students in public universities is around 50%, while the graduation rates at private universities are around 69%1.This paper aims to broadly explore and discuss how student and professor expectations mayinfluence students’ conceptions of engineering identity, their acquisition of knowledge andskills, as well as their plans for navigation through the “engineering pipeline” by analyzing theinterview responses of two freshman engineering students and one engineering faculty member.MotivationsAs stated earlier, it is important to acknowledge that engineering identity is not necessarily asconcrete or fixed as research might suggest13,14,19. It is likely that each individual studentpossesses a different understanding of the engineering profession, as
conversations: prompted conversations,and spontaneous conversations. The prompted conversations were initiated by the programcoordinator, who articulated a brief question or statement asking students to reflect on key aspectsof their undergraduate research experiences, including: students’ expectations and goals for participating in the program students’ goals for their research projects ways to handle research obstacles lessons students learned through research students’ future goals and plans related to research, graduate study and careers Page 23.580.4Other than posting these initial conversational prompts/questions
Prelim + Mulligan Candidacy Exam/process ProposalFormulating research Research writing +plan Proposal Rewriting or Real World Conference + "TheData Collection
andlearning center. There are two ways to approach this overlap. The first is to make the ASEEprogramming unique. On large campuses, some Chapters have found success in providingSTEM-specific content as a supplement to the campus-level content for all majors. The secondapproach is to partner with other organization(s). This approach has extra benefits; it exposesASEE and its mission to the members of other organizations and it can provide extra assistancefor planning and execution. For research-specific programming, some campuses have foundsuccess with ASEE-hosted STEM education poster sessions. While almost 90% of therespondents reported having some campus-level teaching programming, at least 65% reportedthat they are interested in ASEE providing
theirsophomore engineering courses, which negatively impact student retention (Ricks, Richardson,Stern, Taylor, & Taylor, 2014).One way an engineering program at a southwestern university is working to better prepare theirstudents in their classes is by implementing a competency-based math assessment in one of theircritical second-year engineering courses. The exam was created through Pearson’s MyMathTestwhich uses Artificial Intelligence (AI) to adapt a study plan based on the student’s correct andincorrect answers. The administrators customized the exam to test students on math topics thatwere considered important in order to successfully pass the engineering course. The assessmentwas given to students on their first week of school and was
written, semester after semester. This is both great, and bad. These othernon-writing activities are fantastic and probably more effectual at changing the system most days. Butgraduate student funding eventually dries up, graduate students are not equally listened to and creditedwhen they take on service and activist roles, and graduate school is frankly a difficult place with highworkload and low pay that you don’t want to stay forever. Figuring out what you need to do to get out ofhere (i.e., how to get the writing done) is not the whole game, but it’s one part of it.So, take some time and map out what your strengths and weaknesses are. Be honest with yourself aboutit. Start to work out some plans for how to combat those weaknesses. How will
as valuable in engaging community voices, the literature suggeststhat an effective organizer will not work entirely within one approach or the other, but insteaduse a blend of both to best accommodate the particular context of a project[15]. This blendedapproach becomes the most useful for community organizers, who now have the dexterity toadapt their plan to changing situations. A flexible approach is also beneficial in standardengineering practice because an effective engineer will know how to adapt their approach for thenature of a specific project — an idea that contradicts the tendency for engineers to follow aconsistent framework that can be applied to all projects[16].In addition to a flexible approach, community organizing can
team placed great emphasis on contactingcampus and industry professionals who possessed experience with similar products. Duringinterviews, project team members were asked why they hadn’t contacted environmentalorganizations or homeowners associations that often address the algae problem upon which theirwas based, which may have helped them locate a source of algae, which had posed a problemfor them. Team members indicated they hadn’t thought in terms of approaching such resourcesbecause they were focusing more on their business plan. This failure to identify resourcesdemonstrates narrowness of perception regarding stakeholder engagement that is guided bystudent experience rather than project purpose. The primacy given to successfully
. Studentssubmitted “revised” resumes after the seminar, and comparing the “initial” and “revised”documents indicated that while most students’ resumes improved over time, there was a strongerimprovement in the treatment group (who received individual advising).IntroductionDeveloping an effective resume is essential for students transitioning from undergraduateprograms to the workplace or graduate school. Prior research has indicated that providingengineering students with guidance on developing strong resumes can support the developmentof personal identity [1] as engineers and encourage career planning [2]. Yet the most commontype of resume support provided to undergraduate engineering students is through careeradvising centers, which frequently focus on
disciplines for increased professional and social collaborativeopportunities. Due to both the large number of members and committees, WISE is currently ableto support one event a week. These events may be small, such as our Friday Coffee and WellnessChat (with topics on how to ask for help and identifying your communication style), or largerevents which have career development programming applicable to the whole membership.Best PracticesEvents that have had both high turnout (greater than 20% of the organization) and high feedbackscores include workshops on creating an individual development plan, improving publicspeaking with theatrical improvisation, and fellowship opportunities with examples fromsuccessful applicants and peer review of
the current structure is more guided than simply asking students about theirproblem-solving process. This structure requires less reflection on their own problem-solving process, butstill provides us with meaningful data. Cyclical resource use (using a resource early in the process andreturning in it) was lost in this iteration of the survey.Future Work In the future, we plan to continue analyzing the qualitative data from the Survey InstrumentVersion 2.2 to learn about possible differences in the data we collected. We also plan to add gradecorrelations to the specific responses on the Version 2.2 Survey Instrument to identify the resourcenetworks and combinations that proved to be the most productive for the students in the course
rates as well as supporting faculty with development of effective learning and teaching pedagogies.Mr. James Blake Gegenheimer James Gegenheimer is an MSME Candidate in Mechanical Engineering at LSU. When graduated, James will commission as a Second Lieutenant in the United States Air Force. He will be stationed at Hill Air Force Base in Salt Lake City, Utah. He plans to pursue a Ph.D. through the Air Force and work with the Air Force Weapons Research Laboratory. James is currently a Supplemental Instructor at LSU for Thermodynamics where he has served since 2013. He has worked to improve how STEM college students learn through the use of active learning. c American Society for
Louisiana Art and Science Museum in Baton Rouge. Adrienne has a Master of Science degree in zoology from LSU, where she studied in the Museum of Natural Science, and an Education Specialist Certification in science education.Mr. James Blake Gegenheimer James Gegenheimer is an MSME Candidate in Mechanical Engineering at LSU. When graduated, James will commission as a Second Lieutenant in the United States Air Force. He will be stationed at Hill Air Force Base in Salt Lake City, Utah. He plans to pursue a Ph.D. through the Air Force and work with the Air Force Weapons Research Laboratory. James is currently a Supplemental Instructor at LSU for Thermodynamics where he has served since 2013. He has worked to improve how
, whois a senior faculty member, this mentoring program has been evolved and expanded over many years upto a point where it has become a very effective and helpful system for both the incoming and the outgoingundergraduate students [7].School of Engineering, Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico (PUPR), Puerto RicoSeven (7) fulltime faculty members offer mentoring. Each mentor is assigned certain number of studentsand receives compensation for up to two (2) credit hours per semester. Students with eighty (80) or moreapproved credit hours are assigned a mentor for discussing their career plans, progress in the academicprograms, optimal or alternative choices for course selection, and so on [8]. In addition, the office ofStudent Development and
include: preparing future engineering faculty, improving teaching and learning, distance education and underrep- resented student success.Shree FrazierDr. Osman Cekic, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Turkey Osman Cekic holds a Ph.D. in higher education and student affairs from Indiana University at Blooming- ton and a master’s degree in secondary school administration from the University of Arkansas at Fayet- teville and a Bachelor’s degree in educational administration and planning from Ankara University in Page 22.267.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011Turkey. He
is "planningthe learning experience" through which instructors plan their instructional activities.A. Curricular PrioritiesAccording to Wiggins & McTighe (2005) the first stage of Backward Design is identifying thedesired results that are organized based on their priorities in the following three categories:1. Enduring outcomesAs described by Wiggins & McTighe (2005) this portion of the curricular priorities encompassesthe content and "big ideas that have enduring value beyond the classroom" as well as "reside inthe heart of discipline” and also those that “require uncoverage and offer potential for studentsengagement". Based on the research findings as explained by Condoor et al. (2008); Steif andDollar (2005) the main output of
disciplines, as well as their values andgoals, are used to inform their selection of a major. Students must also navigate differentmatriculation paths and major application processes used by universities. After being acceptedinto a major, students may still doubt if they want to study engineering or if their major alignswith their interests and future career plans. While research has been conducted on this processstudents face and what factors can affect the decision of their major, research is lacking onstudents who are not accepted into their major, disrupting students’ planned paths intoengineering and jeopardizing their future as an engineer. Future research should address howuniversities can best support these students to continue increasing the
able to demonstrate effective learning of the intended outcomes as each semesterprogressed. Moreover, student responses indicated that they enjoyed the process of learningthrough the different activities planned for the course.I. Introduction PhD students in an engineering major are in general expected to devote the majority oftheir time to research. For a few semesters during the PhD program, they may be funded asgraduate teaching assistants for an undergraduate course taught by a faculty member.Responsibilities of a graduate teaching assistant typically include grading, holding office hours,leading labs and help sessions, and substitute-lecturing when the faculty member has otherengagements. Serving as the instructor of record for
attritionrates in the sciences focused on the research question: “what influence do TAs have onunderclass students‟ plans to major in or leave the sciences?”5. Study results showed thatalthough GTAs could not be directly tied to retention they had a large amount of control overclassroom climate, which in turn did impact retention rates. Moreover, students cited GTAenthusiasm and attitude as facilitating the students‟ learning. Given the similarity of retentionand attrition issues across Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) fields, findingsfrom this study in science are very likely to be relevant to engineering.Graduate Teaching Assistants in EngineeringAccording to the National Academy of Engineering: “the essence of engineering – the
significant with a t-test result of 2.9 at an alphavalue of 0.05.The authors plan to use these practices in two other courses over the next three years. Thesecourses are: Airport Engineering and Civil Engineering Materials. The practices can be used inother courses, degree programs, and schools with appropriate modifications in order todecrease the learning gap.References[1] Wince-Smith, Deborah L.,”The Creativity Imperative: A National Perspective”, PeerReview, Vol 8. No. 2, Spring 2006.[2 ] Levy, Frank and Murnane, Richard J., The New Division of Labor: How Computers areCreating the Next Job Market, Princeton University Press, 2004.[3] Wilson, Leslie Owen, http://www.uwsp.edu/education/lwilson/creativ/define.htm, March07, 2006.[4] Fry, R. (2007
camps started.ResultsOnly two researchers received the opportunity to participate in this program, and unfortunately,this left us with an objectively small sample size. Other engineering students were spoken to in apublic setting, both former and current, on the potential benefits of the program.Both participants reported using skills learned during the program during their followingsemester at the university: Their 50 hours of coding experience was used to help sort data andconstruct graphs for classes. Their CAD experience came into play when they were able tomodel problems in an online space to assist in solving them. Their project oriented mind set gavethem an edge with planning and completing all assignments and projects on time
, In-Class Learning Environment as a Teaching AssistantIntroductionActive learning techniques, when properly implemented, have been shown to improve learningcompared to traditional lecture. A review of active learning by Prince found broad support foractive, collaborative, cooperative, and problem-based learning.1 Specifically, a meta-analysisrevealed that small-group work, one form of active learning, promotes enhanced academicachievement, more favorable attitudes toward learning, and increased persistence in STEMfields.2 Despite the strong evidence, many college engineering courses uphold the status-quo,lecture-only format because changing the structure of a course takes considerable time, planning,and foresight
Question Question Prompt Focus Area Number 1 Could you describe your pathway into the Engineering Education Research Pathway into community? Engineering 2 What position will you be starting in the fall? Describe your expected roles Education and and responsibilities. Career Plans 3 Could you describe your experience on the job market? 4 What resources did you use? Why? Job Search Process 5
students commented:“usually after class on Mondays, Tuesday, Wednesdays, and Fridays, I'm in there [in class] for agood two hours maybe for the whole day. And then I just go home and study for four hoursstraight”-ReedOn the other hand, some students didn’t plan when to study, or schedule it, but rather completedit between completing other tasks and seemed to be completing studying between other tasks,without necessarily dedicating a clear time slot: “I would take whatever time I had during the dayto study outside of class”-Hoa. Other students completed their studying between classes, forexample: “I have a break, and classes don't start till 12:30, so usually I'll do some mathhomework or something in that time.”-JenniferTime in Labs and LecturesWe
both a formative and summative evaluation plan for their teaching.Obj. 5 - Students will have developed their own philosophy of teaching statement. Format of the courses is based on one three-hour session, one evening per week for 10weeks (academic quarter). Primary leadership has been by the study author, however selectedtopics are addressed by colleagues from a range of units across campus and from otherUniversities. The course is highly interactive, frequently using collaborative learning techniques.Formative and summative assessment is modeled throughout course and with end of term tools.Each segment (topic and presenter) is assessed independently at the end of the course. Thirtyminute individual exit interviews are used in
. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ Appendix B Classroom Schedule for the Intervention Topic Day Class ScheduleIntroduction/ Setup 1 • Introduce project, overview/ purpose, show clubhouse • Consent/assent forms 2 • Pre-Questionnaires • Smart Homes (architecture, trends, needs) • Brainstorming Ideas- what could my clubhouse look like? Architecture / 3 • What’s the process of creating a building from start to finish? Construction • What are blueprints? • Scaling activity • Floor Plans
Paper ID #19864Utilizing a Student Led Program to Make Major Leaps in PersistenceLt. James Blake Gegenheimer, STEP James Gegenheimer is an MSME Candidate in Mechanical Engineering at LSU. James is a Second Lieu- tenant in the United States Air Force. He will be stationed at Hill Air Force Base in Salt Lake City, Utah. He plans to pursue a Ph.D. through the Air Force and work with the Air Force Weapons Research Labora- tory. James is currently the Supplemental Instruction Coordinator at LSU for the College of Engineering. He also served as a Supplemental Instructor in Thermodynamics for over three years. He has worked to
. 2. Watersheds and their functions Activity in google earth 3. Controlling water/ power development Dam construction 4. Fluid mechanics; pumps, open channels Non-Newtonian Project flow 5. Water treatment Water treatment filtering project Page 26.1505.5 6. Water system park Creation of a water parkTable 3: CBI Challenges for other Developed Courses.Developed Course CBI Challenge 1. Nanotechnology Develop a new multi-million dollar idea using nanotechnology (research plan, technical publication, patent
Page 22.1340.4Thomas, personal communication, December 14, 2010). Planning is already in process to boostthese numbers for the 2011 Midwest region meeting at Arkansas Tech in Russelville and the2012 meeting at the Missouri University of Science & Technology in Rolla.Beyond student chapters, SCC, and region meetings, ASEE has continued to promote studentinvolvement in engineering education through the creation of the “Bring-A-Student” program,which allows students to attend the ASEE Annual Conference without an ASEE membership.Engineering education departments at institutions such as Virginia Tech have organizedworkshops to provide opportunities for graduate and post-doctoral students to explore positionsin academia. In addition, faculty
important ones • Incorporating planned recreation and personal time into your schedule • Being on time for classes, meetings, practices, appointments, etc... • Maintaining a balance between your athletic, academic, and personal life • And, trying to complete at least one major task per dayThe idea is that by incorporating these suggested strategies into their lives, students may make amore efficient use of their time. The interviewed students’ actual use of many of these strategieswill be discussed in the Finding and Discussion sections.Application of Propositional Logic to Expectancy-Value TheoryIn an effort to facilitate a framework for concurrent motivated actions, this work introduces theconcept of propositional logic to the