deeply in graduate education,interdisciplinary learning has not been highly reflected or cultivated in engineering educationcurricula [1]. This lack of acknowledgment may be attributed to the historical exclusion ofinterdisciplinary ways of being and thinking across the disciplines, which also limits how studentssee themselves as engineers. Historical perspectives within engineering education include thosethat “institutionalize cultural and epistemic injustice” by excluding views that deviate from thedominant ways of thinking in engineering [2, p. 4]. Riley and Lambrinidou [2] expressed how thisapproach to educating engineers may result in engineers who do not feel they fit into the mold ofa stereotypical engineer, which emphasizes technical
support cross-cutting technologies across three coredisciplines: 1) computer and engineering science research specifically in a form of machinelearning and high performance computing (HPC), 2) advanced manufacturing, and 3) nucleardetection technologies. For outreach and development, ETI hosted the first of three summerschools from August 24-28, 2020 with the theme of “Data Science and Engineering”. Theschool was hosted in an on-line format and had over 200 participants. The recorded content isavailable on-line as a resource for students. This describes the hurtles and methods utilized toovercome obstacles limiting in-person workshops in 2020.The summer school had four modules: 1) Fundamentals of data Applications, 2) ComputationalMachine
moved to a blended format and students were coming in-person in theLAB from potential different locations and environmental settings, it could have been disastrousand may spread the virus. Several precautions and security measures were taken to mitigate thesechallenges. Face covering was mandated during LAB hours. Each LAB was equipped with a handsanitizer dispenser and sanitizing wipes stations. Instructors included few extra notices in thecourse syllabi as below, in addition to daily class briefing.1. Students will work in group of 12, rotating between weeks. You MUST show up on yourassigned day and may not join with other groups on alternate days due to social distancing.STRICTLY ENFORCED.2. MUST wear “MASKS” through the duration of LAB
or ECE, such as Control Theory, Digital Signal Processing or StructuralDynamics.The curricular goals of ESA are to further develop students’ skills and expertise in theengineering analysis process, increase their self-directed and peer learning abilities, and toconvey content that is common to ME and ECE programs. The focus on quantitative analysis ispart of a broader effort to educate students in this area. The course material is built around ahands-on project to control an inverted pendulum on a cart, a classic problem in control theory[1] which is often included in Signals and Systems and System Dynamics courses [2], [3].To this end, we developed a project using an affordable system based on an Arduino-likeplatform, the Balboa 32U4
gained through multidisciplinary approaches, and furthervalidation of multidisciplinary capstone projects.IntroductionCognizant of the burgeoning needs of multidisciplinary engineering competencies in addressing global grandchallenges for engineering, reports such as The Engineer of 2020 and Innovation with Impact have helpedunderscore the significance of preparing engineering students with multidisciplinary competencies [1-2]. Theannouncement and implementation of Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000) also emphasized the ability ofengineering graduates to function in multidisciplinary teams [3]. At the same time, numerous conference papersand journal articles have recognized the urgent need for multidisciplinary engineering education, while
isolatedfrom the environment and preventing or minimizing its negative impact on the environment is amonumental task that has recently gained momentum. According to the EPA, sustainability is “tocreate and maintain conditions, under which humans and nature can exist in productive harmony,that permit fulfilling the social, economic, and other requirements of present and futuregenerations”(1). Sustainable engineering is a process of practicing engineering withoutcompromising on the quality of the environment. Sustainable engineering therefore utilizes amultidisciplinary approach of balancing social, economic, and environmental aspirationscombined with good practices of engineering design, thus closing the gap between technology andthe community(2). The
foundthat team conflict is highly negatively correlated with team performance and team enjoyment incapstone design courses, with 1 in 4 students reporting that they experienced significant conflict,with the majority of cases consisting of conflict of a personal, or relationship, nature [1].In 2015, a series of teamwork training modules were developed by the Teamwork Clinic throughthe collaboration of various departments on campus [2]. Each of the six modules were designedto integrate seamlessly into courses with large or lengthy design projects, with the goal thatstudents apply what they learn directly to their team processes and team projects. This papercontinues to expand on work that has been published about the first four teamwork modules inthe
communities in our city through research, training, and communityengagement. The importance of involving undergraduate and graduate students in all stages ofthis work, as well as creating career opportunities for them, is emphasized.BackgroundUrban universities have an increasingly important role in the growth and development of citiesand their communities. According to the Coalition of Urban Serving Universities, in the pastquarter century urban universities have recognized the many challenges facing their cities andhave increased their engagement efforts to address pressing community issues [1]. In the processof expanding their community engagement, universities are providing opportunities to studentsto broaden their education, be involved in real
. From this process, as ranked list was produced and the dean of the collegechose several ideas for to focus on, some of which are in the process of being implemented.After implementation began, a survey was conducted with faculty to explore their perceptionsabout the value of the town hall process. A large majority of respondents felt heard through thisprocess and would participate again in a future forum.KeywordsTown hall, Education Ideas, Retention, Student Success, interdisciplinary collaborationIntroductionThis paper extends on work published at the ASEE Southeast Section Conference in March of2020 [1]. The research project itself was inspired by the ASEE’s Interdivisional Town HallMeeting held at the National Conference in 2017 [2]. A
fundamental concept that is commonly taught in foundational engineering classes inthe “middle years” where students often struggle to find relevance [1], [2]. Instructors deliverlectures on the processing, production, storage and delivery of energy for industrial andhousehold purposes. There are discussions about the resources used to create energy and how tobetter use those resources. Sometimes engineering considerations of energy focus on quantitiesand numbers involving efficiency and costs. Energy continues to be one of those engineeringtopics that is siloed and discussed in isolation without a social, cultural, or environmentalcontext.The conceptualization of energy within a sociotechnical framework is critical for the formationof future
Challenges and the engineering solutions that address them. It will alsoinclude insights gained from its design, development, and initial offering, and offerrecommendations for future work.IntroductionMany institutions across the United States, and internationally, have established an NAE GrandChallenges Scholars Program (GCSP), which aims to prepare engineering graduates not onlywith technical skills, but also with social skills and global awareness. Students in this programengage in various curricular, co-curricular, and extracurricular activities, all focused on anoverarching Grand Challenges theme, to help them achieve the following five competencies: (1)Talent competency; (2) Multidisciplinary competency; (3) Viable business
needs. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work in Progress: Integrating Writing throughout the Engineering CurriculumIntroductionCommunication skills continue to be a top ‘soft skill’ many employers consider weak, whileeducators believe engineering students possess strong communication skills upon graduation [1],[2]. In fact, in an ASME survey where 647 industry supervisors, 42 department heads, and 590early-career engineers responded to a question on mechanical engineering graduates strengthsand weaknesses, there was a discrepancy in how industry rated communication skills compare tothe other two groups [1]. Only 9% of the
Work in Progress: Introducing negotiating skills in capstone courseIntroductionEmployers of 21st century engineering and technical students are looking for individuals who inaddition to their technical skills, also possess soft skills. Those soft skills include at a minimumcommunication, teamwork, and interpersonal skills. Several studies have recommendedrevisions to existing engineering and technical curriculums to incorporate soft skills [1-3]. Inaddition to industry professionals indicating a desire for increased soft skills in graduates,students also see the need for additional exposure while in school [4]. Because there is no formaldefinition of soft skills, it is necessary to determine for each
she mentors 1-2 young undergraduates in the NSF REU program for 10 weeks, advocating and training for a graduate education. And for 4 years running now, she has made and demonstrated an Augmented Reality Sandbox for the annual summer science and engineering festival at WPI, TouchTomorrow.Dr. Katherine C. Chen, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Dr. Katherine C. Chen is the Executive Director of the STEM Education Center at Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI). Her degrees in Materials Science and Engineering are from Michigan State University and MIT. Her research interests include pre-college engineering education, teacher education, and equity in education. American
discipline focused onthe creation of smart and autonomous systems and processes in an integrated and interdisciplinaryfashion towards improving the quality of human lives. Despite the growing need for MREprofessionals and increasing numbers of undergraduate and graduate degree programs, this fielddoes not yet enjoy recognition as a distinct and identifiable discipline.A distinct and identifiable engineering discipline must address four questions: 1) What is the bodyof knowledge that practitioners must master? 2) What skills must practitioners demonstrate? 3)What are the ways of thinking that permeate the discipline? 4) How do practitioners define anddistinguish the discipline? Within the MRE community, there is disagreement over how thesequestions
, 2003 Distinguished Teacher Award, and 2012 Inaugural Distin-guished Award for Excellence in the category Inspiration through Leadership. Moreover, he is a recipientof 2014-2015 University Distinguished Teaching Award at NYU. His scholarly activities have included3 edited books, 9 chapters in edited books, 1 book review, 63 journal articles, and 164 conference pa-pers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 40 M.S., and 5 Ph.D. thesis students; 64 undergraduate research studentsand 11 undergraduate senior design project teams; over 500 K-12 teachers and 130 high school studentresearchers; and 18 undergraduate GK-12 Fellows and 59 graduate GK-12 Fellows. Moreover, he di-rects K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach programs that enrich the STEM
vision for Engineering in the 21stcentury: “Continuation of life on the planet, making our world more sustainable, secure, healthy,and joyful” [1]. To prepare engineering graduates who possess not only strong technical skillsbut also the global awareness and social skills necessary to tackle the challenges, the GrandChallenges Scholars Program (GCSP) was proposed and established by three engineering Deansin the U.S. and endorsed by the NAE as an educational supplement to any engineering programboth within the U.S. and internationally. To date, over 90 institutions have established their ownGCSP. They all aim to prepare graduates who have achieved the following five competenciesidentified by NAE GCSP [2]: 1. Talent Competency: mentored
in appreciation of course relevance of both theengineering course and composition course. This project is significant as the results from thisstudy will be used to better design and link interdisciplinary curriculum and leverage topics inand between all cohorted classes.IntroductionThe importance of writing and communication skills to the academic and professional pursuits offuture engineers is well established. ABET lists an “ability to communicate with a range ofaudiences” as a student outcome for the accreditation of undergraduate engineering programs[1].Writing specialists have long sought to identify and develop “reliable ways” of helping studentsprepare for the writing situations they will likely encounter as engineers [2, p. 318]. Yet
associates to be successful researchers and professionals. At times,faculty members may not be trained to be effective mentors and do not have a toolkit of mentoringskills to rely on when inevitable mentoring challenges occur. While there is significant evidencepointing to the value of promoting strong mentorship for research students, there are very fewmentors who receive effective mentor training and mentors often rely solely on their pastexperiences and on observations of other mentors to build their own mentoring styles [1-2].Therefore, it is vital to provide appropriate training for faculty mentors in effective mentoring sothat they can aid their students to be as successful as possible during their formal studies andthroughout their research
years that focus on community outreach and service. Theseprojects include a community bike rental station, an automated greenhouse for a K-8 school, andassistive technologies for employees with disabilities. These new projects exist along with“traditional” competition-based capstone projects such as Formula FSAE.Given these two classes of multidisciplinary capstone projects, we examine the experiences ofthe students, faculty, and community partners during the transition to new service-learningcapstone projects. Specifically, we report on interviews conducted: (1) with faculty to understandtheir administrative and instructional challenges in adding service-based capstone projects, (2)with community-partners and their perceptions of working with
real-world research projects with team members from multiple disciplines hashelped these undergraduates to gain experiences outside their own disciplines. This has aidedthem in developing diverse skill sets that are described in terms of: interdisciplinary experiences,links between their classroom learning and lab experiences, academic and professional skills,impacts of faculty and graduate mentoring, and impacts on academic and career decisions.1. IntroductionIn order to tackle the multifaceted problems of the 21st century, industries often engageemployees from multiple disciplines to solve a single problem. Although, industries haverecognized the need for interdisciplinary collaborations, the departmental structures in collegesand
, computer engineering, and computerscience majors compose the ECCS Department. A sixth major, engineering education (EngEd),is housed within the college but is not part of any department. There is no graduate program inthe college.The senior design project, or capstone, has been a required part of each engineering major sincethe 1980s. Each department developed its course independently, and they remained independentuntil combined for the 2016-17 academic year. So long as each capstone project was containedentirely within one department, the separate capstone courses served their purpose well. But in2004, the college began to experiment with multidisciplinary capstone projects.1 Since then, theproportion of projects involving multiple engineering
retain global leadership inscience and technology [1]. As of 2017, the 300,000 degrees awarded annually are “only afraction” of the needed STEM degrees [2]. As has been noted by others [e.g.3, 4], one desirableapproach to addressing the U.S. need for additional engineering graduates is to focus efforts onrecruiting and retaining women and underrepresented groups into engineering. Accordingly,researchers have been exploring ways to draw more women and underrepresented minorities intoSTEM and have found that degree flexibility, greater integration of multiple disciplines,authentic learning challenges, and dynamic and collaborative approaches to teaching andlearning are all critical to making increases [2]. While not simple, making changes to
data literacy is becoming an increasingly important concern in higher education[1, 2]. For engineers, statistics is probably more aligned with the concept of information literacythan any other course that will be studied. While it may be going too far to say that the entiretyof an introductory statistics course is a vital component to every undergraduate engineeringprogram, it is probably safe to say that certain statistics topics are essential. For engineers,working with data and experimentation are just a fact of life. This fundamental realization,coupled with an opportunity stemming from recent changes to the university’s general educationprogram, has motivated us to begin a process to redesign an introductory statistics course thatresides
discussed regarding thenecessity for engineers who can work on multidisciplinary teams, produce engineering solutionsthat balance multiple perspectives, synthesize knowledge to solve complex problems, andcommunicate their ideas to diverse audiences [1]-[2]. More importantly, the Engineer of 2020report described the importance for engineers who can be open to “nonengineering disciplinessuch as science, social science, and business [2, p. 50].” This highlights the need to investigatehow students become aware of interdisciplinary engineering education as an option, as well as tounderstand the experiences of students who do not identify with the curriculum structures oftraditional engineering disciplines.Prior engineering education work has
M16A4 external and internalparts and 3D animations for maintenance and troubleshooting procedures. The proposedapproach can be applied to other similar weapons/equipment with minimal changes. The projectwill also conduct preliminary research on software framework, interface, and file structures foreasy integration of different objects under the same AR application.This project contains several major tasks: 1) 3D modeling of the weapon, including all internaland external parts to be displayed in the AR application, 2) 3D printing of the weapon mockupthat only requires the external parts converted from the file format used in Task 1 and furtheroptimization of the model for 3D printing, 3) software development in Unity that utilizes mobiledevices
classrooms and labs of dozens of New York City public schools. He received NYU Tandon’s 2002, 2008, 2011, and 2014 Jacobs Excellence in Education Award, 2002 Jacobs Innovation Grant, 2003 Distinguished Teacher Award, and 2012 Inaugural Distin- guished Award for Excellence in the category Inspiration through Leadership. Moreover, he is a recipient of 2014-2015 University Distinguished Teaching Award at NYU. His scholarly activities have included 3 edited books, 9 chapters in edited books, 1 book review, 62 journal articles, and 154 conference pa- pers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 35 M.S., and 5 Ph.D. thesis students; 58 undergraduate research students and 11 undergraduate senior design project teams; over 500 K-12 teachers and
work in progress) Abstract Wrappers are defined as a short form that students complete along with an assignment orexam that focuses on the learning process rather than on the content itself. In this study, studentsare asked to state the perceived “effort,” the amount of time spent completing or studying forrespective assessments and their preparedness to complete both formative and summativeassignments in an Electrical Engineering (SCADA Systems and Design) and MechanicalEngineering (Dynamics) class. As expected, scores on formative assessments are mildlycorrelated with summative assessments. However, results indicate that time spent studying forsummative assessments is not correlated to the summative assessment scores.1
, chemicalrefining, and electric power generation are examples of critical infrastructure that use IndustrialControl Systems (ICS), also known as Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Systems(SCADA), to monitor and control physical processes. ICS are cyber physical systems whichcollect data from sensors monitoring physical processes and use it to control the process vianetworked electronic control of actuators, switches, and valves. Protecting these ICS, and otherslike them, from cyber-attacks is a national priority [1]. The ICS used throughout critical infrastructure are often designed, built, operated, andmaintained by engineers from domains related to the physical process being controlled. Forexample, chemical engineers design refineries, civil
developedthrough the construction of a design-based task. Often, DBL is challenge driven, where learnersseek to find a solution to a complex problem through a project-based approach [5], [7]. The useof DBL tends to be within a single discipline (e.g., only electrical engineers) [4] or as means of“unifying” or mixing sub-disciplines (e.g., electrical, mechanical, and civil engineers) [11].Recent movements towards multidisciplinary learning in higher education have called for thedesign process found science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) to be blendedwith the artistic and creative process of the arts. Often referred to as STEAM or STEM + Art [1],[8], this approach aims to pique student interest through opportunities to engage in