experts and their work in relation to environments, technologies, and human lives. Her current research projects deal with earthquake risk management technology in Mexico and the United States, environmental data justice in the US/Mexican borderlands, and the development and practice of engineering expertise.Dr. Gordon D Hoople, University of San Diego Dr. Gordon D. Hoople is an assistant professor of general engineering at the University of San Diego. His research interests lie in microfluidics, rapid prototyping, genomics, engineering ethics, and engineering education. He earned his MS and PhD in mechanical engineering from University of California, Berkeley and a BS in engineering from Harvey Mudd College.Prof
catalogue description for ELMC 461: Students work in teams to design and construct an interdisciplinary project. Teams, with clearly defined individual responsibilities, are required. During the course of the semester, each team undertakes the necessary activities to bring about a successful design project that is well understood, documented, and presented in both oral and written form. Emphasis is placed on research, innovation, project management, decision-making, prototyping, design for manufacturing, design for testability, environmental and ethical issues in design, depth and breadth of analysis, quality of hardware, documentation, and communications. Prerequisites: Junior Status; ELMC160
mathematics, science and engineering b. an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data c. an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability d. an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams e. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g. an ability to communicate effectively (3g1 orally, 3g2 written) h. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and
, pains, challenges, mistakes, etc. of being human. A second goalin developing such narrative is to avoid explanation. Simply tell it. Force the students “into thestory” and give them the power to read between the lines. [6]Design case studies, ethical issues, and real-world problem statements are usually presented innarrative format, but not all engineering documents should be written as stories. Lab reports andproject reports are properly written in a passive third-person, and “Five measurements weremade of the field strength” is preferable to “We measured the field strength five times.”However, story format may be fitting in any section on personal contributions or reflections.Strategic use of stories in class can capture the interest of
describes - "The needs of the workforce are changing (American Society for Engineering Education, 1994; NationalAcademy of Sciences, 1995) … dynamics in the labor market are putting a premium onstudents who have a broad knowledge of different subjects, … and the ability to work inteams. Students educated with a narrow disciplinary focus and in solitary learning stylescan have difficulties adjusting to such an environment. Indeed, such difficulties are adominant theme in the complaints voiced by business leaders about contemporary under-graduate education."In February 2006, the IEEE updated its Code of Ethics by removing the word‘engineering’ from its first point, changing “to accept responsibility in makingengineering decisions” to “to accept
capstone senior designcourse are as follows. The results were presented in the authors’ other paper.6 1. The ability of the students to formulate a problem statement. 2. The ability of the students to generate solutions. 3. The ability of the students to evaluated the generated solutions. 4. The ability of the students to obtain a final design including safety, economic and ethical considerations. 5. The ability of the students to communicate effectively.At the end of the second semester, a similar assessment is conducted by the faculty members andthe industrial sponsors. The five outcomes evaluated for the project are listed below. Theevaluators were asked to rate the outcomes from 1 to 4. The results presented in Table 2
objective of EI courses is to enhance the critical ability of citizens tocomprehend technological systems, to improve their abilities to make intelligent choices.The EI courses should include most of the following characteristics: ≠ Contain well-founded engineering principles; ≠ Relate to engineered systems with which students readily identify, ≠ Involve good science, introductory-level analysis, economics, societal/environmental impact, and such topics as global engagement, ethics, and cultural aspects; ≠ Provide, as appropriate, hands-on laboratory experiences; ≠ Require well-conceived reports based on literature and database searches that include critical assessments and elements of analysis; and ≠ Include basic
also discovered ethical concerns regarding the technology. If a computer is used inthe communication of multiple individuals, how could misuse be detected and controlled?After the opportunity areas were defined, the teams envisioned future scenarios that illustrate animproved operator task flow with the integration of mixed reality technology. A head-mounteddisplay (HMD), the Microsoft HoloLens, was chosen to allow hands free operation. As part ofthe multidisciplinary teamwork, the technical limitations from the mechanical engineering pointof view had to be understood as well as the current limitations regarding the software andhardware of the HMD device.Follow up conversations with engineering lead to a more thorough, holistic understanding
; emphasis on social relevance, service learning, volunteerleadership, and collaboration. These skills can be taught without significant investment.Introduction and emphasis on more soft skills in engineering classes can help students develop Page 23.256.3these skills.In the engineering senior design courses for example, ethics and law (patent and trademark) canbe incorporated in the teachings. These could be in the form of assigned reading, case studies,videos, external lecturers, and webinars from professional organizations like ASME, IEEE, andAIAA. Moreover writing should also be much emphasized, assigned and graded. Further oraland technical
of 2020” 6:• strong analytical skills (science, mathematics, discovery and design),• practical ingenuity, creativity,• communication, business and management,• leadership, high ethical standards, professionalism,• dynamism, agility, resilience, flexibility,• lifelong learners.Engineers Australia lists its required graduate attributes as follows 7 – the emphasis is ours: a) ability to apply knowledge of basic science and engineering fundamentals; b) ability to communicate effectively, not only with engineers but also with the community at large; c) in-depth technical competence in at least one engineering discipline; d) ability to undertake problem identification, formulation and solution
. • Topics: design process, creative design, project management, team work, business basics, product / project lifecycles. (possibly could have ethics and oral/written communication) • Multi-disciplinary project assigned. D. Freshman course • “How Things Work” – show the interdisciplinary nature of engineered products, engineering projects, and their manufacture/construction. • Hands-on laboratory (product teardowns, field trips) E. Suite of Design • Create a suite of design electives organized
research. Transdisciplinary research focuses on societalproblems. Therefore, the research process must take into account the ethical and social factors ofthe problem. Finally, the last category suggested by the developers in the framework isEffectiveness. As Legitimacy focused on the fairness and ethical aspect of the project in regardsto societal needs, Effectiveness of transdisciplinary will determine how the research will make apositive change in its context.Unlike Rubrics 1 and 2, this paper only presents a framework and a prototype rubric. The valuein the proposed Transdisciplinary Quality framework is that it can be used to determine whetheror not the selected project is meeting its research goal. While the researchers tested theframework on
#11 27-31 Loops, Arrays and 4 File I/O Ch 10: Pgs 275-280 Games Simulation and #12 3-7 Design, Project 5, File I/O, User Forms Ch 12: Pgs 299-338 Spring 2013 Project 5 Ethics, Business and Quiz #3 Workbook & Ch 12: Pgs 338-366 Project #5 November #13 10-14
. Those key elements of cooperative learning are highly required in multidisciplinaryindustrial environments and should be incorporated in designing interdisciplinary courses.There is an emerging understanding by many accrediting agencies that our students requirestronger career preparation. The National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE) hasidentified eight career readiness competencies: 1) Professionalism/Work ethic; 2) Oral/Writtencommunications; 3) Critical thinking/Problem solving; 4) Teamwork/Collaboration; 5)Leadership; 6) Digital technology; 7) Career management; 8) Global/Intercultural fluency [10].These competencies are echoed by our governing accrediting bodies, the Association to AdvanceCollegiate Schools of Business (AACSB
, epistemic notions ofprofessional engineering need to be de-constructed. This is a large project and beyond thescope of this paper. However, it is possible, somewhat, to shape engineering curricula throughsubject syllabi. This paper is concerned with the development of a subject syllabus inChemistry and Materials Technology with an emphasis on, what Felder and Brent1 to refer as,independent and contextual knowing. In independent knowing students are exposed to theattitude that a significant proportion of engineering knowledge is uncertain and tools of Page 12.495.3critical thinking and ethical attitudes are required in the decision-making process
communities of practice coming together to solve a particular problem of commonconcern.24 Through defining, designing and making SmartSurfaces the academic communities ofpractice were able to come together as new communities of interest (the teams).As stated above, cross-disciplinarity in education is widely believed to provide valuableexperience. Newell indicates that products of cross-disciplinary courses are: a greaterappreciation of and ability to integrate other’s points of view; an increased ability to evaluate thestatements of experts - particularly in the detection of bias; an increased acceptance ofambiguity; an increased understanding of values and ethics; and an increase in the ability to thinkcreatively.25 It should be noted that these
” experiment we could find,and the ELISA technique is directly applied in a common product: the home pregnancy test.Week Fifteen: “Nano-Ethics”Finally, the course concluded with an interactive discussion on the ethical issues surroundingnew technologies, specifically nanotechnologies. To this end, the class played a Democs “cardgame.” Democs is an acronym for a deliberative meeting of citizens.21 Developed in the UnitedKingdom,22 these are a means for non-experts “to work out, share, and express their views onpublic policy issues.” The “game” is made up of sets of cards (“Issues,” “Information,” and“Story”), and is not played to win, but sets up a semi-structured group discussion of complextechnical issues through the medium of the cards. It is
engagement LL-c Start earlier in the semester LL-d Everyone doesn’t have to do everything; focus on the process LL-e Being part of something bigger than the individual project has a positive effect on the work ethic of some studentsElectrical and Computer Engineering TeamsThe permanent magnet generator’s (PMG) design is that of a rotor comprised of two quarter-inchthick steel plates with permanent magnets mounted on each plate with alternating north-southorientation, and a stator with enamel coated magnet-wire coils mounted in the gap between therotating magnet plates. Solid models of the rotor were created in SolidWorks and machined onan automated machining center. Three reference rotor designs were
. An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability d. An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams e. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g. An ability to communicate effectively h. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context i. A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning j. A knowledge of contemporary
instructional models without fully discarding them. Though this subjectwas designated to be delivered as a Problem-Based Learning (PBL) subject, the educationalapproach taken was such that the PBL delivery was only a part of a pedagogical toolbox. Themain educational thrust was one of inductive learning and teaching derived from courses suchas creative arts. Aside from PBL, the inductive teaching approach incorporated Case-Based(CBL) and Enquiry- Based learning (EBL) which provided the appropriate pedagogicalscaffolding for knowledge integration. Material technological sciences, manufacturingengineering, engineering design, issues of ethics, sustainability and environment were weavedtogether. Such educational approach was necessary if strictly academic
manner. 5. Ability to use modern computer tools in engineering. 6. Ability to communicate in written, oral, and graphical forms. 7. Ability to work in teams and apply interpersonal skills in engineering contexts. 8. Ability and desire to lay a foundation for continued learning beyond the bachelors’ degree. 9. Awareness of professional issues in engineering practice, including ethical responsibility, safety, the creative enterprise, and loyalty and commitment to the profession. 10. Awareness of contemporary issues in engineering practice, including economic, social, political, and environmental issues and global impactAbility to work in teams appeared to be the most significant skill SEI participants developedafter
onthose beliefs. The program is also grounded in John Dewey’s proposition that higher education isto assist individuals in developing the skills to be effective in their preferred occupation. Thisprogram focuses on developing professional competencies such as people and projectmanagement,leadership, and ethics, as well as perseverance, stress management, and the ability toreflect and modify one’s process of learning. Treveylan’s [9] studies on “the work that engineersdo” call for more emphasis on professional skills such as communication and the ability toperform effectively on teams. Treveylan advocates for students teaching others because“education, like engineering practice, relies on special kinds of social interactions” and thatstudents
strategies to create a conflict resolution plan (based on the case study scenario)1 Ethics approval: Office of Research Ethics #41447 • Considering that some types of conflict can be productive, how did this influence the decision-making in your team? How might this influence the way you approach future teamwork? • Consider the nine attributes of effective teams, which of the attributes may have been lacking in your current team? What steps did you take as a team to strengthen and improve these attributes?A thematic analysis was conducted on these reflection reports to understand where students sawvalue in the conflict modules that they participated in. Each class of students was analyzedindependently to
and outcomes. The department’s adopted outcomes andobjectives are monitored by analysis of the FE results, alumni surveys, employer surveys, anddepartmentally developed assessment tools.The FE results are used extensively to monitor the ability of UT Martin engineering graduates toperform basic engineering and economic analysis. Secondary use involves using the results tomonitor for a basic understanding of ethics. This paper concentrates on the use of the FEexamination scores and problems associated with the use of those scores.CurriculumThe total hours required for the B.S.E degree are 128. In 1999, concentration area electives wereapproved and published in the University catalog. The total number of elective hours requiredwas set at 21
Paper ID #20602The CASCADE Experience: An Innovative Cascaded Peer-Mentoring ProjectDr. Nael Barakat P.E., Texas A&M University, Kingsville Dr. Nael Barakat is a professor of Mechanical Engineering and Associate Dean for Research and Grad- uate Studies at Texas A&M University - Kingsville. He is a registered professional engineer in Ontario, Canada, and a fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). His areas of interest include Controls, Robotics, Automation, Systems dynamics and Integration, Mechatronics and Energy Harvesting, as well as Engineering Ethics, professionalism, and Education. Dr
Paper ID #25641Teaching Across Boundaries: Examining the Institutional Process of Estab-lishing Multidisciplinary CoursesMr. Samuel Aaron Snyder, Virginia Tech Sam Snyder is a first year Ph.D. student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He received his Bachelors of Science in Materials Science and Engineering in 2017 from Virginia Tech. His current research interests are in engineering ethics education, social network analysis, and institutional change.Desen Sevi Ozkan, Virginia Tech Desen is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and holds a B.S. in Chemical and
tasks, optimize flexibility, creativity, and productivity after a sprint per week.”Liberal Arts Core Experience for All StudentsIn designing the core courses, interdisciplinary teams of faculty worked alongside co-designersin learning how to create a curriculum for the context of the institution. The resulting seven corecourses that all students, regardless of major, are expected to complete by the end of their secondyear of study, are intended to transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries and to expose studentsto different ways of thinking. They are: ● Rhetoric ● Scientific Inquiry ● Vietnamese Studies ● Visual Studies ● Ethics and Moral Philosophy ● Logic & Limitations ● Creating & MakingThis common core
, June 26-28, 2018Environmental Forensics: An Authentic Blend of Science, Engineering, and Liberal Arts Ingredients Ashraf Ghaly, Ph.D., P.E., Professor Engineering Department, Union College, Schenectady, NY 12308ABSTRACTEnvironmental forensics is a rich topic that encompasses many technical as well as non-technical fields. These include science, engineering, ethics, law, insurance, society,litigation, policy, economics, pollution/contamination, cleanup, testing, standards, andsustainability. This interesting mixture of subjects provides a fertile ground for aninterdisciplinary course. Sources of environmental problems are usually related toemissions, pollution, contamination, and
ethics, and “soft” skills such asleadership, communication skills, social awareness, etc. Figure 1 illustrates the kind of engineerswe want our graduates to be through the interdisciplinary curricula we designed for them. Figure 1. Goal of our interdisciplinary curriculaMultidisciplinary Design ProjectsThe freshman students matriculated into the JI do not declare a major until the sophomore year.In the first year, all students take an Introduction to Engineering course where they work inteams on self-proposed engineering design projects. In this course, they go through the entireengineering process from an initial idea to the design to manufacturing and finally to a workingprototype. They learn about the skills and
stakeholders, get feedback, and stay in touch with client-defined needs,preferences and priorities. Client communication also helps better inform engineering membersabout cross-disciplinary constraints including social, ethical and legal issues.II. MethodsEngineering Curriculum Parameters: Two Year / Four Semester Project Course SequencePrevious publications addressed the competitive process by which students are selected onteams8, and the way students are assessed9 in our credited engineering project curriculum atMessiah College. However, a few curriculum modifications have occurred in the last coupleyears that will be highlighted here. Recent modifications were motivated by a desire to simplifyrequirements, match assignments to project needs rather