9 10 s ts ut pu np ut -i
Health Organization data tables. Accessed 01/24/09 from http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/en/3 United Nations Millennium Development Goals. Accessed 01/24/09 from http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals4 Striebig, B., & Norwood, S. (2009). West African Technology, Education, and Reciprocity (WATER) Implementation in Benin. Paper accepted for publication in the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. Page 14.943.15 14AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank all those that
extends back to the 1930’s when the school was a junior college. The University wasknown as The University of Tennessee Junior College, and the engineering program consisted ofthe first two years towards a baccalaureate degree in the student’s chosen field of engineering.The University became a four-year college in 1951. Most degree programs were transformed intofull four-year baccalaureate programs at that time. The engineering program remained a two-year transfer program with most students transferring to the University of Tennessee atKnoxville.In the fall of 1967, a formal proposal was developed by the UT Martin Department ofEngineering and submitted to the College of Engineering at Knoxville for an engineering degreewith majors from one of
results of theanalysis by major with regard to the two-way interaction as viewed by the third party. Many ofthe responses were Neutral and one survey had a written response of N/A with respect to the oneof the third party questions. It is believed that many of the “Neutral” answers may have been “Idon’t know what the other two did when they were working in a two-way interaction.”Therefore, it is recommended that a sixth response category be added to the survey to allowstudents to answer “no observation” or “don’t know”. Page 11.766.14Bibliography[1] Northrup, S., Moriarty, J., Vallee, G., Presz, W., “A Successful Interdisciplinary Engineering
Intellectual Property Advisory Committee (IPAC) (Patent in progress).7. Technical Date Sheet for 1002300 Twist-Release Polymagnet Pair – 90 degree with Detent, available from http://catalog.polymagnet.com/media/pdf/1002300%20datasheet.pdf on October 24, 2016.8. A.B. Nellippallil, J.K. Allen, F. Mistree, R. Vignesh, B.P. Gautham, and A.K. Singh, (2017). A Goal-Oriented, Inverse Decision-Based Design Method to Achieve the Vertical and Horizontal Integration of Models in a HotRod Rolling Process Chain, ASME Design Automation Conference. Cleveland, Ohio, USA. Under Review.9. C.-H. Goh, S. Ahmed, A.P. Dachowicz, J.K. Allen, and F. Mistree, Integrated Multi-scale Robust Design to Consider Microstructure Evolution and Material Properties in the
emphasis in STEM-H related curriculum experiences at various colleges and universities across the U.S. Gwen’s work with NSF, USDOE, DOE, DOD, HRSA, and DOJ helps in providing the evaluative needs and expectations of federally funded grants with regard to accountability and compliance. In addition, she has served as a panel reviewer for NSF proposals for S-STEM and other EHR programs, GAANN, SIP, and EOC with the USDOE, and is currently an AQIP Reviewer and Peer Reviewer for the NCA Higher Learning Commission. As an administrator, Gwen has served Director of Assessment for 6 years and Executive Assistant to the President for one year at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She has also served as Assistant to the
, 66(6), pp.888~898.[21] China Ministry of Education official website http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/201803/t20180329_331767.html[22] Barriball K L, While A. Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper.[J]. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2010, 19(2):328-335.[23] Kolbe R H, Burnett M S. Content-analysis research: An examination of applications with directives for improving research reliability and objectivity.[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1991, 18(2):243-250.[24] Zhang Lei, Wang Chen. A comparative study of public policy issues in urban planning between China and the United States based on content analysis [j]. Urban Development Research, 2011, 18(11): 33 - 38.[25] Miles M B
/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020/#GC3. [Accessed January 29, 2019].5 U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs, “What are KSAs?” [Online]. Available:https://www.va.gov/jobs/hiring/apply/ksa.asp. [Accessed January 29, 2019].6 Reh, J. F., “KSA: Using the Knowledge, Skills and Abilities Model.” The Balance Careerswebsite, 4 October 2018. [Online]. Available:https://www.thebalancecareers.com/understanding-knowledge-skills-and-abilities-ksa-2275329.[Accessed January 29, 2019].7 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “The Importance of KSA’s (Knowledge,Skills and Abilities) in the Federal Application Process.” [Online]. Available:https://www.cdc.gov/hrmo/ksahowto.htm. [Accessed January 29
contamination have people been exposed to? • Can environmental forensics assist in allocating remediation costs?To answer the above questions, information is needed. The sources of the informationinclude the documentary record, including statements of witnesses or otherknowledgeable individuals, aerial photographs, insurance maps, stored electronicinformation, and measurement or sampling data from the field.Chemical wastes placed on a property by several different owners/operators over decadesof occupancy may necessitate a cleanup of both polluted soil and underlyinggroundwater. The ability to determine which disposal practice(s) by each owner/operatorresulted in the need for cleanup activities usually involves historical information andoften
Multidisciplinary Engineering Curriculum, Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 20183. J. Ross, K. Johnson, K. Varney, A Multidisciplinary Approach to Study Abroad, Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 20114. R. Harichandran, B. Kench, S. McGee, M. Collura, J. Nocito-Gobel, C. Skipton, Establishment of Innovative Shared Departments to Advance Interdisciplinary Education, Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 20175. J. Froyd, M. Ohland, Integrated Engineering Curricula, Journal of Engineering Education, January 2005, pp. 147-1646. L. Lattuca, D. Knight, H. Ro, B. Novoselich, Supporting the Development of Engineers’ Interdisciplinary Competence, Journal of Engineering Education, January 2017, Vol
research with Biometric Monitoring and Privacy Control as related to moreeffective delivery of social services via WERCware.VI. AcknowledgmentsThe author would like recognize: Dr. Nancy Patrick and Dr. Randall Fish for their contributionsto the manuscript, as well as their guidance of students and project work over the years; Mr. CurtByers as the visionary for WERCware, original CEO of SymBionyx, and representative client.References1. Barrett, S., et al., “Service Learning: Assistive Technology Undergraduate Design Projects,” Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference, San Antonio.2. May-Newman, K., et al., “Senior Design Projects in Assistive Technology: Opportunities for Technology Transfer,” Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual
government experiencedoesn't necessarily mean one has hands-on design experience and vice versa. Also designprojects in academia can provide the requisite experience but only, in our opinion, if theproject(s) involve strict engineering discipline and in-depth reviews. If design experiencedinstructors are not available, course objectives can still be met but the class will probably lackdesign room realism.How to start - Figure 13 is a summary of our recommendations if you find yourself having todevelop your own SE Design course of instruction. 12 Figure 13: SE Design Capstone Course Design Approach1. If you don't have first-hand design experience, educate yourself on how it's done
. As far as the amount of interaction and mentoring that I expected from my faculty research advisor, I did not know what to expect. From my experience in research, mentors vary significantly in their styles and approach of conducting their research and interacting with their students. At the beginning of the project, I second guessed almost every idea that I came up with and did not trust my judgment to do anything correctly or efficiently. I always ran whatever idea that I came up with by either David S. or Justin B. prior to acting on it, no matter how minor it seemed. About half-way into the research program I began to feel far more comfortable with the whole design process
notable migration of e+’s direct-matriculation students out of theprogram and into discipline-specific engineering programs to three distinct shared studentmotivations: 1) students who developed a new or greater passion for a more traditional,discipline-based engineering program; 2) students who strategized acceptance to the CEASthrough the (not enrollment-limited) e+ program with the intention of transferring later to amajor they perceived as enrollment-limited; and 3) students who inadvertently arrived to the e+program thinking that it was the engineering college’s “open-option” major.Perhaps not surprisingly, the program advisor noted that many first-year students did not arrivewith a curricular plan for themselves and were slow to select
Line, vol. 12, no. 9, May-June 2003. [Online]. Available: http://www.prism-magazine.org/mayjune03/graduate.cfm [Accessed Dec. 2, 2017].[3] Y. Matsuda and N. Okada, “Community diagnosis for sustainable disaster preparedness”, Journal of Natural Disaster Science, vol. 28, no.1, pp. 25–33, 2006.[4] A. Maskrey, “Revisiting community-based disaster risk management”, Environmental Hazards, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 42–52, 2011.[5] S. Santa-Cruz, G. Fernández de Córdova, M. Rivera, M. Vilela, V. Arana and J. Palomino, “Social sustainability dimensions in the seismic risk reduction of public schools: A case study of Lima, Peru”, Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2016.[6] J. Klein, “A
, OR, June 2005.[9] Al-Khafaji, K., “Learning Sustainable Design through Service.” International Journal for ServiceLearning in Engineering. 1, no. 1 (2006): 1-10.[10] Grzelkowski, Kathryn P. “Merging the Theoretical and the Practical: A Community Action LearningModel.” Teaching Sociology. 14, no. 2 (1986): 110-118.[11] Kvam, Paul H. “The Effect of Active Learning Methods on Student Retention in EngineeringStatistics.” The American Statistician. 54, no. 2 (2000): 136-140.[12] Helle, L. et al., “Project-Based Learning in Post-Secondary Education – Theory, Practice and RubberSling Shots.” Higher Education. 51 (2006): 287-314.[13] Jahanian S. and J. M. Matthews. “Multidisciplinary Project: A Tool for Learning the Subject.”Journal of Engineering
-0935103. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors would alsolike to thank the study participants for their participation.References1. T. Martin, K. Kim, J. Forsyth, L.D. McNair, E. Coupey, and E. Dorsa, “Discipline-based instruction to promote interdisciplinary design of wearable and pervasive computing products,” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 2011. (DOI) 10.1007/s00779-011-0492-z.2. R. Frodeman, J.T. Klein, and C. Mitcham, editors, The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, Oxford UP, 2010.3. C.L. Dym, A.M. Agogino, O. Eris, D.D. Frey, and L.J. Leifer, “Engineering
Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). McCulley is a board member of the CAPA and SPARKS National Science Foundation project with five years of service. She has more than 17 years’ experience working in industry as a project engineer specializing in automation and controls engineering.Prof. Dustin Scott Birch, Weber State University Dustin S. Birch possesses a master’s of science in mechanical engineering from the University of Utah, a bachelor’s of science in mechanical engineering from the University of Utah, and an associate’s of sci- ence in design and drafting engineering technology from Ricks College. Birch is an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Technology Department at Weber State University. He
... 2. I decided on my 1st choice project based on best fit with my interest and concentration(s). 3. I decided on my 1st choice project based on the recommendation of a friend. 4. I decided on my 1st choice project by reading the Job Description (JD) online. 5. The project Job Description (JD) for my 1st choice project was detailed enough. 6. I compared the Job Description (JD) of my 1st choice project with other JDs. 7. I decided on my 1st choice project based on my personal interview with the then current project leaders and/or faculty advisor during the GO Job Fair. 8. I decided on my 1st choice project based on some other reason (please explain reason below). 9. Other reasons for choosing 1st choice project, not included
, 2012.5. J. Highsmith, Agile Project Management, Boston: Addison-Wesley, 2004.6. K. Schwaber and J. Sutherland, “The Scrum Guide: The Definitive Guide to Scrum: The Rules of the Game,” Scrum.org, 2011.7. I. Sommerville, Software Engineering, 8th Edition, Essex: Pearson Education, 2007.8. The State of Scrum: Benchmarks and Guidelines, June 2013, http://www.scrumalliance.org/why-scrum/state-of- scrum-report.9. Planning Poker: An Agile Estimation and Planning Technique, http://www.mountaingoatsoftware.com/agile/planning-poker.10. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), “Criteria for Accrediting Computing Programs,” Computing Accreditation Commission, Baltimore, MD, 2012.11. S. Ambler, Acceleration: An Agile
Education AnnualConference, Salt Lake City, UT.Stiggins, R.J. (1997). Student-Centered Classroom Assessment, Second Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.Olds, B., Moskal, B., and Miller, R. (2005). Assessment in engineering education: evolution, approachesand future collaborators, Journal of Engineering Education. 94(1), pp. 27-40.Todd, R., Magleby, S., Sorensen, C., Swan, B., and Anthony, D. (1995). A survey of capstoneengineering courses in North America, Journal of Engineering Education, 84(2), pp. 165-174.Wiggins, G. and McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by Design. Association for Supervision andCurriculum Development, Alexandria, VA
and/or safety aspects of the manufacturing process(s) illustrated in the work ofart, the production methods used to produce a particular product, or how a particular work of artwas produced. If the work of art illustrates a process from the past, a perspective on how theprocess (or environmental/safety considerations) have changed to the present is expected withmore weight on the present.Timeline:Initial choice for topic/work of art: due Monday, March 18th. If multiple students/groups havethe same choice, an alternative selection may be needed.Preliminary topics (short description of the focus of the paper with the title/artist of the work ofart and a minimum of 2 references outside the textbook) are due on Monday April 15th.Final papers are
; Exposition. 19. Richerson, S., and Suri, D., “Strategies for Assessing Multi-Disciplinary Collaborative Experiences,” American Society for Engineering Education, 2008. 20. Alford, K. L., “Multidisciplinary Computer Science Design Projects,” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 21. Pawar, U., Pal, J. and Toyama, K., “Multiple Mice for Computers in Education in Developing Countries,” ICTD 2006, pp. 64-71. 22. Anderson, R. E. et al., “Building a Transportation Information System Using Only GPS and Basic SMS Infrastructure,” ICTD 2009. Page
; !"% !"$ !"# ! #"' $"! $"' %"! %"' &"! &"' '"! '"' !"#$%$#&'()24056) *2/".7$8&.$/"*)89):1173 Figure 5. Individual impact on group consensus compared to peer perceptions of contribution.Developing and delivering the course required the collaboration of a group of individualcontributors (including students) and has been a positive experience for all. Generally theobjectives of the course have been achieved but analysis of the assessments indicates that thereare deeper issues that should be addressed as engineering students move to professional practice.References1. Crawford, Andrew S. (1998). “Leadership education at the University of Michigan
., . . . Trenor, J. M. (2011). Multiple perspectives on engaging future engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 48-88.7. Jonassen, D. H., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139-151.8. Bowring, S., Epstein, A., & Harvey, C. (2014). Engaging First-Year Students in Team- Oriented Research: The Terrascope Learning Community Geoscience Research and Education (pp. 223-236): Springer.9. Heinricher, A., Savilonis, B., Spanagel, D., Traver, R., & Wobbe, K. (2008). Great Problems Seminars: A New First-Year Foundation at WPI. Paper presented at the ASEE Regional Meeting
Of Project BasedService Learning". 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas3. Engineers Without Borders (link). Last accessed 2/10/174. EPICS @ Purdue (link). Last accessed 2/10/175. John Duffy, Linda Barrington, and Manuel Heredia. "Recruitment, Retention, And ServiceLearning In Engineering". 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas, 20096. Malinda S. Zarske, Derek T Reamon, Angela R. Bielefeldt, and Daniel W. Knight. "Service-based First-year Engineering Projects: Do They Make a Difference? ". 2012 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, 20127. Jacqulyn Baughman, Gretchen A. Mosher, Ann M Gansemer
Representation: Theory, Applications, and MPEG-7 Standardization, Springer, 2003.20. S. Geman and D. Geman, “Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 721–741, 1984.21. Stan Z. Li, Markov Random Field Modeling in Image Analysis, Springer, 2001. Page 13.371.15Appendix A : Initial Course Syllabus UNC Charlotte Machine Vision Lab - ECGR3090/6090/8090 Syllabus http://www.visionlab.uncc.edu/index2.php?option=com_content&task=... ECGR3090/6090/8090 SYLLABUS Written by Andrew Willis
the originally registered students logged in to the course toparticipate. Specifically, 94,788 unique students (~76% of the initial enrollments) were active inthe course (i.e., logged in to participate at least once), with 13,811 students active in the lastweek (~11% of the initial enrollments). Figure 3 shows a graph of the number of “activestudents” from week to week – i.e., students who logged in and participated in the course viacore video views or downloads, quiz/exercise/project submissions, and/or discussion forumactivity. These numbers do not tell us which students were active in which week(s) or whichspecific course activities attracted their attention; clearly, not all 94,788 unique students were