Conference Session

SE Curriculum and Course Management

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Francis Lutz, Monmouth University; James McDonald, Monmouth University

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Constituent Committee

mathematical programming, statistics and queuing theory, corporate planning, quality engineering, information systems, software development and the development of microprocessor and digital signal processor based hardware and software. He was a recipient of the NATO System Science Prize. Page 14.778.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Integration of Software Engineering Graduate Education and Continuing Professional Development ProgramsAbstractMonmouth University offers a thirty-six credit graduate program in software engineering. Insupport of the US Army’s Software Engineering Center

Conference Session

Software Engineering Teaching Techniques

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Clifton Kussmaul, Muhlenberg College

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Constituent Committee

feature.Students find it easier to start on this assignment, since it builds on the previous assignment.Project planning is more difficult, although they have some WBS experience from earlier codingassignments and from the concept proposals in the non-technical sequence.3.2.3. DevelopmentSome of the proposed features turn out to be quite simple, while others prove to be quitechallenging; separating the analysis helps to identify features that present appropriate challengesbased on student background, ability, and other activities in the course. Ideally, students wouldadd one simple feature and then build something more complex; thus far, most students havedone one or the other. Recent examples include: ≠ minor changes to the phpBB bulletin board

Conference Session

SE Curriculum and Course Management

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Stansbury, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Massood Towhidnejad, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Constituent Committee

(0.75), Good (1.0), or Excellent (1.25). Therefore, if theyperform above and beyond the call of duty, they are rewarded. However, if their contribution ismoderate or lower, they will not receive full credit for the team project grade. For example, if astudent is evaluated as having a effort=Good, support=Moderate, attitude=Good, their PCF=(1 +0.75 +1)/3=0.9167. Table 1: Team grade point distribution. Team Grade 75 Quality 13 Team organization 10 Test/quality plan 3 Chemistry 5 Process document 2 Dynamic 5 Inspection

Conference Session

SE Curriculum and Course Management

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zulfa Zakaria, IIUM

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Constituent Committee

(take bold character) TB JM TB TB + N + TM (take bold character) TB N TB TB + TM (take bold character) TB TM TD A1 = TD (answer for topic A1 which is stated on the last column in Appendix) Page 14.112.8Page 14.112.9Page 14.112.10Page 14.112.11Page 14.112.12Page 14.112.134.2. Challenges to the validity of the studyThe survey conducted here faces possible challenges that may arise when it is compared to otherexperiments and case studies [25], even if it was planned with an adequate consciousness of suchchallenges