programming is an integral part of being an engineer and has provided a means ofperforming analysis that would be cumbersome to complete analytically. In Fall 2022, a set ofprojects were developed for a junior level dynamics course. In prior offerings of this course, thetypical dynamics theory was covered and assessed using textbook assigned problems and exams.The developed projects required the students to recollect their knowledge of MATLABprograming from their programming class taught during their first year and apply those skills tosolve systems over a specified time instance. In this paper, the three projects developed arepresented. Subsequently, the assessment of the students’ performance with respect to the desiredlearning outcomes is
Paper ID #39870Learning Engineering Material Selection and Design Process Using anEngine DissectionDr. Craig Altmann, Virginia Military Institute ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Learning Engineering Material Selection and Design Process Using an Engine DissectionAbstractDuring the fall 2022 semester, the Mechanical Engineering department at the Virginia MilitaryInstitute (VMI) was interested in implementing a hands-on project in their Introduction toMechanical Engineering course. The goal of the project was to provide new students anexposure to mechanical engineering through means of
, civil and environ- mental engineering, and general engineering. He has won several awards for excellence in instruction; most recently the Saul K. Fenster Award for Innovation in Engineering Education. His research focuses on increasing diversity in STEM education and the STEM workforce. He has received multiple grants to run workforce development training programs as well as undergraduate research experience programs to train underrepresented minority and first-generation students. He is the Founding Director of NJIT’s Grand Challenges Scholars Program. He also has worked on several research projects, programs, and initiatives to help students bridge the gap between high school and college as well as to prepare
both teaching and research. Inthis paper, I share my personal journey of developing a PKM system with some tips and tricksI’ve learned along the way.My Personal Knowledge Management SystemMy journey toward implementing a knowledge management system started with a desire tobetter organize the literature sources for my research projects. I had used reference managers foryears, but each had limitations such as cost, portability, and searching. All the referencemanagers are great for what they were designed to do: collect information into a database tocreate citations. Beyond that they vary in their features for notetaking, highlighting articles, etc.After conducting research at three different institutions with licenses for three different
received multiple grants to run workforce development training programs as well as undergraduate research experience programs to train underrepresented minority and first-generation students. He is the Founding Director of NJIT’s Grand Challenges Scholars Program. He also has worked on several research projects, programs, and initiatives to help students bridge the gap between high school and college as well as to prepare students for the rigors of mathematics. He is also involved in various engineering education initiatives focusing on the integration of novel technologies into the engineering classroom, and excellence in instruction. His additional research interests include water, and wastewater treatment, stormwater
community vision with Pitt’s core compe- tencies of research and education, Sanchez has built up Pitt Hydroponics in Homewood, founded Con- stellation Energy Inventor labs for K-12 students, and re-created the Mascaro Center’s Teach the Teacher sustainability program for science educators in the region. As a teacher he designed and created the Sustainability capstone course which has annually partnered with community stakeholders to address sustainability challenges at all scales. Past projects have in- cluded evaluating composting stations in Wilkinsburg, studying infrastructure resilience in Homewood, enabling community solar in PA, improving energy efficiency in McCandless Township, and improving water quality in
evolution is not without barriers to entry andassociated risks.The objective of this paper is to share the experiences of three established civil engineeringfaculty and their mentor who are within two years of receiving their first NSF grants to supportEER projects at their home institution. Barriers to entry, challenges, and the lessons learnedassociated with their growth as emerging engineering education researchers are discussed.Strategies and resources are provided to assist new engineering educators to: lobby forinstitutional support, secure initial extramural funding, initiate collaborations, formulate short-and long-term career plans, build an Individual Development Plan (IDP), and develop aneffective mentor-mentee relationship with an
you during office hours about theirinterests.A key strategy is to make sure that students in your class know about your research. Show themthat it is interesting and meaningful. Can you integrate some of your research findings intolectures? Can you assign projects related to your research? You might discuss some researchyour students have done recently, and how it fits into the material they are studying in the course.As one of our respondents puts it, Sharing how your research fits in the goals of the course is very important. It is our only way to excite students about coming up with the next generation of engineering solutions but be grounded in the course materials we are teaching. But what is also important is to
benefits in that regard. Thefollowing section details that experience from the perspective of impacts on new facultyworkload and additional benefits that participation in the program offered to career andprofessional development. 3.1. Program Benefits on Teaching The weekly reflections provided an opportunity to further improve the course content and themethod of creating the groups for class activities and projects and following the progress ofstudents on their group project. Some specific examples are provided below.Monitoring in-class success on course learning objectives The weekly reflections were helpful for faculty to provide targeted learning objectivesand guidance. For example, one of the reflections asked students what
interdisciplinary STEAM collaborations?” From this data, we synthesized fourrecommendations, which are further discussed in this paper.Research Context & MethodsIn 2018, our project commenced that facilitated and studied higher education researchers’experiences with science communication with the public on interdisciplinary teams. The projectteam selected sixteen STEAM faculty members from a pool of applicants at a large, public,midwestern university who expressed interest in participating in interdisciplinary collaborationsand engaging with the public around science communication. We targeted early careerresearchers, and at the time the project began, thirteen of the participants were tenure-track butnot yet tenured while three of the participants
Paper ID #37682Instructor Profile in Global Shared Learning Classroom: Development ofCompetencies and SkillsPatricia Caratozzolo, Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey, Mexico Patricia Caratozzolo received her Ph.D. from Universitat Polit´ecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona. She is a Full Member of the Institute for the Future of Education and an Assistant Professor at Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico. She leads projects in Educational Innovation, Critical Thinking, Cognitive Flexi- bility, and the development of Social Oriented Interdisciplinary Skills in STEAM. Dr. Caratozzolo is a Senior Member of IEEE, a Member of the Executive
degree program at Western CarolinaUniversity. This ensures that students have primarily used their individual lab kits as part of in-person courses, rather than online courses. Students prior to the 2021-22 academic year wouldhave used their kits as part of remote courses, and not had access to traditional benchtopequipment, both of which might affect their perceptions of individual lab kits.The survey catalogued the types of activities that the student had engaged in with the M2K (labexercises, post-lab exercises, homework, projects both personal and for other classes). The M2Kdoes require installation and setup which is not required for benchtop devices, so the ease ofsetup was surveyed with a three-level Likert scale (easy, challenging
students in 11both the 2018 (n = 10) and 2022 (n = 13) versions of the course. Six assignments comprised thetotal coursework for the EGR 340 course: (1) Homework assignments, (2) the Borrow/Fillsimulation project, (3) The Atterberg project, (4) Gravity Dam project, (5) a midterm, and (6) acourse final assessment. The projects–Borrow/Fill, Atterberg, and Gravity Dam–are detailedabove (see the section titled Development & Delivery of EGR340). All six assignments wereequally weighted in both 2018 and 2022. All quantitative analyses were carried out using Rsoftware (R Core Team 2020).Qualitative analysis followed a process of grounded analysis of themes
experiments and activities that reflect authentic sci-entific practices and applications relevant to industry or research fields. For example, using thecommercial available software which students will use in their future career; integrating case stud-ies, simulations, or hands-on projects that mirror real-world problems and scenarios, alongsideincorporating modern technologies, equipment, and techniques used in industry settings. 22.1.3 Assessing student learning outcomesVarious indicators can be employed to assess and evaluate the learning outcomes, including stu-dents’ performance in laboratories, completion of homework assignments, and examination results.Designing homework assignments and quizzes
, usability testing and human-computer interactions, and pedestrian and driver safety. Past projects include the development of virtual trailblazing techniques for human naviga- tion, as well as the development of the ”veball”, a 3D input device with haptic feedback for manipulating virtual objects in 3D applications. Professor MacGregor’s main areas of teaching focus on human factors engineering, user-centred design, user research methods, and cognitive ergonomics. As a discipline, human factors engineering is a com- bination of engineering, psychology, kinesiology and anthropology. The field of cognitive ergonomics strives to understand how humans process and manipulate information so that their limitations and capa
family members(children, siblings, parents, etc.).Courses Included Students from three courses at the University of Southern Indiana were eligible to takethe survey. These courses were selected because the same HyFlex course format was used for theentire Spring 2022 semester and all courses were taught by the principal investigator. A fourthcourse taught by the PI, Systems Engineering and Freshman Design (ENGR:108), was notincluded in the analysis because the second half of the course was a project build and could notbe taught using HyFlex format. The first class included in the study was Fundamentals of Engineering (ENGR:107). Thisclass is a 3-credit-hour introductory engineering course typically taken during freshman year.The
oral presentations,videos, and modified reports.Poster presentationPoster presentation is often assigned as one of the final deliverables of project-based engineeringcourses (Sweeney et al., 2004; Stagg-Williams et al., 2021). Poster presentations are usuallyassigned in addition to a final report in engineering design courses and are expected to enhancestudents’ presentation skills (Davis and Wilcock, 2003; Sibley et al., 2012).Tranquillo and Cavanagh (2007) argue that short assignments such as posters allow the studentsto think about the content instead of solely focusing on writing a long lab report, which they referto as “busy work”. They point out the time and space limitations that restrict technicalcommunication in the real world and
engineering education research faculty in the engineering departments and creating a graduate program. Her research focuses on the development, implementation, and assessment of modeling and design activities with authentic engineering contexts; the design and implementation of learning objective-based grading for transparent and fair assessment; and the integration of reflection to develop self-directed learners.Mr. Logan Andrew Perry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Dr. Perry is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education in the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. His work contains a unique blend of engineering education and civil engineering projects. Dr
Paper ID #41125Engineering Educator Identity Development in a Socially and Culturally EmbeddedDiscipline Specific Graduate Teaching Assistant Professional DevelopmentProgramDr. Gokce Akcayir, University of Alberta Dr. Gokce Akcayir works on the SPARK-ENG project as a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Alberta. Gokce received both her masters and Ph.D. degrees in Educational Technology. After completing her Ph.D. in 2018, she joined the Educational Technology, Knowledge, Language and Learning Analytics (EdTeKLA) research group at the University of Alberta where she completed a SSHRC postdoctoral fellowship. Later she
societal contexts [7]. Theemphasis is on enhancing students' ability to confront social and ethical dilemmas in theirprofessional lives, acknowledging the crucial role that ethical decision-making plays inengineering practice.One approach is to integrate ethics and societal impact (ESI) issues directly into senior capstonedesign courses. This integration can be achieved through various methods, including dedicatedlectures, discussions, and project work that emphasize ethical decision-making in engineeringpractice. According to a 2016 national survey [8], 40% of engineering faculty include ethics andsocietal impacts (ESI) in capstone design courses. ESI topics such as professional practiceissues, safety, engineering decisions in uncertainty, and
: Fostering Interest in EngineeringAmong High School Students and Developing Future Engineering EducatorsABSTRACTThe development of the engineering workforce is a priority of engineering educators acrossdisciplines. Domestically, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projects that approximately 25,000new civil engineers will be needed each year of this decade. Given recent infrastructurelegislation, many more civil engineers will likely be required to design, build, and maintain theseproposed projects. Well-developed pre-college engineering curricula have been proven toincrease student enrollment in engineering majors. However, these benefits depend on effectiveclassroom technologies, tools, and techniques. This multi-year study looks at a one
real worldmuch more flexible than their artificial course deadlines, but by holding these rigid deadlinesthey were preventing students from learning to manage their time and projects [4]. Anotherauthor realized that being compassionate about deadlines builds community with the studentsand that some of the best work was turned in after the deadline [7]. Fairness was a concern, asstudents who turned in things late had more time to work on them and consider the problem.However, they conceded that few if any students complained about flexible deadlines beingunfair.Deadlines and DiversityIn a 2016 article, Boucher framed rigid deadlines as contributing to student stress and imposingunfair consequences on the most vulnerable students [8]. For
assessment process for a developing country. He has developed several global collaborations and currently involved in a number of projects in different countries.Sunzia Sultana, University of Michigan, Flint I am currently working as a full-time Software developer. I completed my Masters in Computer Science & Information System at University of Michigan-Flint ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Development of a Procedure to Avoid Plagiarism in Scholarly WorkAbstractManaging scholarly work such as papers, proposals, and other similar documents can pose achallenge to graduate students, new academic professionals as well as experienced researchers.The complexity increases when the
) C+ E2: Identify common op-amp circuits, find the output voltage (or gain) for several cascaded amplifiers. 1/3 of a B- E3: Find the analytical solution describing the voltage (and current) in a RC grade or RL circuit as a function of time. increase for E4: Use Mesh analysis to find V, I and/or P in complex circuits with multiple B each sources. additional E5: Use source transformation to simplify and then analyze a circuit to find skill passed B+ the V, I, P or a R. A1: Design an op-amp circuit project to transform input signal to meet A- specified output
class with 44% receiving an A, 29% receiving a B,and 16% receiving a C.Course DetailsThe Introduction to Programming for Engineers course is a 1st year course that teaches C++ andcovers hardware in the form of an Arduino. The grade is made up of multiple componentsincluding: - Attendance/Participation 5% - Labs 8% - Homeworks (and Updated Homeworks) 12% - Quizzes 10% - Midterm 1 15% - Midterm 2 15% - Final Project 15% - Final Exam 20%The final project is a “robot” that is designed from the circuit and Arduino material learned in thecourse.Material is offered in the text, but first covered in lecture. Lab assignments each week offer a firstlook at the material covered in lecture for the week. The weekly Homework
) common inquiry protocols [11]. The team employed the NICframework to guide and structure our CoP to accelerate progress [12] on improving laboratorycourses by sharing information and collaboratively addressing issues that arise. We have foundthat the CoP has been helpful for both new and experienced faculty to have a network of support.The current CoP is organized by a group of eight specialized faculty. Our backgrounds aresummarized in Table 1. In addition to organizing CoP events, the members of the organizingteam also collaborate on research projects across our lab and design courses. We have recruited32 additional members into the CoP; the available demographics are summarized in Table 2.During the CoP events, instructors from across the
nefariouspurposes or that these publishers/platforms and their boards and employees are generating self-serving content. Rather, Bezos has said a key reason he bought the Washington Post is topreserve the sanctity of its reporting [22]—although Forbes has somewhat pessimisticallytermed Bezos and proclaimed like-minded owners as “philanthropic white knights” [23, para. 2].But it is worth noting to students that media content is created by people, who may need—if notfrom a legal, at least from an ethical standpoint—to disclose conflicts of interest or work tocounteract their own intrinsic biases. Class conversations about media ownership are alsoworthwhile. As Heidi Legg with Harvard’s Future of Media Project asks, “If information wantsto be free and
logistics of each modality, this hopes to identify the similarities and differencesthat contribute to student success, shedding light on the critical role of course design inengineering education.While traditional face-to-face instruction has long been the standard method of teaching, the riseof hybrid and fully online courses has introduced new possibilities and challenges. Hybridcourses blend the benefits of face-to-face interaction with the flexibility of online learning,allowing students to engage in discussions, collaborate on projects, and participate in real-timeactivities. Fully online courses, on the other hand, offer students the convenience of learningfrom anywhere at any time but require strong self-discipline and time management skills
engineeringknowledge and skills. In the course, students were assigned the role of associate engineers fora consulting group. The associates were responsible for providing engineering expertise torural communities to assist in developing local small agricultural and food manufacturingbusinesses and start-ups. Students were informed and familiarized with the course design,their roles, and activities in the early weeks of the semester. In class, limited time was allottedfor lectures on technical content and more on engaging students in workplace-like activitiessuch as discussions, training problems, and projects. Students were expected to completetraditional course lecture material outside of class so that class time could be efficientlyutilized to answer
Education. His research focuses on increasing diversity in STEM education and the STEM workforce. He has received multiple grants to run workforce development training programs as well as undergraduate research experience programs to train underrepresented minority and first-generation students. He is the Founding Director of NJIT’s Grand Challenges Scholars Program. He also has worked on several research projects, programs, and initiatives to help students bridge the gap between high school and college as well as to prepare students for the rigors of mathematics. He is also involved in various engineering education initiatives focusing on the integration of novel technologies into the engineering classroom, and