Paper ID #21411Basic Electrical Parameters Measurement Laboratory: A K-12 OutreachProjectDr. Rohit Dua, Missouri University of Science & Technology ROHIT DUA, Ph.D is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer En- gineering at the Missouri University of Science and Technology and Missouri State University’s Coopera- tive Engineering Program. His research interests include engineering education. (http://web.mst.edu/˜rdua/) c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Basic Electrical Parameters Measurement Laboratory: A K-12 Outreach
Paper ID #34912Adapting Soft Robotics Outreach to Teacher-Delivered Curriculum in theVirtual Classroom (Work in Progress)Ms. Sapna Shah, Harvard UniversityMr. Alex Beaudette, Harvard UniversityMr. David R. Bergandine, University of Illinois Laboratory High School Chemistry Teacher University Laboratory High School 1984 - 2021Savindi N. Devmal , University of Illinois Laboratory High School Savindi Devmal is a student at the University Laboratory High School in Urbana, IL. Savindi’s interests include bioengineering and soft robotics, and she is the recipient of the Barbara Lazarus award to develop bioprinters for soft
residency, fellowship and postdoctoral training at Harvard. Her research focuses on development of novel antimicrobials and polymeric delivery devices to treat infections with multi-drug resistant pathogens, as well as STEM and community outreach. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #23942Dr. Robin S.L. Fuchs-Young, Texas A&M University Dr. Fuchs-Young is a Professor in the Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine in the College of Medicine at Texas A&M University. The scope of her laboratory research includes studies of breast can- cer health disparities and the bio
engineering, incorporating laboratory experiences into traditional coursework, and bringing awareness of electrochemical engineering to chemical engineers. Biddinger’s research involves applications of green chemistry and energy utilizing electrocatalysis, batteries, and novel solvents. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Program evaluation of a high school summer bridge program in chemistry and engineeringAbstractIn this paper we evaluate a summer college preparatory program for New York City high schoolstudents housed at Bronx Community College. The program was titled “Introduction to EnergyTechnology” and it focused on teaching chemistry and engineering
, Undergraduate Programs (IBBME) and the Associate Chair, Foundation Years (Division of Engineering Science), she is currently the faculty advisor for the Discovery Educational Program. Dawn is a recipient of the 2017 U of T Early Career Teaching Award and was named the 2016 Wighton Fellow for excellence in development and teaching of laboratory-based courses in Canadian UG engineering programs. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Discovery: Transition of an inquiry-focused learning program to a virtual platform during the COVID-19 pandemic (Evaluation)AbstractThe shift to distance learning in response to the COVID-19 pandemic has presented teachers
sessions aimed to help thestudents gain an understanding about the different fields of engineering that can be studied in orderto be part of the transportation workforce; that is, other engineering fields are related totransportation not only Civil Engineering.Hands-On Laboratory Experimental Sessions The goal of these sessions was to provide the students with a fun, interactive learningenvironment in which they can discover different aspects of transportation engineering. All of thehands-on sessions were designed so that the students were engaged in the session through buildingor conducting an experiment. The session related to building and testing a bottle rocket is oneexample of such activities (Table 1: Week 1, Friday). In this session
State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019An Engineering Grand Challenge Focused Research Experience for Teachers (RET) Program: Purpose, Outcomes and Evaluation (Evaluation)AbstractThis paper provides details on administering a NSF-funded Research Experiences for Teachers(RET) Site grant. The experience was organized with stratified laboratory research teams solvingEngineering Grand Challenge-focused problems. Described here are the research questions andoutcomes related to the development and impetus behind stratified teams, and how literature froma variety of disciplines suggests diversity of thought and viewpoint are strongly correlated to highfunction teams. Detailed also are the
, was a seven week long summerresearch experience designed for high school students entering 10-12 th grade. The main goal ofthe program was to provide young women and underrepresented minority high school studentswith a laboratory research experience and inspire them to enter college and pursue STEM degrees. Each summer, students from local high schools were selected to participate in laboratoryresearch as scholars under the supervision of a mentoring graduate student and faculty member.Each team composed of two YSs and their graduate mentor tackled problems innanomanufacturing and made significant contributions to ongoing research projects. At the endof the program, each high school student gave a final presentation of the results to
biomedical scientist in Immunology, Dr. Borges balances the world of what STEM professionals do and brings that to STEM education in order to provide PD that aligns to The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Since 2008 she has provided teacher PD to science teachers in the tri-state area, including international visiting teachers and scholars. Dr. Borges’ research interests include: building STEM professional-teacher relationships, diversity and equity, and enhancing urban science teaching and learning.Dr. Vikram Kapila, New York University Vikram Kapila is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics, Controls, and Robotics Laboratory, a
classroom activities that meet the goals of the standards in the context ofteaching and learning science [6]. Such activities must be rigorous, coherent, and related tostudents’ lived experiences [7]. Prior work by the research team involved afterschool engineeringand science programs and summer camps that resulted in improved confidence, self-concept, andinterest in STEM-related post-secondary study and careers [8]-[11], particularly for studentsfrom traditionally underrepresented groups [12], [13]. Although there has been significant workin developing high school engineering coursework and out-of-school programs (see, forexample, Project Lead the Way [14]), more work is needed on developing engineering activitiesand laboratory experiences that
Paper ID #23445Hk Maker Lab: Creating Engineering Design Courses for High School Stu-dents (Evaluation -or- Other)Dr. Aaron Kyle, Columbia University Aaron Kyle, Ph.D., is Senior Lecturer in Biomedical Engineering at Columbia University. Dr. Kyle teaches a two semester series undergraduate laboratory course, bioinstrumentation and Senior Design. Senior Design is Dr. Kyle’s major teaching focus and he has worked diligently to continually enhance undergraduate design. He has taught or co-taught the BME Design class since January 2010. Dr. Kyle has spearheaded the incorporation of global health technologies into Senior
Paper ID #30964University-Designed Middle School Science Experiences Aligned with NGSSMrs. Zahraa Stuart, Stony Brook University Zahraa Stuart received Bachelor of Engineering in electrical engineering from Stony Brook University in 2016.In 2017, she joined the PhD program in Electrical engineering statistical signal processing. Zahraa design, develop and instruct engineering teaching laboratories for both high school and middle school students and teaches since 2016.Dr. Angela M Kelly, Stony Brook University Angela M. Kelly is an Associate Professor of Physics and the Associate Director of the Science Education
breakdown set thecommunity-based activities regarding environmental sustainability BCA would perform and setfeedback mechanisms to critically evaluate the learning outcomes and goals of the week’sactivities. Day 1: Day 2: Day 3: Day 4: Day 5: Welcome, Urban Internet of Green Outdoor laboratory, Biotechnology Sustainability Things Infrastructure BCA Closing ceremony Morning: Morning: Morning: Morning: Morning: Welcome, Education and Arduino Education on Experiments led by team building introduction to presentation, the benefits of nearby highly
operate between the worlds of formal and informal science in that they takeplace in formal learning settings (university classrooms and laboratories) with activities doneoutside of school time [7]. By allowing students to engage in real-world activities aligned withgrade-appropriate standards, camp participant is often able to not only pursue their interests inSTEM but also to gain confidence and efficacy in the process.Self-efficacy is an important concept within education due to the influence that a student’sperceptions of their abilities have on other related concepts like motivation, goal orientation, andpersistence. When students are successful at and interested in a task, they are more likely toengage in the task in the future due to their
educators from schools with higher needs, suchas larger number of at-risk students or higher drop-out rates. After completing safety training and receiving basic information about lithography,laboratory tools’ use and scientific background of their projects, teachers start their research asmembers of a faculty research group, mentored by a trained graduate student. At the end of theprogram, teachers are expected to prepare and present a scientific poster to summarize theirresearch and a lesson plan that will be implemented during the following school year and submittedto the website Teach Engineering [22]. The lesson plan presentation always registers highattendance from NASCENT faculty and staff, administrators and teachers from the school
selection will be addressed along with project identification,scheduling, and the presentation of outcomes.During the admissions process, students are divided into sections that range from 16-24 studentseach. Every section has a different theme in the STEM fields, centered in the area of expertise ofthe faculty lead instructor, which can range widely in subject. Students rank their top twosection topics in the application and nearly 80% of students are offered their first-choice section.Since 2014, a section entitled, ‘Racecar Design through Engineering Experimentation,’ orRacecar, has been offered with section enrollment around 25 students, which representsclassroom and laboratory capacity. Unlike most other sections, Racecar i s taught
students gain an understanding of the different fields of engineering thatcan be studied in order to be part of the transportation workforce; that is, how other engineering fields arerelated to transportation, not only Civil Engineering.Hands-On Laboratory Experiments The goal of the hands-on laboratory and experimental sessions is to provide students with a fun,interactive learning environment in which they can discover different aspects of transportation engineering.All the hands-on sessions are designed so that the students are engaged in the session through building orconducting an experiment. A session related to building and testing a bottle rocket is one example of suchactivities. In this session (Build a Bottle Rocket), the
and Tapping) in High School Science ClassroomsAbstractShop classes where students use tools to fashion useful and functional objects from metal, wood,plastic, and other materials are disappearing from most American high schools in favor of moretheoretical subjects. Multiple factors contribute to this transition including 1) cost to maintainshops, 2) liability concerns, 3) focus on exam-driven standards-based testing, 4) and curriculumrealignment for improved college admissions. There is interest in re-introducing elements ofshop class back into high schools enabling students to learn by doing and to become more awareof how things are made.Borrowing upon foundational Energy Engineering Laboratory Module (EELM™) pedagogy
Professor (Lecturing) in the Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. He received his B. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Utah and a M. S. from the University of California, San Diego. His teaching responsibilities include the senior unit operations laboratory and freshman design laboratory. His research interests focus on undergraduate education, targeted drug delivery, photobioreactor design, and instrumentation.Prof. Jason Wiese, Jason Wiese is an Assistant Professor in the School of Computing at the University of Utah. His research takes a user-centric perspective of personal data, focusing on how that data is collected, interpreted, and used in applications. His work crosses the domains of
’ knowledge in a variety of areas. Students who had just completed either the10th or 11th grade are recruited via a program web site or by contacting guidance counselors,STEM teachers, and principals. Social media was also used as a recruitment tool. Applicants areevaluated using selection criteria that include high school transcripts and an essay where studentsdescribe their reasons for wanting to attend.STEM-SEP has been held on the campus of Penn State University-Harrisburg each June since2016. The workshop sessions provide participants with active learning opportunities throughparticipation in laboratory-style experiments and team activities. Such activities have shown toimprove retention of women in engineering majors, a key feature since female
suspected that the global learners who were not asinterested in science (particularly females) responded well to the GBL module. It is suspectedthat most of the students who commented on the fact that subject material should be taughtbefore the GBL module was executed, were sequential learners. This may be verified when morepost survey results are obtained. It should be noted that if used in conjunction with the PLMS, alllearners would have the opportunity to access content related material at any point during thegame development.The major challenge noted with the GBL module is the fact that the project was not a suitablereplacement for the laboratory component of the class and students suffered as a result. It shouldbe noted that in general, the
the bridge to test its functionality.Constraint • The prefabricated arch bridge should connect between two provided abutments that are placed 80 cm apart. • Your team must present the mathematical calculations for the bridge component dimensions prior to making the individual components. • Each prefabricated bridge component should be made from wood and manufactured using the equipment found in the production laboratory (i.e. band saw and jigsaw).Appendix: Design Example. 5 pieces of woodMathematical calculation 180° 𝜃= = 36° 5 2 𝐿1 = 2 × 𝑟 × 𝑠𝑖𝑛 = 2 × 40 × 𝑠𝑖𝑛18°, 𝑠𝑖𝑛18° = 0.309 𝜃 L1 = 2 × 40 × 0.309 = 24.72cm 2 L2
Paper ID #31726Building the Bioengineering Experience for Science Teachers (BEST)Program (Work in Progress, Diversity)Dr. Miiri Kotche, University of Illinois at Chicago Miiri Kotche is a Clinical Professor of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Chicago, and cur- rently serves as Director of the Medical Accelerator for Devices Laboratory (MAD Lab) at the UIC Innovation Center. Prior to joining the faculty at UIC, she worked in new product development for medi- cal devices, telecommunications and consumer products. She also serves as co-Director of the Freshman Engineering Success Program, and is actively
●! 2D & 3D Coordinate Systems ●! Systems Design ●! Laboratory Guidelines Engineering Geometry ●! Troubleshooting ●! Machine Specific Safety ●! Recognizing, Selecting, & ●! Reverse Engineering ●! Attire and Equipment Applying Appropriate GeometricEngineering Graphics Concepts & Practices ●! Engineering Drawings ●! Manipulation of Geometric ●! Dimensioning and Tolerances Equations ●! 2D CADD ●! Trigonometry
University of Central Florida and is anticipated to graduate in Spring 2019. He has two masters degrees one in mechanical engineering from UCF and another in aerospace engineering form Sharif University of Technology. He currently works in the Nanofabrication and BioMEMS Laboratory at UCF and his research areas include Nanofabrication, Microfluidics, Sensors and Actuators, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Optimization, and Mathematical Modeling. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Running Head: Project CoMET RETCollaborative Multidisciplinary Engineering Design Experiences for Teachers (CoMET) Train the Trainer Model of Supports Type 5 Work in ProgressThe K-12 learning environment is
Science. She serves as faculty supervisor for the Discovery initiative and is program co-director for the Igniting Youth Curiosity in STEM Program. Dawn was a 2017 Early Career Teaching Award recipient at U of T and was named the 2016 Wighton Fellow for excellence in development and teaching of laboratory-based courses in Canadian UG engineering programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018IBBME Discovery: Biomedical engineering-based iterative learning in a high school STEM curriculum (Evaluation)Davenport Huyer, L.1, Callaghan, N.I.1, Smieja, D.1*, Saab, R.1*, Effat, A. 1, Kilkenny, D.M.1Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto.*These
the Journal of Engineering Education (JEE). Prior to joining ASU he was a graduate student research assistant at the Tufts’ Center for Engineering Education and Outreach.Dr. Jumoke ’Kemi’ Ladeji-Osias, Morgan State University Dr. J. ’Kemi Ladeji-Osias is Professor and Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies in the School of Engineering at Morgan State University in Baltimore. Dr. Ladeji-Osias earned a B.S. in electrical engi- neering from the University of Maryland, College Park and a joint Ph.D. in biomedical engineering from Rutgers University and UMDNJ. Dr. Ladeji-Osias’ involvement in engineering curricular innovations includes adapting portal laboratory instrumentation into experiments from multiple STEM
Program for High School Students. The course was open for rising highschool juniors and seniors. This class was designed to have approximately six hours a day ofstudent-instructor facetime over the five-day week. This instructional time included traditionallectures as well as field trips, laboratory experiments, and active learning activities. The homebase for the course was an active learning classroom with features such as pod seating, movabletables, and whiteboards. Additionally, the intention was for students to visit various campuslocations, view and participate in laboratory experiments, and learn more about the life of aresidential student.Initially, the course development focused on understanding the student population of the class;high
consisted of the application of Monte Carlo techniques to model a germanium detector for use in astrophysics studies. The study was part of the Gamma Ray Observatory program on the WIND satellite. In addition, the Monte Carlo technique was used to model the geometry of the Spectrometer for Integral (SPI) of the International Gamma Ray Astrophysics Laboratory, INTEGRAL. This project was launched in October 17, 2002. Cur- rent research activity has been in the area of Aviation Safety. In particular, the development of monitoring technologies to enable detection of unsafe behaviors in the flight deck. Have made presentations in in- ternational forums in Serbia, Japan, Spain, Australia and Ireland. Graduated with a B.Sc
on applications of nanotechnology and materials scienceconcepts. Two annual events crown the intervention: a) an annual club meeting at the universitycampus, and b) a Nanodays event, where each club conducts nanotechnology demonstrations attheir own schools. Furthermore, a group of high school students and teachers is selected toparticipate in a 4-week Summer Research Program, in the Center’s laboratories. Collegeadmissions data show that 75% (N=12) of the research summer program participants and 42% ofstudents admitted from schools with MSE clubs have enrolled at UPRM, with a 94% second-year retention rate. For the schools with MSE clubs, between 49% and 75% of students whochose to major in Science, Engineering or Technology programs were