, was a seven week long summerresearch experience designed for high school students entering 10-12 th grade. The main goal ofthe program was to provide young women and underrepresented minority high school studentswith a laboratory research experience and inspire them to enter college and pursue STEM degrees. Each summer, students from local high schools were selected to participate in laboratoryresearch as scholars under the supervision of a mentoring graduate student and faculty member.Each team composed of two YSs and their graduate mentor tackled problems innanomanufacturing and made significant contributions to ongoing research projects. At the endof the program, each high school student gave a final presentation of the results to
Paper ID #30964University-Designed Middle School Science Experiences Aligned with NGSSMrs. Zahraa Stuart, Stony Brook University Zahraa Stuart received Bachelor of Engineering in electrical engineering from Stony Brook University in 2016.In 2017, she joined the PhD program in Electrical engineering statistical signal processing. Zahraa design, develop and instruct engineering teaching laboratories for both high school and middle school students and teaches since 2016.Dr. Angela M Kelly, Stony Brook University Angela M. Kelly is an Associate Professor of Physics and the Associate Director of the Science Education
Professor (Lecturing) in the Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. He received his B. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Utah and a M. S. from the University of California, San Diego. His teaching responsibilities include the senior unit operations laboratory and freshman design laboratory. His research interests focus on undergraduate education, targeted drug delivery, photobioreactor design, and instrumentation.Prof. Jason Wiese, Jason Wiese is an Assistant Professor in the School of Computing at the University of Utah. His research takes a user-centric perspective of personal data, focusing on how that data is collected, interpreted, and used in applications. His work crosses the domains of
Paper ID #31726Building the Bioengineering Experience for Science Teachers (BEST)Program (Work in Progress, Diversity)Dr. Miiri Kotche, University of Illinois at Chicago Miiri Kotche is a Clinical Professor of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Chicago, and cur- rently serves as Director of the Medical Accelerator for Devices Laboratory (MAD Lab) at the UIC Innovation Center. Prior to joining the faculty at UIC, she worked in new product development for medi- cal devices, telecommunications and consumer products. She also serves as co-Director of the Freshman Engineering Success Program, and is actively
consisted of the application of Monte Carlo techniques to model a germanium detector for use in astrophysics studies. The study was part of the Gamma Ray Observatory program on the WIND satellite. In addition, the Monte Carlo technique was used to model the geometry of the Spectrometer for Integral (SPI) of the International Gamma Ray Astrophysics Laboratory, INTEGRAL. This project was launched in October 17, 2002. Cur- rent research activity has been in the area of Aviation Safety. In particular, the development of monitoring technologies to enable detection of unsafe behaviors in the flight deck. Have made presentations in in- ternational forums in Serbia, Japan, Spain, Australia and Ireland. Graduated with a B.Sc
in the biotechnology laboratories. Fluorescent molecules can be used directlyor attached to other molecules to determine the locations of certain structures or an/aactivity/parameter (such as pH) within the cell [4]. Q-dots have been developed as fluorescentassays for contrast enhanced biomedical imaging, such as tumor imaging and therapy [1-2, 5].Lesson Objectives1. Introducing Q-dots as an advanced concept in chemistry/materials engineering2. Enhancing the students’ understanding of particle sizes and Q-dots as a type of nanometer- sized particle3. Engineering macroscopic dots with fluorescence properties4. Expanding on the fluorescence effect as one of the important optical characteristics of some manufactured Q-dots5. Exposing the
Polymer Physics from the University of Abou Bekr Belka¨ıd, UABT (Tlemcen, Algeria). Dr. Hakem taught and supervised students as Professor at UABT until she joined the Department of Materials Sci- ence Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) as Visiting Professor in 2005. Before joining CMU, Dr. Hakem made several short and long-term visits as a Visiting Professor at l’Institut Charles Sadron (Strasbourg, France), Max-Planck Institute for Polymer Research (Mainz, Germany) and Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne, USA) where she worked on mean field theory applied to uncharged poly- mers and polyelectrolyte systems and small-angle neutron scattering of amphiphilic polymer systems in the presence of electrolytes
thebackground to and basic knowledge about each mode of transportation. Lectures were followedby a hands-on laboratory class or a computer-based activity where students could apply the basicprinciples of transportation engineering to solve a problem related to each mode oftransportation. Finally, field trips were arranged to help students connect the theory and hands-onactivities to real-world engineering and aviation applications. A Likert scale questionnaire wasused to inquire about participants’ opinions of STEM and to assess the effectiveness of theprogram in introducing students to STEM. This paper reflects on opportunities and challenges indeveloping and implementing the curriculum and suggests improvements to it.IntroductionHigh school students
(IBBME), University of Toronto. In addition to instruction, she has acted as the Associate Director, Undergraduate Programs at IBBME as well as the Associate Chair, Foundation Years in the Division of Engineering Science. Currently an Associate Professor, Teaching Stream, she serves as faculty supervisor for the Discovery program and is program co-director for the Igniting Youth Curiosity in STEM Program. Dawn was a 2017 Early Career Teaching Award recipient at U of T and was named the 2016 Wighton Fellow for excellence in development and teaching of laboratory-based courses in Canadian UG engineering programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Discovery
, with her B.A. in Education with an additional emphasis in English. In addition to being an avid sports fan, Kristine spends her free time with her dog and volunteering with her church, the Cary HOSTS program at Edward Cary Middle School, and the Presbyterian Children’s Home and Services.Dr. Kenneth Berry, Southern Methodist University Dr. Kenneth Berry is the Associate STEM Director at the Caruth Institute in the Lyle School of Engi- neering at Southern Methodist University (SMU). He has worked as an education specialist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory until he received his doctorate in Educational Technology in 2001. He then taught at the Michael D. Eisner School of Education at California State University at
University, where she studies teachers’ experiences as they learn about robotics, how they envision incorporating robotics in their curriculum and challenges that they face.Dr. Vikram Kapila, NYU’s Tandon School of Engineering Vikram Kapila is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics, Controls, and Robotics Laboratory, a Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a DR K-12 research project, and an ITEST re- search project, all funded by NSF. He has held visiting positions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His research interests include K-12 STEM education, mechatronics, robotics, and con
Physics Laboratory, where he focused on nanotechnology, from 2003 to 2005. In 2005 he left JHU/APL for a fellowship with the National Academies where he conducted research on methods of increasing the number of women in engineering. After a brief stint teaching mathematics in Baltimore City following his departure from the National Academies, he began working for the Center for Minorities in Science and Engineering (CMSE) in the Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland. In 2011, he began working directly under the Office of the Dean in the Clark School, coordinating outreach and recruitment programs for the college. In 2016, he assumed the role of director of the Office of Undergrad- uate Recruitment
72,000-square-foot and $30 million building. This maker space provides additive manufacturing support for design courses, laboratory courses, and entrepreneur initiatives. This facility houses several differ- ent technology 3D printers that capable of printing parts from polymers, fibers, composites, and metals as well as 3D scanning and subtractive manufacturing equipment. His research focuses on machining and manufacturing with a specific concentration on the use of additive manufacturing processes for ad- vanced materials. He emphasis on design for additive manufacturing (DfAM), topology optimization, lightweight applications, and finite element analysis in additive manufacturing processes. Dr. Vora exten- sively
Paper ID #29312A Study of Secondary Teachers’ Perceptions of Engineers and Conceptionsof EngineeringEmel Cevik, Texas A&M UniversityDr. Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is a professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dr
interests include robotics, mechanical design, and biomechanics.Dr. Vikram Kapila, NYU’s Tandon School of Engineering Vikram Kapila is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics, Controls, and Robotics Laboratory, a Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a DR K-12 research project, and an ITEST re- search project, all funded by NSF. He has held visiting positions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His research interests include K-12 STEM education, mechatronics, robotics, and con- trol system technology. Under a Research Experience for Teachers Site, a DR K-12 project, and GK-12 Fellows
from an internal grant opportunity by a group ofalumna and friends of WPI to support women in STEM [1]. In the very first iteration of theprogram, the goal was to enable high school women to engage in hands-on STEM research instate of the art research laboratories under the guidance of women graduate student role modelsfor a semester (10-12 weeks).By having the research projects supervised by graduate students, we did not have to burdenfaculty members (although they needed to approve their graduate student’s participation in theprogram) and the graduate students had opportunity to develop their skills in scoping a shortresearch project and mentoring younger students. Furthermore, to compensate the graduatestudents for their time and effort, a
engineering pedagogical content knowledge and engineering engagement, whichled to an overall increase in teaching engineering self-efficacy [19]. Other studies have alsofound that the integration of robotics projects into various disciplines increased the involvedteachers’ self-efficacy around the use of robotics into middle school curriculum [20]. Immersingteachers in laboratory settings and research experiences has also been effective at increasing highschool teachers’ self-efficacy in content areas such as nanotechnology [21], as well as shiftingtheir perceptions of engineering as a field [22]. These examples of professional developmentactivities embody the five principles of professional development and ultimately demonstratedthe effectiveness of
is not generated by robotics alone. Instead, it is specificapplications of robotics that can be used to attract underrepresented minorities. The worksummarized here illustrates that intentional curricular design for ER programs may be aneffective tool to increase student diversity in the STEM fields.Robotics as a vehicle to strengthen STEM conceptsPrevious ER implementations and research suggests the practicality of using a roboticscurriculum in order to promote meaningful learning of STEM concepts [5]. These ERimplementations have transformed traditional STEM education processes by teaching theoreticalconcepts through concrete robotics experiences. While some STEM subjects have laboratory,activities integrated into the course, many, such as
the Medical Accelerator for Devices Laboratory (MAD Lab) at the UIC Innovation Center. Prior to joining the faculty at UIC, she worked in new product development for medi- cal devices, telecommunications and consumer products. She also serves as co-Director of the Freshman Engineering Success Program, and is actively involved in engineering outreach for global health. Miiri received her Ph.D. in Bioengineering and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Chicago and a B.S. in General Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.Miss Amna Hoda, The University of Illinois at Chicago Amna Hoda is a Biomedical Engineering student at The University of Illinois at Chicago
consider engineering as a major. University faculty havea role to play in encouraging and giving direction to high school studies in mathematics, science,and engineering so that students’ experiences can help them become interested and engaged inengineering studies. This can be done through meetings to discuss college expectations inengineering, inviting K-12 teachers to the college campus to visit laboratories and attendlectures, or providing professional development that helps them understand more about theengineering process and ways to better prepare students for college. Studies that delve intostudent reasons for choosing engineering as a major and future career can help counselors andfaculty members in secondary schools, colleges, and
, Brooklyn, NY, where he is serving as a research assistant under an NSF-funded ITEST project.Dr. Vikram Kapila, NYU’s Tandon School of Engineering Vikram Kapila is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics, Controls, and Robotics Laboratory, a Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a DR K-12 research project, and an ITEST re- search project, all funded by NSF. He has held visiting positions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His research interests include K-12 STEM education, mechatronics, robotics, and con- trol system technology. Under a Research Experience for Teachers Site, a DR K-12
survey conducted using the “VR game development” keywords yielded 120 ASEEconference publications over the years including subjects such as VR centered project-basedlearning, system usability scale for Oculus Rift and Samsung Gear equipment, use of VR inSTEM e-learning, teaching drilling trajectory concepts, virtual laboratories for solar powertechnology. Architectural design education, engineering technology, graphics modeling andanimation courses were some of the application areas found. The following section list a few ofthe VR publications with a game content built in. A group of authors from foreign and USuniversities developed a VR game for GIS learning environment [3]. The authors focused on theownership content, stimulation of lateral
Paper ID #29311Professional Development Activities for Secondary STEM Teachers andStudents’ Engineering Content Knowledge and AttitudesEmel Cevik, Texas A&M UniversityDr. Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is a professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the
, “Service learning: A positive approach to teaching engineering ethics and social impact of technology,” age, vol. 5, p. 2, 2000.[15] E. Tsang, C. D. Martin, and R. Decker, “Service Learning as a Strategy for Engineering Education for the 21 st Century,” in 1997 Annual Conference, 1997, pp. 2–355.[16] L. J. Bottomley and E. A. Parry, “Assessment of an engineering outreach program: Hands on engineering,” Proc. American Society for Engineering Education, ASEE 2002, 2002.[17] D. E. Giles Jr and J. Eyler, “The impact of a college community service laboratory on students’ personal, social, and cognitive outcomes,” Journal of adolescence, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 327–339, 1994.[18] A. R. Bielefeldt and N. Canney, “Impacts of service
. Ardito, “Influence of students’ motivation on theirexperience with e-learning systems: An experimental study,” Universal Access in Human andComputer Interaction, vol. 56, pp. 63-72, 2009.[11] R.H. Tai, C.Q. Liu, A.V. Maltese, and X. Fan, “Planning Early for Careers in Science,”Science, vol. 312, pp. 1143-1144, 2006.[12] G.E. Hall and S.M. Hord, S. M., Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes,2nd ed. Pearson/Allyn and Bacon, 2006.[13] A.A. George, G.E. Hall and S.M. Stiegelbauer, “Measuring Implementation in Schools: TheStages of Concern Questionnaire,” Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, 2006.[14] S.A. Sorby, “Impact of Changes in Course Methodologies on Improving Spatial Skills,”International Journal for Geometry and
Online Learning Girls in grades 3-8 The Ambassador is building an online Platform and learning platform to help participants Weekend learn about biomedical engineering. Her Workshops platform is comprised of videos, quizzes, and laboratory simulations. The platform will first be implemented in in-person workshops, though its use is expected to expand after
supported by making them thoroughly aware of thenational and state developed resources to assist them in their teaching [7], [20]. Full awareness ofthe state standards and professional development opportunities are particularly important since“the technology educator is the only person in many districts who really has a clear vision forwhat technology education needs to be” [7]. Steinke and Putnam [43] recommend employing asituational mentoring framework for new technology education teachers as a means to reduce“stressful duties” such as laboratory management. As a means to remedy the “supply anddemand dilemma,” Ndahi and Ritz [20] urge high school teachers to make a “commitment tosend one member of this year’s graduating class to pursue a teaching
(SSI) have received increased attention from many science andengineering educators, as it provides a meaningful learning opportunity to improve students'argumentation skills [4] - [7]. In the SSI environment, students can formulate positions, negotiatediverse ideas, and make decisions about important issues directly related to their everyday life [8].The problems in SSI contexts are “more open-ended, debatable, complex, or ill-structured” [9,p.140] than the general scientific hypothesis in the laboratory. In this kind of environment, studentsare required to apply their epistemic understanding of argument (i.e., what counts as good evidence,what counts as a good claim) to debate, reach a consensus, or make decisions [10] - [12].Sadler [6