the start of the Fall Semester. These requirements were established to ensureacademic equilibrium among participants.To elaborate on the application process, each prospective participant underwent an interview toassess their interests and understanding of sustainability concepts. Questions concerned theirperceptions of sustainability, its potential applications within their engineering-focuseduniversity curriculum, and how they envisioned integrating sustainability principles into theirfuture careers. The responses collected during these interviews were analyzed to establish apreliminary ranking of candidates. This ranking was further evaluated by two university facultymembers, each with distinct expertise: one specializing in sustainability
learners’ beliefs, monitoring, and control of test-enhanced learning. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 823-862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09578-2[42] Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher, R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough, J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.) & FABBS Foundation, Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 56–64). Worth Publishers.[43] Soderstrom, N. C., & Bjork, R. A. (2015). Learning versus performance: An integrative review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 176-199. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1745691615569000[44] Kirk-Johnson, A
Paper ID #41385Work-In-Progress: Holistic, Multi-disciplinary Systems Approach to TeachingSustainable and Contextual Engineering Concepts for Undergraduate StudentsDr. Courtney Pfluger, Northeastern University Dr. Courtney Pfluger is an Associate Teaching Professor at Northeastern University. In 2011, began as an Assistant Teaching Professor in First-year Engineering Program where she redesigned the curriculum and developed courses with sustainability and clean water themes. In 2017, she moved to ChE Department where she has taught core courses and redesigned the Capstone design course with inclusion pedagogy practices
, University of Connecticut Davis Chacon Hurtado, Ph.D., is an assistant research professor at UConn. He co-directs the Engineering for Human Rights Initiative, which is a collaboration between UConn’s Office of the Vice Provost for Research, the School of Engineering, and the Human Rights Institute, to promote and advance interdisci- plinary research in engineering with a clear focus on societal outcomes. Davis is working with a number of faculty on campus to develop research and curriculum at the intersection of human rights and engi- neering, such as the one discussed herein. Davis completed his Ph.D. in Transportation and Infrastructure Systems at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana, in 2018. His research
time the course is completed, therefore it is becoming imperative that we leverage the 0 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 2022299latest advances in neuroscience that highlight the need to focus on building new neuron inter-connects via experiential learning design to form an Integral Engineer[7].The educational sector is currently facing several significant challenges. These include : 1)the implementation of remote labs [1], 2) the need for skills specific to the semiconductorworkforce [9], and 3) the development of soft skills that are crucial for succeeding in today’sjob market [14][27].This paper sets out with a clear and focused objective: to use 21st-century tools such
courses will be offeredseparately.This unique background sets the stage of the 5-DOF robotic arm project presented in this paper.The first prototype was developed by a team of three rising Engineering Physics sophomores,mentored by an engineering faculty member, during their 2022 Summer Engineering Internshipexperience. Currently another team of students are continuing the development and transferringthe Arduino-based system to the ROS 2 platform in their Directed Research course with the samefaculty member. Upon the completion of the migration to ROS 2, components of this robotic armsystem will then be integrated into the course projects of multiple courses in the BS-Engineeringand BS-Robotics curricula. Another direction of this project is to
empathy, design education, ethics education and community engagement in engineering. She currently teaches Cornerstone of Engineering, a first-year two-semester course series that integrates computer programming, computer aided design, ethics and the engineering design process within a project based learning environment. She was previously an engineering education postdoctoral fellow at Wake Forest University supporting curriculum development around ethics/character education.Maria Vasilyeva, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Transfer Learning from Math to Engineering and Using Scaffolds through Hands-on Learning to Build New Engineering
this paper is to present an outline of the curriculum, examples of assigned studentprojects and educational strategies for the Deep Learning module and to discuss the successfulproject ideas completed by the students in the course over the past 2 years. Deep learning andcomputer vision have been generally under the purview of computer science and data sciencemajors, but software tools such as MATLAB and carefully selected curriculum can make AI andDL accessible to multidisciplinary engineering students who generally possess limited and variedsoftware development backgrounds.It should be noted that an application of deep learning models called large language models(LLMs) have been introduced into the mainstream in the past few years. Examples
. This major would have students take an Introduction to Engineering Design class,Statics, Materials, complete an external project, and do a one-semester capstone. Thisengineering curriculum would be supported by math, physics and chemistry courses, includingelectronics and thermodynamics through the physics department. The initial engineering sciencedegree was not meant to be an ABET-accredited degree but a pathway for students interested inengineering to gain engineering training while integrating other interests such as business,environmental science, and data science. This degree was intended to provide strong preparationfor careers in areas such as entrepreneurship, project management, architecture/design,government technology policy
-based learning, online learning and metacognition. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Formula for Success for Interdisciplinary InitiativesBackgroundThe open-ended and ill-defined nature of today’s challenges [1] requires students with the abilityto work both within and outside of their own discipline [2], [3] by integrating knowledge andskills from various fields [4]. Most academic and research institutions often operate in silosrather than in organizational structures that facilitate learning and discovery across disciplines.Interdisciplinary research and education have been recommended as an approach to tackle suchproblems [5], [6]. Thus, universities have been moving towards
, ornationality [15]. Although differences exist between the two perspectives, they are moredifferent in emphasis than in kind. Thus, some researchers link the two perspectives to get amore fully integrated view. They view identity as a complex phenomenon that involvesreflexive activities of self-categorization and identification with respect to membership inspecific groups [16][17]. In the following, we prefer the third interpretation as it provides amore comprehensive understanding of identity. Interdisciplinary identity Disciplinary and interdisciplinary identities are two manifestations of identities in termsof disciplinary affiliations and have been regarded as an intrinsic driving force for learningstrategies, learning performance, and
] emphasizes the importance of real-world experience in education, reporting on 29 programs that have successfully infused real-worldexperience into the curriculum. This course explores the use of real-world experience at a deeperlevel within the curriculum, with students engaged in team-oriented instructional methods. In recent years, strong interest has gained traction for the incorporation of project-basedlearning (PBL) in a variety of different engineering disciplines, e.g. [26-33]. These previous effortscan inform proposed curriculum. However, few prior efforts have occurred to implement PBLthroughout an entire engineering curriculum. One exception is the Iron Range Engineering (IRE)program, which started in 2010 and uses 100% PBL with no
responded to an IRB-approved follow-up survey about their learningexperiences. Reflective student feedback from both multidisciplinary trips indicated thatengineering students deepened their understanding of chosen topics in consideration of global,cultural, and societal factors, and that the non-engineering students enjoyed the visits more thanthey expected and overcame initial fears about engineering-related coursework, discoveringengineering practices in many aspects of their social lives. Overall, the students gave positivefeedback about the multidisciplinary trips and demonstrated achievement of the learningoutcomes. In the future, the authors plan to continue collaborations to further integrate the coursemodules and regularly evaluate the
mentioned Collaborating across and integrating disciplines 86% 100% Interdisciplinary Gaining disciplinary knowledge from others 86% 100% Learning Outcomes Learning the ‘languages’ and methods of other disciplines 71% 57% Extending one’s work to apply in other disciplines 29% 29% Bringing other disciplines in to receive feedback 36% 42% Working in an emergent space to combine insights 64
and is considered a fundamental sub-ject in an undergraduate and postgraduate robotics curriculum. Furthermore, project-based learninghas shown significant benefits in engineering domains, specifically in interdisciplinary fields such asrobotics which require hands-on experience to master the discipline adequately. However, designinga project-based learning experience to teach control theory in a hands-on setting can be challenging,due to the rigor of mathematical concepts involved in the subject. Moreover, access to reliable hard-ware required for a robotics control lab, including the robots, sensors, interfaces, and measurementinstruments, may not be feasible in developing countries and even many academic institutions in theUS. The current
the utilization of hands-on pedagogy as a means toenhance peer learning collaboration and curiosity among chemistry undergraduate students. Theresearch seeks to instill confidence and competence in students' grasp of fundamental chemicalprinciples, collaborative skills, and problem-solving abilities, while also nurturing their curiositythrough the integration of active learning techniques, laboratory experiments, and interactiveteaching methodologies. The study discusses an examination of the impact of hands-onpedagogy on students' peer learning collaboration and curiosity. The study was carried outamong undergraduate students taking foundations in chemistry, which includes engineering andother STEM majors. The study adopted a pre-post-test
challenges that multi-disciplinary collaborations may present [9] - [12].Teaching multidisciplinary skills in the engineering classroom, though important, can bechallenging due to a variety of reasons. First, engineering students traditionally find themselvesrestricted by a narrow disciplinary focus [13]. Though multidisciplinary courses can better preparestudents for real world contexts [14], for learning to become more multi-disciplinary, instructorsthemselves need to be trained to break disciplinary silos and successfully teach students how tofunction on multi-disciplinary teams [15]. Second, the engineering curriculum is already packed[16], often leaving little room for integrating multidisciplinary courses. Further, classroom settingscan be
written by students and those generated by AI. In light of the analysis conducted, thispaper aims to identify and explain the advantages and disadvantages of relying on AI tools andemphasize the need for careful consideration of ethical and pedagogical aspects to ensure aharmonious integration of AI into the educational landscape. Recommendations for best practiceswithin engineering curriculum, as well as samples of assignments are also presented in this work.Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Enhanced Learning Outcomes, Technical Writing, GenerativePre-trained Transformer, Real-Time Dynamic Feedback.Introduction:The recent noticeable advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have garnered the attention ofscientists across various fields. One
questions asking if the student anticipated adhering to academicintegrity rules (Q13), if they felt that others would not adhere to academic integrity rules (Q14),and if the student felt that they were skilled enough in computer literacy to succeed in an onlineenvironment (Q15) or if there would be technical problems due to the online environment (Q16).ResultsPopulation CharacteristicsAs summarized in Table 2 the paired data population included four disciplines, namely CivilEngineering (CE), Chemical Engineering (ChemE), Electrical Engineering (EE) and MechanicalEngineering (ME). Of the four disciplines the majority was ME at 61% and CE at 36%. 84% ofthe students identified as male, 15% female, and 1% identified as agender. Fourth-year studentsmade
Ph.D. in Microelectronics-Photonics from the University of Arkansas. He attended Oklahoma State University where he graduated with a B.S. in Computer Science and an M.S. and B.S. in Electrical Engineering. He is currently a facultyDr. Emilie A. Siverling, Minnesota State University, Mankato Emilie A. Siverling is an Assistant Professor of Integrated Engineering and the Iron Range Engineering Bell Program through Minnesota State University, Mankato. She has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education, an M.S.Ed. in Curriculum and Instruction - Science Education, and a B.S. in Materials Science and Engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Self-Study of Faculty Methods
data science micro-credential have unique opportunities to improve critical super-skills, including writtencommunication, project management, iterative thinking, and real-world problem-solving.THE NEED FOR DATA ACUMENEngineering disciplines are increasingly adopting and integrating data science into their problem-solving and experimental approaches [1-3]; yet few engineering programs directly integrate datascience and visualization into their curriculum. In an effort to address this need and respond tothe NASEM report on Data Science for Undergraduates, which calls on institutions to increase“data acumen” through “a range of educational pathways,” [REDACTED] School ofEngineering and Applied Sciences launched an undergraduate micro-credential
multidisciplinary curriculum involving two or moresubject areas not only increases students’ competence in complex problem solving and thuscompetitiveness in the workforce, but also increases interest in future coursework for women [5,6, 7, 8]. The inclusion of engineering majors that support multidisciplinary pathways could helprecruit and retain more engineers into the workforce, as well as help balance the ratio of men towomen engineers practicing the profession.Recently at several universities (such as University of Colorado Boulder, Boise State, OregonState, Texas A&M, Purdue, and University of Southern California), there has been an emergenceof new engineering majors which incorporate outside disciplines into engineering studies,allowing for more
thoughtful mapping,planning, and alignment of student outcomes to direct assessments of students that must conductedby faculty on an on-going basis. This process must be systematic to facilitate the continuous reviewof programs.Faculty assessment of student outcome performance is a critical component of this process. Whilethe spreadsheet is still the most common assessment tool, several programs have developed othertools and instruments to aid in the assessment process. These tools are often used to automate someportion of the assessment process [2–5]. Programs develop tools in-house or purchase commercialsoftware. These tools may have several benefits such as including the systematic integration ofplanning and assessment, centralized maintenance
deployed a bomb finding robot named the LynchBot to Iraq late in 2004 and then again in 2006 deployed about a dozen more improved LynchBots to Iraq. His team also assisted in the deployment of 84 TACMAV systems in 2005. Around that time he volunteered as a science advisor and worked at the Rapid Equipping Force during the summer of 2005 where he was exposed to a number of unmanned systems technologies. His initial group composed of about 6 S&T grew to nearly 30 between 2003 and 2010 as he transitioned from a Branch head to an acting Division Chief. In 2010-2012 he again was selected to teach Mathematics at the United States Military Academy West Point. Upon returning to ARL’s Vehicle Technology Directorate from West
advanced controlexperiments for classroom use. These experiments frequently employ LabVIEW and require asignificant financial investment by institutions to include them in the curriculum. Anotherconsideration is the time invested in learning to use another software or hardware platform.Ultimately, students may be able to operate an apparatus. Still, they may not master themethods, focusing instead on the ability to use the software and hardware provided by thevendor.Hardware Utilization and Cost-Effectiveness One of our goals was to provide a low-cost alternative to expensive control experiments thatare often unaffordable for smaller teaching colleges and. While MATLAB is widely used inacademic institutions, control experiments often are not due
ofstudents, demand that we don't simply follow but become a leader for innovative approaches andmodels for an equitable, post-carbon, circular economy that supports a human flourishing andecological integrity. There is a need and opportunity to create a coherent program to form newengineering graduates capable of meeting technical engineering requirements woven with thesocial, economic, political, environmental, and other facets central to sustainability and resilience.In response, an interdisciplinary team of researchers proposed the creation of a new SustainableEngineering (SE) Minor at UPRM as part of a larger plan to develop a new Bachelor's degreeprogram in this area. This plan will allow concrete developmental progress while acknowledgingthat
Your Hand, a multidisciplinary collaboration between engineering and the artsAbstract: Raise Your Hand is an immersive, interactive sensor-driven dynamic art exhibit.Vision tracking software changes the video projections, mechatronics, and music composition inresponse to the height of a visitor’s raised arm. The 1 ½-year project brought together studentsand faculty from computer engineering, computer science, electrical engineering, industrialdesign, mechanical engineering, literature, media and communication, computational media, andmusic technology. Further, students were integrated into the project in different forms, includingcapstone design teams, Vertically Integrated Project (VIP) students, undergraduate research
Paper ID #37614Redesigning Senior Capstone Sequence with Multidisciplinary,Industry-Sponsored ProjectsDr. Reza Rashidi, SUNY University, Buffalo Dr. Reza Rashidi is an Associate Professor at SUNY University at Buffalo. He was an Associate Professor at SUNY Alfred State when he redesigned the senior capstone sequence presented in this paper. He received his Ph.D degree in Mechanical Engineering (MEMS development) from the University of British Columbia in 2010 and completed his Postdoctoral Fellowship in Development of Biomedical Sensing Devices in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of
other majors leaves the two quite farapart in the visualization.A limitation of the disciplinary distance measure is that it is based on the curriculum andpractices of a single institution. It is shaped by the groupings of majors within academic units;campus and department subject-code conventions; and collaboration between departments. Forexample, a technical writing course might be offered by an English/ Communicationsdepartment, showing connections between all technical majors that make use of the class. If atechnical department required their own version of the course under their own subject code, theapparent connection with other majors would disappear. The measure is especially sensitive tocampus and department subject code conventions
provide an ideal learning tool for students in STEMeducation, allowing them to gain hands-on experience regarding the mechanics, planning, andcontrol of robotic arms.Here, a robotic arm kit was introduced that is composed entirely of off-the-shelf components thatcan be assembled using a screwdriver and wrench. The assembled kit is low-cost (< $200), easilytransportable in a small plastic toolbox, and can be powered utilizing a built-in battery or standard5V USB cable (< 500 mA) connected to a laptop computer. This low-cost, transportable, anduntethered robotics platform was used to evaluate the design of experiential learning experiencesthat complement existing robotics curriculum focusing on the mechanics, planning, and control ofserial