the“How well have you improved...” self-assessment questions in the survey, the students withdisability responded significantly (p=0.004 for response of “very well improved” and p=0.048for “extremely well improved”) more positively than the majority. Moreover, the group ofstudents who transferred or the group of students who were international, we found these twogroups of non-majority students also gave more positive responses than the majority. We foundthese three student groups shared a commonality: their common areas are the ability tocommunicate and explore from viewpoints of more than one academic field. Lastly, greaterpercentages of students with disability found “Course(s) outside my major” had the most impacton their improvement than
that best serves student learning. • Instructors should be good listeners and excellent observers. They should conduct student evaluations regularly.AcknowledgementsI would like to acknowledge with gratitude the support of the engineering faculty at the U.A.Whitaker School of Engineering at Florida Gulf Coast University and Professor Neville Parker atThe City College of New York.Bibliography1. Alley, M., Crowley, L., Donnell, J., and Moore, C. Writing Guidelines for Engineering and ScienceStudents. 08/2006, Available online at: http://www.writing.eng.vt.edu/workbooks/design.html (accessed January 2,2007).2. Brent, R., Felder, R., and Rajala, S. (2006) Preparing New Faculty Members to be Successful: A No-Brainer and Yet
., vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223–231, Jul. 2004.[3] M. T. H. Chi, “Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities,” Top. Cogn. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 73–105, Jan. 2009.[4] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 1–6, 2014.[5] C. E. Wieman, “Large-scale comparison of science teaching methods sends clear message,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8319–8320, 2014.[6] R. Felder and R. Brent, Teaching and learning STEM: A practical guide. 2016.[7] M. Stains et al., “Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities,” Science (80
senseof pride of what was accomplished when they are finished.References[1] A. Kolb and D. Kolb. (2005). Learning styles and learning space: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2):193-212.[2] K. Robinson, and A. M. Azzam. (2009). Why creativity now? (interview). Educational Leadership, 67(1):22-26.[3] S. B. Velegol, S. E. Zappe, and E. Mahoney. (2015). The evolution of a flipped classroom: evidence-based recommendations. Advances in Engineering Education, Winter 2015.[4] A. Pears, S. Seidman, L. Malmi, L. Mannila, and E. Adams. (2007). A survey of literature on the teaching of introductory programming. Working Group Report on ITiCSE on Innovation and Technology in
2017.Dr. Kristen Sara Cetin, Iowa State University Dr. Kristen S Cetin is an Assistant Professor at Iowa State University in the Department of Civil, Con- struction and Environmental Engineering.Dr. Andrea E. Surovek, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Andrea Surovek is a research scientist working in the areas of biomimicry for sustainable construction and engineering education at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology. She is the recipient of the ASEE CE Division Seeley Fellowship and the Mechanics Division Beer and Johnston Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award. She is a fellow of ASCE and ASCE/SEI. She received her PhD from Georgia Tech, and also holds degrees in both Civil Engineering
"gain knowledge," “ideas,” and “techniques” to take back as externalartifacts "portable to a variety of campuses." Change happens when I take the right things home -- things like "tools to help in the curriculum change process" or "ways to get students doing morestuff in class.” I’ve heard that “active learning” and “group dynamics” are examples of things Imight pick up at the workshop.My implementation of these good-teaching artifacts will change my students into betterstudents. "I want my students to be invested in their education" and "care about my specialty"enough to "pursue further learning.” Even the “quieter wallflower[s]” and the ones who “runaway from the STEM fields” should be “craft[ed] into good, effective, & happy
step towards further instructional advancement by establishing acomprehensive data-driven approach to achieve student development outcomes needed toprepare graduates to meet the escalating challenges of professional practice.References1. The Vision for Civil Engineering in 2025, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, June 2006.2. Achieving the Vision for Civil Engineering in 2025: A Roadmap for the Profession, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, Aug. 2009.3. Graham, Ruth, (2012), The One Less Traveled By: The Road to Lasting, Systemic Change in Engineering Education, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 101, No. 4, pp. 596–600.4. Crismond, David P., and Robin S. Adams, (2012), The Informed Design
sword," Current directions in psychological science, vol. 7, pp. 67-72, 1998.[3] R. Moreno, "Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia," Instructional science, vol. 32, pp. 99-113, 2004.[4] E. A. Locke and G. P. Latham, "Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel," Psychological science, vol. 1, pp. 240-246, 1990.[5] S. H. Song and J. M. Keller, "Effectiveness of motivationally adaptive computer-assisted instruction on the dynamic aspects of motivation," Educational technology research and development, vol. 49, pp. 5-22, 2001.[6] S. J. Ashford, R. Blatt, and D. V. Walle, "Reflections on the
, and B. Moore, “Why College Students Cheat: A conceptual model of five factors,” in The Review of Higher Education, vol. 41, no. 4, p.549+, Summer 2018.[8] M. G. Simkin and A. McLeod, “Why do college students cheat?,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 94, no. 3, pp.441-453, July 2010.[9] M. Peters, T. Boies, and S. Morin, “Teaching academic integrity in quebec universities: roles professors adopt,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 4, no. 99, pp. 1-13, Sept. 2019.[10] T. VanDeGrift, H. Dillon, and L. Camp, “Changing the engineering student culture with respect to academic integrity and ethics,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 23, pp.1159-1182, Nov. 2016.[11] S. E. Küçüktepe, “College students’ cheating
?AbstractAs higher education evolves, one instructional tool, the classic textbook, is undergoing varioustransformations. Textbooks, once viewed as the cornerstone to instruction in higher education,are now often seen as outdated. Some instructors are opting out of published textbooks andinstead designing content for their courses on an as-needed basis by creating electronic classreadings from an array of digital resources. While the limitations of textbooks are not new,today‟s technologic advances afford many alternatives to print-based books. Furthermore, certainfields, by their very nature, dictate the need for timely, current resources and the coursedescribed in this paper is one such course for it covers alternative energy sources. This upper
, a team teachingmodel is used in ENGE 1114 during the on-sequence semester. Depending on the number offaculty assigned to the course, one or two faculty members are assigned as the module leader(s)for each module. The module leaders prepare the materials for both lecture and workshop duringthe module and deliver the lectures.Personnel RolesIn the on-sequence semester the teaching team for one of these first-year common courses mayinclude up to 10 faculty, 17 graduate teaching assistants (GTAs), and 15 undergraduate graders.One or two of the faculty serve as course coordinator(s). In ENGE 1024 and ENGE 1104, thecourse coordinators have primary responsibility for course content, including lecture materials,workshop materials, assignments
engineering education, where engineering students want tobase their knowledge on concrete knowledge rather than on abstract logic, and achieve theunderstanding of a topic with a learning strategy from the specific to the general concepts. Themethodology and results of this study should be considered in further research, and implementedin other colleges and universities, especially in those emergent countries, since their applicationcan result in the enhancement of an the infrastructure system of a country and the growth of itssociety and achieve better economic development indexes.References[1] Caro S., S.; “The Paradigm of Civil Engineering Education within the Colombian Context”. Internacional
90% of my students (N=87) strongly agreedthat sharing my teaching philosophy is critical. Additionally, underrepresented students wereempowered and archived more than half the “A”s in my courses. In conclusion, since equal is notalways fair, instructors must make their expectations exceptionally clear to ensure that anystudent can succeed and earn an “A.” I believe it is time for educators to polish their teachingphilosophy, create appealing visual models, and share them with their students.IntroductionDeveloping a Teaching Philosophy Statement (TPS) is central in any academic career [1]. TPSdeclares the educator’s approach to teaching and learning. Creating a teaching philosophyengages educators in metacognitive reflection on what they
required to make the research enterprise’s engine work. These inputs aredivided into four categories that include: building on the university’s infrastructure (red), fundingthe research enterprise (green), e xtending the research enterprise (blue), a nd s ustainability(magenta). Page 14.1026.4Building on the University’s Infrastructure (Shown in Red)When a new faculty member is hired by a university they are nor mally given a start-up packagethat includes some space to set up their research program and money for equipment, studentsupport, travel, and, in most cases, a couple of years of summer support for them. From this startthey need to develop
. Schaffer, S. P., X. Chen, X. Zhu, and W. C. Oakes. Self-efficacy for cross-disciplinary learning in project-based teams. Journal of Engineering Education. 2012. 101(1): 82-94.6. Richter, D. M., and M.C. Paretti. Identifying barriers to and outcomes of interdisciplinarity in the engineering classroom. European Journal of Engineering Education. 2009. 34(1): 29-45.7. Jones, F. and S. Harris. Benefits and drawbacks of using multiple instructors to teach single courses. College Teaching. 2012. 60(4): 132-139.8. Krometis, L. H., E. P. Clark, V. Gonzalez, and M. E. Leslie. The ‘death’ of disciplines: development of a team-taught course to provide an interdisciplinary perspective for first-year students. College Teaching. 2011. 59: 73-78.9
. Thisdemonstrated the improvement in the students’ performance level. Furthermore, all theinstructional tools that were developed and implemented in this hybrid classroom environmentwere also presented and discussed in this paper.IntroductionRecent studies have called for major pedagogical reforms to improve the quality of engineeringeducation by incorporative more active teaching styles1. Modern teaching styles apply student-centered learning techniques to effectively improve the quality of the learning process2,3.However, in today's tightly packed engineering curriculum, the amount of lecture time thatfaculty can afford to allocate to such active learning activities is very limited. In the early 2000’s,the notion of flipping the classroom started to
attributed to the development of value systems andvery high ethical standards, teaching others to generate knowledge, and the use of creativity anddiverse backgrounds to bring “unique perspective[s]” to research problems. One engineerdescribed the need for diversity in engineering in order to innovate: “The advances come whenyou’re sort of looking at—you’re applying something new to a different area and you’re bringingin people who haven’t looked at it before.” Others refer to the importance of collaborations andcollaborative work in generating advances in technology, especially between different fields (ex.mechanical engineering and psychology to advance mental health technologies), collaborationsbetween university research facilities and industry
, making enforcementof this requirement possible.Sometimes there are multiple valid ways of solving a problem but not enough class time todemonstrate each method. In these situations, demonstrate one method in class and screencastthe other method(s).In a software skills-focused course, there is rarely time to cover all of the useful features thatstudents might find useful in the future. Screencasts demonstrating some of the advancedfeatures could be used as a resource for the more advanced students who desire an additionalchallenge above and beyond the basic material.Screencasts can help answer student questions outside of classScreencasts can be an effective method of answering student questions. When teaching a classthat involves the use of
researchers and were generated based on experiencewith homework in STEM courses, both from a teaching and a student perspective. The surveywas composed of five main sections:1. General questions about the student’s school, year of study, major, and average number of problem sets assigned per week.2. Positive Homework Course. Questions relating to a homework experience in a STEM course that the student would describe as “positive.” a. Initial questions asked for the name of the course, and the type(s) of homework utilized in the course. The name of the professor was asked, but was optional. b. Then students were asked to rate on a scale from Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, to All of the Time, the amount to which they felt
teamwriting team, review a test led to team used contributed test preferably not the coordinator. long and questions, but were ultimately This team should create the unproductive responsible for creating and solutions and rubrics for grading discussions. printing the final version(s) of its the tests as part of the test design. assigned test. Instructors who Any instructor could express Provide a deadline for comments weren’t directly concerns about any questions that prior to review by the test creation involved in had been submitted to the Google team and then
. Perry, W. G., Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years – A Scheme, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968, 1970. 2. Guttenplan, D. D., “Measuring the Wealth Effect in Education”, in The New York Times, 12/1/2013, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/02/world/europe/measuring-the-wealth-effect-in-education.html? , (accessed 1/26/2015). 3. Strauss, S., “The Connection Between Education, Income Inequality, and Unemployment”, in The Huffington Post, 1/2/2012, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-strauss/the-connection-between- ed_b_1066401.html , (accessed 1/26/2015). 4. Morse, R. and M. Foster, “How U.S. News Calculated the Best Global Universities Rankings”, in US News
: Gender differences and interactive effects of students’ motivation, goals, and self-efficacy on performance,” in Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, ser. ICER ’16. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2016, p. 211–220. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/2960310.2960329 [2] B. C. Wilson and S. Shrock, “Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: A study of twelve factors,” SIGCSE Bull., vol. 33, no. 1, p. 184–188, Feb. 2001. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/366413.364581 [3] D. Zingaro, M. Craig, L. Porter, B. A. Becker, Y. Cao, P. Conrad, D. Cukierman, A. Hellas, D. Loksa, and N. Thota, “Achievement goals
teach or evaluate these subjects.”2 Developing an effective—and efficient—grading approachis particularly difficult for new educators who lack confidence in their evaluation abilities orthose of their teaching assistants (to whom the grading often falls). Meanwhile, technicalwriting educators constantly seek to reinforce the importance of writing to students outside of thewriting class. Both interests, and ultimately those of students, are served when educators from Page 11.669.2various engineering departments work with technical writing educators to develop a gradingsystem that provides specific grading criteria for the grader(s) to ensure
[Internet]. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2004 [cited 2012 Feb 14]. p. 135–42. Available from: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/985692.98571014. McGilly K. Cognitive science and educational practice: An introduction. Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice [Internet]. MIT Press; 1996 [cited 2014 Jan 4]. Available from: http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=YyiywUE- M0YC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=%E2%80%9CCognitive+science+and+educational+practice:+An+introduction, %E2%80%9D+mcgilly&ots=hsx7tDRdU7&sig=FZDyQ2fop4CST7tDfGlULVprYYo15. Olson S, Loucks-Horsley S. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning [Internet]. National Academies Press; 2000
- assisted learning versus conventional teaching methods on the acquisition and retention of knowledge in medical surgical nursing students," Nurse education today, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 866-871, 2011.[14] R. V. Lindsey, J. D. Shroyer, H. Pashler and M. C. Mozer, "Improving students’ long-term knowledge retention through personalized review," Psychological science, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 639-647, 2014.[15] R. F. Hopkins, K. B. Lyle, J. L. Hieb and P. A. S. Ralston, "Spaced retrieval practice increases college students’ short-and long-term retention of mathematics knowledge," Educational Psychology Review, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 853-873, 2016.[16] J. Direnga, M. B. Presentati, M. D. Timmermann, A. Brose and C. H. Kautz, "Does it
facultymember in an intentional and proactive mode that supports one’s goals.AcknowledgmentsThis time management framework and curation of resources is based on professionaldevelopment workshops created for and implemented with the faculty at the University ofSouthern Indiana by its Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning. Support was providedby an AAC&U Bringing Theory to Practice grant.ReferencesBernazzani, S. (2016). 20 Productive Things to Do During Your Downtime. https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/productive-holiday-ideasBoice R. (1997). Which is more productive, writing in binge patterns of creative illness or in moderation? Written Communication, 14, 435-459.Brans, P. (2013). The Top Ten Challenges in Time Management
of student work that illustrate grader misuse of rubrics and issues withreporting numbers.In each of Figure 4’s three examples, the student failed to acknowledge that the 9g and 30gpredictions fell outside the range of the original data. According to the rubric, this shouldautomatically drop all three students to no higher than “underachieved,” as one of the two piecesof evidence for achievement is not demonstrated. However, we can see that for students A and B,the graders assigned marks of “partially achieved” and “fully achieved.” This immediatelyindicates that the grader is either not using the rubric, does not understand the rubric, or does notcare to follow the rubric and reasonably indicates insufficient oversight (given that this
of the fourinstitutions. These styles are characterized by the student’s desire to begin a task alone and thenevolve into a different mode of studying as the task progresses toward completion. We call thefirst of these two Start alone styles: Start alone, End together. This pattern of studying tends tofocus on a formal agreement among students to come together at a preset time(s) to discussdifficulties, compare answers, and engage in other benefits of collective effort. The secondvariation, Start alone, End almost together, while similar in philosophy to Start alone, Endtogether, tends to be more casual and less structured. In this pattern of studying, studentstypically agree with a group of other students to begin a task on their own, and
communication as their 1particular mode of autopoietic reproduction” (p. 3) As leading systems theorists Capra andLuisi[9] described: [Because] communications recur in multiple feedback loops, they produce a shared system of beliefs, explanations, and values – a common context of meaning – that is continually sustained by further communications (p. 308).Applying this theory to systems of higher learning, we argue that the social life (or “culture(s)”)of engineering colleges and departments is maintained by a network of communications fromwhich messages or stories emerge that reflect this “common context of meaning”. What, then,are these
Institute in Freiburg, Germany working on advanced MMOD protection systems for satellites and developing preliminary designs for safe lunar habitats using in-situ materials for pro- tection against meteoroid impacts. This year he served on another NASA Independent V&V Committee to review the MMOD risk assessment process for NASA’s Constellation program. At Missouri S&T, Dr. Schonberg continues to teach a variety of graduate and undergraduate courses in civil, mechanical, and aerospace engineering. Page 22.104.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 A Streamlined Approach to Developing and