Asee peer logo

Relaxed Deadlines: Do They Provide an Unfair Advantage?

Download Paper |

Conference

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Portland, Oregon

Publication Date

June 23, 2024

Start Date

June 23, 2024

End Date

June 26, 2024

Conference Session

NEE Technical Session 4 - Assessments: Grading and deadlines

Tagged Division

New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)

Tagged Topic

Diversity

Page Count

16

DOI

10.18260/1-2--47938

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/47938

Download Count

98

Paper Authors

biography

Bridget M. Smyser Northeastern University

visit author page

Dr. Smyser is a Teaching Professor in the Mechanical and Industrial Engineering with research interests that include lab and design pedagogy, inclusive teaching, and neurodiversity in STEM.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Educators seeking academic rigor often point to the necessity of strict deadlines for student work to prepare students for the reality of life after college. However, during the pandemic, there were calls to relax deadlines to alleviate stress for the sake of the students’ mental health. Flexible deadlines can also benefit neurodiverse students and non-traditional or marginalized students. One argument against relaxed deadlines is the risk of students who turn assignments in late having an unfair advantage due to having more time to work or having access to solutions or classmates’ assignments. Accordingly, homework grades were examined for three past terms of a course at Unknown University with liberal late policies. The goal was to determine if there were any statistical differences between grades for students who turned homework in on time versus those whose work was turned in late. Additionally, the data was examined for correlations between late homework and the grades on related lab experiments. For every homework examined in three terms, the average homework score for the on-time homework was higher than the late homework score. This was true even if grades of zero were excluded from the sample. For nine of the assignments, the difference between on-time and late grades was statistically significant, further underlining that extra time did not provide any advantage, either in terms of being able to cheat off other students or spending additional time on the problems. Grades on the more difficult lab experiments were positively correlated with grades on certain homework assignments, but these benefits diminished the later the homework was turned in. Results indicate that while relaxed deadlines may provide mental health benefits for the students, the learning value of the homework assignments decreases the later they are turned in. Based on this data, a combination of liberal deadlines and directly reaching out to students whose work is more than three days late may maintain the mental health benefits while preserving the learning benefits.

Smyser, B. M. (2024, June), Relaxed Deadlines: Do They Provide an Unfair Advantage? Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--47938

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2024 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015