Paper ID #43952Head, Heart, Hands: A Rubric for Creating Inclusive STEM Learning EnvironmentsDr. Meagan C Pollock, Engineer Inclusion As an engineer turned educator, through her company, Engineer Inclusion, Dr. Meagan Pollock focuses on helping others intentionally engineer inclusion® in education and the workforce.Lara Hebert, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Serves as the Outreach and Public Engagement Coordinator for The Grainger College of Engineering. She brings to this position and this initiative expertise in teacher education and curriculum design.Dr. Lynford Goddard, University of Illinois Urbana-ChampaignDr. Luisa
, 101(3), 539–564. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00061.xCorcoran, T., Mosher, F. A., & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based approach to reform. Philadelphia, PA: Center on Continuous Instructional Improvement.Custer, R. L., & Erekson, T. L. (2008). Engineering and technology education. Woodland Hills, CA: Council on Technology Teacher Education.Duncan, R. G., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2009). Learning progressions: Aligning curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 606–609.Grubbs, M. E., & Strimel, G. (2015). Engineering design: The great integrator. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 50(1), 77-90.Helmer, O
High/Identify Medium/Use in presenting engineering Attention to PBL, hands on, High/Integrate Not applicable open-ended challenges Designing challenges High/Integrate Not applicable (open-ended, fair test, constraints/criteria) Connections to curriculum High/Develop Not applicable standardsThe establishment of learning objectives for the sessions is the first step in planning trainingsessions. The next step is to consider various pedagogical strategies to present the material.Using an approach to conceptual change, as enumerated in Krause [6], we made a list ofcommon preconceptions and misconceptions about engineering that we have encountered
STEMeducation with industry for innovation. The objective is to prepare learners for STEM careers and to connectindustry through academia. In higher education, the critical learning skills are necessary to STEM educationand degree completion. There are retention efforts provided for the curricular support program that scholarshave contribute to motivation and outcomes of STEM interdisciplinary degree completion. Our efforts tosupport pre-college STEM education includes an understanding of college readiness and the learningenvironment using project-based learning (PBL). Hands-on experiences are general found to be successfulwhen integrated using PBL methods with industry. According to recent study, both intrapersonal andinterpersonal skills in PBL has
everyday items. Previousstudies haveIn this resource exchange, we share the guideline we developed for parents so they can easilydevelop wide range of play-based engineering activities integrated in science, math and story-telling. We provide examples of the activities we and participating parents developed, as samplesto be used by other parents and educators.References[1] Ohland, C., & Ehsan, H., & Cardella, M. E. (2019, June), Parental Influence on Children'sComputational Thinking in an Informal Setting (Fundamental Research) Paper presented at 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--33157[2] Alemdar, M., Moore, R., & Ehsan, H. (2023). Reflections on the Impact of COVID-19 on Pre-CollegeEngineering
program's model of providing curriculum and equipment through STEP and students'work in a technology, engineering, and design education program integrating a pilot electric dragster (e-dragster)project as a work-in-progress. Furthermore, the paper will communicate initial challenges and successes withinformation on how the program can share resources with the pre-college engineering education community toenhance learner technological and engineering literacy.STEM Partnership Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) partnerships demonstrate STEM concepts andprovide pre-college engineering education experiences unavailable in several schools (1). Partnerships, such as thesupporters of STEP, model a collaborative effort to solve
Paper ID #40802A Longitudinal Engineering Education Study of a Holistic EngineeringPedagogy and Holistic Design Thinking Methodology on PostsecondaryStudent Academic Success and RetentionMark Povinelli, Syracuse University Dr. Mark Povinelli was the Kenneth A. and Mary Ann Shaw Professor of Practice in Entrepreneurial Leadership in the College of Engineering and Computer Science and the Whitman School of Management at Syracuse University. He is currently an adjunct professor in the College of Arts and Sciences, where he teaches in the Ren´ee Crown University Honors Program at Syracuse University. Dr. Povinelli is the New
to the dearthof relevant experience most teachers possess [6].2. Project Purpose & DescriptionWith the program’s overarching theme of energy, we aimed to: (a) deepen high school teachers’understanding of engineering principles, practices, and design, (b) support the development ofSTEM-integrated curriculum aligned with the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS), and(c) to enhance ongoing collaboration and interchange among university faculty, local schools, andindustry-based personnel. The purpose of the program evaluation was both formative andsummative, aiming to improve incoming cohorts’ experience, and report on the impact of theprogram on participants. We hypothesized that teachers would a) have an enhanced knowledgeand experience
HispanicContext. TaLENt Fellow Action-Based Research ProjectsThe four action-based projects conducted during the 2021-2022 school year are brieflydescribed in Table 2. These projects aimed to integrate engineering design into the participatingschools' curriculum by implementing various strategies, such as creating engineering designchallenges, developing a teacher professional development program, integrating engineeringdesign into existing science curricula, and building partnerships with local engineers andindustries. The TaLENt fellows led these projects, with support from their school colleagues andan engineering curriculum mentor from the "TaLENt." While this article does not provide adetailed account of each Project's implementation cycle, it does
year.Fullan’s educational change theory was used to investigate the impact of STEAM education in 2public school districts as they aligned to new state STE curriculum frameworks. A mixedmethods, embedded case study approach was used to explore how sixteen (16) elementaryteachers and six (6) district leaders implemented revised STE curricula before and during thepandemic. This study investigated the research question “How does the presence of science,engineering and technology curricula and STEAM Labs, and in particular their absence duringCOVID-19, impact elementary education and the implementation of new science, technology andengineering (STE) curriculum frameworks?”. Study participants were invited betweenDecember 2021 – February 2022 to complete an
learning, STEM integration, engineering education, curriculum development, and self-efficacy.Dyanne Baptiste Porter, Georgia Institute of Technology Dyanne Baptiste Porter is a postdoctoral research fellow at Georgia Tech Center for Education Integrating Mathematics, Science, and Computing (CEISMC). Prior to earning her Ph.D. in Mathematics Education, she taught high school mathematics for eight years. Her research interests include interdisciplinary mathematics teaching and learning, equitable teaching and learning practices in STEM, and increasing representation in advanced mathematical sciences.Dr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is a Associate Director and Principal Research
, theinfrastructure and efficacy of the Engineering Research portion is detailed. Concepts, coursedescriptions, and assessment tools presented here were designed to be modular so that otherinstitutes interested in integrating research into secondary school curriculum could adapt thesecomponents to fit individual constraints.MethodsProgram OverviewBaylor Research (BR) is a pre-collegiate research program that includes Engineering,Biomedical, and Environmental topics. The program resides within the Science Department withfour faculty (the principal scientist in Environmental Research, the principal scientist inBiomedical Research, and two principal engineers in Engineering Research) who hold higherdegrees in their respective field. The mission of Baylor
://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-the-zone-of-proximal- development-2796034. [Accessed Oct. 15, 2022].[41] S.D. Sheppard, “Mechanical dissection: An experience in how things work,” in Proceedings of the Engineering Education Conference: Curriculum Innovation & Integration, pp. 1–8, 1992.[42] J. Lamancusa, M. Torres, and V. Kumar, “Learning engineering by product dissection,” in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings: The American Society for Engineering Education, 1996.[43] M. L. Calderon, “Application of reverse engineering activities in the teaching of engineering design,” in International Design Conference. Croatia: Design Education, pp. 1249–1258, 2010.[44] C. Lauff, D. Kotys-Schwartz, and M. Rentschler, “Design
engage and teach kids in STEAM Club, university students can learn how tosuccessfully engage and teach the same kids via their museum exhibit final project. Engagementenhances their ability to be academically successful. Through S-L participation, we are teachingengineers to engage and effectively communicate in an active learning scenario.MetacognitionS-L remains an integral aspect back in the classroom. Reflections after each S-L session establisha connection between direct service and the academic curriculum. Studies have demonstrated thevalue of reflection to enhance comprehension, performance, and self-regulated learning[27]. Research also shows that the majority of students require external support to engage inreflection [28]. Thus
students have about engineering and engineers. A 2011 study asked students to draw an engineer and interviewed some students about their drawings. They found that most students described engineers as a mechanic, laborer, or technician, with few students describing an engineer as a designer. In addition, students predominantly drew engineers as men[3]. This misconception of engineers and engineering makes it difficult for students to picture themselves as engineers, which means students who may enjoy engineering might not consider it a viable career option. ince the Capobianco et al. 2011 study, there has been an increase in engineering curriculum inSK-12 spaces due to many states
-ChampaignMiss Taylor Tucker Parks, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Taylor Parks is a research fellow in engineering education at the Siebel Center for Design. She earned her bachelor’s in engineering mechanics and master’s in curriculum & instruction from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research focuses on promoting teamwork in complex engineering problem solving through collaborative task design. She currently co-leads the integration of human-centered design principles within select courses across the Grainger College of Engineering.Mr. Saadeddine Shehab, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign I am currently the Associate Director of Assessment and Research team at the Siebel Center for Design
on the responses, three of the researchers selected the participants to balance a number offactors: • number of teachers vs number of researchers • experience with educational research as a participant or part of research team (teachers) • research topic focus (researchers) • gender diversity of participants • school diversity (public vs private, large vs small, urban vs rural, geography within the US)Once the potential workshop participants accepted their invitation, we examined participants’areas of interest with respect to CS education and topics of CS education research and found twodistinct areas: curriculum specific (e.g., CS integration, curriculum alignment, anddevelopmentally appropriate practices in CS) and
Wetheim College of Engineering. Her focus is on developing curriculum ba ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Establishing Sustainable Programs: Creating Lasting Computer Science Summer Programs for Middle School Students (Evaluation)Krista D. Chisholm, Ph.D., Olivia Lancaster, Areesha Razi, Nancy Ruzycki, Ph.D.University of Florida, Department of Materials Science and EngineeringAbstractInformal learning environments are among a number of ways to build learning experiences forstudents outside of the classroom. These experiences can create opportunities for students toengage and develop an interest in computer science and engineering outside the
Paper ID #41858High School Students’ Perspectives on Pre-college Engineering EducationCourses (Fundamental)Jialing Wu, Vanderbilt University Jialing Wu is an incoming first-year PhD student in Engineering Education at the Ohio State University. She earned her M.Ed. in International Education Policy and Management at Vanderbilt University, Peabody College, and also holds a bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from China. Her research interests encompass international engineering education, pre-college engineering, as well as the application of quantitative methods and advanced technology in Engineering Education
Paper ID #39382One of These Things Is Not Like the Others... Machines Can Learn toClassify Too (Resource Exchange)Dr. Stephany Coffman-Wolph, Ohio Northern University Dr. Stephany Coffman-Wolph is an Assistant Professor at Ohio Northern University in the Department of Electrical, Computer Engineering, and Computer Science (ECCS). Research interests include: Artificial Intelligence, Fuzzy Logic, Game Theory, Teaching Computer Science to First-Year, K-12 Outreach, and Increasing Diversity in STEM.Dr. Marcia Pool, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Dr. Marcia Pool is a Teaching Associate Professor and Director of
. Insummary, a critical contribution of the Socially Transformative Engineering Pedagogy is engaginglearners in different modes of reasoning so they can achieve their full potential for conscientiousdecision-making.Pedagogical Translation of the Socially Transformative Engineering FrameworkIntegrating a new framework with an emphasis on engineering reasoning fluency while integratingsocial and ethical perspectives can be daunting. Therefore, we present an illustrative lessoninspired by a curriculum developed by Sung and colleagues [29]. In this lesson, engineering is notthe central focus, but engineers are situated as part of a legal case. As part of the legal case, twoengineers are the expert witnesses, one representing the defendant and the other
qualitative study draws from data gathered as part of a larger efficacy study of the EiEcurriculum [29]. In the present study, the primary unit of analysis is the design team.Participating design teams were in classrooms that participated in the larger study during itssecond year of data collection; were video–recorded as part of qualitative data collection for thelarger project; and learned two science–integrated engineering units in sequence, Unit 1 and Unit2. Unit 1 for all teams was an EiE bridges unit in which students used simple materials toconstruct a strong and stable bridge across two abutments [20]. Unit 2 involved the design of anelectrical circuit; a package to contain a plant; an oil spill clean–up process; or site preparation tosupport
Paper ID #38609Intergenerational E-Textile Workshops for Engineering andSocial-Emotional Learning (Fundamental)Emanuel Joseph LouimeEunice Yujin KangEmma Anderson, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyKristin A Searle, Utah State UniversityDr. Avneet Hira, Boston College Dr. Avneet Hira is an Assistant Professor in the Human-Centered Engineering Program and the Depart- ment of Teaching, Curriculum and Society (by courtesy) at Boston College. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Intergenerational E-Textile Workshops for Engineering and Social-Emotional LearningIn this paper, we share the
. In this manner, we strive towork within the realities of schooling in everyday classrooms while also helping to catalyzechange that improves the educational experiences of students and the supports that are availablefor teachers. In this discussion, we reflect on the opportunities of teaching and learningengineering and the accompanying tensions that arise in doing so.Our engineering curricular units are designed to be integrated into science or STEM time in K-8educational settings—both in school and out-of-school settings. Through our testing withteachers, we learned that setting engineering in broad societal issues offered an authentic visionfor engineering in society, but also posed problems for teachers constrained by time. Engineeringis
most impactful time toenergize students about careers in STEM is in K-12 settings. To emphasize and spotlight the importance ofbuildings on humans, along with providing an interactive learning experience for potential future STEMstudents, a five-day summer camp focused on multi-disciplinary building design was held at (insertuniversity name). The camp curriculum included hands-on, design-oriented projects from severaldisciplines: architecture, mechanical, structural, construction, sustainability, acoustics, and lighting. Inaddition, tours of several buildings on campus were conducted along with after-hours relaxation time forcampers. The implementation of activities and the well-designed hands-on projects not only increased thestudents
Knight, University of Tennessee at Knoxville Laura Knight is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engi- neering at The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, and an advocate for expanding the numbers of future engineers through education and community outreach. Laura returned to academia after over 25 years of working in locations across the country and raising a family. She held engineering and manufacturing leadership roles with a variety of private and public com- panies, including President/Owner of a developing children’s discovery museum, which brought outreach programs to underserved populations. Collaborating across communities, industries, and academic disciplines
programs but as student mentors to the teams and serve as judgesand scorekeepers during the competition (as shown in Figure 6).5. Qatar Invents: (Engineering Design and Innovation Program)The engineering design and innovation program empowers students to explore the entire designprocess, from conceptualization to prototyping. Participants are immersed in an environment thatencourages creativity, resourcefulness, and outside-the-box thinking. Through hands-on projects,students learn the value of iterative design, discovering that failure is an integral part of innovation.The program places significant emphasis on teamwork and effective communication, mirroringthe collaborative nature of engineering projects in real-world settings. By working
with the Neag School of Education at UConn, seeking a Master’s of Curriculum and Instruction, and will be entering the public teaching workforce after graduation of Spring 2024.Todd Campbell, University of Connecticut Todd Campbell is a Professor and Head of the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Connecticut.Marina A. Creed, UConn Health and UConn School of Medicine Marina Creed is an Instructor in the Department of Neurology at the University of Connecticut School of Medicine and practicing Neuroimmunology Nurse Practitioner in the Multiple Sclerosis Center at UConn Health. She has been engaged in translational public health efforts throughout the COVID19 pandemic to improve outcomes