elements of deliberate practice are: (1) motivation, (2) intentional plan ofpractice, (3) repetition, and (4) timely feedback. We assign homework to provide students withrepetitive, intentionally designed practice opportunities, but ensuring that students receive timely,effective feedback is resource-intensive and does not scale well to large classes. In addition, ourexperience with traditional homework grading suggests that many students do not even viewdetailed feedback when it is provided. One solution to both problems is for students to grade theirown homework assignments.Direct evidence of effectiveness of student-grading for learning is scant, but suggests thatself-grading is more effective than peer-grading for achieving learning objectives
provide a potential use for it.This work-in-progress paper describes the motivation and development process of these labs, aswell as preliminary lab examples and planned assessment.There is substantial discussion in the engineering community about the importance of includingill-structured problems into curriculum within engineering education, as these problems betterrepresent the experiences post-graduation [1]–[7]. However, past work has found that textbookproblems are rarely ill-structured in form and that students may be rarely exposed to ill-structured problems within their engineering curriculum [1], [2], [5]. One area in which ill-structured problems are easier to incorporate are within lab experiences. Student laboratoryexperiences are
. Data Collection Multi-faceted data were collected: students’ demographics (gender, First-generationcollege student or not, URM or not), course assignments and assessment grades (two quizzes andfinal exam), overall course grade, learning strategies completion status, and responses to weeklyLearning Journal surveys. In addition, a Beginning-of-Quarter survey and an End-of-Quartersurvey (Appendix 1) were used to gather information on students’ familiarity with variouslearning techniques. Learning Journals then serve as a weekly reflection and planning method forstudents’ learning. In particular, the weekly learning journals asked students to indicate their timespent on learning activities in the past week and to rate the confidence level
Paper ID #38386Characterizing Student Work while Solving Ill-Defined Statics Problemsin GroupsMax Magee, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Max Magee is an undergraduate research assistant in the Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. He is majoring in Aerospace Engineering and minoring in Law and Mathematics and set to graduate in May 2023. After graduation, Max plans on seeking employment in the Aerospace field, preferably working with space craft.Dr. Jessica Swenson, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Jessica Swenson is an Assistant Professor at the
standardized exams [2]. Traditionally, the course has employed standard exams inwhich students answer four textbook-based problem-solving questions within a 60-minutetimeframe. This study aimed to replace one of the traditional midterm exams with an experientialassessment to explore the impact on students' performance and their preference for this formatover the traditional setting. In this experiential assessment, students were tasked with designingand building a built-up beam using foam materials and sewing pins during the exam (60minutes). The objectives of the exam encompassed calculating the loading of a beam from afloor plan, drawing shear force diagram, bending moment diagram, recognizing maximum shearforce and bending moment on the beam
and faculty housing,equipping the classroom, and planning excursions to local sites in Rome as well as two largerexcursions to Florence and to Venice. This allowed the professor (namely me) to concentrate onthe academics of the program and not which trains to book, how to get museum tickets, arrangebus drivers, or how to arrange for different tour guides. The AIA staff were extremely friendly toboth students and faculty, and provided invaluable insights into individual travel planning, Italianculture, and great local restaurants.RecruitmentEven though we had a potential pool of nearly 1000 students, we only had 14 applicants whenwe tried to run the program in 2021. We attribute this in large part to residual COVID anxiety,plus I was just
teaching.They were still developing their teaching approach as of fall 2023 and adopted most of theprovided curriculum into the early weeks of their intervention section, implementing theprovided worksheets with minimal modifications for the topics that aligned with their courseoutcomes. Work with the models constituted a significant fraction of classroom time for the firstthird of the quarter, implementing four activities in the first three weeks. Instructor A made someadjustments later in the term in response to student feedback regarding the amount of class timedevoted to activities, ultimately implementing two activities (out of three originally planned)over the middle five weeks of the term.Instructor A taught with the models again in winter 2024
literature review as well as manuscript writing and editing. In addition to research, Edward spends his time on campus building rockets at the UCSD chapter of Students for the Exploration and Development of Space, where he designs, simulates, and manufactures structural components. Edward plans on pursuing a PhD in a structures-related field, which he hopes to leverage in the development of more cost-effective and useful space vehicles. In his free time, Edward enjoys watching films and picking up a good book.Richard Eugene Vallejo Jr, University of California, San Diego Richard Vallejo is a third-year undergraduate student at UC San Diego majoring in Mechanical Engineering with a specialization in Controls and Robotics
placing the scale,supports, and beam and then zeroing the scales. The students then place the weights for each axleload: the 5 g blue weight for the first axle load, the 20 g yellow for the second axle, and two 10 gyellow weights for the third axle load. (a) (b)Figure 5. Actual loading set up for equivalent system example (a) profile view and (b) plan view.The instructor and students can then discuss their confidence that what they have set up is anaccurate and/or precise model of the actual systems. What variations might exist in each set up,or in the accuracy of the measuring devices, etc.? If there are several models in the room (ideallya model for groups of two to four
Customized Fixtures Lab Module UTM Thermal Stress in Hot plate or Thermocouples, Dial 6 Bimetallic Strips In Process Oven Gauges Lab ModuleBased on our findings and plans to develop these lab modules for SO6 assessment, we havecreated a brief description of each module in the following sections. Instructors are encouragedto use or disregard any part of it to implement these modules at their institution.2.1.1 Stress Concentration Analysis Around a Circular Hole (In Process)Objective: To investigate the effect of stress concentration around
DevelopmentTest design is a process of developing questions or tasks to measure students’ knowledge and skill[1]. A test plan delineates the steps and considerations along with specifications for testadministration and scoring procedures for this process. In this section, we will demonstrate howto develop a test plan by taking validity and reliability into account. To develop a test plan, onemust first consider the intended use of the test scores and the expected interpretations that willarise from them. Subsequently, the test’s content and format are carefully determined to ensurethat the resulting evidence supports the intended interpretations for their respective purposes. Testitems are then created based on the test specifications and are evaluated
and deformable bodies course that elected to participateand were currently taking or had completed introductory physics. Students were recruited from asingle instructor across three sections at the United States Air Force Academy and twenty-oneinterviews have been completed and 10 more are planned to be completed in the future.Interviews were conducted in accordance with an approved protocol and attainment of informedconsent.Think Aloud ResultsFor the purposes of this work-in-progress study, we report on the analysis of four studentinterviews of interest; future work will expand this analysis. The selected four students initiallyselected an incorrect answer and after follow-up questions, changed their answer to the correctchoice. Initially
conducted the observation during the activity sessions, documenting observations andnoting any unique participant behaviors in field notes. These field notes served as the basis foridentifying patterns and themes. The course instructors also shared their observations madeduring the activities and throughout the planning stages leading up to the class activities.Focus groups were convened to solicit feedback from students who utilized the app during theclassroom activities. The objectives were to (a) gauge the usability and user friendliness of theapp, (b) identify the app's strengths and weaknesses, and (c) identify potential areas ofimprovement. Two weeks after the last class activity using the app, student participants wereinvited to participate
the problems. With this data wewill also conduct a Discrimination vs. Difficulty analysis to determine question effectiveness [7].Progress Five faculty from across the country have gathered to discuss the creation of this new RBDCI.Each faculty member individually identified topics that should be included in a RBDCI. During bi-weekly meetings the faculty identified a total of 25 topics, which were combined or prioritized to reducethe number to 11 key concepts. The 11 concepts will be used for the question creation phase, where 3-5questions will be created for each concept. Once the questions are created, they will be tested in variousclassrooms. Based on the results from evaluating these questions, we plan to reduce the final number
plan to give the questionnaire multiple times duringthe Spring semester. We also plan to give the faculty members teaching the course aquestionnaire designed for them. This will allow us to determine if the mindset of facultymembers affects the mindsets of their students as shown in previous research [11-12]. Based onthese results we will decide what, if any, intervention to implement in the course.Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarilyreflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force Academy, the Air Force, theDepartment of Defense, or the U.S. Government. Approved for public release, USAFA-DF-2024-383: distribution unlimited.References:[1] Dweck, C.S., “Mindset
fromrevisiting specific lessons or accessing additional resources outside the classroom (Mayer &Moreno, 2003). With the physical models the authors are planning to video tape the use of thephysical models and make it available on the course VLEs on the LMS. A strong understandingof Statics is critical for future courses and real-world applications in engineering and documentingthe experience by the students for future use comes handy.The Need for Innovative Teaching MethodsStatics is often perceived as an abstract and difficult subject for students to comprehendparticularly because it involves complex mathematical models that are sometimes disconnectedfrom the tangible applications that students will eventually face in their careers. The challenge
with ideas and writing essays.”“It is very limited when it is asked to solve advanced math problems, like differential equationsand linear algebra. However, it is very useful to solve coding errors.”“Sometimes it gives the wrong answer and that causes confusion.”“I usually use it proofread my papers and summarize articles.”“Sometimes I use it to reword sentences or choose different vocabulary when I write a report.” Figure 4: Students’ Primary Use of ChatGPT Across Various Purposes.It is important to highlight that this is an ongoing project, and the authors plan to carry outadditional surveys in the future to gain further insight into students’ preferences. Ultimately, todemonstrate ChatGPT's effectiveness in crafting well-written
, the fixture must allow testing the concept in multiple configurations, sothe setup is interactive in a live demonstration to the class.The project component is assessed based on three deliverables namely (i) demonstrationproposal, (ii) critical design review, and (iii) project presentation and report. For the first twoteam deliverables, teams meet with the instructor/TA. Demonstration proposal is a deliverablewhere the teams present their plans along with a brief description of the statics concept that theyintend to demonstrate with their set-up. Projects are approved when the instructor/TA deems tobe within the scope, and it is not a repetition of a project by another team. During the criticaldesign review, teams present their engineering
. There was a significant difference in whether or not studentsbelieved that the portfolio helped them improve their communication skills between the twosemesters, with 87% agreeing or strongly agreeing in the Fall of 2024 and only 50% in theSpring of 2024. The reason for this difference is still unclear. Most encouraging in these results,and one of the reasons we decided to keep this assignment in the Fall of 2024 even though wedecided not to continue using Connect, was the fact that over 50% indicated that they consideredthis activity a good use of their time and planned to keep a portfolio in their other courses. Table 1 – Results from the portfolio reflection assignment
Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Annual ConferenceLocal LimitationsDuring Fall 2022, Statics in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at NC State Universitybegan implementing weekly quizzes. Because cheating is also endemic, the team decided that thequestions should use randomly generated inputs.9 Mastery learning with empathy requires givingstudents multiple attempts to show that mastery. Initially the plan had been to create multiplequizzes, deliver them in Moodle (our learning management system on campus), and grade smallsections by hand.NC State University implemented Moodle 4.0 for Fall 2022 on campus. At that time, theCalculated question type which would allow us to code the questions for the students was
were in the Spring 2020 special offering of theclass, which had 35 students; therefore, it is difficult to determine the level of preparation forthese enrolled students. The 2020 Spring quarter offering of the class was of course taughtonline. Because of staffing issues, we have not been able to offer the section since.Course FormatAs mentioned previously, the class was offered in a flipped format, with online video shortlectures and example problems. We utilized undergraduate Learning Assistants (LAs) in eachcourse cohort. The Learning Assistant model consists of three basic principles: the LAs receiveinstruction in pedagogical strategies, they work closely with the instructors to understand andhelp plan course activities, and they help the
Paper ID #46772Work in Progress: Assessing the Impact of Spatial Skills on Performance ina Statics CourseRosemary Yahne, Utah State University Rosemary Yahne is an undergraduate student at Utah State University. She plans to graduate with a Bachelor of Science in civil engineering with a minor in geology. Her research interests include spatial ability impact on various groups in engineering.Daniel Kane, Utah State University Daniel Kane is a third-year Ph.D. student in the department of engineering education at Utah State University. His research interests include spatial ability, accessibility for students with
dynamics course while the other was atraditional in-person lecture course. The MPP selected for this study is focused on helpingstudents understand the relationships between work, power, and efficiency and was assigned as astandalone homework assignment shortly after introducing these topics in their classes. Theinitial problem statement is provided in the appendix, while a flowchart illustrating the entiresequencies of questions that the students could follow to reach their final answer will bediscussed in the Methodology section below. A brief discussion of the initial results of this studyis included followed by the planned future work.Methodology:During a beta test of one of the new MPP problems this fall 2024 and spring 2025 semesters
, that is, not just selected topics as in manyof the previous studies. This study had several objectives: 1. Determine which of the activities in a flipped Dynamics class are most effective, in the students’ opinions, in helping them master the course material. 2. Identify practices that help new instructors who are planning on flipping a Dynamics course, especially those who are planning on using materials developed by somebody else. 3. Identify factors and practices that lead some students to prefer a flipped structure in Dynamics and other students to prefer a traditional structure.Description of the coursesBrief descriptions of how the flipped course has evolved from being in a 100% remoteenvironment to a face-to
body regions [10]. The use of sentiment analysiswas performed on psychology students to help categorize their level of reflection [11]. It has beenused to determine how emotions and views affect teacher lesson plans for their elementary studentson new material relating to computer science [12]. In a study done with first year engineeringstudents the emotion of the student reflections was determined using sentiment analysis to findthat gender and race played a role in the emotion of the response recorded [13]. Another exampleincludes student reflections on a mechanical engineering assignment that are scored with sentimentanalysis to determine the overall student feeling on the assignment and guide further courseimprovement [14]. A final example
planning and resourcing physical hands-on laboratories [24]. Virtual laboratories can beused to demonstrate bending moment, torsion, and transverse shear loading on simple structuresas well as complex aircraft components. However, virtual laboratories lose some of the benefitsrealized from in-person, physical hands-on experiences. Simulations also include perfectexecution and may not capture critical assumptions needed for experimental tests.The research question which this study aimed to answer was “Can training aids be developed tohelp student visualize failure of non-traditional materials under various loading conditions tocompliment laboratory programs?” The study presented in this manuscript investigated thedesign and development of three
reported that they were not planning onusing the flipped classroom approach in the future. With a question asking if they wouldrecommend the flipped classroom approach to others, 21 of 24 instructors reported that theywould recommend the approach. Overall, the perception of the flipped classroom approachamong those using it is clearly positive.We then asked open-ended questions about the positive and negative aspects of using the flippedclassroom approach. In terms of the positive aspects, the most commonly mentioned idea wasthat the instructors got to know where the students struggled most and could directly engagethem in that moment. This idea was mentioned by 8 of the 24 instructors. Some other commonpositive aspects of using the approach
concepts was achievedand retained. It would be especially interesting to see how students handle 3D problems in thesefollow-on courses, since the Statics course primarily focuses on 2D problems only.Preliminary results from this study have helped to identify common misconceptions, which can beused to inform the development of hands-on activities and physical demonstrations for the course.As mentioned previously, lab activities with a more qualitative focus have been successfullypiloted at Stevens. Based on positive student feedback, plans to develop additional qualitative labsand exercises are underway. Comparisons of different course implementations (with and withoutthe lab activities) can be used to evaluate the efficacy of the labs in helping
, listening to and participating inclass discussion, group project work, and using the FBD app; among those who did not use theapp, women reported fewer gains in self-efficacy than men after these controls.Implications: Each year, more than 600,000 students enter engineering programs in the UnitedStates. These students plan to master a challenging skill set that requires them to understand howto model and analyze real world problems. Frustrating core course experiences can dissuadestudents from continuing to pursue an engineering degree and subsequent career. These findingsprovide emerging evidence that gamifying learning can be useful for all students taking statics,but particularly for women.Keywords: statics, women, self-efficacy, content mastery
, achievement, and career plans,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 319–336, Oct. 2010.[9] S. Deterding, R. Khaled, L. Nake, and D. Dixon, “Gamification: Toward a definition,” in gamification workshop proceedings, Vancouver, Canadá, May 2011, pp. 1–79.[10]G. Barata, S. Gama, J. Jorge, and D. Gonçalves, “Studying student differentiation in gamified education: A long-term study,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 71, pp. 550–585, Jun. 2017.[11]L. Brown and M. Tsugawa, “WIP: Case study - Training STEM high school teachers to integrate engineering through gamification,” presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, Utah State University, 2024.[12]L. Brown and M. Tsugawa, “WIP: Using games and