Paper ID #7102Developing Interdisciplinary Research Partners: The Learning by InnovativeNeuro Collaborations Research UREDr. Barbara Burks Fasse PhD, Georgia Institute of Technology Barbara Burks Fasse is the Director of Learning Sciences Innovation and Research in the Coulter De- partment of Biomedical Engineering (BME) at Georgia Tech. Dr. Fasse studies the efficacy and value of student-centered learning initiatives and reform pedagogy, specifically Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning, in classrooms, instructional labs, capstone design, and undergraduate research experiences. She joined the BME faculty in 2007
skills. This can be done by attending to the general education intent ofthe course throughout, not just in selected lessons designed to support specific outcomes on thegeneral education rubric. The course fuses engineering literacy with cognitive and affectiveknowledges and reflexivity and attempts to emulate Heywood’s ideal of “a liberal education thatenlarges the mind” rather than “the study of a range of disparate subjects that apparently have noconnection with one another” [5].This paper presents the author’s experience of incorporating historical, social, political, andeconomic lenses into the introductory engineering course by assigning team projects to addresschallenges of COVID-19 in refugee camps.The project assignment was intended to
where, when etc. That is why; when I was a student, I hated history. I always thought why I would learn about what war was fought in what age and who did what when it has nothing to do with my life.The professional engineer went on to suggest, “You can make a difference if you tell itlike its story so that it sticks in your mind, and makes it interesting.” For many yearswhile serving as a history instructor at a community college I frequently heard similarstatements from the best students in STEM fields.STEMstoryEducation has undergone a revolution in a generation. Many of us learned handwriting ingrade school, read Dick and Jane primers, performed calculations on a slide ruler, studiedmechanical drawing, and took vocational
Exercise. (2010). at 11. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. & Cocking, R. R. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. (National Academy Press, 1999). at 12. Michael, D. R. & Chen, S. L. Serious games: Games that educate, train, and inform. (Muska & Lipman/Premier-Trade, 2005). at 13. White, B. Y. & Frederiksen, J. R. Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students. Cogn. Instr. 16, 3–118 (1998).14. Smith, P. L. & Ragan, T. J. Instructional design. (Wiley New York, NY, 1999)15. Wankat, P. C. Improving engineering and technology education by applying what is known about how people learn. J. SMET Educ. Innov. Res. 3, 3–8 (2002).16. Kubiszyn, T. &
care systems ('bedside'). An integrated Engineering-Rehabilitation Livinglaboratory should be set up that can provide a common workplace where engineering minds andmedical minds will likely create fruitful synergies and innovative outcome. Secondly, theconcepts and prototypes can be quickly developed and tested with the end-users i.e., doctors, Page 23.527.15therapists and patients in the very environment in which the end product will be used. An ideallocation for such a lab will be somewhere closer to the hospital premises.ConclusionThe Engineering in Medicine program is a unique academic program with promising results. Theprogress of the
Paper ID #5697Learning Outcomes from an Art-Engineering Co-curricular CourseProf. John J. Marshall PhD, University of Michigan John Marshall’s research focuses on: design methods; tangible interaction; and cross-disciplinary collabo- ration. He has a collaborative approach to designing, making and teaching that recognizes the boundaries of the problem being addressed, not the artificial boundaries of traditionally-defined disciplinary practice. Marshall is an Assistant Professor at the Stamps School of Art & Design and an Assistant Professor of Architecture at the Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning
engineers 1 2than womenEngineers fix things 3 Page 23.139.10Engineering makes a good contribution to 2 1societyWhen the Kinesiology students were asked “What is the first word which comes to mind when Isay engineer?”, they said contractor, designer, and studious. When asked “What is the first wordwhich comes to mind when I say engineering?”, they answered building, structure, and design.Finally, they were asked “What expectations do you have about working with engineeringstudents on an adapted physical activity design project?” Answers included: I
Paper ID #5997Assessing Student and Employer Satisfaction in a Liberal Arts/EngineeringBachelor of Arts DegreeDr. Michael Haungs, California Polytechnic State University Michael Haungs is an Associate Professor in the Computer Science Department at California Polytechnic State University. He received his B.S. degree in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research from the University of California, Berkeley, his M.S. degree in Computer Science from Clemson University, and his Ph.D in Computer Science from the University of California, Davis. Over the last 8 years, Dr. Haungs has been actively involved in curriculum
AC 2011-2599: A SCALE DYNAMIC MODEL FOR FIRE PROTECTIONEDUCATIONAhmed Cherif Megri, University of Wyoming Dr. Ahmed Cherif Megri, associate professor of architectural engineering at the University of Wyoming (UW), teaches several HVAC and energy courses. Dr. Megri is also teaching a course titled ”Compre- hensive Performance of Building Envelope and HVAC Systems” for Summer School at UW, and ”Smoke and Fire Dynamics” during summer session at Concordia University, Canada. His research areas include airflow modeling, zonal modeling, energy modeling, and artificial intelligence modeling using the support vector machine learning approach. Prior to his actual position at UW, he was an assistant professor and the
, details of the semi-structuredtime block used, our grading approaches and rubrics, student and instructor reactions, challengesand opportunities identified, and guidance on the circumstances under which we recommendusing this approach.Of note, student feedback indicating that students felt ‘like a real engineer’ and thought theywould remember this exercise far better and for far longer than wiping their mind of thecramming before a typical exam. While the level of technical analysis during the exercise did notrise to the level of a typical final exam, in all courses, students had been tested on most of thecontent during partial exams. Instead, students had to display a higher level of ‘real world’ skillsincluding problem-solving on an open-ended
Paper ID #30599Partnering Undergraduate Engineering Students with Preservice Teachersto Design and Teach an Elementary Engineering Lesson through Ed+gineeringDr. Kristie Gutierrez, Old Dominion University Dr. Gutierrez received her B.S. in Biology from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 2001, M.Ed. in Secondary Science Education in 2005 from the University of North Carolina at Wilmington, and Ph.D. in Science Education in 2016 from North Carolina State University. Dr. Gutierrez is currently serving as an Assistant Professor of Science Education in the Department of Teaching and Learning at Old Dominion
– Situation, Self, Support, and Strategies in Schlossberg’s model ofadult transition [15]. Schlossberg’s model has implications for engineering students who mustenvisage themselves in new roles as a working adult, resulting in changed routines, expectations,and relationships.Communication and Perspective-takingPerspective-taking, or adopting the view of another, has long been associated with enhancedcognitive empathy. A natural phenomenon in conversation [16], perspective-taking allows us toaccurately understand the mind of another, and the term is applied to spatial and social domains.Visual perspective-taking tasks have been linked with enhanced cognitive empathy performance[17-20], and some studies suggest virtual reality modalities may be
Paper ID #28751Two Student Workshops on Identifying and Resolving Teamwork ConflictDr. Rania Al-Hammoud P.Eng., University of Waterloo Dr. Al-Hammoud is a Faculty lecturer (Graduate Attributes) in the department of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Waterloo. Dr. Al-Hammoud has a passion for teaching where she con- tinuously seeks new technologies to involve students in their learning process. She is actively involved in the Ideas Clinic, a major experiential learning initiative at the University of Waterloo. She is also re- sponsible for developing a process and assessing graduate attributes at the
; Exposition, Vancouver, BC. 10.18260/1-2--17867[15] Purzer, S., Fila, N., & Nataraja, K. (2016), Evaluation of Current Assessment Methods inEngineering Entrepreneurship Education Advances in Engineering Education, 5(1), n1.[16] Besterfield-Sacre, M. E., & Robinson, A. M., & Özaltin, N. Ö., & Shuman, L. J., &Shartrand, A. M., & Weilerstein, P. (2012, June), Essential Factors Related to EntrepreneurialKnowledge in the Engineering Curriculum Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--21338[17] Pistrui, D., & Layer, J. K., & Dietrich, S. L. (2012, June), Mapping the Behaviors, Motives,and Professional Competencies of Entrepreneurially Minded Engineers in Theory and
UnitedStates is better equipped than most other countries to combat these problems, it still is vulnerableas even its latest technologies cannot detect risks in all situations. It is with this in mind that amaster’s level academic program concentrating on Homeland Security and Safety Engineeringhas been developed.The primary challenge of this program is to incorporate an array of courses in engineering andtechnology that are complementary, comprehensive, and relevant. A combination of experiencedprofessionals from academics, public service, and private industries were brought together todevelop a curriculum that identifies the common fundamentals and practices defining boththe theory and effective practice of asset and people protection. Similar input
incorporated with just this end in mind. The prerequisite for the course was set attwo years of high school Spanish, a level that would not intimidate prospective students.This proficiency allowed the course to be taught at the intermediate level. Wirelesslaptop technology was integrated throughout the course, appealing to engineers’ interestin and love of technology. To make the course even more attractive to engineers, it wasdesigned to satisfy the science, technology, and society (STS) requirement of curricula inthe College of Engineering. This was crucial, as the engineering curriculum is Page 12.53.3particularly tight. If the class didn’t satisfy a
AC 2008-1411: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH TO TRANSPORTATIONEDUCATIONGreg Waidley, University of Wisconsin - MadisonJason Bittner, University of Wisconsin - Madison Page 13.188.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 An Interdisciplinary Approach to Transportation EducationAbstractOur current transportation system is a manifestation of the decisions made by transportationprofessionals in our somewhat recent past. Those decisions were influenced by the education thattransportation professionals received and by their approaches to problem solving set forth by aculture imbedded in them throughout their professional lives.We are now acutely aware of the
2006-858: BLANK SLATE ENGINEERING AT FLORIDA GULF COASTUNIVERSITY – INNOVATIVE AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY FROM THEGROUND UPSusan Blanchard, Florida Gulf Coast University SUSAN M. BLANCHARD joined FGCU as Founding Director of the School of Engineering in February 2005. She received the A.B. in Biology from Oberlin College in 1968 and the M.S. and Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from Duke University in 1980 and 1982, respectively. Before moving to FGCU, Dr. Blanchard was the Director of Biomedical Engineering Undergraduate Programs at North Carolina State University and Professor in the joint Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and North Carolina
Paper ID #19218The Journey to One: Teachers’ Transformation in Multidisciplinary Cooper-ation on Engineering EducationDr. Mei-Mei Song, Tamkang University Mei-Mei Song is an Assistant Professor in the Graduate Institute of Futures Studies and the Director of the Center for Futures Intelligence and Research (C-FAR) at Tamkang University in Taiwan. Dr. Song’s teaching and research interests are in futures thinking, futures education, and engineering education. She earned her M.A. and Ed.D. from Teachers College, Columbia University and is a fellow of World Futures Studies Federation (WFSF).Prof. Shang-Hsien Hsieh, National
reviewed eight years of experience by a team of faculty and students developingWERCware to provide social services; several lessons have been learned along the way. Theselessons may also be instructive to other engineering faculty who manage or advise undergraduateengineering projects. To recap, four key lessons learned by the team phrased as suggestions hereinclude 1) keeping the big picture in mind to helps project team members focus on what works toserve the client by effectively meeting the need, not just developing fancy technology, 2) whendeveloping a new product, it helps to start by trying to meet a specific need in a smaller localmarket, and gradually work toward the larger market, 3) grant funding or other support for fieldtesting proves
Paper ID #13767FOCUS in Climate: Flights of Courses Unified for StudentsDr. Deanna H Matthews, Carnegie Mellon University Dr. Deanna H. Matthews is Associate Department Head for Undergraduate Affairs and Assistant Teaching Professor in Engineering and Public Policy, and Education Director and researcher in the Green Design In- stitute at Carnegie Mellon University. In her role in Engineering and Public Policy, Dr. Matthews oversees the undergraduate programs in EPP, including coordination of the undergraduate double major and minor curricula, undergraduate student advising, and teaching introductory courses in
project itself and the research team were multidisciplinary in nature. Theteam was composed of an undergraduate student, midway through a general engineering programwith a concentration in mechanical engineering, and a professor in electrical engineering. Theproject was a second-stage of development for an idea originally developed for a Senior Capstoneproject. The research group for the capstone project consisted of four students of variousengineering concentrations, who ultimately presented their work at a regional conference6.With the above context in mind, the instructor set out to design a research experience that wouldbe challenging and rewarding for the student. In the continuum of process vs product-orientedundergraduate research, the
Media at Polytechnic University (now NYU Polytechnic School of En- gineering), and her Ph.D. in Educational Communication and Technology at New York University. Her mixed methodology research, focusing on interdisciplinary studies, has been presented at numerous na- tional and international conferences and published in peer-reviewed book chapters and journal articles on varied topics such as technical writing, the future of science education, game design, virtual reality, and problem solving. Her book is entitled Cases on Interdisciplinary Research Trends in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Studies on Urban Classrooms (Information Science Reference, 2013).Dr. Candido Cabo, New York City College of
Hispanic respondents. For comparison, only 13% of students indicated thesame level of interest in fulfilling medical school admission requirements, and only 8% ofstudents had the same level of interest in attending law school after completion of anundergraduate engineering degree.Engineering design is a powerful vehicle for math and science learning in K-12 classrooms,standing to improve student learning and achievement in those subjects, and increase studenttechnological literacy, awareness of and interest in pursuing engineering as a career.8 Withengineering, science and math teacher development in mind, engineering design was thereforecarefully woven in and through the fabric of the degree program.Regardless of national need and student
Paper ID #21632International Engineering Student Motivation to Develop CommunicationSkills: a Case for an Integrated Training ApproachJohn Pringle, Vantage College, University of British Columbia John Pringle M.Ed. (Applied Linguistics) has been teaching academic and professional writing for 15 years. He has previously researched the value of Systemic Functional Linguistics as pedagogical tool to teach report writing, and the benefits of collaborative writing on second-language acquisition.Dr. Gabriel Potvin, University of British Columbia, Vancouver Dr. Gabriel Potvin is a faculty member in the Department of Chemical and
in Computer Science at James Madison University.Mr. Matthew Edwin Schumaker Page 23.376.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Designed-for-Motivation based Learning for Large Multidisciplinary Team One Semester Hands-on Network based Course Case Study Dr. Emil H Salib, Joshu A. Erney, Matthew E. Schumaker Integrated Science & Technology Department, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA salibeh@jmu.edu, erneyja@dukes.jmu.edu,schumame@dukes.jmu.edu1. IntroductionA key goal of
AC 2010-2388: ASSESSMENT OF INSTRUCTIONAL SYSTEMS DESIGNMysore Narayanan, Miami University DR. MYSORE NARAYANAN obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool, England in the area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. He joined Miami University in 1980 and teaches a wide variety of electrical, electronic and mechanical engineering courses. He has been invited to contribute articles to several encyclopedias and has published and presented dozens of papers at local, regional, national and international conferences. He has also designed, developed, organized and chaired several conferences for Miami University and conference sessions for a variety of organizations. He is a senior
Paper ID #8104The Comprehension ChallengeDr. Narayanan M. Komerath, Georgia Institute of Technology Professor of Aerospace Engineering. Former chair, Aerospace Division of ASEE. Over 300 papers (120+ refereed), 3 Patents, 15 PhDs and over 160 undergrads guided in research. Team leader, EXROVERT project on learning to innovate on complex systems. Page 23.1174.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 The Comprehension ChallengeAbstractThe need for increased
AC 2007-2538: INTEGRATING BIOMEMS AND BIOMEDICAL MICROSYSTEMSINTO ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION: A THREE-YEAR PILOTSTUDYIan Papautsky, University of Cincinnati IAN PAPAUTSKY received his Ph.D. in bioengineering from the University of Utah in 1999. He is currently a tenured Associate Professor of in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Cincinnati. His research and teaching interests include application of MEMS and microfluidics to biology and medicine.Erik Peterson, University of Cincinnati ERIK T. K. PETERSON received his M.S. in electrical engineering from the University of Cincinnati in 2006, and is currently pursuing his Ph.D. His research interests
integrated Engineers-Without-Borders(EWB) into its formal curriculum through its widely acclaimed Engineering Clinic sequence.Clinic is a required course (from the freshman through senior years) in which multidisciplinaryteams of students carry out independent research projects over the course of one or moresemesters. They are a vital part of the “hands-on, minds-on” curriculum where students applyengineering principles to projects sponsored by industry, government or individuals. EWBprojects present opportunities for students to apply engineering theory to real life problems thatare not only outside of the classroom, but also often outside of their country and culture.Properly addressing the problem required the students to appreciate the societal