Asee peer logo
Displaying all 16 results
Conference Session
NEE Technical Session 3 - Courses: development, logistics, and impact
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sarah Rajkumari Jayasekaran, University of Florida
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
Education During the Pandemic: Responses to Coronavirus Disease 2019 From Spain," Frontiers in Psychology, Original Research vol. 12, 2021.[2] A. Bashir, S. Bashir, K. Rana, P. Lambert, and A. Vernallis, "Post-COVID-19 Adaptations; the Shifts Towards Online Learning, Hybrid Course Delivery and the Implications for Biosciences Courses in the Higher Education Setting," Frontiers in Education, Original Research vol. 6, 2021.[3] S. R. Jayasekaran, S. Anwar, K. Cho, and S. F. Ali, "Relationship of students' engagement with learning management system and their performance-An undergraduate programming course perspective," 2022.[4] I. A.-O. DeCoito and M. A.-O. Estaiteyeh, "Transitioning to Online Teaching
Conference Session
NEE Technical Session 2 - Educator's experience and perspective
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yuliana Flores, University of Washington; Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington; Soraya Grace Barar; Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
prep weeks. Week 4's preparationconsisted of Paige and Gabby splitting up the work of creating a new set of slides and theirinstructor notes. Like the prior weeks, the expectation was to use AUT 2020's slides but not evenwatching the Zoom recording for AUT 2020's Data Visualization lecture helped the team feelconfident in delivering the content. The data does not provide information as to why the videowas unhelpful. As a result, Paige and Gabby did research on the topic to understand datavisualization (data type/measurement scale, nominal/ordinal/quantitative, etc.). This led to Paigeand Gabby updating the visualization examples using postcards from previous students. All threeeducators acknowledged the amount of work required for week 4 and
Conference Session
NEE Technical Session 1 - Educator's Tools
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Toluwalase Opanuga, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Logan Andrew Perry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Grace Panther, University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
highlighted the need for a more consistent SDL assessment inengineering education. Of the SDL assessment scales discussed, Cadorin et al.’s [21] SRSSDLwas considered suitable for the validity current study for two reasons. First, its items alignedwith the skills to be examined in engineering students as part of a larger study that explores theimpact of metacognitive learning strategies on their self-directed learning. Second, it had beenwidely used in nursing education and its validity has been confirmed in related disciplines [48,60]. Examining the SRSSDL’s validity in a different setting- engineering education, wasnecessary to ascertain its suitability for the SDL assessment of engineering students.III. MethodsA. Instrument DesignCadorin et
Conference Session
NEE Technical Session 4 - Assessments: Grading and deadlines
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cassie Wallwey, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Michelle Soledad, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Carol Geary, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
; BackgroundAssigning grades as a practice in educational systems has been used commonly since the early1900’s [1]. Grades are globally ubiquitous to students’ academic success. Whether representedalphabetically (A, B, C, D, & F) or numerically (through percentages or grade-point averages)grades can be considered a universal language taught to nearly everyone as early as primary andelementary school.Grades are a practice tool and serve dual function in educational systems. Formative assessmentsare ideally low stakes assignments that happen multiple times in a way that scaffolds studentlearning and development and deliver frequent real-time feedback to students [2], [3], so anygrades that are a result of a formative assessments (e.g., homework, quizzes
Conference Session
NEE Technical Session 3 - Courses: development, logistics, and impact
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sanaz Motamedi, University of Florida; Viktoria Medvedeva Marcus, University of Florida
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
:10.1371/journal.pone.0248925[3] K. Hu, K. Godfrey, Q. Ren, S. Wang, X. Yang, and Q. Li, “The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on college students in USA: Two years later,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 315, p. 114685, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114685.[4] M. Mailizar, D. Burg, and S. Maulina, “Examining university students’ behavioural intention to use e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An extended TAM model,” Educ Inf Technol, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 7057–7077, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10557-5.[5] A. D. Dumford and A. L. Miller, “Online learning in higher education: Exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement,” Journal of Computing in Higher Education, vol. 30, no. 3, pp
Conference Session
NEE Technical Session 3 - Courses: development, logistics, and impact
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Meghana Parameswarappa Jayalakshmamma, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Ashish D Borgaonkar, New Jersey Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
, skilled, andmotivated workforce ready to address future technological challenges. Hence,encouraging educators and policymakers to reconsider the traditional separationbetween research and education, fostering a more agile and responsiveengineering workforce prepared for the challenges of the future.5. References[1] J. E. Froyd, "Evidence for the efficacy of student-active learning pedagogies," Project Kaleidoscope, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 64-74, 2007.[2] J. Lucena, G. Downey, B. Jesiek, and S. Elber, "Competencies beyond countries: the re‐organization of engineering education in the United States, Europe, and Latin America," Journal of engineering education, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 433-447, 2008.[3] N. Spinks, N. Silburn
Conference Session
NEE Technical Session 2 - Educator's experience and perspective
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rebecca Marie Reck, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Jessica R TerBush, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Caroline Cvetkovic, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Holly M Golecki, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Christopher D. Schmitz, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Katie Ansell, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; David Mussulman, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Chandrasekhar Radhakrishnan; Ilalee Harrison James, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
years.SyllabusImproving inclusivity and belonging in lab classes starts even before students come to theclassroom. How instructors organize classroom materials can signal to students the environmentthat the lab will create. Faculty can set the stage for an inclusive classroom by including syllabusstatement(s) and an instructor learning philosophy. These sections of the syllabus connectstudents with resources and make clear the instructor’s commitment to creating an inclusiveenvironment. When students come to class on the first day, spending time reviewing these itemsdemonstrates their importance to the class. If you have a syllabus quiz, including questions onthese items can also reinforce their importance to students.Syllabus statements can include a land grant
Conference Session
NEE Technical Session 1 - Educator's Tools
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Timothy A Wood, The Citadel; Stephanie Laughton, The Citadel
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
, Weapons of mass instruction: a schoolteacher’s journey through the dark world of compulsory schooling. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers, 2009.[11] P. van der Ploeg, “Dewey and Citizenship Education: Schooling as Democratic Practice,” 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-67905-1_20-1.[12] J.-J. Rousseau, Emile: Or On Education. New York: Basic Books, 1979.[13] R. Koganzon, Liberal States, Authoritarian Families: Childhood and Education in Early Modern Thought. Oxford University Press, 2021.[14] T. Sowell, Inside American Education, Standard Edition. Free Press, 2003.[15] T. Sowell, The Vision of the Anointed: Self-Congratulation as a Basis for Social Policy. Basic Books, 1996.[16] S. E. | T. Oregonian/OregonLive, “Oregon says
Conference Session
NEE Technical Session 3 - Courses: development, logistics, and impact
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer Mott, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
Count course was educationally effective” Scored out of 5 Section Completed Average Median S. Dev Online MWF 11 4.78 5 0.33 Online MW 7 4.73 5 0.47 Face-to-Face (1) 17 4.54 5 0.66 Face-to-Face (2) 13 4.18 4 0.95 Hybrid 15 4.07 4 1.1It's likely that some students' dislike for the flipped classroom method contributed to the lowercourse evaluation scores for the hybrid and in-person sections. These are
Conference Session
NEE Technical Session 2 - Educator's experience and perspective
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yuzhang Zang, Western Washington University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
contributions: this should include remodeled or new designed teaching materials, novel teaching methods, and the fulfillment of learning outcomes 2. Summarize student feedback: strength, weakness and other comments should are be consid- ered. Here is an example: Please identify what you consider to be the Please identify area(s) where you think the strengths of the course/section course/section could be improved well organized and put solution and assignments lab expectation was not clear on Canvas in a timely fashion The balance between homework, lectures and labs leave more time for students to take note are really nice and worked with the topics covered by each Professor was good at presenting strate- Homework was a
Conference Session
NEE Technical Session 1 - Educator's Tools
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Laura Savage, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
, including an Engineering Economy course in thespring 2024 semester. These games will be studied to determine in which courses they have themost impact, how best to incorporate learning outcomes into the games, and which aspectsstudents find the most and least engaging. References[1] P. Backlund and M. Hendrix, “Educational Games – Are They Worth the Effort? A literature survey of the effectiveness of serious games,” in 2013 5th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-GAMES), Poole, UK, 11-13 September, 2013, pp. 1-8.[2] C. Sousa, S. Rye, M. Sousa, P. J. Torres, C. Perim, S. Mansuklal, and F. Ennami, “Playing at the school table: Systematic
Conference Session
NEE Technical Session 1 - Educator's Tools
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer Mott, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Steffen Peuker, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
., “Integrating Ethics Into A Civil Engineering Course”, Paperpresented at 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois. https://peer.asee.org/1291[3] Bowers, S., & Maccarone, E. M., & Ricco, G. D., "On the Integration of Ethical, Legal, andSocietal Issues into a Computer Science Senior Design Capstone Program". Paper presented at2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana.https://peer.asee.org/25826[4] S. Rajan et al., "Incorporating Ethics in Engineering Education." Journal of ElectricalEngineering & Technology, 30 (2017): 164-171.[5] Hedayati Mehdiabadi, A., and James, J. O., & Svihla, V., “Ethical Reasoning in First-YearEngineering Design Paper”, presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &
Conference Session
NEE Technical Session 2 - Educator's experience and perspective
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gokce Akcayir, University of Alberta; Marnie V Jamieson, University of Alberta; Kristian Basaraba, University of Alberta; Duncan Buchanan, University of Alberta; Qingna Jin; Mijung Kim, University of Alberta; Janelle McFeetors, University of Alberta; Kerry Rose, University of Alberta
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
Conference Session
NEE Technical Session 4 - Assessments: Grading and deadlines
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer Mott, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
calculating gradesmade them more difficult to understand, not easier. For example, if a student receives one4, two 3's, and one 2 on a four-standard assignment, the average grade is 3, which is a B.However, the percent grade is 4+3+3+2=12, then 12/16=0.75, resulting in a C grade. Thestudent notices a C in the grade book and becomes concerned about their grade, but it isincorrect. Automatic letter grades were turned off in Canvas, but even if students knew the scaleis different than traditional, it did not help that the student’s immediate reaction to seeing a 75 andremembering that they have a B, and not a C. Part of the purpose of the new grading is to make itless stressful not more, so this solution was not utilized. Furthermore, rather than
Conference Session
NEE Technical Session 4 - Assessments: Grading and deadlines
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Bridget M. Smyser, Northeastern University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
LatePenalties in Programming Assignments.” Western Canadian Conference on ComputingEducation 2006.[7] Wyre S. “An argument for accepting late work”. Faculty Focus. August 21, 2019.[8] Boucher E. “It’s time to ditch our deadlines”. The Chronicle of Higher Education. August 22,2016.[9] Savini C. “Are You Being Rigorous or Just Intolerant?”. The Chronicle of Higher Education.May 4, 2016.[10] Hills M, Peacock K. “Replacing power with flexible structure: Implementing flexibledeadlines to improve student learning experiences”. Teaching and Learning Inquiry. Vol. 102022.[11] Jansen D, Petry K, Ceulemans E, Noens I, Baeyens D. “Functioning and participationproblems of students with ASD in higher education: Which reasonable accommodations areeffective
Conference Session
NEE Technical Session 1 - Educator's Tools
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Quamrul H. Mazumder, University of Michigan, Flint; Sunzia Sultana, University of Michigan, Flint
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
Write an Article: Preparing a Publishable Manuscript.”CytoJournal, vol. 9, no. 1, 2012, pp. 1–1, https://doi.org/10.4103/1742-6413.92545.[16] Breeding, Tessa, and Adel Elkbuli. “Origins and Implications of Proper Citation Practiceson Academic Integrity in Surgical Literature.” Surgery, vol. 172, no. 6, 2022, pp. 1873–74,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2022.08.033.[17] Mages, Wendy K., and Deborah S. Garson. “Get the Cite Right: Design and Evaluation of aHigh-Quality Online Citation Tutorial.” Library & Information Science Research, vol. 32, no. 2,2010, pp. 138–46, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2009.10.004.[18] Belter, Ronald W., and Athena du Pré. “A Strategy to Reduce Plagiarism in anUndergraduate Course.” Teaching of Psychology, vol. 36