Paper ID #37242Multidisciplinary Engineering Programs: Does Combining Engineering Fo-cusAreas with Courses outside of Traditional Engineering Add Value toStudents’ Degree and Career Pathway?Robert Lijun Wang, University of Colorado, Boulder Robert Wang is currently an Integrated Design Engineering student at the University of Colorado Boulder. His primary areas of study are mechanical engineering and Chinese language and culture. With his studies, Robert is striving towards building a more sustainable future along with connecting engineers’ ideas around the world. Outside of school, he also loves exercising, reading, and
Paper ID #42032Work-in-Progress: The Unique Impact of an Interdisciplinary ExperientialLearning Program on Undergraduate STEM Students’ Career ReadinessDr. Rea Lavi, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Rea Lavi received his Ph.D. degree from the Faculty of Education in Science and Technology, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. He is Lecturer and a Curriculum Designer with the NEET program, School of Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, where he teaches thinking skills to undergraduate students. His research interests in STEM education involve the fostering and
Paper ID #41319Connecting the Dots: Professional Networking for Engineering StudentsDr. Jessica A Kuczenski, Santa Clara University Jes is a Senior Lecturer and Chair of the General Engineering programs at SCU. She teaches a variety of courses including Introduction to Engineering, Introduction to Engineering Prototyping, Community-Based Engineering Design, Career Launch, and Senior Projects.Christelle Sabatier, Santa Clara University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Connecting the Dots: Professional Networking for Engineering
three semesters, starting from the initialoffering of the courses in Fall 2022, indicate that students’ perception of the course is largelypositive. Students in both courses found the courses very valuable in multiple ways. In the paper,detailed survey results will be presented and discussed. Areas for future work will also be shared.Introduction and MotivationAt Arizona State University (ASU), the Grand Challenges Scholars Program (GCSP) is a multi-year co-curricular program that typically spans the entirety of a student’s undergraduatecollegiate career. The majority of GCSP students start their journey in the program as incomingfirst year students or during their first year and continue in the program until they graduate fromtheir
tounderstand what a Ph.D. does in academia, which might discourage them from considering thecareer as a choice. Furthermore, the few who know they want to work in academia may not knowwhether they want to be a teaching-oriented professor or a research-focused professor. Anestablished job shadowing program allows students to decide what is best for them and their futurecareers and consider pursuing a Ph.D. as a valid career choice. A consequence of establishing aprogram like this could be that more students are encouraged to pursue Ph.D. programs,particularly individuals who are underrepresented in academia. This paper presents the results ofreviewing the existing literature on job shadowing programs, analyzes the effects of theseprograms across
InstituteKeywords: education center, HSI, career development, academic servicesAbstractSan Francisco State University is a Hispanic Serving and a Primarily Undergraduate Institutionlocated in the diverse San Francisco Bay Area community. As part of a National ScienceFoundation Hispanic Serving Institute Improving Undergraduate STEM Education grant, theEngineering Success Center was established in late 2021, with an official launch in Spring 2022.SFSU’s School of Engineering is home to 1,400 undergraduate students of which 67% are ethnicminorities, and 18% are female. Surveys conducted through Institutional programs showed thatonly 14% of students attained a position prior to graduation. Within this context, the EngineeringSuccess Center was created to
.”),and three Likert Scale style questions asking students to rate their perceptions of how useful,interesting, and impactful the robotic arm was in their learning and career plans (e.g.,“Howinteresting do you think it was to use the robotic arm for learning activities?”) [17]. We structuredthe survey in this way to provide students an opportunity to discuss the robotic arm unpromptedfirst, before we specifically addressed those activities. We conducted this survey at the end of thesemester, prior to final exams to assess students’ complete experiences of the course. As part ofthe consent process, participants had the opportunity to grant access to assignment grades to beused in the research. Thirty-six participants consented to having their
KPMG. He has a Ph.D. in I/O Psychology from Northern Illinois University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Using Science to support and develop employees in the tech workforce - an opportunity formulti-disciplinary pursuits in engineering educationSreyoshi Bhaduri, Marina Dias, Amulya Mysore, Robert Pulvermacher, Amelia Rivera-Burnett,Shahriar Sadighi, Wanqun Zhao12IntroductionThe majority of students who choose to major in engineering do so to become a part of thecommunity of practice of professional engineers (Johri & Olds, 2011), meaning that they want tohave adequate exposure to what a career as a professional engineer could potentially be as part oftheir college experience. However
students see themselves as engineers af-ter graduation [5]. Critically, studies have shown students transition from interest in engi-neering, to seeing engineering as an option, and finally choosing to become an engineer in avery short period of time [6]. Additionally, short interventions (like a one-day versus multi-day experience) have been shown to have similar outcomes for attracting diverse students totechnology careers [7]. We envision our intervention operating as a vicarious experience [8],which enhances self-efficacy.In robotics, research from educators indicates that robotics education has a unique opportu-nity to promote diverse participation, including meaningful applications, tactile robotic sys-tems, and well scaled projects. Still
].The second possibility for expanding access offers depth over breadth. Stacking multiple high-impact practices has been demonstrated to hold potential as a multiplier effect [13,4,14-15].Where experiencing a single high-impact practice is good, experiencing more than one can beeven better. In this study we ask, To what extent does stacking additional high-impact practiceson top of course-based PBL provide additional benefits for students? We examine this potentialvalue in terms of the range of benefits previously associated with PBL: developing professionalskills and mindsets, as well as building content mastery; improving self-efficacy and ownershipover learning; and career preparedness. We then extend these well-established impacts of PBLby
. What did you wish to get out of joining this team and did you get what you wanted through working on said team? 3. What has been the most useful experience or lesson you have learned from being on your respective engineering competition teams? 4. Tell me about a time you used a skill or experience from your engineering competition team outside of school? 5. What aspects of being on said engineering competition team were the most important to you? 6. Do feel that your engineering competition experience has helped open doors or helped in your career goals? If so, in what ways? 7. What do you feel that you’ve used the most in the real world or in your career, your a. class knowledge, or your experiences you
Scholars Program: Students’ Perceptions Across Three YearsAbstractThis work seeks to understand students’ perceived value of their participation in a multi-year co-curricular program, the Grand Challenges Scholars Program (GCSP), at Arizona State University(ASU) and explore how these perceptions vary between students at different class levels.Students in the GCSP engage in multidisciplinary, entrepreneurial, multicultural, research, andservice learning activities throughout their undergraduate collegiate career, in order to gaindiverse perspectives about global challenges related to a Grand Challenges theme (Health, Joy ofLiving, Security or Sustainability). At ASU, GCSP students are also encouraged to connect withtheir peers
reflections of members from a multi-disciplinaryteam. Even though the focus of this particular group is software based, the take-aways for multi-disciplinary collaboration will apply across non-software teams as well. Ultimately, this paperaffords an opportunity for educators to expand on examples of how multiple disciplines cometogether in the tech/engineering workforce. Additionally, the paper implores engineers to engagein lifelong learning as they interact with increasingly multi-disciplinary teams in the workplace.BackgroundMost students who choose to major in engineering do so to become a part of the community ofpractice of professional engineers [1], meaning that they want their college experience to includeadequate exposure to what a career
]. Undergraduate research experiences (UREs) are believed to be an important approach foractively engaging students, a key goal of these teaching reforms. Such experiences are seen as vital for thebroader aims of increasing inclusivity and expanding participation in STEM fields. UREs have madeimportant contributions to the career development and success of many students. Practitioners often credittheir early undergraduate research experiences as pivotal in shaping their professional paths [1]. Inrecognition of this, the National Science Foundation has provided substantial funding to give studentsvaluable opportunities to participate in UREs. These opportunities have been shown to help preparestudents for further studies and careers [1], [2], [3
financial need and help them to succeed instudies and careers within an urban setting. To achieve this goal, the collaborators have built onresearch, best practices, and evidence-based findings from other projects including severalcollaborators’ NSF/DUE S-STEM and STEP projects.2-1. GoalsThere are six overarching goals of the Urban STEM Collaboratory project. All project activities,evaluation, and research efforts were designed with these goals in mind. The six goals include:Goal 1. Increase the recruitment, retention, student success, and graduation rates of academicallytalented undergraduate mathematical sciences and engineering majors with financial need.Goal 2. Implement strategies and activities that contribute to student academic success
Biological and Agricultural Engineering at Louisiana State University and her Ph.D. in Biological Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech. Her research is related to hydrology, reclamation, ecological engineering, and engineering education.Dr. Saundra Johnson Austin, University of South Florida Dr. Saundra Johnson Austin has dedicated her career to promoting diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging of elementary, middle, and high school students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education and careers. Her research is grounded in the effective implementation of STEM curricula in urban middle schools. She has published and presented on STEM education and organizational change. Dr. Johnson Austin
contributed to the training and development of faculty in developing and evaluating various engineering curriculum and courses at UPRM, applying the outcome-based educational framework. She has also incorporated theories on social cognitive career choices and student attrition mitigation to investigate the effectiveness of institutional interventions in increasing the retention and academic success of talented engineering students from economically disadvantaged families. She’s also involved in a project that explores the relationship between the institutional policies at UPRM and faculty and graduate students’ motivation to create good relationships between advisors and advisees.Dr. Christopher Papadopoulos, University of
, higher education institutions (HEI)have started matching such industry needs. HEIs are initiating having students work acrossboundaries of sector, discipline, and identity. Students are being prepared for intersectoralcollaboration and multiple career pathways in a workforce that will change more rapidly incoming years. Students are enabled to join multidisciplinary teams with people who approachproblems with different methods and knowledge, and to solve problems in diverse groups interms of culture, race/ethnicity/nationality, gender or socioeconomic status.The International Research Experience for Students (IRES) program of NSF contributes todevelopment of a diverse, globally engaged higher education workforce with world-class skills.Within
addition, studies on students’ experiences ingraduate programs stress that interdisciplinary graduate students often struggle to developpositive senses of identity, belonging, and motivation necessary for pursuing interdisciplinarywork as early-career academics [25], [26], [27]. They are challenged to understand and integratediscipline-based expectations of Ph.D.s [15] and to find and sustain the kinds of collaborativeinterdisciplinary experiences necessary for their persistence in interdisciplinary engineering anddesign careers, often with little support [9], [17], [26], [28], [29]. These barriers suggest that weneed to develop more robust understandings first of how students conceptualize interdisciplinarywork, which in turn can help inform
Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Susquehanna Section CapstoneAward for the design and development of "smart" shoes that can track the wearer’s weight, steps,and distance (see Figure 1). He proposed the idea of smart shoes himself and worked with histechnical advisor to develop and build a prototype.Six colleges from the region competed in the IEEE competition that year. "The 2022 SecondAnnual IEEE Capstone Competition” had many well-planned and well-engineered projectsubmissions. All of these project submissions have demonstrated the technical, the practicalskills, and the innovation needed for these students to graduate and begin their careers asengineers,” said Luis Carlos Torres Jr., IEEE Susquehanna Section past chair and awardscommittee chair. The
. This major would have students take an Introduction to Engineering Design class,Statics, Materials, complete an external project, and do a one-semester capstone. Thisengineering curriculum would be supported by math, physics and chemistry courses, includingelectronics and thermodynamics through the physics department. The initial engineering sciencedegree was not meant to be an ABET-accredited degree but a pathway for students interested inengineering to gain engineering training while integrating other interests such as business,environmental science, and data science. This degree was intended to provide strong preparationfor careers in areas such as entrepreneurship, project management, architecture/design,government technology policy
of 2020 report [5, p. 125], noting “The questionsof… how much specialization there should be at the undergraduate level, how to preparestudents for careers that include both technical and managerial tracks, and how to meet the needsand expectations of society all seem timeless.” This tension is echoed in a more recent 2018NAE report [6]. Bear and Skorton [7] state, “the notion that disciplinary specialization andtechnical depth are the only important prerequisites for employment turns out to be false.” Kingand Pister [8] also advocate for broadening engineering Bachelor’s degrees, and present a varietyof ideas to achieve this aim.According to data from the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) [9] only asmall number of students
CertificationStudies of STEM schools have presented mixed findings regarding the impact of certification onstudent achievement. For example, authors of a quantitative study aimed to understand thedifference in college and career readiness of fourth- and fifth-grade students attending STEMcertified and non-certified elementary schools [9]. The results of their study illuminated onesignificant relationship, such that students at STEM schools displayed higher English LanguageArts (ELA) median growth percentiles than students at non-certified schools. Findings amongother subjects and grade levels were insignificant, however. Similarly, a study of third- and fifth-grade students identified a positive relationship between attending a STEM-certified school
, “Work in Progress: Development and Facilitation of aNew Certificate/Class for Undergraduate Teaching Assistants in Engineering and ComputingPrograms,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Baltimore, Maryland,USA: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/44221[2] D. Lopatto, “Undergraduate Research Experiences Support Science Career Decisions andActive Learning,” CBE-Life Sci. Educ., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 297–306, Dec. 2007, doi:10.1187/cbe.07-06-0039.[3] S. Kaul, C. W. Ferguson, P. M. Yanik, and Y. Yan, “Importance of UndergraduateResearch: Efficacy and Student Perceptions,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & ExpositionProceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2016
-technicalaudiences, such as users, managers, and other professionals. Therefore, in addition toengineering coursework, technical oral and written communication skills help prepare studentsfor their future careers. The Society for Technical Communication defines technicalcommunication as “a user-centered approach for providing the right information, in the rightway, at the right time so that the user’s life is more productive” [2]. Over the past two decades,many institutions have established technical communication labs to guide and train students inthese technical communication skills, emphasizing oral and written communication for business,engineering, and the sciences over the humanities. Compared to technical communication labs, writing centers
to big University campusesAbstractThe primary purpose of a Satellite-University campus structure is to make higher education easilyaccessible to a diverse group of students in remote locations. The satellite campus aims to providethe same wholesome College / University experience as any other large University campus. Thecollege experience is one of the most exciting and transformative times in a student’s life. Thestudents not only look forward to a quality education in a discipline of their choice, but also get toexplore their true calling in terms of gaining, understanding, and honing their skillsets towardstheir dream career, while cultivating strong dependable relationships with their fellowcollegemates. The Satellite-University campus
Polytechnic Institute and State University. In 1987 he joined the Department Electrical and Computer Engineering at UMASS Lowell as its Analog Devices Career Development Professor. Dr. Thompson has served on the executive boards of the Cooperative Research Fellowship program of Bell Laboratories (1991-1999) and the AT&T Labs Fellowship Program (1996-2006). At Bell Laboratories Dr. Thompson created with the Vice President of Research and Nobel laureate, Arno Penizas, the W. Lincoln Hawkins Mentoring Excellence Award (1994). This award is given to a member of the research staff for fostering the career growth of Bell Labs students and associates. This award is ResearchAˆ¨ os highest honor for mentoring contributions. In
to study) 29% 15% Organizational skills (keeping track of homework, complaints 17% 15% about using ecampus, all different programs they need to use, finding what they need to complete work) Juggling other responsibilities (job, sports, team, fraternities, 10% 23% etc.) Extenuating family circumstances 0 3%Example excerpts from each topic analyzed in the reflective essays are provided below:TIME MANAGEMENT: “I have honestly struggled with time management throughout mywhole school career. It’s just hard to find time to hang out with my newly made friends andcomplete all my school work with time to spare
future careers in engineering. Students did most of their projectwork in our fabrication lab equipped with a laser cutter, a CNC machine, several UltiMaker 3Dprinters, and some power tools. They also had access to our circuits lab equipped with solderingstations, fume hoods, and circuit measurement and testing instruments. The faculty mentors gavea few short tutorials on how to use the equipment and topics related to the projects. Most of thetime was dedicated to hands-on project-based learning. Students also presented their iterativedesigns every other week to the entire SEI group, and showcased their projects to the public withposters and demonstrations at the school-hosted exposition of summer programs.The development of a 5 Degrees-of
,this method of instruction does not encourage deep thought or investigation into the significanceof standards and standardization. The need for improved integration of professional standards inengineering education has been long recognized [1].The inclusion of standards in the senior capstone course is part of the ABET accreditationprocess for engineering programs [2], and many students begin to develop a deeperunderstanding of the importance of codes and standards through the capstone experience. Thecertificate program described in this paper is designed to develop this deeper understanding ofcodes and standards earlier in a student’s academic career. The certificate program focuses onthe role of codes and standards within the engineering