Conference Session

Encouraging Students to Think Critically

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rebekah Oulton PE, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

activities was toengage the students in active, rather than passive learning (Romkey & Cheng, 2009;Viswanathan & Radhakrishnan, 2015). I generally served as facilitator, rather than a deliberateguide in these discussions, making sure students felt comfortable and had a chance to have theiropinions heard, but not explicitly directing the discussion (Jacquez et al., 2007).Along with the in-class SGMA materials, each weekly homework assignment included a SGMA-specific question, as did the midterm(s) and final exams. As shown in Table 2, these individualassignments also progressed through the Bloom’s Taxonomy hierarchy. They were generallymore open-ended than the typical homework problems (Jacquez et al., 2007) and incorporateduncertainties or

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Margret Hjalmarson, George Mason University; Jill K. Nelson, George Mason University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

: Contributions of Faculty to Student Engagement in Engineering. J. Eng. Educ. 97, 339–353 (2008).4. Shulman, L. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educ. Res. 15, 4–14 (1986).5. Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N. & Hewson, P. W. Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. (Corwin Press, 2010).6. Laurillard, D. Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. (Routledge, 2012).7. Wenger, E. Communities of practice  : learning, meaning, and identity. (Cambridge University Press, 1999).8. Hjalmarson, M. et al. Developing Interactive Teaching Strategies for Electrical Engineering Faculty. in Proc. 120th ASEE Annu. Conf. (2013).9

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade I

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Agnieszka Miguel, Seattle University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

AcknowledgementsThe author would like to thank Elizabeth J. Mills and Lisa Berman for their editorial review of thisarticle.References [1] R. Boice, “Classroom incivilities,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 37, pp. 453–486, August 1996. [2] L. B. Nilson, Teaching at Its Best. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company, Inc., 2 ed., 2003. [3] J. M. Braxton and A. E. Bayer, eds., Addressing Faculty and Student Classroom Impropri- eties, vol. 99 of New Directions for Teaching and Learning. San Francisco, CA: Wiley Peri- odicals, Inc., Fall 2004. [4] S. Brown, “Civility in the classroom,” http://www.tc3.edu/instruct/sbrown/ fac/civilbib.htm, 2004. [5] P. J. Morrissette, “Reducing incivility in the university/college classroom,” International

Conference Session

Faculty Development: Tenure & Promotion

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Garrick Louis, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

overviewyour idea, rationale, major activities, expected results, and achievement of the NSF meritreview criteria of intellectual merit, and broader impacts. Thus, at minimum, the projectsummary should state the issue or problem you propose to study, establish its relevanceand importance to your field of study, state your research hypothesis, and define the longterm goal(s), short term objectives, and associated activities. This is a good point todefine your proposed activities in the areas of research, education, and service oroutreach if appropriate. It is mandatory to state the intellectual merit and broaderimpacts of your proposed work in the project summary, as these address NSF’s meritreview criteria that are required of all proposals submitted

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators 2: Success In and Out of the Classroom

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Huma Shoaib, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sean P. Brophy, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

international ACM conference on Internationalcomputing education research - ICER 13, 2013.[2] Y. Bosse, D. Redmiles, & M. A. Gerosa, “Pedagogical Content for Professors of IntroductoryProgramming Courses,” Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation andTechnology in Computer Science Education, Feb. 2019.[3] T. Lowe, & S. Brophy, “An operationalized model for defining computational thinking,” In2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1-8, IEEE, October 2017.[4] A. C. Calderon, D. Skillicorn, A. Watt, & N. Perham, “A double dissociative study into theeffectiveness of computational thinking,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 25, no.2, pp. 1181–1192, Mar. 2020.[5] P. J. Denning, “Remaining trouble spots with

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Byron G. Garry, South Dakota State University; Suzette R Burckhard, South Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

, Felder4 wrote: “Consider the universal vision of the professor of the 90's. Shedoes pioneering research in a critical area and brings in big bucks to support the research,including several six-figure NSF grants and 60% release time. She publishes 5-10 paperseach year in the most prestigious journals in her field and is a shoo-in for the NationalAcademy. She is a dedicated and stimulating instructor and wins teaching awards at heruniversity and nationally. She does more than her fair share of the tedious but vitalservice chores that no one wants to do and does them excellently. She is mostlyimaginary.” In 1987 Feldman5 examined 42 studies and concluded that “the likelihoodthat research productivity actually benefits teaching is extremely small…the

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade in Teaching I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brock E. Barry, U.S. Military Academy; Maj Jonathan Bodenhamer, U.S. Military Academy, Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering; James J O'Brien Jr., American Society of Civil Engineers

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

background knowledge andteaching experience. It is easy to be misled or misinterpret cues that are not filtered for context,culture, gender, and personal bias. The available literature focusing on nonverbal classroomcommunication is significantly partial toward projected cues of the instructor and providessurprisingly little content specific to decoding student generated cues.ReferencesAngelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques : a handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Davis, B. G. (2009). Tools for teaching (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Gregersen, T. S. (2005). Nonverbal cues: clues to the detection of foreign language anxiety. Foreign Language

Conference Session

Tools and Strategies for Teaching Online Courses

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Alyson Grace Eggleston, The Citadel; Robert J. Rabb P.E., The Citadel

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

ofbest practices.References[1] B. J. Beatty, Hybrid-Flexible Course Design. EdTech Books, 2019. https://edtechbooks.org/Hyflex/.[2] “Standards from the Quality Matters Higher Education Rubric,” Sixth Edition. Quality Matters. Retrieved from Specific Review Standards from the QM Higher Education Rubric, Sixth Edition.[3] “7 Things about Swivl,” Grand Valley State University Information Technology. Retrieved from https://www.gvsu.edu/cms4/asset/7E70FBB5-0BBC-EF4C- A56CBB9121AECA7F/7_things_swivl.pdf.[4] C. Li, “Hybrid Teaching of College English Under the Background of Big Data,” Data Processing Techniques and Applications for Cyber-Physical Systems (DPTA 2019), 445- 450, 2020.[5] S. Singh & A. Arya, “A hybrid

Conference Session

That's a Great Idea! Learning-focused Methods to Revitalize Your Courses

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rob Sleezer, Minnesota State University, Mankato, Twin Cities; Jacob John Swanson, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

assessments from faculty, experiments they perform, and client corrections. Theassessments from faculty are often based on intuition and wisdom which allow them to predictwith some success the outcomes of the experiments the students perform. Regardless of thepredictions of the faculty and the students, the actual outcome of the experiments dictate nextsteps. Either the design works, or it does not. If it does not, which is most often the case, at thispoint in the semester there is little to no time for recovery. Finally, as a design comes togetherthe client(s) may provide feedback that the students did not appropriately frame the problem (i.e.the design is doing what was asked, but this is not what is needed) or that the design teammisinterpreted

Conference Session

Best of NEE

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melani Plett, Seattle Pacific University; Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington; Diane Carlson Jones Ph.D, University of Washington; Tamara Floyd-Smith, Tuskegee University; Nanette M. Veilleux, Simmons College; Caitlin Hawkinson Wasilewski, Seattle Pacific University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

students engage in course content and motivatethem to try harder, but faculty also have the power to weaken student engagement. Thefollowing are possible implications for faculty as a result of our analyses. a. To facilitate students’ sense of belonging and motivation to participate in class, an instructor can implement the following ideas that require minor effort on the part of the instructor: i. Learn student names or simply recognize if students have been attending class, asking questions, working hard, etc. ii. Tell students explicitly during class that s/he cares that students learn the course material. iii. Encourage students to attend office hours if/when they need

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexandra Coso Strong, Georgia Institute of Technology; Mary Katherine Watson, The Citadel; Donna C. Llewellyn, Boise State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

in most impactful undergraduate course by modified Carnegie classification. Research Universities Bac/A&S International (VH, H, DRU, Masters) Kruskal-Wallis Test Philosophies (n = 6) (n = 16) (n = 66) Median %1-2 %4-5 Median %1-2 %4-5 Median %1-2 %4-5 χ2(2) p Perennialism 4.0 13.7 74.2 5.0 16.7 83.4 4.0 18.8 62.5 1.816 0.403*,1 Social

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert A. Chin, East Carolina University; I. Richmond Nettey, Kent State University; Edem G. Tetteh; Philip Weinsier, Bowling Green State University, Firelands

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

responsibilities, if any, and their institutionalCarnegie profile3 are as follows:Professor and Associate DeanUndergraduate Instructional Program—Prof+A&S/HGC: Professions plus arts & sciences, highgraduate coexistence; Graduate Instructional Program—CompDoc/NMedVet: Comprehensivedoctoral (no medical/veterinary); and a Community Engagement—Outreach and PartnershipsCarnegie classification—category institution.ProfessorUndergraduate Instructional Program/Prof+A&S/HGC—Professions plus arts & sciences, highgraduate coexistence; Graduate Instructional Program—Doc/Prof: Doctoral, professionaldominant; and a Community Engagement—Curricular Engagement and Outreach andPartnerships Carnegie classification—category institution.ProfessorUndergraduate

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jumoke Oluwakemi Ladeji-Osias, Morgan State University; Anita M. Wells, Morgan State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

 Managing Challenging Classroom Situations,” Currents in Teaching and Learning, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 4­18, Spring 2009.7. D. McCabe, “Classroom Cheating Among Natural Science and Engineering Majors,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 3, pp. 433­445 , 1997.8. H. J. Passow, M. J. Mayhew,  C. J. Finelli, T. S. Harding, and D. D. Carpenter, “Factors Influencing Engineering Students’ Decisions to Cheat by Type of Assessment,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 643­684, 2006. DOI: 10.1007/s11162­006­9010­y9. C. R. Nordstrom, L. K. Bartels, & J. Bucy, “Predicting and curbing classroom incivility in higher education,” College Student Journal, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 74­85, 2009.10. M. A. Kitzrow, “The

Conference Session

Educating Students for Professional Success

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David F. Ollis, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies, New Engineering Educators, Student

hydrolizes myelin glycoprotein6. Buanol via co-fermentation of T. Resei, R. erythroplis and immobilized C. beijerinckii.7. Expression of thermostable scaffoldin protein in S. solfataricus8. Site-directed mutagenesis of oxygen diffusion pathways in C. reinhardtii hydrogenase for enhanced oxygen tolerance9. Phototrophic biocathode for enhanced biomass photosynthesisMaterials-related10. Photon modulated On/Off switch via light oxidative voltage (LOV) protein.11. Organic solar cells via combined nanotube-bulk polymer heterojunctions12. Cation-exchange membrane formation via film forming and hot press lamination13. Increasing the efficiency of self-healing polymers14. Lithium ion battery electrolytes for low temperature

Conference Session

Launching Successful Academic Careers

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Chin, East Carolina University; Nancy Study, Virginia State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

ensure the manuscript is consistent and within theboundaries of the journal’s scope and that the identity of the author(s) of the manuscript beconcealed from reviewers during the review process.Manuscript PreparationPreparation of manuscripts intended to be published in the EDGJ is guided by the latest edition Page 15.826.3of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association4. Even though thefollowing list may not necessarily be inclusive or applicable to all manuscripts that are submittedto all journals, authors ought be mindful of the following: evaluating content; design andreporting research; authorship; types of manuscripts

Conference Session

Enhancing Teaching and Research

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Gary Lichtenstein, Arizona State University; Kelsey Watts, Clemson University; Evan Ko, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Balsam Albayati

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

-peer-review-putting-skills-into- practice/[3] A. E. Carroll, “Peer Review: The Worst Way to Judge Research, Except for All the Others.” NY Times, November 6, 2018. Retrieved from https://nyti.ms/2yRcClr.[4] C. Tyson, “E.O. Wilson on the Next Big Thing.” Chronicle of Higher Education, May 7, 2019. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/EO-Wilson-on-the-Next- Big/246257?utm_source=at&utm_medium=en&cid=at[5] L. Benson, “Reflecting, Rebooting, Reviewing,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 3, p. 311 - 312. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20288[6] K. Edström, J. Bernhard, M. van den Bogaard, L. Benson, C. Finelli, S. Chance, S. and R. Lyng, “Reviewers, reviewers, reviewers

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators 4: Tips and Tools

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nathan John Washuta P.E., The Citadel; Robert J. Rabb P.E., The Citadel; Emily Kate Bierman, The Citadel; Patrick Bass, The Citadel; Jason Howison, The Citadel; James Righter, The Citadel

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

organization before the semesterbegins. This requires a well-organized schedule and insight to the material rather than buildingthe course as one teaches it during the semester.Bibliography[1] S. M. Reynolds and R. N. Tackie, "A Novel Approach to Skeleton-Note Instruction in Large Engineering Courses: Unified and Concise Handouts that are Fun and Colorful," in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[2] S. T. Peverly, J. K. Garner and P. C. Vekaria, "Both handwriting speed and selective attention are important to lecture note-taking," Reading and Writing, vol. 27, pp. 1-30, 2014.[3] S. L. Robinson, H. E. Sterling, C. H. Skinner and D. H. Robinson, "Effects of Lecture Rate on Students' Comprehension and

Conference Session

Size, Civility, and the Classroom Culture: Setting Class Tone with a Student-centered Perspective

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington; Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Melani Plett, Seattle Pacific University; Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Tamara Floyd Smith P.E., Tuskegee University; Nanette M Veilleux, Simmons College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

affective outcomes wereinvestigated with the goal of predicting and improving engagement and connection tocommunity across a diverse range of institutions, students, teaching styles, and faculty. In theportion of the study discussed here, qualitative analysis of focus group data was used to identifydifferences in student perceptions of formal (in class) and informal (out of class) faculty supportby class size and institution type at five different institutions in engineering and computerscience majors.Research SettingThe five participating institutions in this study, described according to their Carnegieclassifications34, and their key characteristics as drawn from institutional data and missionstatements are as follows: HBCU (Masters S): A

Conference Session

Women, Minorities and the New Engineering Educator

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brook Sattler, University of Washington; Jessica Yellin, University of Washington; Yi-Min Huang, University of Washington; Jennifer Turns, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

included issues related to recruiting and retaining more minorities in engineering. He believedthe service aspect of diversity did not belong in a teaching portfolio because it did not directlyrelate to teaching. His second category referred to ways to handle diverse groups of people in theclassroom. YI104 chose to not include his diversity statement in his teaching portfolio because hedid not like it and felt that diversity was more of a service responsibility, rather than explicitlyrelated to teaching diverse groups.YI104’s diversity views were greatly influenced by a childhood experience. When he was growingup he asked his grandfather if he knew Tagalog and his grandfather responded,‘you’re American, speak English”. This caused YI104 to treat

Conference Session

Tools and Strategies for Teaching Online Courses

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Ashwini Menon; Guoyi Wang

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

detection are standalone, but some can serve as tools within an LMS. A limitation ofthese tools is that they are specialized to a particular kind of question, and the exam may includequestions of several different types. A rubric-based tool can work with questions of differenttypes. It takes advantage of a grading rubric to identify students who “lose points” for the samereasons.Keywords: plagiarism, online exams, webcam monitoring, Integrity (software), CopyDetect, S-Check, Turnitin, Unicheck, Textreuse, Gradescope1. IntroductionAlmost overnight, the COVID-19 pandemic forced all classes online, and along with the classes,all exams. This meant that human proctoring was no longer possible, not for formerly face-to-face classes, nor for distance-ed

Conference Session

Off the Beaten Path

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward Gehringer, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

down.There are a couple of reasons for doing things this way. It is assumed that a grader can do amore impartial job if (s)he does not know the student whose work is being graded. Second,many exams are common across an entire university, which may consist of many colleges. Soanyone who is involved with the same course is assumed to be competent to grade any student inthe course.The third difference is that some countries seem almost immune to grade inflation. TheEgyptian observed, “Tough questions are given and many system exist for grading, but in mostcourses the mean of the students grade will be in (C or D) grade.”But by far the most common observation was that final exams overseas count much more thanthey do in America. In China, the final

Conference Session

Educating Students for Professional Success

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert J. Gustafson, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies, New Engineering Educators, Student

and Oreowicz11 that engineeringgraduates, in particular Ph.D.’s, need to know how to teach for both academic and industrialcareers, and that ideally education in pedagogy occurs during graduate school. The paper goeson to point out that taking a pedagogy course and serving a teaching internship during graduateschool closely parallels the procedures used to prepare graduate students to do research. Wankatand Oreowicz12 observe that engineering students have proven to be very reluctant to takecourses from the College of Education. Students in engineering do not subscribe in significantnumbers. Perception is that content as not relevant to engineering instruction and instruction isdone in manner outside the comfort zone of engineering students

Conference Session

Working Together: Approaches to Inclusivity and Interdisciplinarity

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kenya Z Mejia, University of Washington; Yen-Lin Han, Seattle University; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

. This work encourages the engineering educationcommunity to find new ways to define how an inclusive practice is working for a specificcontext, as a supplement to a quantitative approach.References[1] C. E. Foor, S. E. Walden, and D. A. Trytten, “‘I Wish that I Belonged More in this Whole Engineering Group:’ Achieving Individual Diversity,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 103–115, 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00921.x.[2] B. Berhane, S. Secules, and F. Onuma, “Learning While Black: Identity Formation and Experience for Five Black Men Who Transferred Into Engineering Undergraduate Programs,” J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 26, 2020, doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2020024994.[3] M. Kali, S. Secules, and C

Conference Session

Perspectives on Engineering Education During COVID-19

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Keven Alkhoury, New Jersey Institute of Technology ; Ahmed Z. Edrees, University of Jeddah & New Jersey Institute of Technology; Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Ashish D. Borgaonkar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

amongst all three teaching modes. Nevertheless, significant differences maysometimes exist between one or two pairs. Thus, post-hoc analysis (Tukey) is used to determinewhich pair(s) cause this significance, shown in Table 8. Tukey’s analysis are performed only onthe two significant constructs from the ANOVA analysis, and the results indicate that the students’response to the interactive construct differ significantly between a semester with fullyimplemented remote teaching and one with in-person labs with a p-value of (p = 0.001), a meandifference of (-0.930), and a standard error of (0.238); this difference indicates that students in in-person sessions anticipated to receive more interactive learning instructions than those in remotesessions

Conference Session

NEE - 3: Improving Homework and Problem-solving Performance

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Derek Breid, Saint Vincent College

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

highlight best practices and solution pathways that are moreconsistent with how the material was presented in class.- Engage with the students’ metacognitive responses! Answer questions that they bring up, orcomment on the good realizations that they have. If they write about needing to improve in acertain way, ask them later how this effort is going, and if they need any ideas.[1] P. C. Wankat, “The Role of Homework,” ASEE Conf. Proc., 2001.[2] P. C. Wankat and F. S. Oreovicz, “Testing, homework, and grading,” in Teaching Engineering, 1st ed., McGraw-Hill College, 1993, pp. 213–234.[3] W. Li, R. M. Bennett, T. Olsen, and R. McCord, “Engage Engineering Students In Homework: Attribution of Low Completion and Suggestions for

Conference Session

Technology for Faculty Development and Classroom Management

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gillian M. Nicholls, Southeast Missouri State University; Neal A Lewis, University of New Haven

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

student facing credible accusation(s) ofacademic misconduct to plead ignorance.The Academic Honesty Quiz in this example incentivizes students to study the policies so theycan answer the questions. They cannot advance to further course content without scoring a100% on the quiz, but they can repeat the quiz an unlimited number of times. The quiz is both alearning motivation and provides an opportunity to start the course with an easily obtained highscore that counts towards the course grade. Many instructors use syllabi quizzes to ensurestudents are familiar with other administrative details about the course, so creating a quiz with afocus on academic honesty is an educational tool that doesn’t require extensive time to set up

Conference Session

Tips and Tricks for Assessing Student Performance

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gilbert C. Brunnhoeffer III, Roger Williams University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Paper ID #17693Homework Is So 20th Century !Dr. Gilbert C Brunnhoeffer III P.E., Roger Williams University Practiced Civil Engineering and Engineering Management in the U S Army for 20 years. Engaged in software engineering for three years and ran factories producing engineered materials for the aerospace and electronics industries for seventeen years. Teaching career includes engineering mechanics, civil engineering, and construction management for seventeen years. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Homework Is So 20th Century

Conference Session

NEE 2 - Strategies to Improve Teaching Effectiveness

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dustyn Roberts P.E., Temple University; Joshua A. Enszer, University of Delaware; Allen A. Jayne P.E., University of Delaware; Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Delaware; Amy Trauth, University of Delaware; Andrew Novocin, University of Delaware; James Atlas, University of Delaware

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Potential sources of material include your own personal notes where you Present students with made a mistake, or a homework/exam inaccurate work (on a solution that introduces mistakes worth slide or handout) and pointing out have them take a few Make clear something is wrong on your notes on what is wrong, handout, to avoid confusing students Intentional 2-10 then follow up by calling who arrive late or aren't fully paying Mistake(s) minutes on students

Conference Session

Research on Diversification & Inclusion

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Erin A. Cech, Rice University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

Satisfaction Measures:question was missing). (m) Personal satisfaction from work (n) Satisfaction with quality of work unitSurvey respondents were asked “do you consider (o) Satisfaction with working conditionsyourself to be one or more of the following,” with (p) Employee empowermentthe following response categories offered: (q) Co-workers cooperation“Heterosexual or Straight,” “Gay, Lesbian, (r) Satisfaction with procedures (s) Overall job satisfactionBisexual, or Transgender,” or “Prefer not to say.”Respondents who answered “prefer not to say” were excluded from

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade in Teaching I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Barry Dupen, Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

photocopy or scan the relevant page(s) from your notes, and mark in red the changes you would like to see. You can benefit from extra points, and next semester’s class will benefit from better handouts. Page 15.372.7One third of the students participated in the extra credit assignment, and most of thesesubmissions were thoughtful, detailed, and thorough. Some students submitted recommendationsin sentence form. Here are some examples: The only change I would make is on page 5 under valve actuation: separate the mechanical vs. pilot vs. solenoid better. They run together and look like they are of the same group. It would be easier