than non-dual-credit students. Additionally, dual-credit engineering courses have been shownto increase the persistence of minority students in engineering majors [23, 24, 25].Dual-credit programs, also known as dual enrollment or concurrent enrollment, emerged during the 1970s[18, 26, 27]. Initially developed for gifted and high-achieving students planning to attend college, theseprograms allow students to take college courses to build confidence, experience college expectations, andprepare for the transition to higher education.NTU offers dual-credit engineering to promote engineering literacy, reinforce engineering concepts, andinspire confidence among young Native American students to enroll in engineering programs. NTU'sdual-credit
) were encouraged. Opportunities for Teacher’s Quantum Workshop organized in Summer 2022 and 2023 communication and provided a set-up for teachers to listen quantum fundamentals from creativity scientists, convey their questions, and interact with the projects team and other teachers to apply what they learn in their teaching during their formal curriculum plan. Continuous Iterative revisions during the first two years of the project helped improvement improve the instructional design, implementation, and evaluation processes.In this paper we specifically elaborate on the first design principle that aligned the expectationsand instructions
understand it better. F. I know what to do to increase student interest in STEM.InterviewsTeachers were interviewed after the last of their summer program sessions to gain more contextinto how participating in the summer programs impacted their teaching practice with respect to theconcepts developed during the summer camp. Teachers were asked the following two questions: • How has your participation impacted the way you think about teaching? • How do you plan to incorporate computational thinking, engineering design, use of technology and system thinking in your future classrooms?The research team chose these questions as they captured how teachers’ perspectives on teachingin STEM may have changed after participating in an
: Tech Presentation 1 and 2 Prototyping, Soldering, Electronics Prototyping, testing plan, build, test. Tech 2 Testing Presentation 3 and 4 Testing, During flex time: power tools, Iterate, Test, Final Refinements. Website and Refining, advanced 3D printing, laser video production. Practice presentation and 3 Presenting cutting, CNC Router, final presentation. programming, solderingThis curriculum closely parallels the Seven Key Characteristics of Integrated STEM proposed byRoehrig, et al [14] which are: 1) focus on real-world problems - using the UN SustainableDevelopment goals as a
based on how well each is likely to meet the criteria and constraints of the problem. 3-5 ETS1-3: Plan and carry out fair tests in which variables are controlled and Which NGSS failure points are considered to identify aspects of a model or prototype that engineering can be improved performance MS ETS1-1: Define the criteria and constraints of a design problem with expectations are sufficient precision to ensure a successful solution taking into account relevant addressed in the scientific principles and potential impacts on people and the natural intervention
al. [37] positedthat teacher beliefs influence teachers’ willingness to adopt new pedagogies and teachingstrategies (e.g., active learning, team-based learning, and discussions). Yasar and colleagues [37]argue that understanding teachers’ views about engineering and engineering practices isnecessary to integrate technology and design into pre-college education effectively. Engineeringdesign challenges are student-centered and require students to actively utilize an iterative processto prepare, plan, and evaluate their solutions at each stage of their design. However, howengineering is implemented in the classroom depends on teachers’ views of how students learn[31]. Hence, for students to understand and engage in the EDP effectively
problem.Model Shareability and Reusability None of the activities required the production of mathematical solutions that are sharedwith a client. Also, there were no requirements in the activities to create mathematical solutionsthat could be modified for other engineering situations.Effective Prototype A requirement in the Mmm Cupcakes: What's Their Life Cycle Impact activity was thatthe mathematical model could be used with different sets of data for the problem. The purpose ofthe mathematical model was to design an optimal life-cycle plan with the least amount ofenvironmental impact. There was no requirement in the activity that the mathematical model beused in a similar engineering context. For this reason, the activity partially met
recordings of this project from this family.Throughout this project, Betty provides mainly managerial support and verbal support, thoughshe also steps in to provide physical support several times. She is mostly a project manager andfacilitator, keeping Harper moving through the project while also balancing home lifemanagement. While Harper is still designing her bot, Betty collaborates in parallel as sheattempts to figure out how to connect the battery and motor. Betty’s managerial support is partlyproject related, partly behavior related, and partly family life related. Betty’s involvement andsupport is interrupted by friends visiting, dinner plans, baby brother, and other household tasks.While Betty is present for much of the activity, she is off
with each standard. These boxes closely resemble the format of those created for the NGSS [Fig. 8]. • Curriculum Frameworks: Provides a roadmap for curriculum development.• Instructional Resources: Examples of lesson plans aligned with the new standards, teaching observation rubrics, and other resources to assist educators and school districts.• Curriculum Resources: Vetted resources from national standards documents aimed to assist educators and school districts in developing standards-aligned curriculum while also meeting the needs specific to their community and students.• Research Resources: Articles and reports related to NGSS and STEL research studies.• Professional Learning: Recorded training sessions covering
past experiences. The results showed that the teacher with an engineering backgroundtended to emphasize the engineering activities, while the teacher with a biology background modifiedlessons to deepen students’ understanding of biology. Furthermore, teachers emphasized parts of theBID curricula that aligned with their teaching backgrounds and training.Teachers’ understanding of integrated curricula also impacts students learning [37]. As such, they tendto plan, modify, and enact curricula based on their perception of its relevance to their students. In onestudy, Steven et al. [38] found that designing activities that incorporated exploring illustrated examplesin nuanced ways that attended to students’ learning needs impacted their retention
as a result. Separately, any excerpts that were reflective of the strength ofthe participants’ anticipatory and initial—prior to and following their first year of study,respectively—SoB were captured, often In Vivo to maintain the students’ individual voices [31].In a second round of coding, the socialization experiences were then sorted into two categoriescapturing the participants’ exposure to their university and their planned discipline. Finally, theparticipants’ anticipatory and initial belonging was mapped against their pre-college experiencesto find themes across the eight students.PositionalityThe author recognizes his own positionality with respect to the work done in this study. Heacknowledges his privilege in having been able to
detect color when shown on the Video Display. • My favorite part of the project was learning how to code the arm to move. Figure 8. Student Survey Questions and Student ResponsesLessons learnedMany things were learned over the course of the summer. One of the main lessons learned by thestudents was time management. For the first time, the students had to produce specific results ina limited amount of time, but with proper instruction and planning, the project was successful.Being able to complete this project gave the students the knowledge that with proper planningand time management, anything can
engineering design. Similarly, Gasiewski et al. [40] gathered quantitative datafrom over 2,500 students and conducted focus groups with 41 students to investigate therelationship between student engagement and introductory science instruction.InstrumentationThe Engineering Profession in Mathematics (EPM) questionnaire was developed to assess thetypes of mathematics used in engineering practice. The questionnaire provides a commonstructure for evaluating engineering problems based on their alignment with mathematicalcontent standards. The 24 engineering problems in the questionnaire were derived from pre-service teachers' lesson plans for grades 7-12, and these problems were categorized into eightmathematical content areas. The problems were selected
impact. A significantaddition to our study will be the involvement of a second instructor and their teaching team,offering a fresh perspective on the course's effectiveness. We plan to conduct focus groups withthis new cohort to gain deeper insights into their experiences and impressions. For future offerings of the course, we are developing a comprehensive student survey thatwill explicitly address the five key themes central to our course design and implementation.These themes include fostering a sense of belonging, supporting self-regulation skills in theonline learning environment, enhancing self-efficacy in engineering, promoting learning andmotivation through innovative online pedagogies, and evaluating the effectiveness of
beams, and includedsome small side holes for the bench user’s view.These two example talks were conducted in the classrooms of two teachers from the DesignTalks community of practice. In this study, we investigated the perceptions of these teachers andfour others, asking, How do elementary teachers perceive the benefits of intentionally facilitatedwhole-class conversations during engineering design units?MethodsThis qualitative study is part of a larger project in which university researchers partnered with K-6 teachers to develop Design Talks. We started in 2020 with two core teacher partners, meetingbi-weekly to discuss readings, plan engineering design units, and brainstorm structures forleading whole-class conversations within these units