students by combining laboratory experiencewith weekly instructional seminars in an attempt to foster future success in graduateschool. This approach was designed and implemented for a ten-week summer researchexperience program for undergraduate students. The weekly instructional seminar seriesaddressed research skills in three key areas: communication, investigation, anddocumentation. The seminar series began with the “Communications Seminars,” where studentparticipants learned how to concisely explain their research topics through an ‘elevatortalk’ activity, a common exercise utilized in business fields. Followed by “InvestigationSeminars,” that addressed conducting literature reviews and creating annotatedbibliographies. Instructions on
, and early warnings.2) ME Faculty will mentor students in areas and activities such as professional opportunities for students (internships, professional societies, co-ops, undergraduate student research and industry projects, design competitions, professional meetings, etc.),answer questions about career choices, encourage good habits (study habits, ethical behavior, healthy life, stress management techniques, search for any required professional help, etc), motivation (rewards of hard work, celebrate success, learn from failure, etc.), building a relationship (personal accountability, showing that we care, etc.), financial aid/scholarships, and selection of technical electives appropriate to student interest and career goals3
capitalize on, particularly graduatestudents who needed to find short term summer jobs. Many of those that found jobs nevercame back to school and dropped graduate school. The department was growing andexperiential learning student internships at a local civil engineering company orgovernment entity were difficult to obtain for rising seniors and graduate students. TheChair asked if the laboratory could accommodate two or three internships during summer1991. ERDC made an on the spot commitment to accommodate up to ten experientiallearning internships during the summer of 1991. This conversation initiated a summerexperiential learning research internship program, thriving to this day.Summer Experiential Learning Research InternshipsThe recruiting
Balti- more County (UMBC). Her research centers on using visualization and data mining (visual analytics) to improve the state of medicine and healthcare. She is also interested in developing interfaces with univer- sal access to assist in the learning of programming languages. In 2007, she received a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship to complete her doctorate, which permitted her to pursue her interests in biomedical informatics in collaboration with medical professors at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. In 2008, her paper, ”Visualizing Multivariate Time Series Data to Detect Specific Medical Conditions”, was nominated for the Best Student Paper Award at AMIA 2008.Dr. Renetta G. Tull
. Specifically, thewords used in the CI are not translated in the best connotation, since Arabic words arecompound, i.e. one word can have more than one meaning. These findings were incorporatedinto our study’s research design, which is explained in the following section.Research DesignStatics is a pivotal course for engineering students especially in the areas of civil and mechanicalengineering. Previous work demonstrated the presence of naive conceptions (misconceptions)on statics concepts among mechanical and civil senior engineering students.10, 11 CATS has beendesigned to detect errors associated with incorrect concepts necessary for Statics. Thedevelopment of CATS began with the identification of central Statics concepts based on ananalysis of
Durdella, California State University, Northridge Nathan Durdella is an assistant professor in the Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Stud- ies at California State University, Northridge (CSUN). Over the last decade, Durdella has served as a project evaluator on multiple federally funded projects, including two Title V projects and a Veterans FIPSE project, and currently serves as co-principal investigator and project evaluator for CSUN’s Title V/HSI-STEM project in the College of Engineering and Computer Science. Durdella’s current research focuses on college impact and uses qualitative research methods to examine community college transfer students of color in STEM fields, female single parent students
graduate students to select and pursue a major in an Engineering or STEM discipline, and find scholarships to fund their studies • faculty to survive the tenure process and thrive in an academic environment • academic administrators to get training in academic administration • professionals to thrive and stay viable, competitive and current in their professional life • researchers who want to study, publish and get funding for research in pedagogy and diversityBy collecting links in one place that are helpful throughout the lifetime of a minority or womeninterested in a career in engineering, it is hoped that this gives the reader a lifelong perspective ofconsidering the entire career and short and long term opportunities
the future of theengineering profession3. Companies striving to stay in business for generations push theenvelope of technology; this is where innovation and new perspectives are crucial. Forexample, most people are motivated to develop products that will have an impact on herself,himself, or someone they love. For example, a team of women designing cars think about wherethe in-car light is located, and for childcare and safety reasons, situate it near the floor instead ofits common location in the dome of the car4. This suggests that similar people with similarexperiences will conceive a subset of product ideas relating to their subset of experiences. Evenone individual with a different set of experiences adds a myriad
perspective on ambassador programs, and peer-mentoringobservations are one way to capture perspectives from students. As a major component ofambassador programs, peer mentoring is recognized as an impactful mechanism for academicsuccess and retention4,5.The perspective of ambassadors who are immersed in the day-to-day activities of mentoringcould provide significant value to our understanding of students’ needs. Ambassadors’perspectives may provide rich opportunities to design a comprehensive program that is directlymatched to the students’ needs, since ambassadors can be fully immersed in the program as it isdelivered. Additionally, ambassadors serve as trusted “indigenous” members of the peer-mentoring community and are able to observe student
-represented minority (URM) engineering students definepersonal success as compared to majority engineering students. Understanding these potentialdifferences may enable university administrators and faculty to educate and support thesestudents in relevant ways that enhance their ability to succeed.This analysis was drawn from a larger study that employed interdisciplinary, mixed-methods toidentify factors contributing to the successful retention and graduation of under-represented andunder-served minority engineering students at a predominately white research institution. URMengineering students participated in face-to-face interviews designed to engage them in reflectionand discussion of their lived experiences as engineering students. From this
AC 2011-2360: INSTRUCT INTEGRATING NASA SCIENCE, TECHNOL-OGY, AND RESEARCH IN UNDERGRADUATE CURRICULUM AND TRAIN-INGRam V. Mohan, North Carolina A&T State University (Eng) Dr. Ram Mohan is currently an Associate Professor with the interdisciplinary graduate program in com- putational science and engineering (CSE). He serves as the module content director for the INSTRUCT project. Dr. Mohan currently has more than 90 peer reviewed journal articles, book chapters and con- ference proceedings to his credit. He plays an active role in American Society for Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and serves as the chair of the ASME materials processing technical committee and a member of the ASME Nanoengineering Council Steering
underrepresentedstudents by serving as an integral part of a student’s development. Planning and professionalengagement with a mentor can help students to be successful in completing a degree in STEM and thepursuing a graduate degree in STEM. Mentoring can be especially essential for underrepresentedundergraduate students pursuing STEM degrees. Mentoring relationships provide students with apositive environment that can lead to networking opportunities and career opportunities after graduation,but only recently has research been conducted to fully understand the best practices of mentoringrelationships.Based on previous studies conducted, 82.4% reported positive outcomes for mentees.6 Students whohad a mentoring relationship usually had higher retention rates and
Studentsthrough Enhanced Mentoring and Summer Research Programs”, 124th ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, June 2017[10] R. Whalin and Q. Pang, “Emerging Impact on Graduation Rates/Times From A SummerEngineering Enrichment Program”, 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis,IN, June 2014[11] J. Volcy and C. Sidbury, “Developing a Summer Bridge Course for Improving Retention inEngineering”, 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA, June 2013[12] E. Perez and O. Castillo, “Summer Immersion Program for First-Year Engineering Studentsas a Strategy to Increase Retention: First-Year Results”, 123rd ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, New Orleans, LA, June 2016[13] Hunter, Mary Stuart, et al. Helping
a 10 hour per week commitment of research from undergraduate students. In addition toresearch hours, students are required to attend monthly professional development sessionsfocused on best practices in research, program deliverables, and community building. Exampletopics include maximizing your research experience, communication, research ethics, academicwriting, poster design, and an overview to graduate school. At the conclusion of the program,students are required to present their research as a poster and write an associated researchabstract.To apply for the program, students connect with a faculty member and write a short 1 to 2 pageresearch proposal describing the type of work they will be doing, the importance of the research,and a
) have some of but not all of the same issuesand therefore best practices. S-STEM wants to study what works best, where, and with whom.This paper provides examples of approaches to seize the opportunity leading to successfulmethods which had a positive impact on students and project success. Not all approaches havebeen successful and therefore embody the challenges faced by programs, particularly in thesettings of these MSIs. We take this chance to offer suggestions based on lessons learned fromthe missteps. Offer support for the new rules for S-STEM and how they can help projects tohave better impacts on local students as well as the broader MSI community.Institutional ContextThe two S-STEM projects discussed herein were housed at two different
and advisor to the student chapter of the National Society of Black Engineers. Dr. Rogers has been recognized for his teaching, research, and service efforts through numerous invited seminars and awards. Notable awards include the 2015 Partner of the Year Award from RIT’s Multicultural Center for Academic Success, the 2016 Richard and Virginia Eisenhart Provost’s Award for Excellence in Teaching from RIT, the 2017 Emerging Investigator designation from Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, the 2017 Henry C. McBay Outstanding Teacher Award from the National Organization for the Professional Ad- vancement of Black Chemists and Chemical Engineers, and the 2018 Dr. Janice A. Lumpkin Educator of
glaciology. In recent years, he has focused on issues of mathematical education and outreach and he has developed a wide range of K-12 outreach projects. His current interests include the mathematical education of teachers, the scholarship of outreach, computational mathematics, and complex dynamics. Page 26.896.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Fundamental Research: Impacts of Outreach on Entering College Students Interests in STEM (Fundamental)IntroductionThe need to train qualified science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM
skills,” sense of belonging, and learningexperiences for peer leaders and female CS students. Additionally, pair programming and peerinstruction may be viable practices that will help benefit women in computing with regards tolearning experiences and learning outcomes, but not their retention or persistence. Highlycollaborative course offerings, such as flipped classrooms and “trio of best practices”classrooms, were shown to improve learning experiences, learning outcomes, retention, andpersistence of minoritized women in computing. Future research is still needed aroundpedagogical impacts on individual intersections such as Black women, Latina women, andNative American women. Additionally, future quantitative studies should provide
student’s successful engineering knowledge, practices, and values during the semester? 2. What factors other than the course contribute to developing student’s successful engineering knowledge, practices, and values during the semester? 3. What have you lost or retained about your own culture in favor of engineering culture? II. MethodA. SettingIn fall 2016, over 3,600 students registered for a FYE foundation course at asouthwestern university. The FYE program at this institution has undergone numerouschanges. These revisions are well-grounded in research and best practices. The course istaught to all those first-year students in about 30 sections. Instructors manage
ofresearch, (4) an interactive tour of the conference hardware competition which provides concreteexamples of cutting edge research, (5) a small group Q&A with graduate students engaged inresearch, and finally (6) a panel discussion with diverse research faculty committed to post-secondary engineering education. The challenges associated with this approach to outreach, theadvantages of incorporating a STEM intervention into a technical research conference, andsuccessful methods for locating a group of underserved students are discussed. In addition, thescale and impact of the intervention are evaluated through open-ended and quantitative surveys.The survey results document the positive student reaction to this intervention. The positivestudent
in the workforce and their daily life. She is a subject matter expert in product design/development and digital engineering/manufacturing especially from prototype or service to marketplace. Prior to joining NTID, Dannels worked for several engineering corporations.Mr. Chris Campbell, Rochester Institute of Technology Chris Campbell is a Research Associate Professor with the Center on Access Technology at the National Technical Institute for the Deaf, one of the colleges at Rochester Institute of Technology. His research and development focus is on access technologies that will positively impact post-secondary educational experiences for deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals.Mr. Brian Trager, Rochester Institute of
AC 2011-259: FACIAL RECOGNITION SYSTEM SCREENING EVALUA-TION METHODOLOGY FOR COMPLEXION BIASESRigoberto Chinchilla, Eastern Illinois University Dr. Rigoberto Chinchilla (PhD in Integrated Engineering, Ohio University) is an Associate Professor in the School of Technology since 2004 and Current Interim Coordinator of Graduate Studies for the School of Technology at Eastern Illinois University. His teaching and research interests include Applied Statistics, Quality Assurance, Computer and Biometric Security, Information Systems, and Automation. Dr. Chinchilla has been a Fulbright scholar, a recipient of a United Nations scholarship, chosen as a Faculty Marshall for the Graduate School, and received an Achievement and
services to foster success in Calculus I as it isknown to be a roadblock for student success in STEM fields. The second activity supports theimplementation of Challenge-Based Instruction (CBI) in selected key courses. CBI, a form ofinductive learning, has been shown to be a more effective approach to the learning process thanthe traditional deductive pedagogy. The third activity supports faculty development workshopson CBI techniques and other locally developed teaching tools with a focus on increasing studentsuccess, and finally the fourth activity develops and supports pathways to STEM fields betweenSTC and UTPA. This project provides a model that is expected to have a significant impact onthe number of STEM graduates and that will be simple to
AC 2012-4444: IMPLEMENTATION OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING TECH-NIQUES TO INCREASE MINORITY STUDENT INTEREST IN RF/MICROWAVEENGINEERINGDr. Michel A. Reece, Morgan State University Michel A. Reece is currently a tenured professor and Research Director of the Center of Microwave, Satellite, and RF Engineering (COMSARE) in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Morgan State University. In this center, she pursues research in the areas of high frequency device char- acterization and modeling, highly efficient solid-state power amplifier design, and adaptable components design for software defined radio applications. She became the first female recipient at Morgan State to obtain her doctorate degree in
women and underrepresented minorities. He received his M.S. in Industrial & Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech and his B.S. in Industrial Engineering from Clemson University.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using
practices. Human capital analyses are problematic in explaining women’s location in the workforce and perpetuate the deficit model of gender inequality. (p. 156-157)Taken together, these three sets of critics point out major methodological flaws in using pipelineas a metaphor for structuring research studies: • Most studies do not articulate what counts as a “successful” scientific or engineering career. Must a person remain in the same profession for her entire working life for her to be considered “in” the pool? Or might there be more “kinds” of scientific-related careers that should “count” than that of bench scientist or design engineer?18 • Assuming that “gender effects” on career choices can be studied
Enterprise for STEM Learningpartnership between JHU and Baltimore City Schools. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Impact of Student Driven Engineering Design ProjectsAbstractAs part of a National Science Foundation (NSF) funded Math and Science Partnership (MSP)between an urban, east coast, city school district and a private research university, city youthfrom three high-minority, high-poverty neighborhoods were taught the engineering designprocess both in-school and afterschool. Those in the afterschool program had STEM experts asmentors as well as a paid facilitator. They engaged in engineering projects from NPASS2 byEducation Development Center, Inc. and from Engineering Adventure by the
100 million hits per year. Professor Nelson is also currently serving as principal dean for the UIC Innovation Center, a collaborative effort between the UIC Colleges of Architecture, Design and the Arts; Business Administration; Medicine and Engineering.Ashkan Sharabiani, Exelon Corporation I am a Senior Data Scientist at Exelon Corporation. My area of expertise is to apply Machine Learning and Big Data Analytics methods in real life problems and drive efficient solutions by creating data products. Prior to joining Exelon, I was a PhD student in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research at the University of Illinois at Chicago. During my graduate studies I was involved in several data analytics projects in
hypothesis to better align them with the real-world. Inthe last two decades, the National Research Council has encouraged the use of “student-centeredinquiry-learning” teaching methods in secondary and postsecondary curricula6,7. These strategieshave been widely incorporated into classes such as anatomy and physiology8, biology 9,10,mathematics11, business marketing12, among many others. Applications of these techniques ininterdisciplinary programs spanning from science to engineering are still lacking. The student-centered inquiry-learning educational theory and best practices serves as the educationalframework of the proposed program.As illustrated in Figure 1, the process starts with a background evaluation for each trainee andthe follow-up
considered a major influence, as they inspired their children to achievemore than they had accomplished educationally. Anthony’s parents continually encouraged himto “do the best you can and strive for the highest.” Cianni described her parents as “the biggestinfluence.” Macy’s parents constantly inspired her to “go farther than us.” Clewell3 found thatparents were extremely instrumental in encouraging black graduate students to pursue post-secondary education.Participation in a Research or Internship Program May and Chubin26 assert that participation in research is extremely important inencouraging undergraduate students to pursue graduate degrees in engineering and science. Thisproved to be true for many of the study participants, as it was