Conference Session

Launching Successful Academic Careers

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Rose, University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

March 17, 2010)8. Kelly, W.E. “Standards in Civil Engineering Design Education.” J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract. 134(1), January 2008, pp. 59-66.9. Brenner, B. “Editor's Note.” J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract. 128(3), July 2002, pp. 99.10. Bundy, D. “Preparation of Papers in Two Column Format for the FIE 2010 Conference.” Frontiers in Education Clearing House website, accessed January 7, 2010 (URL: http://fie- conference.org/format/FIEformat.pdf).11 Murad, M. “Course and syllabus change to incorporate aspects of diversity in engineering and engineering technology courses.” Proceedings, 2004 ASEE Annual Conference, June 2004, Salt Lake City, UT. (CD-ROM).12 Rose, A.T. and Kinsinger, K. S

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade in Teaching I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Henry Louie, Seattle University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

. Page 15.1329.10References 1. R. Murray and J. R. Brightman, Interactive teaching, European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 295-301, 1996. 2. C. C. Bonwell and J. A. Eison, Active learning: creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1, Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development, 1991. 3. L. A. Van Dijk, G. C. Van Den Berg, and H. Van Keulen, Interactive lectures in engineering education., European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 15-28, 2001. 4. B. Mehlenbacher, C. R. Miller, D. Covington, and J. S. Larsen, Active and interactive learning online: A comparison of web-based and conventional writing

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade in Teaching II

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adrian Ieta, State University of New York, Oswego; Thomas Doyle, McMaster University; Rachid Manseur, SUNY-Oswego

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

offensive. Keepingthis balance may ensure the coexistence of challenging tests with good SET scores (SET scores areobviously not exclusively the result of good grading).References[1] Ieta, A., R. Manseur, and T.E. Doyle. (June 14 – 17, 2009) “Effective criteria for teaching and learning.” The 2009 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, TX, 2009.[2] S. S. Stevens, “On the averaging of data,” Science, Vol. 121, Jan. 1955, pp. 113–116.[3] Wilbert J. McKeachie, and Marilla Svinicki. McKeachie’s Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College Page 15.629.8 and University Teachers, Boston, Houghton, 2006.[4] Lang, J. W. B

Conference Session

Mentoring and Development of New Faculty

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alisa Clyne, Drexel University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

University Press, 2000.12. Seymour, E., “The Loss of Women from Science, Mathematics and Engineering Undergraduate Majors,” Science Education, vol. 79, no. 4, 1995, pp. 437–473.13. National Research Council Board on Engineering Education, Report on Designing an Adaptive System, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1995.14. Ambrose, S., et al., Journeys of Women in Science & Engineering, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA, 1997.15. Committee on Women Faculty in the School of Science, A Study on the Status of Women in Science at MIT, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1999.16. Tierney, W., and E. Bensimon, Promotion and Tenure: Community and Socialization in Academe, State

Conference Session

Training and Support for NEEs

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Canan Bilen-Green, North Dakota State University; Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University; Christi McGeorge, North Dakota State University; Elizabeth J. Birmingham, North Dakota State University; Ann Burnett, North Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Science and Engineering 2006; Washington D.C.: NRC Press.3. Bickel, J., Clark, V. Encouraging the Advancement of Women. Medical Student JAMA 2000; 283: 671;Wunsch, M.A. Giving Structure to Experience: Mentoring Strategies for Women Faculty. Initiatives 1994: 56 (1): 1-10.4. Ragins, B.R., McFarlin, D.B. Perceptions of Mentor Roles in Cross-gender Mentoring Relationships.Journal of Vocational Behavior 1990: 37: 321-339.5. Zachary, L. The Mentor's Guide 2000. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.6. Mark, S., Link, H., Morahan, P.S., Pololi, L., Reznik, V., Tropez-Sims, S. Innovative Mentoring Programsto Promote Gender Equity in Academic Medicine. Academic Medicine 2001: 76: 39-42.7. Baugh, S.G. & Scandura, T.A. The Effect

Conference Session

Encouraging Students to Think Critically

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan; Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Conference Session

Tips and Tricks for Actively Engaging Students

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Clifton B. Farnsworth, Brigham Young University; Donna Harp Ziegenfuss, University of Utah; Matthew W. Roberts, Southern Utah University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

. Jossey-Bass, 2007.[2] National Research Council. How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in theclassroom. National Academies Press, 2004[3] Mazur, E. Farewell, lecture? Science, 323(5910), 50-51, 2009.[4] Ambrose, S.A., Bridges, M.W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M.C., and Norman, M.K. How learningworks: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. John Wiley & Sons, 2010.[5] Barr, R.B. and Tagg, J. From teaching to learning—A new paradigm for undergraduateeducation. Change: The magazine of higher learning, 27(6), 12-26, 1995.[6] Weimer, M. Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. John Wiley & Sons,2002.[7] Handelsman, J., Miller, S. and Pfund, C. Scientific teaching. Macmillan, 2007.[8] Ebert-May, D

Conference Session

Best of NEE

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas Shepard, University of St. Thomas; Alison B. Hoxie, University of Minnesota Duluth; Matt Anderson, Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

instructor, and student motivation27.A recent paper by Gehringer and Peddycord outlines various strategies for dealing with the issueof students having access to textbook problem solutions28. The following alternatives to usinggraded homework problems from the course textbook were presented:Reduce the weight of homework and:  increase the weight of exams  give weekly/frequent graded quizzes  increase the weight of projectsUse questions from other sources such as:  new editions of textbooks  automated testing system that randomizes parameters for each student  self-made problems (i.e. write your own)  swap problems with instructors at other schools  take problems from a different textbook(s)  have an

Conference Session

Best of the NEE

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Squire, Virginia Military Institute; Charles Bott, Virginia Military Institute; Matthew Hyre, Virginia Military Institute

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

details of the contract. Let them meet the specificpeople who are paying them to do this work and have them give some small presentation to themat an early time: the students will quickly learn that they must take full personal responsibility forthe quality of their work.It takes both the right type of industry contract and the right undergraduate(s) to make theresearch experience work. If either isn’t appropriate, the experience is miserable for the student,granting agency, and advisor. It can be difficult for a new professor to turn down a potentialcontract or a student that requests to be involved in a project but it is far more difficult to managean inherently poor match into a successful outcome. Spend as much time in the early

Conference Session

Been There, Done That: Advice for NEEs

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Engelken, Arkansas State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

of when they may be needed in the future. Emphasis on computer simulations can also consume class time that historically was devoted to covering fundamentals. As with all of the trends discussed in this section, balance has to be struck between well-proven historical methodologies and new and (potentially) improved ones. Page 14.293.76. Hybridization of Academic Disciplines: Another recent trend is hybridization of academic disciplines, both in academia and profession(s). This offers certain advantages, for example, resource pooling and broader perspectives on problem solving. It reflects increasing hybridization of disciplines in the

Conference Session

Tips of the Trade: Best Practices, Expanded Advice, and Strategies for Implementable Course Improvement

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

J. Blake Hylton, Ohio Northern University; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

aslargely positive by the instructional team. Additionally, it is believed that these perceptions couldbe positively impacted with more directed student instruction as to how to interpret and utilizethe standards-based grading feedback. There was very little such instruction in this course,meaning that students often failed to effectively leverage the rubric feedback to guide theirlearning.AcknowledgementsThis work was made possible by a grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF DUE1503794). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.Bibliography1. Atwood, S. A., Siniawski, M. T., & Carberry, A. R

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura D Hahn, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Chris Migotsky, University of Illinois

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

-observation meeting is where we thoroughly describe the full observationsequence and expectations, it’s a somewhat didactic activity: useful, but not necessarilyenlightening. In the future, we could encourage a deeper conversation during these meetings—for example asking the faculty to be reflective about past teaching experiences how they (or alack thereof) impact their current teaching. Figur 3 id post ob r atio m ti nn t t ll n S na Moti ate You to ange lab t Ye S w at Set hange Start with Self

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington; Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Tamara Floyd Smith, Tuskegee University; Melani I. Plett, Seattle Pacific University; Nanette M. Veilleux, Simmons College; Mee Joo Kim, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

teams that evolve by student self-selection processes over time that most often provide these benefits, while success in assignedteams may not be as prevalent. Thus, educators may benefit from observing and examining theinformal, self-assembled working teams students create in order to modify the way theyorganize, assign, diagnose, and support more formal project teams within courses and classroom.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThe authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the National Science Foundation for theirsupport of this work under the REESE program (grant numbers DRL-0909817, 0910143,0909659, 0909900, and 0909850). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ted Eschenbach P.E., University of Alaska Anchorage; Neal A Lewis, University of Bridgeport; Gillian M. Nicholls, Southeast Missouri State University; William J. Schell IV P.E., Montana State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

., and Anbari, F. T., Editors. Praeger Publishers. Page 26.1654.113. Beck, K., Beedle, M, van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., Grenning, J., Highsmith, J., Hunt, A., Jeffries, R., Kern, J., Marick, B., Martin, R., Mellor, S., Schwaber, K., Sutherland, J., & Thomas, D. (2001). Manifesto for agile software development. Retrieved from http://agilemanifesto.org/ .4. Schwaber, K. (2004). Agile project management with scrum. Microsoft Press.5. Cockburn, A. & Highsmith, J. (2001, November). Agile software development, the people factor. IEEE Computer, 34(11), 131-133. doi: 10.1109

Conference Session

Faculty Unite! Effective Ways for Educators to Collaborate Successfully

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Ann Claussen, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

(2007).10. Pan, D., Tan, G. S., Ragupathi, K., Booluck, K., Roop, R., and Ip, Y. K. “Profiling teacher/teaching usingdescriptors derived from qualitative feedback: Formative and summative applications.” Research in HigherEducation 50(1): 73-100 (2009).11. Marsh, H.W. and Roche, L.A. “Making students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The criticalissues of validity, bias, and utility.” American Psychologist 52(11): 1187-1197 (1997).12. Brent, R. and Felder, R.M. “A protocol for peer review of teaching.” Proceedings of the 2004 American Societyfor Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2004).13. Iowa State University Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning. “Peer Evaluation of Teaching: LiteratureReview

Conference Session

Best of the NEE

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yi-Min Huang, University of Washington; Jessica Yellin, University of Washington; Jennifer Turns, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

who know a lot more than you and can tell you to do things, so it's a very differentatmosphere.”In the military, students in SD106’s classes routinely were senior officers with more experiencethan him who outranked him and had no hesitation in challenging him on course content orordering him to provide them with additional course materials. These time related differences inmaturity and experience level between instructor and student led to a power differential withinthe classroom that faculty in academia rarely experience: “…And so, you know, some folks are receptive, some folks have had -- in some of their jobs have had just a load of experience in this and know way more than you do, and others don't. And when you're done

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

M.D. B. Sarder, University of Southern Mississippi

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Be Done?. In P. Barker & S. Rebelsky (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2002 (pp. 1479-1483). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.13. Tinto, V. (2006). Research and practice of student retention: What next? Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 8(1), 1-20.14. Truluck, J. (2007). Establishing a mentoring plan for improving retention in online graduate degree programs. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, X(1).15. Huett, J. K., Kalinowski, K. E., Moller, L. & Huett, K. C. (2008). Improving the motivation and retention of online students through the use of ARCS-Based E-Mails. The American Journal of Distance

Conference Session

Assessments, Assessments, and Assessments

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David B. Meredith, Pennsylvania State University, Fayette

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

test will look at two billiard balls.Since I only see recent high school graduates, I consider it part of my responsibility to improve the problemsolving skills of the students and (in many cases) to break some of the bad habits that they may have learned inhigh school. It amazes me every year how many engineering students have forgotten the formulae for volumesand surface areas. So they get some practice early in the semester on homework and entrance quizzes to ensurethese basic equations are fresh in their memory. The students that I see are usually weak in converting units. Sothey quickly learn (because I tell them repeatedly) that if they need the velocity in m/s for the equation they areusing, they can expect the velocity to be given in

Conference Session

Launching Successful Academic Careers

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Engelken, Arkansas State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

applicable history, culture, and constraints, or the full extentof contributions of existing faculty. Web sites now make it easy for applicants tofamiliarize themselves with the university and current professors’ professional histories(for example, research record or teaching innovations), and if not meeting the newperson’s standards, it is possible for him/her to develop a marginal superiority complex.If perceiving approval from the chair or dean, they may, with good motives, propose newideas, proposals, and concerns about the status quo. They may consciously orsubconsciously try to mold the program into the image of their preceding institution(s).However, they may be perceived by senior faculty as not showing respect and deference.This causes

Conference Session

Classroom Management

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bridget M. Smyser, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

previous terms, and in-classparticipation grades improved by 4 percentage points. These and other measures showedimproved understanding and engagement from incorporating carefully designed cooperativelearning activities that took advantage of student-owned electronics. Engineering educatorsshould be encouraged to find activities and problems that will benefit from students’ constantelectronic connectivity. In short, there are many benefits to allowing the students to use classtime to ‘play’ with their phones.i Richtel, M., Digitally Aided Education, Using the Students’ Own Electronic Gear, New York Times, March 22,2013.ii Emery, S. Factors for Consideration when Developing a Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Strategy in HigherEducation, Masters

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade I

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aly Tawfik, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Janis Terpenny, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Richard Goff, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

characterized by an easy competition. The reader shouldbe aware that from the 360 / 400 projects (45 workshops × 8 to 9 projects each), the studentswere aware that 30 projects were to be selected for the finals, and 3 projects from these finals areto win prizes.As a result of this minor instructional delivery modification, the students within each of Friday’sworkshops divided themselves fairly among the five energy categories. Hence, just as required,this produced at least one team per renewable energy category.This example demonstrates the great influence an instructor has on the class s/he teaches. It alsoshows how minor modifications to the instructional delivery strategy can have big impacts on theinstructional progress within a classroom.3. Case

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade for Teaching II

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Murray Teitell, DeVry University-Long Beach

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

), 674-681. 3. Pahl, G., & Beltz, W. (1996). Engineering design: a systematic approach. 2nd ed. New York: Springer. 4. Otto, K., & Wood, K. (2000). Product design: techniques in reverse engineering and new product development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 5. Peak, R., Fulton R., Nishigaki I., and Okamoto, N. (1998). Integrating engineering design and analysis using a multi-representational approach. Engineering with Computers, 14(2), 93-114. 6. Pfefferkorn, C. (1975). A heuristic problem solving design system for equipment or furniture. Communications of the ACM, 18(5), 286-297. 7. Hawkins, J., & Blakeslee, S. (2004). On intelligence. New York: Henry Holt and

Conference Session

Encouraging Students to Think Critically

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington; Kathryn Elizabeth Shroyer, University of Washington; Terri L. Lovins, University of Washington; Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

“professional knowledge” as a type ofknowledge arising from engagement in reflection activities is in alignment with Stevens et al.’s(2008) notion of accountable disciplinary knowledge. In other words, reflection activities canhelp students gain or advance their knowledge in relation to course learning objectives,knowledge and skills required for accreditation, etc. In talking with students to explore whetherthe reflection activity did result in professional knowledge, we might be interested in statementsfrom students such as: “I learned something relevant to the course objectives,” “I learnedsomething relevant to my degree,” and “I learned something related to getting a universitydegree.”Factor 2: Personal knowledgeReflection activities have the

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade in Teaching II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Foster, George Fox University; Justin R. Vander Werff P.E., Dordt College

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

instructors recognize some of the learning struggles that students must overcome. • Multiple grading scales provide course assessment possibilities that can accurately reflect student mastery of the covered material in spite of their learning style(s).TAARs • The process of working through quizzes individually first and then in carefully arranged teams seems to be a very good mechanism for facilitating active discussion and peer teaching among students. • Embracing TAARs as a primary teaching tool does require the instructor to give up some lecture time, so courses need to be planned accordingly to fit nicely within the semester schedule; text and class material that are used should be accessible for students

Conference Session

Mentoring and Development of New Faculty

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Cady, National Academy of Engineering; Norman Fortenberry, National Academy of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

collaborations begun at the symposium and whether theywill complete their innovation projects, although several virtual meetings of attendees have beenconducted. Bibliography1. Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2009). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. The Carnegie Foundation for the Enhancement of Teaching. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass. Page 15.1064.7

Conference Session

Classroom Management

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waddah Akili, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

the Dun and Dun Learning Style Model. (11)The MBTI, based on Jung’s theory, has been popular in explaining differences inlearning for normal people. The dimension of most interest for learning is sensing (S)versus intuitive (N) type. (12) The sensing person prefers a straightforward, logical, step-by-step approach to learning. The sensing person, often learns by solving problems, andtends to find theory difficult. The intuitive individual, on the other hand, will skip stepsand follow hunches. He /she learns from theory and tends to do a minimal number ofproblems because they think they understand without having to solve problems. (13)Perry’s Model of College Student Development (14) can also be used to monitor studentlearning. According to

Conference Session

Women, Minorities and the New Engineering Educator

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Noel Schulz, Mississippi State University; Kirk Schulz, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

,” Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference, 2007, in press. Page 12.1615.9Appendix A Guidelines for Writing Your Thesis/DissertationYour thesis/dissertation has two purposes.1) Document your workThe thesis/dissertation is supposed to provide a comprehensive overview of your research work.It should introduce the topic and problem to the reader, explain what previous work has beendone related to the topic, outline your approach, document your techniques and methods, detailthe data and results and provide conclusions and ideas for future work.2) Provide background for the next student(s)Your thesis/dissertation is also a teaching tool

Conference Session

Getting Started: Objectives, Rubrics, Evaluations, and Assessment

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward Gehringer, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

thinkindependently. Learning outcomes were strongly correlated with course evaluation, but aftercontrolling for learning outcomes, he found that expected grades were not positively related toevaluations. In fact, in natural sciences, the highest-rated courses were some of the ones withlower grades. Courses that were either “too hard” or “too easy” were rated lower than coursesbetween these extremes.Eiszler [13] comes at the question from a different perspective—the change in grades andevaluations over time. Using data from more than 37,000 course sections offered between 1980and 1999, he found that during the 1980s, the percentage of students expecting As or A–s heldsteady, as did the average scores on course evaluations. But in the 1990s, the percentage

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade II

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Srikanth Tadepalli, University of Texas, Austin; Cameron Booth, University of Texas, Austin; Mitchell Pryor

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

the course and stopworking prior to the completing R4. These students are also assigned a value of 1. Thus the MoSfor each student starts with a value of 0 that linearly approaches 1 until they complete (or fail tocomplete) the course. This metric addresses the fundamental risk that leaving even small tasks tothe last minute can lead to failure. It does not account for the difference between a studentmethodically progressing through the units and one who completes the majority near the end ofthe semester.Pacing Metric(s) - Pacing metrics discern between early and later procrastination by looking atthe completion dates for intermediary milestones as well as the date a student completes the lastunit. This strategy allows insight into general

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade for Teaching II

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Saravanan Swaminathan, Tennessee Technological University; Barath Baburao, Tennessee Technological University; Donald Visco, Tennessee Technological University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

the very first class, the undergraduatestudents are made aware of the “teaching team” situation. Page 11.670.10 9References 1. "Report of the Committee on Evaluation of Engineering Education," J. Eng. Ed., September, 25 (1955). 2. Adams. K.A., “What Colleges and Universities Want in New Faculty?” Association of American Colleges and Universities (2002). 3. Davis, S., Kring, J. “A Model for Training and Evaluating Graduate Teaching Assistants”, College Student Journal, 35(1), 45 (2001) 4. Katehi, L., K. Banks, H. Diefes-Dux, D. Follman, J. Gaunt, K. Hahgighi, P. K