Paper ID #45672Computer Science as a High School Graduation Requirement: Planning forPolicy Implementation.Rebecca Zarch, SageFox Consulting Group Rebecca Zarch is an evaluator and a director of SageFox Consulting Group. She has spent 20 years evaluating and researching STEM education projects from K-12 through graduate programs.Paula MooreStacey Sexton Hi, I’m Stacey Sexton. I am a queer, nonbinary, Socialist organizer, educator, facilitator and coach supporting individuals and teams working through conflict, deepening their understanding of and action toward social justice, and finding balance between being human and being
State University, where he teaches in the Sustainable & Renewable Energy and Engineering Technology undergraduate programs.Dr. Jin Ho Jo, Illinois State University Dr. Jin Ho Jo is a Professor of Technology at Illinois State University, teaching in the Sustainable and Renewable Energy program. Dr. Jo also leads the Sustainable Energy Consortium at the university. Dr. Jo is an honors graduate of Purdue University, where he earned a B.S. in Building Construction Management. He earned his M.S. in Urban Planning from Columbia University, where he investigated critical environmental justice issues in New York City. His 2010 Ph.D. from Arizona State University was the nation’s first in sustainability. His
affordances for authenticity of role-play-basedproject work in a Swedish upper secondary software engineering course. The project requiredstudents (aged 17–18) to assume the role of software engineer employees at a web-designbusiness with the task of creating a website for a gaming company, where the course instructorassumed the role of the web business owner. The six-week project included the formulation of adesign plan, back-end programming, developing and refining the design and layout, adjustingcontent for accessibility, and publication of the web site. Inductive analysis of observations fromthe unfolding role-play in five student groups (total 22 students), and interviews with fourstudents and the teacher exposed salient themes related to
high school. Vertical alignment(VA) is crucial for advancing students' understanding and preparing them for potential career pathways insemiconductors. VA also enables schools to develop plans for embedding such workforce initiatives intoschool policy, helping to sustain the integration efforts over time. This paper presents preliminary resultsfrom an analysis of VA plans developed by seven school districts within a prominent semiconductorindustry network. Through document analysis, we identify and critique how these schools plan to integratesemiconductor content across grade levels and subjects. The preliminary findings aim to provide valuablelessons for other workforce-driven STEM initiatives and offer potential models for
RESOURCE EXCHANGE Rachelle Pedersen Ashley Kersey LESSON DESCRIPTION Alex Sobotka Dr. Ali MostafaviOnly one in twenty mega-projects in engineering will meet both their authorized cost andschedule; the reasoning behind this requires an understanding of the interconnected conceptswithin project management (e.g., risks, change orders, project complexity).To know what shouldbe considered during the Front-End-Planning (FEP) phases of a project, students needexperiences with the various reasons why these mega-projects fail. This low stakes, low resourceactivity
years of experience working on the NE project. Lack of time to plan andimplement NE was cited as the topmost challenge for teachers. Inability to figure out books andproblems, pressure from administration, difficulties in lesson planning, group dynamics amongstudents, and safety of students while handling materials were some of the other concernsmentioned in the evaluation.Similar findings were uncovered in a survey of 70 elementary and middle school teachers doneby Coppola, S.M., Madariaga, L. and Schnedeker, M. [7]. They found that lack of time, access tomaterials and resources, and unfamiliarity with the content were major barriers that preventintegrating engineering into the classroom.Research MethodologyA list of potential barriers for NE
instruction to createclassroom curricula aligned with the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). The specificobjectives of the program are to: 1. Enhance teachers’ bioengineering content knowledge and pedagogical skills. 2. Enable teachers to translate laboratory research into practical, NGSS-aligned curricula. 3. Address educational equity by preparing teachers to better support diverse, urban student populations.Adopted in Illinois in 2014 to be in effect by the 2016-17 school year, NGSS required complexcurriculum planning on the part of districts. The framework relates science to students’ everydaylives, ensures students learn about being careful consumers of scientific and technologicalinformation, and prepares them with the skills
9emphasizes the designing and prototyping of possible solutions [15]. Again, Putra et al. [4] breakthis phase down into two steps - Plan and Build. In these steps, students worked in small groupsto brainstorm possible solutions, eventually building and modeling their designs. Finally, mostengineering design processes conclude with a third phase requiring testing of designs and aformal decision on the most appropriate solution based on the tests [15]. The EDP used by Putraet al. [4] followed all three phases of the design process, broken into the following steps: Define,Learn, Plan, Try, Test, and Decide. Students in their study worked through these steps to solve aproblem while Putra et al. [4] looked for evidence of CTS. A table connecting the three
stated objectives. The open house led to the most scalable model that UMLhas now adopted with several school districts. The other programs will continue if grant fundscontinue to be sourced. The success of these programs in meeting their objectives demonstrateshow vital it is to jointly consider three factors: Results (learner outcomes), Reproducibility(adequacy of resources), and Representation (diverse and inclusive staffing and studentparticipation). The program partnership rubric was developed to help partnerships plan andevaluate their programs based on these three factors. How the rubric was used to plan these pilotprograms and determine how and/or whether to run them again is explained.Introduction In the United States, students in
. 3.2. Walked through the parts of the sensor using example sensor that we (the virtual instructor) had. (*Note – At Pitt, we had the same monitor so we were able to talk about the monitor through both pictures on the slides and physically over Zoom.) 4. To prepare for the next module, we instructed the students to consider what places or areas they want to set up the monitor to collect data. Module Session 5 LO 5. Creating a Monitoring Program and Collecting Data 1. Reviewed major takeaways from previous modules 2. Creating a Monitoring Plan 2.1. Defined what a Monitoring Plan is for the students 2.2. Think-Pair-Share Exercise on brainstorming AQ monitoring locations 2.3. Finalized the Monitoring Plan
. June: Logistics and Media Coordination Plan demo party event to showcaseJanuary: Foundation Building participants' work. Schedule lab tours. Set up biweekly meetings for planning team Arrange media coverage and program to coordinate and assign tasks. documentation. Finalize tracks that will be offered during the Order program-branded t-shirts. program. Identify the dates for the program. July: Final DetailsFebruary: Initial Planning Send final program details to participants
middle school students—guided by universal design for learning (UDL) principles—and accompanying activities aimed atsupporting students’ CT and EF skills, but soon identified the need for student-facing scaffoldsthat aided students making connections between classroom learning and ORBIT. We report onthe first three of six planned co-design workshops with teachers, focused on exploring designgoals, learning goals, and needs; testing iterative prototypes of digital coding environments; anddeveloping an instructional sequence for practicing CT.In this paper, we explore the following question: What design considerations inform structuringthe ORBIT program technology to support students developing independence in computationalthinking alongside
providing teacher professional development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Developing An Assessment Toolkit for Precollege Summer Engineering Workshops (Works-in-Progress)Abstract Many universities have engineering outreach programming that expose students toengineering that include day camps, overnight camps, and multi-week programs. As the projectsoccur over hours, days, or weeks, rich content is delivered in a very abbreviated timeframe.Often only anecdotal evidence or evaluative surveys reflect what students’ experience. Thisworks-in-progress project describes the strategic plan and first stage towards development oftools for assessing engineering learning in weekly summer
elementarygrades, many elementary teachers report a lack of time, teaching self-efficacy, and disciplinaryknowledge for planning and enacting engineering learning experiences in their classrooms [4].To address these challenges, professional development workshops and graduate courses havebeen developed to support elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and teachingengineering self-efficacy. Indeed, recent studies have shown that these standalone professionaldevelopment experiences can result in significant gains for in-service elementary teachers’teaching self-efficacy and reduce their perceived barriers to teaching engineering in theirclassrooms [5], [6]. However, this raises the question about how elementary preservice teachers(PSTs), those
the sustainable disposal of food wastes was installed in aK-12 school, and researchers assisted teachers in generating hands-on, engineering-focusedlesson plans based on the digester technology. A pre-/post-assessment was conducted for abiology lesson. Results indicate students improved in their knowledge of sustainability issuesrelated to food waste and aerobic respiration. Students also self-reported learning more aboutsustainability, engineering, and biology concepts through the lesson. Perhaps most importantly,students were excited about the hands-on learning experience provided by the digester andexpressed increased interest in engineering and STEM-related careers.I. IntroductionClimate change is a pressing societal issue and researchers
Invitation EXAMPLE PROMPTS Prompt 1: Explore Prompt 2: Create EXAMPLE RESPONSES This is Penny's Civil Engineering Here is the beginning plans forproject. She drew a picture of our street Brady’s birdhouse. He will begin and labeled things that civil engineers collecting materials this week. helped plan. Gabby’s Birdhouse Brady’s Holiday Themed Birdhouse LESSONS LEARNED During recruitment, when families express interest in the program, I 1 recommend having a QR code for them to accept the Remind invitation
of frustrations experienced by children—difficulties in solutionplanning, material handling, achieving desired outcomes, and time constraints—as well ascaregivers’ frustrations that stemmed from planning and collaborating during the makingchallenge with the child. Findings highlight different strategies that caregivers used to mitigatetheir frustrations, such as providing suggestions, assistance, and emotional support, which helpedmaintain the child’s engagement and motivation to complete the engineering challenge. Ourfindings provide insights on how to effectively design online engineering programs that guideand support rural families to develop positive attitudes toward engineering.IntroductionSTEM programs offered by public libraries hold
Paper ID #46064BOARD # 214: Project Drider - Teaching Students about the Dangers ofTicks the Fun Way (Work in Progress)Joshua Dahl, University of Nevada, Reno Joshua Dahl is currently a student at the University of Nevada, Reno. He is pursuing a Masters with an emphasis Computer Science and Engineering but more specifically Compiler Design and Developer Experience. When he graduates he is planning on pursuing a Ph.D. in Computer Science where he hopes to continue to make contributions to both the fields of Computer Graphics and Programming Languages.Erik Marsh, University of Nevada, RenoLandon Wright, University of IdahoQuinn
among instructors [13]. These challengesnecessitate thoughtful planning, coordinated execution, and frequent assessment of studentoutcomes to ensure that team teaching remains effective.In engineering education, team teaching takes on additional layers of complexity. The technicalrigor required in engineering courses demands a blend of expert knowledge and pedagogicalunderstanding. However, teaching teams may find it challenging to coordinate professionalinteraction among skilled instructors and ensure that all perspectives are integrated seamlesslyinto the course content [14]. In addition, engineering educators may seem reluctant to share aclassroom with peers or even uncomfortable at being assessed by students and peers alike [15].Looking
internship opportunities at LBNL for high school students,and engage directly with LBNL’s employees through job shadow, career mapping and speednetworking sessions. In this paper, we will present an overview of the event organization,challenges faced during planning and execution of the event, discuss the lessons learned from thefirst Empowerment in STEM Day and suggest strategies for incorporating such events at othernational laboratories and academic institutions as part of a vital effort into recruiting andretaining more high school girls in STEM-based careers. Additionally, since this was the first in-person event hosted by LBNL’s K-12 Program after the pandemic, we will also share thestrategies implemented at the event so as to engage both
our university. The two-week-long program, modeled after college-level courses, had a mix of rising juniors and seniors.The students resided on campus and attended laboratory sessions four days a week, in two three-hour periods each day. The topics covered included the basics of robotics and key componentssuch as sensors, actuators, kinematics, obstacle avoidance, and trajectory planning. Each sessionstarted with a short lecture providing an overview of the activities and relevant theory. Studentsthen worked on several platforms over the two-week camp, including robotic arm manipulators,mobile robots, and a four-legged robot. Simultaneously, students worked in groups on a researchproject that focused on proposing a robotic design to address a
concept of Problem Framing which is core tothe practice of engineering design. Figure 3 also provides an explanation of each component ofthe sample EPM. All 60 of the EPMs can be accessed for free athttps://www.p12engineering.org/epm. While these EPMs can indicate how to scaffold learningacross different depths of student understanding from basic to advanced, it is important to notethat learning experiences should be shaped according to the individualities of students and theircommunities. That said, the remaining sections of this paper will further describe how the EPMscan be used to plan instructional materials and develop/align P-12 engineering programs/courses.Figure 3. Engineering Performance Matrix Example and Explanation.Developing
future needs. Furthermore, they emphasizedthe need for strategic workforce planning rather than simply filling job vacancies, especially in acompetitive employment market. Fast forward to today, the urgency for workforce developmentin transportation has reached unprecedented levels. Resources available for modernizing andmanaging transportation systems are dwindling, while demographic shifts, rising mobilitydemands, and environmental challenges require significant investments in technology andinfrastructure. The transportation workforce must be prepared to tackle these urgent issues,leading to a need for training and education that aligns with the changing environment. As aresult, the demand for programs focused on transportation workforce
, the participants of the NSTI program presented what they hadlearned in front of the parents/guardians and the representatives from the civil rights division ofour state’s DOT. We conducted surveys among the participants before and after the program. Thepresentations and the survey results indicate that our NSTI program has greatly promoted theparticipants’ interests in STEM and transportation related career.This paper details the organization and execution of the NSTI program, including planning,participants recruiting, curriculum design, daily activities, field trips, presentations, and results ofthe robotic challenges. We also present the survey results and tips and lessons learned. We believethat this paper will be beneficial for the
solutions Student teams work on projects Sweeping Operations 10 Lab Safety Challenge 1: (remotely or in session) How to plan a 3D print 1030 Lab Tour Create school logo Multipiece/tolerance Concept Challenge 2: practice project 11 Intro
, & Saldana, 2014) we identified three categories ofanticipated (planned) role expectations and actual roles. Role expectation was defined as “theteacher’s preferred program responsibility” and included three categories: classroom manager,helper, and learner. The categories were based on verbatim wording in the transcripts. Classroommanager referred to teachers having and using their pedagogical content knowledge regardingtheir classrooms. Helpers indicated a desire to help in whatever ways needed and included acombination of jobs such as classroom manager or to review lesson plans for pedagogicalcontent knowledge (e.g., timing and appropriateness of content for sixth grade). Finally, learnershad a specific intent to learn more about
multiple potential materials to house the smartsensors and will decide which material will work best to allow for data collection at multiplesites based on the mechanism of collection that they choose. Within this lesson, students willrefer to aspects of the engineering design process that include defining the problem and designrequirement, planning for and evaluating multiple design solutions, and optimizing the chosendesign solution based on feedback from both the community educator and camp experts. Theseexperts include electrical engineers who are working with our funding source, [redacted], todesign smart optical sensors so that students receive authentic engineering feedback.Measures to evaluate the projectAlthough this is a work-in-progress
various playgrounds in the world, analyzingusers’ photos, interacting with various users, andreading playground engineers’ stories. DAY1: PHYSICAL FORCES Students rotate to three learning centers to investigate forces in playground equipment. Swing set: Discuss how gravity and inertia are involved in swing sets and calculate the rate of the pendulum swing. Slide: Investigate how different materials influence friction on the slide. Seesaw: Predict and investigate how a lever works. DAY 2: ENTER THE USERS’ WORLD Enter: Identify users and problems that they need to solve. Plan to understand the users’ experiences