projects focused on STEM education and mentoring.Dr. Monique S Ross, Florida International University Monique Ross holds a doctoral degree in Engineering Education from Purdue University. She has a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Engineering from Elizabethtown College, a Master’s degree in Computer Science and Software Engineering from Auburn University, eleven years of experience in industry as a software engineer, and three years as a full-time faculty in the departments of computer science and engineering. Her interests focus on broadening participation in engineering through the exploration of: 1) race, gender, and identity in the engineering workplace; 2) discipline-based education research (with a focus on computer
Paper ID #15242Performance Assessment in Elementary Engineering: Evaluating Student(RTP)Dr. Cathy P. Lachapelle, Museum of Science Cathy Lachapelle leads the EiE team responsible for assessment and evaluation of our curricula. This includes the design and field-testing of assessment instruments and research on how children use EiE materials. Cathy is particularly interested in how collaborative interaction and scaffolded experiences with disciplinary practices help children learn science, math, and engineering. Her work on other STEM education research projects includes the national Women’s Experiences in College
motivate students andprovide an engaging framework for engineering design and innovation through hands-onapplication. By participating in the process, student team members develop necessary workplaceskills through critical thinking, problem solving, teamwork, project management, fundraising andmarketing. At multiple levels, FIRST® provides an opportunity for students, educators, industryand the community to interact while utilizing robotics as a mechanism for participants to growtheir academic, professional and interpersonal skills.Depending upon the grade level, the FIRST® framework usually includes a three-partcombination of a robotic design and build challenge, a comprehensive project or technical report,and team core values. Within the team
Paper ID #17346Engineering Uncertainty: A qualitative study on the way middle school teach-ers incorporate, manage and leverage the uncertainty of engineering designtaskMr. Beau Vezino, University of Arizona Beau R. Vezino is a Ph.D. student at the University of Arizona’s College of Education. His focus is engineering and science education. Beau currently teaches the science/engineering methods course for pre-service teachers and works on several related research projects. Beau is certified teacher and holds a MS in Education in Curriculum and Instruction (2009) and a BS in Mechanical Engineering (2005). Beau’s research
research and gender and culture in science education. Her research interests include girls’ participation in science and engineering; teacher’s engagement in action research; and science teachers’ integration of the engineering design process to improve science learning.James D. Lehman, Purdue University Dr. James D. Lehman is a Professor of Learning Design and Technology in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction and the Director of the Discovery Learning Research Center at Purdue University. He is member of the leadership teams of two current NSF-funded projects, Science Learning through Engineer- ing Design (SLED) and Professional Development for Computer Science (PD4CS). He holds a B.S. and M.S. in biology and
Paper ID #14821Best Practice for Incorporating STEM into Rural Schools: Train and Investin Teacher Leaders (RTP)Ms. Julie Steimle, University of Cincinnati Julie Steimle received her Bachelor of Arts in English and Secondary Education from Thomas More College. She served as development director and managed academic programs in two non-profit organi- zations, Pregnancy Care of Cincinnati and the Literacy Network of Greater Cincinnati, before coming to the University of Cincinnati in 2009. Ms. Steimle initially coordinated UC’s Supplemental Educational Services Program. Currently, she is the Project Director of the
recruiting more young women and members of under represented groups intothe course, that is not the primary goal. Our goal is to develop and present the ENGR 102 HScurriculum in such a way as to inform and attract all the brightest, most creative young mindsinto the field of engineering.ENGR 102 for high school was fashioned after the on-campus university ENGR 102 course.The survey course introduces the student to various fields of engineering through a main lectureand hands-on lab sections. The primary project in the course is the design, test and build of asolar oven. This inquiry/project based learning is carried over to the high school version ofENGR 102. The primary difference between the two versions of the course is increasedclassroom time at
design of high profile transportation structures. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, AND ASSESSMENT OF AN AFTER- SCHOOL ENGINEERING PROGRAM FOR DEAF STUDENTSAbstractThe Engineering Exploration program for deaf and hard-of-hearing students at the Metro DeafSchool exposes middle school after-school program participants to engineering disciplines andconcepts while integrating the Next Generation Science Standards into the program’s curriculum.This project began in the spring of 2014 with a short pilot of four two-hour long sessions, allfocused on Creative Circuitry and sewable/wearable circuits. This paper will focus on theEngineering Exploration program of 2015, which
disciplines and continue to makea significant impact in the scientific community.Microfluidics 101: How to teach K-12 students about microfluidics in a 90 minute lecture.The college of engineering at Louisiana State University has three week-long summer campsoffered to both middle- and high school students to increase interest and enrollment in STEMmajors when the students ultimately decide to attend college. These programs are calledREHAMS, XCITE, and Project NJneer and provide the students with a chance to live in auniversity setting and experience all of the engineering majors offered at Louisiana StateUniversity. During the program, students are mentored by counselors (current engineeringundergraduate students), participate in team-building
skills.Schools around the country are striving to prepare students for the competitive and demandingjob market after college. As a way to assist students for this shift, there are in-depth discussionsabout the benefits of project-based learning, methods for teaching all subject-areas, and extra-curricular clubs.In this paper, a detailed account of the methods and practices used in an extracurricular roboticsclub at a culturally diverse, low-socioeconomic Title 1 School is provided. As studentscollaborate within the team and compete against other schools in FIRST Robotics’ FIRST TECHChallenge ® (FTC), they gain experience in problem solving, programming, fundraising,documentation, and community outreach. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the premise
experience evaluating programs that fall under the umbrella of educational evaluation, including K-12 educational curricula, K-12 STEM programs after-school programs, and comprehensive school reform initiatives. She received her Ph.D. in Research, Measurement and Statistics from the Department of Education Policy at Georgia State University (GSU).Dr. Jessica D. Gale, Georgia Institute of Technology, Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics,and Computing Dr. Jessica Gale is a Research Scientist II at Georgia Tech’s Center for education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on project-based learning, STEM inte- gration at the elementary and middle grades levels, design
Nieswandt, University of Massachusetts, Amherst Martina Nieswandt is an Associate Professor of Science Education and Interim Associate Dean for Re- search and Engagement in the College of Education at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Her research focuses on the relationship between motivation, affects and learning associated with K-16 sci- ence concepts and various instructional contexts (e.g., small groups, project-based learning) utilizing mixed-methods approaches. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Critical Role of Group Affect in Engineering Design Tasks in High School Biology1
previousNational Science Education Standards (NRC, 1990), The Framework and the NGSSoutline a learning progression of science and engineering practices for which studentsshould develop increasingly complex skills as they progress from early elementarythrough high school. Moreover, The Framework and the NGSS outline grade level andgrade band performance expectations related to engineering design. As a result,students are expected to engage in engineering design projects and engineering-relatedproblems in their science coursework. In an effort to address the need for high quality K12 engineering curricula, wedeveloped, implemented, and piloted the Biomedical Engineering Curriculum (BMEC, apseudonym for our program). BMEC curricula apply mathematics
thinking strategies? And how have researchersexamined design thinking? Atman et al.14 examined the design thinking process amongengineering experts and engineering students. Using verbal protocol analysis methods, Atmanasked expert engineers to design a playground in lab settings, and think-aloud the design process.Compared with undergraduate engineering students, the experts spent significantly greateramount of time on scoping design problems, and collected significantly more informationbelonging to a greater variety of categories. Atman pointed out that they chose to focus on fivethemes in the engineering design process, including problem scoping, project realization,alternative solutions generation, distribution of activity over time, and
participated European Union Projects in which she conducted series of professional development programs for in-service science teachers. Areas of research interest are engineering education, inquiry learning and evolution education.Dr. Hasan Deniz, University of Nevada Hasan Deniz is an Associate Professor of Science Education at University of Nevada Las Vegas. He teaches undergraduate, masters, and doctoral level courses in science education program at University of Nevada Las Vegas. His research agenda includes epistemological beliefs in science and evolution education. He is recently engaged in professional development activities supported by several grants targeting to increase elementary teachers’ knowledge and skills
Ages 9-15 Perceptions of Mechanical Engineering by Race and Gender Abstract This work is motivated by a larger research study that looks at the experiences of AfricanAmerican students within a College of Engineering at a major Mid-West University. While thislarger study will present the perspectives of these students currently enrolled in their engineeringdiscipline, a missing piece of this project revolves around how these students perceived ofengineering before they arrived to campus. Thus, the goal of this work is to investigate if andhow student perceptions of a specific engineering discipline – in this case mechanicalengineering – varies across ethnic or gender demographics among students
formed, constructed, or even invented10 . In addition to the importance of providing equal access to all, helping students relate theirpersonal interests to engineering solutions can create innovation based on untapped curiosity andawareness of engineering. A primary educational goal of this project is to present engineering design activities inbroad contexts that intentionally integrate more humanistic or social dimensions of the problemcontext. After a brief on the background of this project, we explain the theories about theimportance of interests for learning and development, and person and thing orientations that weadopt to understand our participants’ social or object oriented orientations of their personalinterests. We then
Paper ID #19731Promoting Computational Thinking in children Using AppsMs. Hoda Ehsan, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Hoda is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education, Purdue. She received her B.S. in me- chanical engineering in Iran, and obtained her M.S. in Childhood Education and New York teaching certification from City College of New York (CUNY-CCNY). She is now a graduate research assistant on STEM+C project. Her research interests include designing informal setting for engineering learning, and promoting engineering thinking in differently abled students in informal and formal
motivation, affects and learning associated with K-16 science concepts and various instructional contexts (e.g., small groups, project-based learning) utilizing mixed-methods approaches.Dr. Elizabeth McEneaney, University of Massachusetts Dr. McEneaney is Associate Professor in the Department of Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies at the University of Massachusetts - Amherst. She is a former high school mathematics and science teacher, and earned a Ph.D. in Sociology from Stanford University. An associate editor for the Journal of Curriculum Studies, she has research interests in equity and access to STEM Education, and the influence of globalization on STEM curricula. c American Society
an arbitrary flow or heat transfer experiment. The FlowGo toolkitaims to promote several outcomes. First, fluid mechanics and heat transfer could help a different demo-graphic of students become interested in engineering. For example, research on female students’ interestin science has shown that they are motivated by projects that have personal connections or allow themto help [8]. FlowGo could support female interest as it can be used for projects to help people or animals,such as irrigation or pet water-providing systems, or artistic expression, such as fountains or water sculpture.Second, FlowGo could serve as a classroom tool that helps teachers meet new teaching standards on engi-neering subjects. For example, the Next Generation
the weight of the bridge. Another adaption of this lesson is assigning “costs” tothe gumdrops, toothpicks and coins that are used in the bridge construction. A ratio can then beformed between the mass of the coins and the cost of the materials used. The values usedthroughout this lesson can be adapted to be whole number or decimals and fractions.Context of Program The lesson plans described here were created and implemented as part of a university K-8collaborative project. STEM graduate students or “fellows” were hired to assist elementary andmiddle school teachers in their classrooms. The program begins the summer before thefellowship with the teachers and fellows jointly attending a two-week summer workshop. CSMfaculty instruct the
about the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Dr. Bell also conducts research and develops resources for integrating technology into science teaching. Dr. Bell has maintained strong ties to public schools through a variety of collaborative projects. Most recently, he completed a 28 million-dollar US DOE-funded I3 project designed to provide research-based professional development to Virginia’s elementary and secondary science teachers. The author of more than 170 articles, chapters and books, Randy currently serves as Associate Dean of Academics and Professor of Science Education in the College of Education at Oregon State University. c American Society for Engineering Education
curriculum materials to create a learning environment where all students canfully participate in engineering design? What kinds of classroom norms do we need to establishfor productive engineering work to take place? These questions may be especially important inschools where students do not frequently have opportunities to engage with their peers in thekind of collaborative decision-making required by engineering design. To begin to answer these important questions, we are conducting a multi-year design-basedresearch project investigating engineering language and literacy demands, resources, andsupports in economically disadvantaged urban U.S. elementary classrooms using the EiEcurriculum. This work involves identifying more and less
applying science knowledge in the classroom and engaging in engineering practices.4As of early 2016, 17 states plus the District of Columbia have adopted NGSS as the basis of theirscience standards.5 And engineering content of many forms has proliferated. Third-party curriculainclude Engineering is Elementary, Project Lead the Way, and The Infinity Project, and schools havealso developed their own programs, either on their own or with other institutions, to make engineering aclassroom option for students.We asked three questions to hone in on specifically how outreach programs might be working to bringengineering directly into K-12 classrooms: • Does this program work to bring engineering into the K-12 classroom through student teachers
Paper ID #15180The Roles of Engineering Notebooks in Shaping Elementary Engineering Stu-dent Discourse and Practice (RTP)Jonathan D. Hertel, Museum of Science Jonathan manages the Examining the Efficacy of Engineering is Elementary (E4) project (an NSF-funded study of the efficacy of the EiE curriculum), overseeing and organizing a research effort that involves 240 teachers in the different states. He also provides evaluation support for the Engineering Adventures and Engineering Everywhere projects. He holds an Ed.M. in learning and teaching from the Harvard Graduate School of Education. In 2013-2014, he was named a
Department of Computer Science University of Wyoming 1 andrea.burrows@uwyo.edu, 2mike.borowczak@uwyo.eduAbstractThis paper provides a view of 22 K12 teachers' expectations versus the actuality of immersioninto an engineering education computer science (CS) project during a Math/Science Partnership(MSP) grant called RAMPED, which was a 16-day, yearlong MSP grant. The CS session usingNetLogo was selected for focused examination. NetLogo is a multi-agent simulator that uses theeducational Logo programming language and was designed for classroom modeling experience.The research question for the study was, "How do K12 teachers view their skill set of usingcomputer science in their
use avariety of qualitative analysis methods to answer questions that contribute to the ongoingresearch and development of the project. This paper reports on an engineering activity designedusing the aforementioned interest-based framework. The participants of this activity wererecruited from a 5-week summer camp focused on positive youth development by engagingstudents in a number of physical (i.e., swimming, judo, and basketball) and learning (i.e.,videography, financial literacy) activities. This study reports on 40 students who consented to bea part of the study, all of whom were between 9-14 years of age and qualified for free or reducedlunch. The students participated in an engineering activity designed and delivered by the researchteam
example, the curricula provide some opportunity for reflection and making inference, butoverall, the emphasis of the worksheets was for recording observations and performingcalculations. While these types of formative assessments are useful for projects, they do notadequately measure students’ abilities to make engineering decisions from a depth of contentunderstanding or their ability to scope an engineering design problem. The findings based on the level of cognitive demand also supports the lack of assessmentof students’ abilities to make engineering designs and problem scope. Lower cognitive demandcategories such as Memorized Practices or Memorized Content are the foundations for studentsto develop high-order thinking. However, by
prototypes that(Ideating and Testing) application of physics, require persistence through geometry and mathematics failure and experimentationTeam Design Projects Defining design problems, Working in teams, defining(Reports and Presentations) conducting research, testing problems, field research, concepts, communicating presenting and writingLaboratories and Studios Building models, defining Used materials, tools and(Designing and Testing) specifications, testing and technology to create and test measuring outcomes hypotheses and modelsField
Conference, Seattle, Washington. https://peer.asee.org/7513[2] Head, L. M. (2011, June), Signals, Systems, and Music: General Education for an IntegratedCurriculum Paper presented at 2011 Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC.https://peer.asee.org/18807[3] Shepard, T., & Carlin, B. W. (2014, June), A First-Year Soldering and Analog Music to LightModulator Electronics Lab Project Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference,Indianapolis, Indiana. https://peer.asee.org/19940[4] Rhudy, M., & Rossmann, T. (2015, June), Musical Analogies as a Teaching Tool forEngineering Concepts Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition,Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24517[5] Park, W. (1998, June), Electronic Music Techniques