Conference Session

Faculty Development and Research Programs (NEE)

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Renee M. Desing, Oregon State University; Abigail Clark, The Ohio Northern University; Rachel Louis Kajfez, The Ohio State University; Cassie Wallwey, The Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)

boundaryless new spaces of knowledge. To truly impact the world, webelieve this is the next step in STEAM and encourage faculty to push themselves to explore thesespaces and collaborations.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1811119. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.We would also like to acknowledge and thank the faculty participants for this work who werewilling to engage with the public in this unique format. We are grateful for your participationand insights.Finally, we would like to acknowledge the rest of the larger study

Conference Session

NEE Technical Session 4 - Assessments: Grading and deadlines

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bridget M. Smyser, Northeastern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)

?”. European Journal of Special Needs Education. Vol.32, No. 1, pp. 71-88. 2017.[12] Brownson C, Drum DJ, Swanbrow Becker MA, Saathoff A, Hentschel E. “Distress andsuicidality in higher education: Implications for population-oriented prevention paradigms.”Journal of College Student Psychotherapy. Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 98-113. 2016.[13] Condra M, Dineen M, Gills H, Jack-Davies A, Condra E. “Academic accommodations forpostsecondary students with mental health disabilities in Ontario, Canada: A review of theliterature and reflections on emerging issues”. Journal of Postsecondary Education andDisability. Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 277-91. 2015[14] Peterson J, Digman MF. “A Comparison of Learning Outcomes and Learner Satisfaction ina CADD Course with Flexible and

Conference Session

NEE Technical Session 3 - Courses: development, logistics, and impact

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sanaz Motamedi, University of Florida; Viktoria Medvedeva Marcus, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)

-learning systems [21]. To assess students’learning styles, this study used the Visual, Aural, Read/Write, or Kinesthetic (VARK) learningstyles inventory which is a questionnaire consists of 16 items used to assess the respondent’slearning style [21]. The study also used the Dixion scale to measure students’ engagement usingthe adaptive or non-adaptive e-learning system; this scale includes the factors of skills,participation/interaction, performance, and emotion [21]. This study found that students wholearned through the adaptive system learned more, reflected by their engagement scale responsesand overall course outcomes. While this study does not model the relationship between students’learning styles and intentions to use, has a small sample