owned business developing programs, performing external evaluation and consulting on research and practice in P12 Engineering Education. A graduate of the Missouri Institute of Science and Technology (Missouri S&T), Elizabeth Parry is a part- ner in STEM Education Insights, a woman owned consulting company specializing in external evaluation, grant writing, curriculum development, engineering coaching and professional learning for P12 teachers and research. Previously, Liz held an appointment in various roles in the Dean’s Office at the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University. For the past twenty five years, she has worked extensively with students from preschool to graduate school
research is on multi-spectral image analytics, and I lead the project BisQue, an open source ML platform for data storage, AI/ML analysis, and visualization.Arthur Caetano, University of California, Santa Barbara Arthur Caetano is a Human-Computer Interaction Ph.D. student at the University of California, Santa Barbara, researching generative user interfaces in Extended Reality at the Human-AI Integration Lab under Prof. Misha Sra. With a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Universide Federal Fluminense (2017), he brings 5 years of experience in Product Management within the financial industry, focusing on internal technical solutions for data scientists and data platform regulators. Arthur also mentors
-Parra, K. M. Tank, T. J. Moore, and B. Fagundes, “Design decision processes of first grade students during an engineering design-based STEM unit,” American Society for Engineering Education Ann. Conf. & Exp., Tampa, FL, 2019.[24] A. M. Rynearson, T. J. Moore, K. M. Tank, and E. Gajdzik, “Evidence-based reaonng in a kindergarten classroom through an integratd STEM curriculum, American Society for Engineering Education Ann. Conf. & Exp., Minneapolis, MN, 2022.[25] V. Cappelle, L. G. Franco, and D. Munford, “Use of drawings and connections between epistemic practices in grade 1 science lessons,” Science & Education, 2023.[26] K. A. Douglas, T. J. Moore, A. C. Johnston, and H. E. Merzdorf, “Informed designers
Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at the Pennsylvania State University. Her research interest focuses on engineering education for young students including classroom discourse, small-group interactions, and engineering identity. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Introduction For the past ten years, STEM education reform documents have prioritized two aspectsthat are new to all K-12 teachers, but particularly elementary generalists. The Framework for K-12 Science Education [1] and Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) [1] were the first timenational reform documents referred specifically to engineering. Despite the number of positiveoutcomes to using an
and discussions on how toassist and teach the workshops, including a review of best practice pedagogy [2]. The workshopfosters a community of practice among educators, promoting collaboration and continuousimprovement in STEAM education. Teachers were surveyed 6 and 12 months post-workshop toreport on the implementation and use of AIR lessons and curriculum in their classrooms. Over85% of participating teachers reported using AIR materials to some extent in their classroom,with 45% reporting the use of 50% or more of the provided AIR materials. One educator utilizedthe provided curriculum and robotics kit to successfully apply for an in-kind grant, enabling herto purchase enough robotics kits for a full class.The AIR Teacher Workshop
passionate about making STEM and AI education relevant and accessible to learners of all ages.Jeffrey D Radloff, SUNY, Cortland Dr. Jeffrey Radloff is an Assistant Professor in the Childhood/Early Childhood Education Department at SUNY Cortland, where he teaches elementary science methods, STEM foundations, and critical media literacy courses. He has a background in biology and pre-college engineering education, and he received his Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction from Purdue University. Dr. Radloff’s interests are in understanding how to best support pre- and in-service teachers’ integration of interdisciplinary STEM instruction, as well as exploring related instructional variation across classrooms. His current work
with the content and with integrating such tasks into theirclassroom, leading to more lasting implementation of engineering education [18], [23], [24], [25],[26]. Reimers et al. [27] also proposed that there are five elements necessary in effective PD topromote the integration of engineering across the curriculum: 1) a focus on engineering content,2) an emphasis on engineering pedagogical content knowledge, 3) a connection to how engineeringdesign incorporates the application of other content areas, 4) exposure to engineering curricula,and 5) alignment to local and national standards.Limited in the literature on effective K-12 engineering education PD is the incorporation ofculturally relevant pedagogy to situate engineering within local
education in pre-college, the Next Generations ScienceStandards (NGSS) was integrated into science education, where engineering education cutsacross disciplines, skills, and practices. It means that each discipline that composes STEMeducation has their-self evolution as an individual discipline too. As a result of thesedevelopments, there has been significant research to explore how engineering education mightsupport learning outcomes, including concept mastery in a social context [18], literacy [15], andlong-term engagement [15]. While these efforts are critical, far less attention has been placed ondesigning learning experiences that support diversity and inclusion. Given what we know aboutthe trajectory of how contemporary engineering education
STEM education through research on curriculum development, teacher professional development, and student learning in integrated STEM environments. Dr. Alemdar currently serves as PI and co-PI for research on various NSF funded projects that focuses on engineering education, teacher networks and STEM learning environments. Her expertise includes program evaluation, social network analysis, mixed methods, and advanced quantitative methods. Dr. Alemdar is passionate advocate for equitable and inclusive STEM education. She actively engages with educators, students, and communities to promote the importance of STEM disciplines and education research in preparing the next generation for the challenges of the future. She
thesummer camp.BackgroundThe Imperative of Early STEM EngagementThe landscape of modern education increasingly emphasizes STEM (Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics), reflecting its integral role in fostering innovation and addressingcontemporary challenges. However, a persistent issue within the engineering discipline is theinsufficient number of students, particularly from underrepresented groups, who express interestin pursuing engineering as both a college major and a career path [3]. This under-enrollmentphenomenon underscores the necessity of cultivating STEM interest at an early stage,particularly during K-12 education.Research underscores the pivotal role of middle school as a critical juncture where students'interests
University Dr. Morgan Hynes is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and Director of the FACE Lab research group at Purdue. In his research, Hynes explores the use of engineering to integrate academic subjects in K-12 claDr. Kerrie A Douglas, Purdue University Dr. Douglas is an Associate Professor in the Purdue School of Engineering Education. Her research is focused on improving methods of assessment in engineering learning environments and supporting engineering students.Prof. Peter Bermel, Purdue University DR. PETER BERMEL is an assistant professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. His research focuses on improving the performance of
physical computinginto their future instruction. However, when examining the descriptive statistics and mean ranks,females reported higher ratings regarding their intent to develop their own physical computingdesign challenges to integrate within the curriculum. Given that the majority of femaleparticipants were elementary educators (75%), Rosie Revere’s Orangutan Dilemma designchallenge [29] may have sparked interest in creating design challenges that incorporated achildren’s book, non-fiction text, or poem related to their current curriculum. Although notstatistically significant, the authors view this as a positive outcome aligned with the goals of thisPD. This finding suggests an increased interest in physical computing among female
Paper ID #37542Board 168: Exploring K-12 S,T,E,M Teachers’ Views of Nature ofEngineering Knowledge (Work-in-Progress)Dr. Jeffrey D. Radloff, SUNY Cortland Dr. Jeffrey Radloff is an assistant professor in the Childhood/Early Childhood Education Department at SUNY Cortland, where he teaches elementary science methods, STEM foundations, and critical media literacy courses. He has a background in biology and pre-college engineering education, and he received his Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction from Purdue University. Dr. Radloff’s interests are in understand- ing how to best support pre- and in-service teachers
Paper ID #43873Board 156: Curricular-Modules Development Based on Summer ResearchExperiences for Teachers on Solar Energy (Work in Progress)Daniel GarzaMr. Cory Andrew ScarboroughLovekesh Singh, Texas A&M University, KingsvilleMarsha Sowell, Texas A&M University, KingsvilleDr. Mohammad Motaher Hossain, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Mohammad Motaher Hossain is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. His research mainly focuses on structure-property relationship in polymers, surface engineering, polymer tribology, contact mechanics, and
andrecommendations are discussed.IntroductionEngineering is increasingly being recognized as an area of interest for K-12 curriculum, andseveral framework and standards documents have proposed engineering learning goals for K-12classrooms [1] - [4]. One significant effort was A Framework for K-12 Science Education:Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas [5], which promotes the integration ofengineering design practices into science classrooms as an authentic context for learning andapplying science concepts [5] - [7]. The result was the Next Generation Science Standards(NGSS) [8], integrating engineering across K-12 science standards, and by 2015, most statescience standards included engineering in some capacity [9]. However, concerns have
continued to be provided for three successive summers. A total of 39 girls participated in thetwo-week half day virtual program in the summer of 2021; 25 girls completed the one-week full day in-person program in the summer of 2022; and 23 girls engaged in the two-week half day in-person programin the summer of 2023. Total contact hours for all three iterations of the camp were the same. Bailey et al.(2023) provides a complete description of the 2021 and 2022 implementations.CULTURALLY RESPONSIVE TEACHING ENHANCES LEARNING CYBERSECURITY 2 The FACS program curriculum focused on six cybersecurity concepts: Confidentiality, Integrity,Availability, Defense in Depth, Think Like an Adversary, and Keep it Simple. Topics concerning onlinesafety
. , Singapore: Springer, 2018, pp. 135–174. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-8621-2_8.[13] M. E. Davis, C. M. Cunningham, and C. P. Lachapelle, “They Can’t Spell ‘Engineering’ but They Can Do It: Designing an Engineering Curriculum for the Preschool Classroom,” ZERO THREE, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 4–11, May 2017.[14] U. Bronfenbrenner, The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard University Press, 1979.[15] B. Barron and P. Bell, “Learning environments in and out of school,” in Handbook of educational psychology, 3rd ed., Routledge, 2015, pp. 337–350.[16] M. Fenichel, Surrounded by science: learning science in informal environments. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2010. Accessed: Feb. 07
participating in the NEET course curriculum. Participants received the course curriculumthrough multiple instructors who utilized diverse instructional modes during their enrollment. Literature ReviewProject-Based Learning Project-based learning (PBL) has gained widespread recognition as an effectivepedagogical approach in engineering education [1], [2], [3]. The fundamental principle of PBL inengineering involves engaging students in real-world, hands-on projects to deepen theirunderstanding of engineering concepts. Research indicates that PBL not only enhances students'technical skills but also fosters critical thinking, problem-solving abilities, and teamwork [2], [4]- [8]. Educators who incorporate
students in developing their problem-solving abilities, logicalreasoning, and creativity is computational thinking [3], [7]. Moreover, Wing suggests thatcomputational thinking “complements and combines mathematical and engineering thinking…ascomputer science inherently draws on engineering thinking, given that we build systems thatinteract with the real world” [7]. To date, there has been a growing focus to includecomputational thinking in K–12 curriculum, especially through the teaching of computer scienceand coding skills [8]–[12].However, there is a gap in the literature regarding how to effectively integrate computationalthinking and engineering design into K-12 education. While there are some programs andinitiatives that have incorporated
with the scholarship of teaching and learning, focusing on experiential pedagogies and inclusive assessment. She is the author of the textbook, COVID-19 and Society (2022, Oxford University Press). Katherine holds a Certificate on Curriculum and Pedagogy in Higher Education from the International Program for the Scholarship of Educational Leadership and is a recipient of the 2023 Outstanding Contribution to Teaching Award from the Canadian Sociological Association.Dr. Robyn Newell, University of British Columbia Dr. Robyn Newell is an Assistant Professor of Teaching in the School of Biomedical Engineering at the University of British Columbia. Her teaching initiatives focus on developing experiential, problem
their confidence for performing specificengineering tasks [5].This paper presents an evaluation of the 2021 Summer Engineering Experience for Kids program(SEEK), a summer program hosted by the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE) designedto offer underrepresented students, not only access to a STEM curriculum, but to cultivate theiracademic self-efficacy in these fields. To determine the impact of the program, this paperexamines the following research questions: RQ1. Does participation in SEEK improve students’ academic self-efficacy? How does impact compare across gender? RQ2. How well does academic self-efficacy predict students’ aspirations of becoming an engineer? For boys? For girls?BackgroundNSBE created the
highestbarrier in the questionnaire results. After lack of time, access to materials was cited as the secondbiggest barrier during the interview.The factors lack of knowledge, inability to figure out books and problems, and difficulty in NElesson planning were described as major concerns after the top three barriers. From the interviewresponses, it is apparent that figuring out books and problems is just one aspect of knowledgewhen it comes to integrating NE into curriculum. Being knowledgeable about which direction tofollow, what lessons to cover, and finding age appropriate materials were some of the otherproblems identified by teachers.2. Effects of PDIn order to determine whether there might be any relationship between participants
development.Amber Simpson, State University of New York at Binghamton Amber Simpson is an Associate Professor of Mathematics Education in the Teaching, Leaming and Edu- cational Leadership Department at Binghamton University. Her research interests include (1) examining individual’s identity(ies) in one or more STEM disciplines, (2) understanding the role of making a.11d tinkering in formal and informal learning environments, and (3) investigating family engagement in and interactions around STEM-related activities. Before joining BU, she completed a post-doctoral fellow- ship at Indiana University-Bloomington. She earned a Ph.D. in mathematics education from Clemson University.Dr. Peter N. Knox, University of Vermont Dr
Paper ID #37959Exploring the nature of engineering during home-based engineeringactivities designed for Spanish- and English-speaking families withyoung children (Fundamental, Diversity)Catherine Wagner, University of Notre Dame Catherine Wagner is a research staff member at the Center for STEM Education at the University of Notre Dame. She earned her Master of Education degree from Notre Dame in 2019 while teaching middle school science. She has collaborated with faculty in the Center for STEM on engineering research for several years, most recently leading an undergraduate research lab on early childhood engineering
Paper ID #41209High School Computing Education: The Landscape of Equity-Enabling Research(Fundamental)Dr. Julie M. Smith, CSEdResearch.org Dr. Julie M. Smith is a senior education researcher at CSEdResearch.org. She holds degrees in Curriculum & Instruction and Software Development. She also completed a doctoral program in Learning Technologies at the University of North Texas. Her research focus is computer science education, particularly the intersection of learning analytics, learning theory, and equity and excellence. She was a research assistant at MIT’s Teaching Systems Lab, working on a program aimed at
contributes heavily to the inconsistent application of engineering at the K-12levels[3], [4]. A sampling of some options proposed by a researcher [5]are sequenced, parallel,partial, enhanced, and total approaches for STEM Integration that have demonstrated someeffects on science learning[6]. In all of these models, what has been accepted is the importanceof the design process in providing students with a meaningful context for identifying multiplesolutions to be applied to problems.[7], [8], [9], [10].Although there has not been an agreed way to do integrated engineering and science, there is,however, an accepted tool for measuring the effectiveness of integrated curriculums (STEM-Integration Curriculum Assessment)[1], based upon a STEM Integration
across the country on developing meaningful, standard-based STEM experiences for their students. Mia currently serves as the Director of Professional Development at WPI’s STEM Education Center and as PI of an IES funded grant, Seeds of STEM. In these roles she oversees the development and facilitation of STEM themed professional development programs for PreK-12 teachers and administrators and the development and testing of STEM curriculum for preschool classrooms. Dr. Dubosarsky has an undergraduate degree in Biology from Israel’s Institute of Technology and a Doctorate in Curriculum & Instruction (science education) from the University of Minnesota.Shakhnoza Kayumova, University of Massachusetts DartmouthDr
Paper ID #43486Impact of Engineering Course Participation on Students’ Attitudinal Factors:A Replication Study (Evaluation)Dr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is a Associate Director and Principal Research Scientist at Georgia Institute of Technology’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC), Dr. Alemdar made significant contributions to the fields of STEM education. Her research focuses on improving K-12 STEM education through research on curriculum development, teacher professional development, and student learning in integrated STEM environments
Learn., vol. 7, no. 2, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.7771/1541-5015.1339.[6] T. J. Moore, S. S. Guzey, and A. W. Glancy, “The EngrTEAMS Project: STEM Integration Curricula for Grades 4-8 (Curriculum Exchange),” presented at the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2014, p. 24.1212.1-24.1212.2. Accessed: Feb. 11, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/the-engrteams-project-stem-integration-curricula- for-grades-4-8-curriculum-exchange[7] A. Hira and M. M. Hynes, “Design-based research to broaden participation in pre-college engineering: research and practice of an interest-based engineering challenges framework,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 44, no. 1–2, pp. 103–122, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1080
-solving (Yang et al., 2020, 2021) and for defining learning outcomes inour curricula. In this way, students use CT throughout the course of the engineering design cyclewith a focus on problem-solving and meaning making (Ardito et al., 2020; Leonard et al., 2017).This body of evidence shows promise for the design of curricula that effectively integrates CT todrive engineering design, leading to learning outcomes in both sets of practices. In subsequentsections, we provide examples of such integration from an engineering and CT middle schoolcurriculum. We describe our approach to engineering and CT, provide examples from ourMiddle School curriculum as part of Youth Engineering Solutions (YES) and introduce ourframework for CT and