- Conference Session
- Revealing the Invisible: Engineering Course Activities that Address Privilege, -Isms, and Power Relations (Interactive Session)
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego; Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego; Odesma Onika Dalrymple, University of San Diego; Susan M Lord, University of San Diego
- Tagged Topics
-
ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Faculty Development Constituency Committee
- Tagged Divisions
-
Design in Engineering Education, International, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Minorities in Engineering
which the university will: become an anchorinstitution, demonstrate engaged scholarship, practice changemaking, advance access andinclusion, demonstrate care for our common home, and integrate our liberal arts education.In addition, the University Core curriculum recently underwent an overhaul with a new CoreCurriculum in place in Fall 2017. One significant outcome of the new Core reflects theUniversity’s commitment to Diversity, Inclusion and Social Justice (DISJ). Whereas studentspreviously were required to take a single Diversity course, the new Core requires students to taketwo Diversity, Inclusion, and Social Justice (DISJ) courses recognizing a developmental modelof achieving these outcomes. In addition, the DISJ designation is now based
- Conference Session
- Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Development Opportunities for Diverse Engineering Students
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Kelsey Morgan Irvin, Washington University in St. Louis; Elizabeth Hiteshue, University of Pennsylvania; Mary Yvonne Lanzerotti, Air Force Institute of Technology; Michael Geselowitz, Stevens Institute of Technology
- Tagged Topics
-
ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering
finalized. The questions were personalized for each interviewee andreviewed by the IEEE Historian. Following changes, the participating students sent the oralhistory questions to the interviewee prior to the interview.A standard set of interview components included the following sections: Introduction, EarlyLife/Education, Career, Awards/Honors, Gender-Related Questions, Reflection/Advice, andConclusion. Table I (shown on the next page) shows the structure of a typical oral historyinterview. Excluding an introduction and conclusion, the five general sections covered in theinterview are Early Life/Education, Career, Awards/Honors, Gender, and Reflection/Advice.Questions are personalized for each interviewee. Questions in the Early Life/Education
- Conference Session
- Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Development Opportunities for Diverse Engineering Students
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Jenni Buckley, University of Delaware; Amy Trauth, University of Delaware; Manuela Restrepo Parra; Laura Meszaros Dearolf, The Perry Initiative ; Lisa L Lattanza MD
- Tagged Topics
-
ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering
for our programming efforts. First, we modeled the long-term effect ofour programming efforts on the percentage of females in the incoming residency class assumingthat we maintain our current level of programming indefinitely. We then adjusted selectparameters in the model to reflect “worst-case” assumptions for recruiting and retention inorthopaedic residency (see Table 2). This analysis is particularly important because our currentprogram evaluation data – on which the model parameters are based – reflect intermediaterecruitment and retention outcomes, e.g., intention to pursue orthopaedic surgery for high schoolparticipants rather than actual matriculation rates into residency. Our worst-case assumptionswere as follows: (1) 10% decrease in
- Conference Session
- Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retention Programs for Diverse Students
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Jennifer L. Groh, Purdue University, West Lafayette
- Tagged Topics
-
ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering
to empower the students and to provide skills to navigate theirexperiences in an engineering workforce. Peer coaching is introduced and implemented throughexamples, training on key coaching skills, and five opportunities for the students to practice theseskills with one another.Mixed methods design is employed to identify emerging themes which can form the basis offuture theories and research as well as to assess the effectiveness of integrating peer coachinginto the classroom. Data analysis includes reflective journals from the perspective of servingboth as the coach and coachee, pre- and post-course surveys, as well as weekly post-classsurveys. While qualitative analysis aids in identifying theoretical frameworks for future studies,results
- Conference Session
- Building and Engaging Communities for Scholarship, Advocacy, and Action for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Eric Specking, University of Arkansas; Adrienne Minerick, Michigan Technological University; Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University; Rocio C. Chavela Guerra, American Society for Engineering Education
- Tagged Topics
-
ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
International, Minorities in Engineering
);• regular dialogue with the Board of Directors; and• diversity booth at Annual Conference & Exhibition (sponsored by industry).This time period included some struggles to get critical momentum going, although perseveranceprevailed until the committee reached a critical mass of members. Much of this progress was theimpact of Bevlee Watford’s role as a charismatic and direct-speaking leader. Processes becamemore institutionalized, which helped set ASEE precedents to move from good ideas, to actionand implementation, to institutionalization and sustainability. A reflection on this period isprovided in the Spring 2014 Diversity Committee newsletter by J.P. Mohsen, ASEE formerPresident [14].3.3. 2013-2014 (Chairs: Teri Reed & Adrienne Minerick
- Conference Session
- Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Development Opportunities for Diverse Engineering Students
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Joanna Wolfe, Carnegie Mellon University; Elizabeth A. Powell, Tennessee Technological University; Seth Schlisserman; Alexandra Kirshon
- Tagged Topics
-
ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering