- Conference Session
- NEE 1 - Innovative Teaching & Learning Strategies
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Ahmed Dallal, University of Pittsburgh; Renee M. Clark, University of Pittsburgh
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
and addressed student difficulties in ways that areeffective and generally enjoyed by the students. Additionally, an active learning workshop in thesummer of 2018 motivated me to use more involved active-learning techniques, including theflipped classroom and inductive learning. Consequently, I flipped the last two modules of anelectronic design laboratory in the summer as well as a signal processing lab in the fall of 2018.The effectiveness of these advanced techniques was formally assessed by comparing student workbefore and after the implementations, and these preliminary results will be discussed. Surveys andinterviews were used to measure student perceptions of the teaching techniques, and these resultswill also be discussed, with
- Conference Session
- NEE 2 - Strategies to Improve Teaching Effectiveness
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Joanna Wright, University of Washington; Lauren N. Summers, University of Washington; Denise Wilson, University of Washington
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
sessions), and Enthusiasm (forteaching and/or for the content of the lesson). These behaviors are discussed in more detail next.EffortA strong majority (73% overall, 79% of male students, 64% of female students) describedinstances during which their TA devoted noticeable effort, or lack of effort, to their teaching role.Many students said that when they could tell that their TA put effort into teaching a class,whether a recitation or a laboratory, they felt more motivated to reciprocate by also putting ineffort. Jonathan described this synergy between student and TAs: It helps to see a TA or professor caring about their subject, because it implies that they care that the students are trying to learn the subject, and that they are doing
- Conference Session
- NEE 1 - Innovative Teaching & Learning Strategies
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Eliza A. Banu, University of Georgia; Colleen M. Kuusinen, University of Georgia
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
: Learning and Retention Benefits in Introductory Psychology," Teaching of Psychology, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 303-308, 2014.[14] D.-p. Cao and X.-y. Yin, "The BOPPPS Teaching Mode in Canada and Its Implications for Higher Education Reform," Research and Exploration in Laboratory, vol. 2, no. 49, 2016.[15] T. A. Angelo and K. P. Cross, Classroom assessment techniques: A handbookfor college teachers. Jossey-Bass Publisher, 1993.[16] B. K. Morris and S. Savadatti, "Analysis of Basic Video Metrics in a Flipped Statics Course," presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.
- Conference Session
- NEE 2 - Strategies to Improve Teaching Effectiveness
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Robyn Paul, University of Calgary; Mohammad Moshirpour, University of Calgary; Emily Ann Marasco, University of Calgary; Sepideh Afkhami Goli, University of Calgary; Ehsan Mohammadi, University of Calgary; Fatemeh Sharifi, University of Calgary
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
, embedded quiz questionsthroughout the videos. Questions are drawn randomly from a quiz bank where possible to avoidacademic misconduct issues.Students are given the opportunity to integrate domain knowledge and creative problem-solvingskills during their interactive laboratory sessions. This course component was designed around astudio format that allows students to work collaboratively while seeking personalized feedback[7], [8]. Instructors and teaching assistants coach students through weekly assignments inpreparation for a larger design-based project. The final design task encompasses technical andcreative aspects that provide students with some autonomy and flexibility as they implement therequired technical elements.MethodologyThis research
- Conference Session
- NEE - 3: Improving Homework and Problem-solving Performance
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Alicia Baumann, Arizona State University; Stephanie M. Gillespie, Arizona State University; Nicolle Sanchez, Arizona State University
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
, “Enhancing student learning of research methods through the use of undergraduate teaching assistants,” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 759-775, 2014.[4] M. A McVey, C. R. Bennett, J. H. Kim, and A. Self, ”Impact of Undergraduate Teaching Fellows Embedded in Key Undergraduate Engineering Courses,” in Proceedings of the 124th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, USA, June 2017.[5] L. Wheeler, C. Clark, and C. Grisham, “Transforming a Traditional Laboratory to an Inquiry- Based Course: Importance of Training TAs when Redesigning a Curriculum,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 94, iss. 1, pp. 1019-1026, June 2017.[6] G. Guadagni, H. Ma, and L. Wheeler, ”The Benefit of Training
- Conference Session
- NEE - 3: Improving Homework and Problem-solving Performance
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Rebecca Marie Reck, Kettering University
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
Paper ID #26870A Systematic Review of Technologies for Providing Feedback and Grades toStudentsDr. Rebecca Marie Reck, Kettering University Rebecca M. Reck is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University in Flint, Michigan. Her research interests include instructional laboratories, assessment, and student motivation. She earned a Ph.D. in systems engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. During her eight years as a systems engineer at Rockwell Collins, she earned a master’s degree in electrical engineering at Iowa State University. She earned a bachelor’s degree in electrical