students enjoyed and highly valued their experience. Teachers were supportiveand recommended expanding the program to other schools.We adapted a college-level lab experience to make it more accessible to high school students andenhanced the campus tour to provide them with a holistic view of university life. We have foundthat the key takeaway from this initiative is the ease and success of the endeavor. Our programrepresents a new contribution to pre-college engineering education by providing high schoolstudents with hands-on exposure to engineering concepts and a glimpse into life as collegestudents. Our future plans include making this an annual event, expanding it to other schools andstudent communities, and improving non-lab activities to
and Human Resources (EHR) and the Division of Human Resource Development (HRD)called for increased accessibility to and diversity of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) fields and STEM education to include marginalized and underrepresented people1. In the NSF2022-2026 Strategic Plan, Strategic Goal 1 aims to broaden the participation of the "Missing Millions" orunder-served, underrepresented, and marginalized populations to fully participate in STEM2. Furthermore,the Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering (CEOSE) is charged by the UnitedStates Congress to advise NSF to increase the full participation of women, historically underrepresentedracial and ethnic populations, and neurodiverse individuals
: whatperceptions and attitudes related to AI usage contribute to PSTs‘ consideration of it as aneducational tool? Implications are provided in the ensuing discussion.Qualitative FindingsFirst, we analyzed the 26 empirical studies to better understand PSTs’ perceptions of AIintegration into STEM education. This qualitative analysis focused on identifying PSTs’perceptions, experiences, and challenges in considering adopting and implementing AI withinSTEM lesson plans. The results revealed several unique themes that are summarized below.Opportunities and Concerns in AI-integrated STEM educationThe first theme that emerged was the collective agreement among PSTs for more proactive useof AI tools in teaching methodologies. According to Kannan (2022), for
are both important toengineering and generative in the classroom [2], [4], [5]. Our group has reported oninvestigations looking closely at several of these [6]–[8]. To effectively engage elementary students in engineering practices to learn disciplinarycontent and crosscutting concepts, high-quality curriculum needs to be available and accessibleto all, and teachers need to participate in professional learning opportunities. Those learningopportunities should not only include them as learners experiencing engineering as a novice butshould also include pedagogies that are effective for scaffolding design projects and supportingstudents through the process of asking, planning, creating, testing, and improving. One of thoseinterventions
, knowledge, or attitudes learned in onesituation to another learning situation [5]. While the concept and practice of transferring learninghave always been intrinsic to educational objectives, it was not until it was defined as an explicitgoal of education plans that it was formally named. Fundamentally, ToL asks students to applytheir learning to contexts different than where they originally learned them [3]. ToL is central inengineering education, given the complex nature of problems in engineering and the tailored,problem-specific solutions they demand. In engineering classrooms, learners must applyfoundational concepts creatively and flexibly in varied contexts [6]. ToL can be promotedthrough strategies like inquiry, problem-based, or project
undergraduate mentors who joined remotely.Building Sustainability in Year TwoThe GGEE team understood that a shift toward more sustainable practices and partnershipswould allow for the program to continue into another year and expand across the state. Whenplanning for the second year of GGEE summer programs, the following areas were identified tobuild out a preliminary sustainability plan: 1) methods to recruit interested schools and districts,2) increase program ownership by schools and districts, 3) engage cost-sharing partnerships, 4)recruit students to participate in programs, 5) research and program assessment, and 6) providingmultiple opportunities for students to return to the program. These six factors were chosenthrough a deconstruction of the
discussion with a question to the students, asking them how they arrived at theIOE building that day. The students volunteered answers about their mode of transportation, suchas taking the bus or driving with a parent. This initiating question prompted a conversation abouthow the vehicle operator knew how to get to the destination in the most efficient way possible.The discussion about the mode of transportation transitioned into a conversation aboutnavigation applications and their route-planning algorithms. The familiar topic of navigationapplications served as a starting point for curiosity about how the “best” route is selected.Students volunteered answers about the factors that the algorithm might consider when selectingthe best route, such as
design process serves as a framework for young students to learn science.An engineering-driven STEM unit, consisting of 14 (50-minute) class periods taught in a 6th-grade science class, requires students to work in teams to implement the EDP and learn scientificprinciples needed to meet a goal. Building on the real-world premise of a freight train derailingand spilling its cargo of various minerals into a lake, students plan, design, and iterate ondecision tree processes for sorting, identifying, and recovering the spilled minerals to find theoptimum solution. As students learn about mineral properties and the value of non-renewablemineral resources from the teacher’s presentations, the information is used to support evidence-based reasoning for
: Inclusion/exclusion criteria for papers. Criteria were determined prior to searching. Inclusion Criterion Justification K-12 participants The study should focus on outreach to pre-college participants, since this population is the most common demographic for STEM outreach and may be the most likely to change career plans toward STEM. This included adults studying K-12 content. STEM program * The studied program or activity should be focused on introducing participants to STEM, either overall or in one aspect. If there is no STEM content, STEM attitudes are unlikely to change. Outreach ** The activity
howto integrate STEM disciplines using a biomimicry context with engineering design as highschool students would experience in an integrated lesson. Teachers also collaborated during thesecond week of the PD to create their own integrated STEM units co-taught the next school year.The following school year, researchers, educators, and industry partners collaborated to providea variety of STEM learning opportunities to support these teachers in unit plan implementation.A total of 43 STEM teachers participated in the project, and 20 integrated STEM lessons wereimplemented in 47 STEM classrooms over three years (2016-2019 academic years).TRAILS researchers learned much from the participants of the TRAILS 1.0 program within amidwestern state
itprovides a basis for building communities. I will return to the idea of creating an SELaware classroom in part 5 of the framework.Part 1: Intentional Grouping Almost every career-oriented role requires collaboration skills; setting studentsup for success using intentionally created student-selected groups is an essential startto any culturally aware STEM classroom. Intentional grouping involves several differenttools that help teachers ensure student success. Brown, et al, write: “When teachers aremindful of the important aspects of group dynamics, such as size, ability, gender, andrace, and plan teams accordingly, every student—particularly those from marginalizedbackgrounds—is set up for success [5].” Teachers need to consider the
. They also completed the M-EDSI (amodified version of the EDSI) to measure their EDTE. Results from the pre-test (M = 49.6, SD =22.9) and post-test (M = 82.0, SD = 13.1) indicate that PSTs’ participation in an engineering-focused K-8 science methods course significantly improved their EDE, t(169) = 19.7, p < .05.Similarly, there was a statistically significant increase in PSTs’ EDTE after participating in thecourse (M = 83.0, SD = 13.3) compared to before (M = 42.5, SD = 25.2), t(169) = 21.0, p < .05.The findings suggest that exposing elementary PSTs to multiple engineering design activitieswithin science methods courses improves their EDE and EDTE. Implications of the results andfuture research plans are discussed in the
Workshop today. I hadto let you know how much she enjoyed it. She talked about it all the way home and then repeatedeverything to her mom. She has been talking about becoming an engineer for several yearsnow. The one volunteer who worked for NASA during her career really impressed her as she isinterested in mechanical engineering, especially robotics. She said all the engineering studentteachers were wonderful. Congrats on a job well done!”Program ContinuationThe overall success of the first year of the SWEET Program is very promising for the workshopleaders and engineering students involved. In future SWEET workshops, the team looks forwardto hosting additional in-person workshops at Rowan University. The workshop team plans toincorporate the
-code.html (accessed Jan. 12, 2023).[37] A. Stych, “Science: STEM badge planned, Girl Scouts CEO says,” bizwomen, May 19, 2017. https://www.bizjournals.com/bizwomen/news/latest-news/2017/05/science-stem-badge-planned- girl-scouts-ceo-says.html?page=all (accessed Jan. 12, 2023).[38] J. E. Stake and K. R. Mares, “Evaluating the impact of science-enrichment programs on adolescents’ science motivation and confidence: The splashdown effect,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 359–375, Apr. 2005, doi: 10.1002/tea.20052.[39] S. Lopez and W. Goodridge, “The State of Engineering Integration in K-12 Science Standards: Five Years After NGSS (Fundamental),” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Salt Lake City
, testing its movements, andpicking up/dropping off/transporting objects using the Workcell. The laboratory work wascarried out by the students in groups of two. The school of engineering provided completesupport in terms of equipment and software required for the program.The weekly plans of the robotics program are shown in Table 2. Students worked onAutonomous Vehicle for four times (12 hours), Robotics modeling for five labs (15 hours), andeight labs for VEX Robot (24 hours). One of the challenging factors that we encountered wasfaculty involvement. Since the participating faculty already had a full teaching load during theSummer, it was difficult to arrange lab content in a way that was both meaningful and coherent.As a result, the program
teaching goals and objectives. C. General Pedagogical Knowledge refers to knowledge of teachers about generalprinciples and strategies such as classroom management and learning theories (Viiri, 2003: 353).It is a general form of information about different theories about how students learn, classroommanagement, lesson plan development and implementation, and assessment of students'understanding (Shulman, 1986; Koehler & Mishra, 2008, 2009). This knowledge requires teachersto understand cognitive, social, and developmental learning theories and how to apply them tostudents in their classrooms (Koehler & Mishra, 2008, 2009). D. Contextual Knowledge refers to knowledge of students’ specific learning contextsworks departmental
, published inEnglish between 2011 and 2023, and relevant to the research question. A content analysismethod was applied to examine the articles (n = 27) that satisfied the inclusion criteria. PSTs'perceptions of integrated STEM education were influenced, according to preliminaryfindings, by the following variables: (a) prior knowledge and experiences with STEMeducation; (b) beliefs about STEM education; (c) perceived benefits and challenges ofintegrated STEM education; (d) available support and resources; and (e) professionaldevelopment opportunities. The paper also addresses the theoretical and educationalimplications of the results for the planning and implementation of integrated STEMprofessional development programs for policymakers and
surveys andsummative tests reveal that the implementation of Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT) strategieswithin the FACS program positively impacts the enthusiasm for and comprehension of cybersecurityamong African American female students. Therefore, we plan to incorporate more CRT strategies such asfamilial engagement. As it stands, parents are only engaged during the recruitment process and the firstday of camp. A few activities during future iterations of the program will include parents. These activitiesmay be completed at camp and/or at home. We also plan to recruit more industry partners to providestudents with real-world problems to solve and an opportunity to form relationships with cybersecurityprofessionals.CULTURALLY RESPONSIVE
had received prior trainingin delivering the program. The materials used in class consisted of a storybook narrating thebackground of a real-world problem that students had to work together in groups to solve usingcommonly available objects. The lesson centered on the hands-on construction of a solutionusing a 5-step framework of “questioning, planning, implementing, concluding, and reporting”adapted for younger children from the engineering design process (Cunningham & Lachapelle,2016).In total, videos on 12 different lesson topics were available for analysis. For each of the 12topics, there were videos from two different classrooms. Each classroom featured a differentteacher. For this work in progress, we selected three lesson topics
incorporate input, process, output, and feedback. An example lesson plan alignedwith Georgia standard MS-ENGR-TS-3 is given . The lesson is found here:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YdD24XDFRItQPckJDSn0L0l7OH6AiWL-aRIats-JA9U/editHer lessons depict the richness of the GauGAN’s NVIDIA Canvas where by it can be used tosketch and customize an image. The customizing aspect is very important because each studentcan highlight their input and make it visible to others. This aspect is critical in engineering andtechnology because visualization adds a sense of the design details. Students seem to benefit byinteractive environment where they can modify or manipulate variable to attain their interestedgoals. This is more engaging than only viewing
informed by the coaches’ understanding of the tournament judging process,but they stressed that they wanted the children to make their own decisions about what toinclude. This was reflected in how Claire facilitated the team’s curation of a product notebookfor tournament judging in the final weeks of the competition season. Following hersuggestion, each team member sat down with Kevin (a team leader and a strong writer) todiscuss what information was important to share with the judges. Kevin created a colourfulproduct notebook in Microsoft Word™, typing up his team members’ contributions based ontheir verbal conversations and process notebook entries. He also included robot photos, codescreenshots, drawings, a robot game mission strategy planning
workshop and howwhat they learned would impact their future career plans. Table 1 shows the 2023 workshopschedule and the following paragraphs provide brief descriptions of workshop sessions.Mathematics: During this session, students learned about coding theory, history and technology.Students were taught integers modulo and cut out two wheels to make their own ciphers. Acipher is an algorithm for encrypting or decrypting messages. During this time, studentsencrypted their own messages and let other students decrypt them. Students also learned aboutcryptology through other ciphers like the affine ciphers and other ways of encryption anddecryption like error correcting code and public key encryption. In addition, vectors and matriceswere also
guidance counselors) attend the SCRIPTworkshop. They received guidance on implementing sustainable practices for AP CSP andcybersecurity learning experiences for their cadets, including recruiting cadets. Figure 1: Four year Air Force JROTC cadet experience in the JROTC-CS Project.The school teams then took their plans back to their schools and implemented them. Thisincluded starting to offer a foundational AP CSP course in the fall semester, having guidancecounselors recruit cadets into the new CS course, and leveraging the JROTC instructor and cadetmentorship to encourage cadets to take the new foundational CS course and participate inWilliamson, McGill
teachers felt the need tochange the curriculum of CS-related subjects to be able to integrate easier.Ahmed et al. conducted a qualitative study (2017-2020) on a teacher PD project that enabled themMabie, McGill, Huerta ASEE 2023to plan, execute, and evaluate lessons that integrate programming into different subjects, butprimarily mathematics [25]. Primary school teachers (n=28) completed all of the lesson plancourses and submitted a detailed presentation of each of their lesson plans, including analog,robot, and block-based programming through Scratch or Scratch Jr. Five categories emerged:didactic methods of the teachers, math content, programming language and tools
through remotelearning [5]. Educational system recovery measures from the pandemic and subsequent studentoutcomes are just starting to emerge but early research, as cited above, indicates that thepandemic has undoubtedly impacted students and teachers [6].New Curriculum FrameworksIn April 2016, the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education adopted anew Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) Curriculum Framework [1]. Since severalyears would be required for standardized test questions to align to the new science standards,some school districts began planning in 2013 when the new draft standards were published forpublic review and comments. However, despite some school districts beginning the processearly, most did not
. Additionally, the post-camp surveys did not include any demographic questions sinceour intention was to match campers’ ID numbers with the demographic information provided byboth parents and campers. Because we are not able to reliably use the camper ID numbers on thecompleted surveys, we are not able to complete any analysis to compare the changes in responsesbetween campers from different demographic groups.PositionalityThe first author was solely involved in the data analysis and evaluation. The second authorcoordinated, planned, and oversaw the summer camps. The third author was the engineeringcontent expert for the camps, helped run the camps, and had the ideas for the camps and thispaper’s evaluation of the camps’ recruitment methods. The fourth
engineering students for navigating the demands and nuances of the workplace whilebeing mindful of their users’ needs, it is necessary to train them to consider the design problemthrough both technical and human-centered perspectives.The Siebel Center for Design offers multiple undergraduate-level courses that expose students toelements of HCD and its iterative design process [5]. However, our team’s scope goes beyondmaking HCD accessible to students already in college. It is equally important to consider ways inwhich the world of STEM can be made accessible to high school students who are navigating thepost-high school planning process. As educators, it is our duty to expand students’ horizons andhelp them discover different educational
included interacting with clients from the local community, completing 3D modelingand 3D printing tasks, maintaining digital fabrication equipment, and representing the printshopat different outreach events. In this paper, we report on findings from qualitative exit interviewswith the youth and focus on understanding the impact of participating in the program from theirperspectives.In this research, we pursued the following research questions: (RQ1) What are the motivations ofyouth for participating in an afterschool technology-rich professional learning program? (RQ2)What is the impact of participating in professional learning programs on youths’ STEM careerinterests and long-term career plans? (RQ3) What are the youth’s own reflections about
term for “African-Centered Teaching Strategies” is sebayt, which means pedagogy in AncientEgyptian (Bailey et al. (n.d)).3 Another term for “African-Centered Curriculum” is sebayt sekher, which means a plan or course ofaction in Ancient Egyptian (Bailey et al. (n.d)).UTILIZING AFRICAN-CENTERED STEM EDUCATION TO INSPIRE 3disciplines as tools to be utilized to create, develop, and implement solutions and initiatives that honortheir past, shift the paradigm of their present, and engages students in the possibilities of the future from aholistically empowered perspective. The Uhuru Academy in partnership with Conscious Ingenuity created the Uhuru AcademyConscious Ingenuity (UACI) Summer STEM Camp to
tocore employment sectors in the United States (US) [1, 2]. In December 2018, the NationalScience and Technology Council (NSTC) Committee on STEM Education released “Charting aCourse for Success: America’s Strategy for STEM Education”, a five-year STEM educationstrategic plan [3]. America’s Strategy places particular emphasis on preparing the STEMworkforce for future challenges by aiming to improve K-12 education. To fulfill the goal set byAmerica's Strategy, the education of the younger generation should be enriched by integratingadvanced technological tools, forging community partnerships, and embracing globalperspectives through a transdisciplinary approach. Tremendous efforts have been dedicated bythe US government, private foundations, and