Asee peer logo
Displaying all 6 results
Conference Session
Scaling class size and technology – New Engineering Educators Division
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Steven S Holland, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Jennifer L Bonniwell, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Joshua David Carl, Milwaukee School of Engineering
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
Computer Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst. He was then a Senior Sensors Engineer with the MITRE Corporation, Bedford, MA from 2011 to 2013. Since 2013 he has been an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Milwaukee School of Engineering. His research interests include ultrawideband antenna arrays, electrically small antennas, Radar systems, analog circuits, and engineering education.Dr. Jennifer L Bonniwell, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Jennifer L. Bonniwell joined the Milwaukee School of Engineering faculty as an assistant professor in 2016. She earned her BS in Electrical Engineering from the Milwaukee School of Engineering and her MS and PhD in Electrical
Conference Session
Scaling class size and technology – New Engineering Educators Division
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael Allen Hayden Ph.D., Indiana State University; Randell W. Peters, Indiana State University
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
what you were taught. Go through the book, e.g., a chapter a week. Go through a list of topics, e.g., a topic a week.Ideally, course content is determined by planning the program’s curriculum so that the content ofeach course plays its part in achieving the program’s educational objectives [5], [6], [7]. This isunlikely to translate to any of the above bullets. Neither academic freedom nor faculty purviewimplies that the faculty member can teach whatever they want to [8], [9]. See Figure 1. In a well-functioning department, e.g., fully accredited with complete ABET approved syllabi, the newfaculty member should be able to focus on interpreting the bases of each pyramid in Figures 1and 2. In an imperfect scenario, e.g., the faculty
Conference Session
Assessment of Student Learning – New Engineering Educators Division
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hani Serhal Saad, Eastern Washington University
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
early on for the post-changes cases and that could also have contributed to the drop in the results. f) Scientific integrity and depth of analysis: An increase of 7% is observed for this criteria. This dealt with how sound and complex the scientific analysis of the paper was. Keeping in mind that while the data is fake or obtained from external sources, the analysis of the results should still be comprehensive. The students were told to be smart about their results and to anticipate what these results could be so as to effectively discuss them. While it might seem odd to be discussing results that were never really obtained, here again the focus is on the interpretation of
Conference Session
Assessment of Student Learning – New Engineering Educators Division
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hani Serhal Saad, Eastern Washington University; Kyle Frederick Larsen P.E., Eastern Washington University; Heechang Bae, Eastern Washington University; N.M. A. Hossain, Eastern Washington University
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
UniversityDr. N.M. A. Hossain, Eastern Washington University Dr. Hossain is working as a Professor in the Department of Engineering and Design at Eastern Washington University, Cheney, WA. His research interests involve the computational and experimental analysis of lightweight space structures and composite materials. Dr. Hossain received M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Materials Engineering and Science from South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, South Dakota. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Investigating Students Performance for Textbook and in House Homework AssignmentsABSTRACTHomework assignments have always been an integral part of learning in all majors and
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Waddah Akili, Iowa State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
,characterized stage two. Stage three: the stage of pondering and deliberations,which has lingered on for a long time, is characterized by calls from industries,engineering graduates, and invited experts, for more rounded engineers with the skillsand abilities to function in a modern business climate. Unfortunately, the response tothese calls has been slow. The “piece meal” approach and/or periodic adjustments toan already over-burdened curriculum, in an attempt to meet a broad set of demands,have not been effective in meeting objectives, and have convinced many stakeholdersthat the time has come for a radical departure from the traditional layered andsequential structure that has prevailed for decades. There are clearly significantchallenges ahead
Conference Session
Scaling class size and technology – New Engineering Educators Division
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Peggy C. Boylan-Ashraf, San Jose State University; John R. Haughery, Iowa State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
classes and a job or family orboth. Most of our education system is not built to cater to their needs, and its results areextremely wasteful –30% failure rate year in and year out in fundamental engineering coursescannot simply be tolerated as an unfortunate reality. Active learning should no longer be anoption –it must be treated as the key ingredient in attempting to start solving this failurecatastrophe. The frame of active learning should contain many interactive elements, includingweekly lectures, in-class activities, online activities71, and hands-on lab exercises –all doneduring the 75-minute class time in each lecture, thus not changing any curriculum structure.Each element of the new paradigm is described below –mechanics of materials