 30, February 2008 2008.[17] S. S. Luthar and L. B. Zelazo, “Research on resilience: An integrative review,” In Resilience and Vulnerability: Adaptation in the Context of Childhood Adversities, pp. 510-550, 1/1/2003 2003.[18] A. S. Masten, “Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development,” American Psychologist, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 227-238, 2001.[19] K. M. Connor and J. R. T. Davidson, “Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC
- Conference Session
- Addressing the Human Dimension in Teaching Statics, Dynamics, Mechanics
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Mechanics
students. Statics’ position early in the curriculum for many engineering majorsresults in it being one of the first courses where students must synthesize knowledge gained inprerequisite math and physics coursework and apply it to higher-level analytical problemsolving. In addition to the technical skills emphasized in the traditional course content, students’ability to self-assess and regulate their own learning (i.e. metacognition) becomes increasinglyimportant. As Grohs (2015) writes in reference to Statics: Though the written learning outcomes of a typical undergraduate mechanics course may be exclusively technical, the timing and nature of the course in the overall scheme of an engineering curriculum position it as a course that also
- Conference Session
- Engaging the Online Classroom
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
-
Jacob Matthew Cook, Oregon State University; Thomas W. Ekstedt, Oregon State University; Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Milo Koretsky, Tufts University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Mechanics
modeling, and data science. Jacob Cook is a currently an M.S. student in the department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Oregon State University under the Sensors and Integrated Microelectronics (SIMs) Lab.Mr. Thomas W. Ekstedt, Oregon State University Thomas Ekstedt is a software developer in the School of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engi- neering at Oregon State University. He is involved in the development of technology-based educational systems, particularly in the areas of concept-based instruction and interactive simulation of physical phe- nomena.Dr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering
- Conference Session
- Assessment Strategies in Mechanics
- Collection
- 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
-
Geoffrey Recktenwald, Michigan State University; Michele J. Grimm, Michigan State University; Ron Averill, Michigan State University; Sara Roccabianca, Michigan State University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Mechanics
pedagogy for problem based courses. He created and co-teaches a multi-year integrated system design (ISD) project for mechanical engineering students. He is a mentor to mechanical engineering graduate teaching fellows and actively champions the adoption and use of teaching technologies.Dr. Michele J. Grimm, Michigan State University Michele J. Grimm is the Wielenga Creative Engineering Endowed Professor of Mechanical Engineering. In addition to her scientific research, Dr. Grimm has spent a large part of her career focused on curriculum development and enhancement of student learning in engineering. She served on the faculty of Wayne State University for 25 years, where she developed and implemented both undergraduate
- Conference Session
- Mechanics Division Technical Session 3
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Amir Hedayati Mehdiabadi, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Rebecca A. Atadero, Colorado State University; Daniel W. Baker Ph.D., P.E., Colorado State University; Anne Marie Aramati Casper, Colorado State University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Mechanics
students to engineering. For example, Busch-Vishniac andJarosz (2004) suggested that integration of team experiences to the curriculum of engineeringthat traditionally had been left to senior year, in earlier years would improve the reputation ofengineering and help students enjoy the academic experience more. Similarly, Gunasekera andFriedrich (2009) argued that the dominant theory-based and not value-oriented pedagogies inSTEM “alienate those students who learn best in creative, cooperative settings that considervalue and emphasize design and synthesis” (p. 162).Intentional instruction about teamwork, particularly when it emphasizes diverse teams andinclusive work practices, offers students professional skills they need to be successful, while
- Conference Session
- Addressing the Human Dimension in Teaching Statics, Dynamics, Mechanics
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Sean Moseley, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Mechanics
commonly and classically taught, tendsto remove the human and social context from consideration. While the EPS method produceswell-posed problems with easily checked solutions, it unintentionally reinforces the worldviewthat engineering is value-free profession where the rigor of one’s technical analysis is moreimportant than the context in which engineering is practiced1. Recognizing this consequence, agrowing body of literature calls for changing engineering education to be more human-centeredthrough awareness of the limitations of purely technical solutions2-5.Changing one’s approach to teaching in this way poses big challenges: how to add ideas to anoverstuffed curriculum—particularly ideas that involve a disciplinary background different