7-12 activity guides Learning Goals • Engineering and technology ethical considerationsHELP vs HARM • Sociotechnical impacts of cellular agriculture innovations • Create claims and context from various Research and media sources consequence mapping • Consider multiple solutions (NGSS K-2-ETS 1-2) • Frame the problem
and neighboring reservations. understandings in relation to community needs. yinish yé Dinésh chįįn “I am robot”ContactKARMA - wiikarma.technology/contactDr. Robert Hayes - robert.hayes@tufts.eduExample CAD Lesson: Make Your Own JewelryLesson Overview★ Objective: Learning TinkerCAD and 3D printing basics through traditional Navajo craft★ Grade level: 3rd-8th grade★ Time to complete: < 1 hour for design, plus ~5-30 minutes per printed pieceExample Robotics Lesson: Count to 10 in Navajo Lesson Overview ★ Objective: Learning robotics and
and development of a formal plan in engineeringdesign processes. According to Crismond and Adams, informed designers—i.e., those whose“level of competence lies somewhere between that of the novice and expert designer” (p. 743)—use divergent thinking to generate as many ideas as possible [1]. The underlying idea ofbrainstorming is that thinking of more ideas will ultimately lead to a better idea to be realizedlater in the design process [2]. For example, Kudrowitz and Dippo summarized findings of theirempirical work on brainstorming, or ideation, as follows: “to get more original solutions [to aproblem], one must push past and build upon the ideas generated first to arrive at the lessobvious ideas and association” (p. 15) [3].Despite
visiting scientistsand engineers. Team projects included designs for prosthetics, bike safety, adaptive devices,medical care, and crop irrigation.Most students believed they gained the ability to improve the world through their designs,emphasizing that they can accomplish much more when working on a team. Additional interviewfindings focused on students’ experience with career sessions where they engaged withscience/engineering professionals including local entrepreneurs. Students expressed confidencein understanding the wide array of engineering-related careers and steps needed to pursue thesefields. The summer program reinforced student interest in STEM majors and careers withenthusiasm for “design for good.”1. IntroductionThis paper details the
surveys con-ducted when students were enrolled in the pre-college program. Our findings provide importantinsights on designing teaching approaches and future pre-college programs that enhance students’preparation for first-year engineering programs and careers in CS and AI.1 IntroductionThe need for a talented engineering workforce continues to grow at a rapid pace [1], while 4-yeargraduation rates are declining [2] and high attrition rates are observed in many engineering pro-grams [3]. In 2024, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics [1] reported that the need for employment inSTEM areas is expected to be 5% higher than in non-STEM careers. Educators and policy makerstackle this need in multiple ways: bridge programs for first-year college students
classrooms.IntroductionConsideration of sustainable practices is increasingly important in a multitude of fields asrecognized by ABET [1], the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) [2], theAmerican Society of Civil Engineers [3] and the American Academy of EnvironmentalEngineers and Scientists (AAEES) [4]. AAEES recommends that sustainability be integratedinto all engineering disciplines [4], and ABET includes sustainability-related criteria in severalprograms including architectural, industrial, and mining engineering in addition to civil andenvironmental engineering. Engineering for One Planet (EOP) is an example of an initiative toprovide instructors in higher education with resources to integrate sustainability across allengineering disciplines [5]. As
and the number of pre-engineering programs. However, theintegration of these programs into high school programs of study is not necessarilystraightforward, as states’ requirements and methods of implementation vary widely. Furtherexacerbating this issue is a lack of engineering experience among teachers, administrators, andlegislators.The National Academies launched a series of studies on integrating engineering into K-12 andfound, among other reasons, difficulty due to lack of engineering within state standards andinsufficient training for pre-service teachers [1-2]. Engineering involves open-ended, ill-definedproblems, usually with multiple solutions [3-5], which is decidedly different from most highschool curricula. In fact, introductory
StudentsIntroductionThere is a strong and urgent regional need to increase the production of qualified cybersecurityprofessionals in the workforce. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ OccupationalOutlook Handbook, jobs related to Information Security Analysis with responsibilities to planand conduct security measures to organization’s computer networks and systems are rated as oneof the fastest-growing jobs in the United States through 2020-3030 [1]. Georgia Department ofLabor predicts a similar trend and forecasts a 16.5% increase in Computer and Mathematicsoccupations in the state of Georgia through 2028 [2]. More specifically, Information SecurityAnalysis occupations are expected to increase by 34.0%, a rate way higher than the average forall
, drawing on theprinciples, processes, and strategies inherent in nature to devise innovative and sustainablesolutions [1, 2]. By employing natural analogies, BID effectively tackles engineering challengesand holds the potential to nurture the knowledge and skills required for developing cost-effective, efficient, and sustainable solutions to complex human issues [3]. The incorporation ofBID into both graduate and undergraduate engineering curricula is endorsed by ABETaccreditation, which acknowledges collaborative skills within multidisciplinary teams asessential for today’s engineering students [1, 4]. Furthermore, as emphasized in the Engineer of2020 report, undergraduate education must prepare students to address engineering problems
. Preliminary findings indicate that homeschoolers made progress in all learningobjectives: apply terminology and concepts, defining the system, identify interactions, and createmodels of the system. The collaborative participation of parents and researchers in implementingthe STEM experience fostered a learning environment that enabled homeschoolers of differentages to collaboratively develop their systems thinking. This study contributes to engineeringeducation research by providing insights into the development of systems thinking among pre-college students within the homeschooling system.IntroductionSystems thinking is a fundamental aspect of engineering education [1]. The challenges engineersface are not isolated entities but are part of complex
learners.IntroductionRecent advances in artificial intelligence have revitalized interest in personalized learning (PL).In particular, large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a promising tool to tailoreducational content to the needs of diverse learners in both K-12 and higher education [1].Although PL has been widely researched for its potential to optimize student engagement andimprove learning outcomes [2], its implementation often remains limited by constraints on real-time customization in either computer-based or in-person interventions. With modern LLMs,educators and researchers now have the tools to move beyond static resources or rule-basedadaptive tutors towards more dynamic systems that can customize learning materials on demand[3]. This shift not
, many students still donot understand the full breadth of problems engineers solve. Studies continue to highlightcommon misconceptions about engineering work including gender stereotypes about engineeringand erroneous concepts about the nature of the engineering profession [1][2][3]. Unfortunately,these misconceptions are driving the U.S. towards a large talent gap such that the number ofengineering jobs that need to be filled in the future will outpace the number of engineeringdegrees awarded [4].For those students who eventually decide to pursue engineering, studies have indicated that whenhigh school students, especially first-generation students, choose engineering, their reasons rangefrom having a curiosity and interest in the subject
asking them togenerate a high-level description of learning activities that met standards for both disciplines.Four humans rated the LLM output – using an aggregate rating approach – in terms of (1) whetherit met the CS learning standard, (2) whether it met the language arts learning standard, (3)whether it was equitable, and (4) its overall quality.Results: For Claude AI, 52% of the activities met language arts standards, 64% met CS standards,and the average quality rating was middling. For ChatGPT, 75% of the activities met languagearts standards, 63% met CS standards, and the average quality rating was low. Virtually allactivities from both LLMs were rated as neither actively promoting nor inhibiting equitableinstruction.Discussion: Our
, 2025Leveraging Photolithography and Integrated Circuits to Foster Electrical Engineering Identity and Values in K-12 LearnersIntroduction: The engineering field has made significant strides in promoting diversity andinclusion. However, electrical engineering (EE) continues to face notable challenges inthis area. While other engineering disciplines have seen a narrowing gender gap, womenremain significantly underrepresented in EE, with a male-to-female ratio of 8:1 [1].Despite its critical importance, EE is often overlooked in K-12 education, where STEMprograms tend to focus on mechanical engineering or general science. As a result, EEconcepts frequently remain unexplored until college [2]. This lack of early exposure,among other factors
program implementation and identifiedaccomplishments and lessons learned by interviewing Program Leadership and key members ofthe Operations and Content Development Teams.This program was designed to be fully online; following the pandemic and responding tostudents’ needs, the curriculum evolved from fully online (i.e., online instructor with individualtake-home kits) in Year 1, to hybrid (i.e., in-person instructor weekly at school) in Years 2 and 3,to a hybrid for-credit elective class during the school day (i.e., in-person instructor twice a week,teacher of record guiding online learning three days) in Year 4. Iteratively, the curriculum wasrevised through data review, student feedback in participatory design sessions, and input
-12 STEM education, advance engineering workforce development, and foster inclusive practices in engineering education.Adesikeola Olateru-Olagbegi, University of North Dakota ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Exploring Teachers’ Lived Experiences with Culturally Relevant Engineering Design: An Instrumental Multiple Case Study (Work in Progress)PurposeThe Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) [1] emphasize connecting science andengineering to local contexts so that standards are relevant for all students. Yet many teachers lacksufficient training or self-efficacy (SE) with implementing engineering education, leading tosuperficial or
differences in how cognitively complex the standards are.Discussion: Standards writers face many tensions and trade-offs, and this analysis shows how – ingeneral terms – various states have chosen to manage those trade-offs in writing standards. Forexample, adding examples can improve clarity and specificity, but perhaps at the cost of brevityand longevity. A better understanding of the landscape of state standards can assist futurestandards writers, curriculum developers, and researchers in their work.1 Introduction and BackgroundThere are 42 U.S. states with computer science standards, totaling just under 10k standards acrossall grade levels K-12. These standards form a nexus at the intersection of policy, curriculum,instruction, and research and
curriculum that are most valuable to a variety of students, and how toimprove the curriculum to better serve all students. 1 Curriculum Design for All Learners (Evaluation)IntroductionThe United States Department of Labor projects a 10.4% increase in STEM-related employmentfrom 2023 to 2033 [1]. However, high school students face inadequate preparation for STEMfields, and the STEM workforce is experiencing attrition. The report from the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) indicates that the proportion of high school students meeting college readinessbenchmarks in STEM subjects declined from 19% in 2021 to 16% in 2022 [2]. Moreover, 24%of
research methods for STEM education research. Dr. Menekse received four Seed-for-Success Awards (in 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2021) from Purdue University’s Excellence in Research Awards programs in recognition of obtaining four external grants of $1 million or more during each year. His research has been generously funded by grants from the Institute of Education Sciences (IES), the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), Purdue Research Foundation (PRF), and the National Science Foundation (NSF). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Teaching Quantum Randomness to Middle School Students: A Two-Year Study (Evaluation)Introduction The integration of Quantum
(BLS) projects that occupations in Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) will grow by 10.4% from 2023 to 2032, significantlyoutpacing the 3.6% growth expected for non-STEM occupations [1]. The technology sectorremains a key driver of this expansion, fueled by advancements and the demand for innovationacross industries. Therefore, in response to the growing need for a larger and more diverse poolof STEM professionals—including educators, researchers, and practitioners—governments andeducational institutions continue to prioritize STEM education [2]. Data from the NationalCenter for Education Statistics (NCES) highlights a 15% increase in STEM major enrollmentover the past five years, with 2024 showing a notable rise in
activity?Researchers collected approximately eight hours of data over 5-unit lessons in a middle schoolengineering and technology classroom. The students participated in creating an electronicexpansion pack for the Sphero BOLT using a micro:bit and sensors. This analysis focused on videorecordings of two pairs of girls in this classroom. Using the Team Interaction Observation Protocoloutlined in [1], we employed a qualitative discourse analysis approach to analyze videos. Thisconceptual framework specifies six types of discourse actions: task-oriented, response-oriented,learning-oriented, support-oriented, challenge-oriented, and disruptive, and was used to categorizestudents’ interactions.Results suggest that girls who engage in collaborative
great potential for families with children,particularly in rural areas where access to engineering learning resources is often limited. Livingin rural areas with geographical constraints can make it difficult for families to visit museums orSTEM events that could trigger children’s STEM interest and participation in their early years[1]. Rural public libraries play a key role in bridging this gap for their communities and families[2], as they are committed to providing informal educational resources, technology, andopportunities to their patrons [3]. An online option to access these sources can allow families touse educational materials at the convenience of their own time and space.However, online programs in general can present challenges for
teachers feelill-equipped to teach engineering due to factors that include: 1) the lack of professionaldevelopment, 2) lack of confidence in content knowledge, and 3) lack of understanding of theengineering education standards. Further, teachers play a key role in perpetuating or challengingdominant narratives. The canonical narrative on engineering is that it is fundamentally a White,male, middle class enterprise. For example, data from the engineering undergraduate enrollmentin 2016 showed that only 21.4% of students are female, with African American females makingup just 1.3%. Thus, considering how to promote equity in engineering in K12 education is urgentand necessary. In this study in a 7th grade classroom at a Title 1 school with a Black
pandemic was disruptive to the education system across the world in countlessways. And while remote and virtual learning tried to address the challenge of content delivery,hands-on laboratory experiences which provided authentic science inquiry for high schoolstudents were impossible to replace during the pandemic. Additionally, the valuable afterschooland summer programs that supplemented such in school training (e.g., science fairs, roboticscompetitions, Science Olympiad) were not available as well. Research tells us that suchexperiences are crucial to catalyze a high school students’ interest in STEM careers [1], [2].Even more detrimental is the fact that these activities are often identified as milestones forstudents who are college-bound
Engineer (TIER-1) and Program Management Engineer (OEM) in the automotive industry, he returned to academia in 2013, receiving his BSc (2017) and MSc (2023) in Business Psychology from H-BRS.Gesche Neusel, Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences Gesche Neusel studied Organismic Biology, Evolutionary Biology, and Palaeobiology (OEP-Biology) at the University of Bonn, specializing in Behavioral Biology. She now works at the Gender Equality Office of Hochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg, where she is dedicated to promoting and supporting girls in the fields of technology and computer science.Steven McAlpine, University of Maryland Baltimore County Steven McAlpine is an assistant teaching professor in the Entrepreneurship
particular attention to engaging students in the STEAM content areas, he focuses his investigations on enhancing creativity and innovation, supporting better documentation, and encouraging collaborative learning. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Development of a Programming Environment to Bridge Students from Block-Based to Text-Based Programming (Work in Progress)IntroductionComputer Science (CS) education continues to expand in U.S. schools, with high school CSofferings increasing from 35% to 60% between 2017 and 2024 [1]. However, significantdemographic disparities persist, particularly affecting African American/Black,Hispanic/Latino/Latina/Latinx, and Native American/Alaskan students
. Weconducted a qualitative document analysis of fifty-eight embedded client letters in fifteenengineering design-based K-12 STEM integration curricular units. Through the lens of theSTEM Integration Framework, we explored the following research questions: (1) What is therole of client letters in context-rich, engineering design-based K-12 STEM integrationcurriculum? (2) How do client letters add value to engineering design-based STEM integrationcurriculum? The analysis revealed unique roles of different client letters and the importantcontextual elements to convey in each role, deepening the connection between content and real-world scenarios in support of problem scoping, knowledge building, engineering design, andconcluding response. Additionally
a Pre-college STEM Outreach Program over Time (Evaluation)Introduction A skilled STEM workforce is critical to maintaining the competitiveness of the U.S. intoday’s global economy. STEM job opportunities have grown faster than non-STEMcounterparts since 2010, and employment in many STEM occupations is projected to grow [1].Recently, many pre-college programs have been developed and implemented to increase highschool students’ interest in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Plentifulprior studies documented the positive impacts of such outreach efforts [2], [3], [4], [5], and [6],but how students’ evaluations change during the program remained an unanswered question.This
-school participants as part of the [Program name]. The curriculum aims to create a holistic impression of the rising semiconductor and microelectronics ecosystem, building basic capacities and skills to develop a more competent future workforce in the US. The content is organized into 5 units integrating electronics, design, and social awareness. We adopt a STEAM education approach to emphasize the life cycle of microelectronics. In the last two days of the program, the participants integrated their learnings through a design project using microcontrollers to address social needs. Three units are included in this exchange.Unit 1: Introduction to Circuits (Not included)Unit 2: The micro:bit Shuffle – Intro to Microcontrollers
. Recognition of these differences and their implications can be leveraged by future standards writers, curriculum developers, and computing education researchers to craft standards that best meet the needs of all learners.1 Introduction and BackgroundState and national learning standards play an important role in articulating and standardizingK-12 computer science (CS) education [1]. However, these standards have not been extensivelyresearched, especially in terms of their cognitive complexity [2]. Learning that incorporates morecognitive complexity (i.e., higher-order thinking skills) is crucial for CS students [3]. CS is a keycomponent of engineering education, especially given the quickly growing and highlyremunerated positions in CS