an issue or a project that would benefit from a technological solution.Considering the divergence between the code of ethics and the design justice principles, it isprobably necessary to re-consider and revise the code of ethics to be more expansive and includethe design justice concepts. Inclusion of the design justice principles and their practice will be aworthwhile effort for NSPE and ABET to undertake and will be an important step on the path tomaking the engineering education system more diverse, equitable and inclusive.References 1. https://designjustice.org 2. https://designjustice.org/read-the-principles 3. Das, M., Ostrowski, A.K., Ben-David, S., Roeder, G.J., Kimura, K., D'Ignazio, C., Breazeal, C., & Verma, A
-Teaching-and-Learning- Toolkit.pdf. [Accessed: Feb. 12, 2023].[6] The Helping Hand Project, [Online]. Available: https://www.helpinghandproject.org/home-2-1. [Accessed: Feb. 12, 2023].[7] K. Talbot, ”Using Arduino to Design a Myoelectric Prosthetic”, Honors Theses, College of Saint Benedict and Saint John’s University, 2014.[Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/honor theses/55[8] S. Yagli and S-J. Hsieh, ”MAKER: Designing and Building a Prosthetic Hand for a High School Engineering Design Course”, Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference, 2018.[9] ”Limb Loss Statistics - Amputee Coalition”, [Online]. Available: https://www.amputee-coalition.org/limb-loss-resource-center/resources-filtered/resources-by- topic/limb
Mechatronicsand Robotics Education,” 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 2020.[2] D. Bradley, “Mechatronics – More questions than answers”, Mechatronics, vol. 20 (8), pp.827-841, 2010.[3] J. A. Mynderse, N. Lotfi, N. Bajaj, V. Vikas, and M. A. Gennert, “WIP: Mechatronics andRobotics Engineering Definitions Among Students, Educators, and Industry Professionals” 2020ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 2020.[4] K. S. McFall, K. Huang, H. B. Gilbert, M. K. Jouaneh, H. Bai, and D. M. Auslander,“Mechatronics and Robotics Education: Standardizing Foundational Key Concepts,” 2020 ASEEVirtual Annual Conference, 2020.[5] S. Nilsson, “Enhancing Individual Employability: The Perspective of EngineeringGraduates,” Education + Training, vol. 52, no. 6/7, pp. 540-551, 2010
? Evidence from multiculturalperspectives. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 21, 21 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00453-6[2] Zhang, Y., Pei, H., Zhen, S., Li, Q., & Liang, F. (2023). Chat Generative Pre-TrainedTransformer (ChatGPT) usage in healthcare. Gastroenterology & Endoscopy, 1(3), 139–143.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gande.2023.07.002[3] Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study ofgenerative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32, 444–452.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y[4] Strzelecki, A., & ElArabawy, S. (2023). Investigating the moderation effect of gender andstudy level on the acceptance and use of generative AI by higher education
who can navigate uncertainty and exploreinterdisciplinary spaces with confidence in their skills and contributions. ReferencesCabrera, A. F., Colbeck, C. L., & Terenzini, P. T. (1998). Teaching for Professional Competence: Instructional Practices That Promote Development of Group, Problem-Solving, and Design Skills. ASHE Annual Meeting Paper.Choi, E., Lindquist, R., & Song, Y. (2014). Effects of problem-based learning vs. traditional lecture on Korean nursing students' critical thinking, problem-solving, and self-directed learning. Nurse education today, 34(1), 52-56.Donnelly, R., Fitzmaurice, M. (2005) Designing Modules for Learning. In G. O'Neill, S. Moore
. Shiel and D. Murchan, “Understanding and Applying Assessment in Education,” Apr. 2017. Accessed: Jan. 07, 2024. [Online].[12] D. Wiliam and P. Black, “Meanings and Consequences: a basis for distinguishing formative and summative functions of assessment?,” Br. Educ. Res. J., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 537–548, Dec. 1996, doi: 10.1080/0141192960220502.[13] R. L. Linn, E. L. Baker, and S. B. Dunbar, “Complex, Performance-Based Assessment: Expectations and Validation Criteria,” Educ. Res., vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 15–21, Nov. 1991, doi: 10.3102/0013189X020008015.[14] A.- Umam, F. P. Mauludi, and M. K. Wardana, “STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF PERFOMANCE-BASED ASSESSMENT APPLICATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION,” J. Engl. Lang. Learn., vol. 5, no. 2
reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References1. K. G. Wolfinbarger, R. L. Shehab, D. A. Trytten, and S. E. Walden, "The influence of engineering competition team participation on students' leadership identity development," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 925-948, 2021.2. A. B. Hargadon, "Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation," Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 24, pp. 41-85, 2002. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-3085(02)24003-4.3. A. B. Hargadon, "Firms as knowledge brokers: Lessons in pursuing continuous innovation," California Management Review, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 209-227, 1998. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.2307/41165951.4. J. Saldaña, The
Positively Transforming Robotics Education at Postsecondary Institutions," IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 157-164, Sept. 2017.[2] M. Gennert and C. Putnam, "Robotics as an Undergraduate Major: 10 Years' Experience," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.[3] "A Roadmap for U.S. Robotics From Internet to Robotics 2013 Edition," sponsored by Robotics in the United States of America, Robotics VO, March 20, 2013.[4] S. McLeod, "An Analysis of Undergraduate Robotics Degree Programs in the United States of America," IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine. In press.[5] [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria-for- accrediting
integration of engineering with humanities topics is a natural choice.Some integration is done in an on-campus course [3] with multiple case studies [4], using amodule in a first-year course [5], with virtual interactions with another institution [6], or during asemester-long course with an attached faculty-led component [7].As a supplemental pedagogy, faculty-led trips are especially impactful when students areimmersed in another culture for several weeks, under the guidance of familiar faculty member(s)from their main campus (see [8][9]). During the faculty-led trips, the students will encounter,with first-hand experiences, the differences in how things run, which often spark inquiries onwhat factors have contributed to those phenomena, and these
their project rankings in hindsight to determine how the experience changed their expectations.• Is there a relationship between project source and perceived project difficulty?• Do the students’ post-graduation plans impact their choice of sponsor source?The authors look forward to collaborating with courses who also use multiple types of projectsources to compare results and determine potential improvements for ensuring students haveoptimized learning experiences.References1. P. Brackin, D. Knudson, B. Nassersharif, and D. O'bannon. "Pedagogical implications of project selection in capstone design courses." International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 27, no. 6, 2011.2. S. Howe and J. Goldberg, “Engineering capstone design
] N. Duval-Couetil, A. Shartrand, and T. Reed, “The Role of Entrepreneurship ProgramModels and Experiential Activities on Engineering Student Outcomes.,” Advances inEngineering Education, vol. 5, no. 1, 2016, Accessed: Feb. 08, 2024. [Online]. Available:https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1090582[9] Perkins, David N., and Gavriel Salomon. "Transfer of learning." International encyclopediaof education 2,6452-6457,1992.[10] S. Hidi and K. A. Renninger, “The four-phase model of Interest Development,” EducationalPsychologist, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 111–127, Jun. 2006. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4[11] P. Schober, C. Boer, and L. A. Schwarte, “Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use andInterpretation,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 126, no. 5, pp. 1763
. (2024, January 5). 2024’s eight best local photo exhibits. Retrieved from https://washingtoncitypaper.com/article/755051/2024s-eight-best-local-photo-exhibits/[22] American Physical Society, Division of Fluid Dynamics. (n.d.). Traveling Gallery of Fluid Motion: Spiraling Upwards. Retrieved from https://engage.aps.org/dfd/resources/traveling- gallery-resources[23] Utah State University. (2024, February 1). USU engineering sponsors traveling exhibition Spiraling Upwards at The Leonardo. Retrieved from https://www.usu.edu/today/story/usu- engineering-sponsors-traveling-exhibition-spiraling-upwards-at-the-leonardo[24] J. K. Garner, J.-A. Page, A. Carver, and A. Inwood, "A commitment to art education and
supported the development of the MXET 250(Robotic Systems Design) course and associated laboratory space.References [1] Wikander, J., Torngren, M., & Hanson, M. (2001). The Science and Education of Mechatronics Engineering. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 8(2), pp. 20-26. [2] Tantawi, K., Nasab, A., Potter, L., Tantawi, O., Wilson, N., Henrie, A., Sirinterlikci, A. & Kaplanoglu, E. (2023). Mechatronics Education-Current and Future Trends. In IEEE 11th International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS), pp. 1-5. [3] Ceccarelli, M. (2003). Robotic Teachers' Assistants. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 10(3), pp. 37-45. [4] Çeven, S., & Albayrak, A. (2020). Design and
the first semester, the instructors encouraged students to use “DesignThinking” to guide their efforts in defining the elements in the exhibit (which correspond tostudent projects). The Design Thinking steps are: empathizing with the customer (i.e., theparticipant, in the case of the exhibit), defining the elements in the exhibit, ideating about how torealize the elements, and next to make and test low fidelity prototypes (that is, prototypes madewith a relatively small investment in time and energy and just good enough to be able to tell ifthe current approach is good). Design Thinking was developed in the late 1950’s through acollaboration of faculty from the departments of Mechanical Engineering and Art andArchitecture at Stanford
back the first cohort, COVID moved both introductory courses online in their firstiterations. Cohorts of students taking introduction to data science, for example, were learningonline in a pandemic, and although we didn’t study COVID-19's impact expressly, it would beeasy to see how outcomes and experiences of students would be much different in on campuslearning environments. Additionally, we struggled to recruit students into the data science micro-credential, and although we have a number of plans to address this difficulty, the effects of thepandemic on students’ willingness to adopt new lines of study is assumed.Recruitment of Students & Finding Room in CurriculumDue to COVID-19, student recruitment was through virtual informational
Champaign 2019 - presentUniversity of Denver Engineering (General) BS 1997- 2007 (Discontinued?)Loyola University Maryland Engineering Science(s) BS 1989 - 2010 Engineering BSE 2011 - presentLoyola University Chicago Engineering Science BS 2018 - 2021 Engineering BS, 2021 - presentSouthern Utah University Integrated Engineering BS 2003 - 2011 Engineering BS 2011 - presentA new movement is emerging around the name Integrated Engineering with sessions held at theAmerican Society for Engineering Education and Frontiers in Education conferences [20], [21].Southern Utah University offered an Integrated Engineering degree [22], [23] from 2003
’, Educational research review, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 130–144, 2007.[4] R. Butler and M. Nisan, ‘Effects of no feedback, task-related comments, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance’, Journal of educational psychology, vol. 78, no. 3, p. 210, 1986.[5] J. Feldman, Grading for equity: What it is, why it matters, and how it can transform schools and classrooms. Corwin Press, 2018.[6] J. P. Moore and J. Ranalli, ‘A mastery learning approach to engineering homework assignments’, in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015, pp. 26–64.[7] A. R. Carberry, M. Siniawski, S. A. Atwood, and H. A. Diefes-Dux, ‘Best practices for using standards-based grading in engineering courses’, in 2016 ASEE Annual
, 2005.[17] Krystian Radlak and Marcin Fojcik. Integration of robotic arm manipulator with computer vision in a project-based learning environment. In 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pages 1–4. IEEE, 2015.[18] Christopher Crick, Graylin Trevor Jay, Sarah Osentoski, Benjamin Pitzer, and Odest Chadwicke Jenkins. rosbridge: ROS for non-ROS users. In International Symposium on Robotics Research (ISRR 2011), Flagstaff, AZ, August 2011.[19] S. Osentoski, G. Jay, C. Crick, B. Pitzer, C. DuHadway, and O. C. Jenkins. Robots as web services: Reproducible experimentation and application development using rosjs. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, 2011.[20
., Dzombak, R., & Martin, S. (2018). Building 21st century skills through development engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34, 619-631. 9. Passino K. M. (2009). Educating the humanitarian engineer. Science and engineering ethics, 15(4), 577–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9184-8 10. Baaoum, M. (2018). Humanizing Engineering Education: A Comprehensive Model for Fostering Humanitarian Engineering Education. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, 2(1), 1-23. 11. U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2023, March). Addressing Challenges of Forced Displacement through STEM Education: A Workshop. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/03-09-2023
. On non-functional requirements. In 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2007), pages 21–26, 2007. doi: 10.1109/RE.2007.45.[10] SR Daly, CM Seifert, S Yilmaz, and R Gonzalez. Comparing ideation techniques for beginning designers. Journal of Mechanical Design, 138(10):101108, 2016.
/03043790701276874.[14] Raju, G., & Sorby, S. A., & Reid, C. (2023, June), Exploring the Role of Spatial Visualization in Design Process of Undergraduate Engineering Students, 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland. 10.18260/1-2-43648.[15] McNeill, N. J., Douglas, E. P., Koro‐Ljungberg, M., Therriault, D. J., & Krause, I. (2016). Undergraduate students' beliefs about engineering problem solving. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(4), 560-584.[16] Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving schools, 19(3), 267-277.APPENDIXSample course outlines from the Robotics Core:COURSE 1: INTRODUCTION TO ROBOTICS (3 Credits)Overview of
CollegesSPF Special Focus Institutions Size VS Very small (FTE<1000) SM Small (FTE from 1000-2999) MD Medium (FTE from 3000 - 9999) LG Large (FTE >10000)References[1] J. Farison “ASEE MECC: The Great Story of a Successful Member Initiative,” inProceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference (https://peer.asee.org/15349).[2] S. H. Vander Leest, “Advocating
feedback with respect to an improvement ininnovation and creativity especially whilst problem solving. This spoke to the successof the two main aspects of this project/s; a multidisciplinary collaboration thatintegrated the strengths of an engineering-based education with that of an Arts basededucation, and the use of design thinking to produce outside the box thinkers. Despitea positive participant feedback, there were some areas where the collaborative projectscored low. The development of hands-on skills is one such example. It had an averagerating of 3.5 out of 5, with the lowest ratings coming from the Art and design teammembers who answered the survey questions. This can be easily explained, as thepurpose of this multidisciplinary project