Paper ID #29948Paper: Exploring How Undergraduate Chemical Engineering Students SpendTheir Time Inside and Outside of the Classroom (WIP)Alaa Abdalla, Virginia Tech Alaa Abdalla is a first year PhD student in Engineering Education with a background in Mechanical Engineering. Her primary research interests are culture and identity, teaching and learning, and design of learning spaces. Her ultimate career goal is to bring together engineering, education, and design thinking.Dr. Nicole P. Pitterson, Virginia Tech Nicole is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Prior to
mentor and mentee gender affect the development and mode (supervisory vs. coaching) of the mentoring relationship?Implications of the two emerging models of research mentoring are discussed both in the localcontext of administering the mentoring program and in the broader context of mentoringprograms overall and other types of research-focused mentoring relationships.BackgroundYOU’RE@CU Program DetailsThe YOU’RE@CU mentoring program has three main goals: (1) increase retention ofundergraduate students in engineering with particular focus on women and underrepresentedminorities, (2) expose students to engineering research careers in academia and industry, (3)encourage graduate students to develop mentoring skills through a hands-on
competitive jobs and activities wheresituations for advancement often exist.There have been several programs implemented to provide hands-on activities in a way thatpromotes females’ sense of belonging, which have been studied by various researchers. Carlsonand Sullivan 12 found many females, in addition to other underrepresented populations, have beenapproached at middle school and high school level to take part in different hands on educationexperiences with a focus in computer science and coding tasks. The purpose of this was topromote STEM fields for a career path, which many of the female students would otherwise notconsider. In some cases, these programs provided them with female role models and femaleengineering mentors in order to help with
Paper ID #25880Cross-Cultural Training and Engineering: An Illustration Using VietnameseEngineering Faculties’ Responses to Nature of Engineering Instrument (Workin Progress)Amanda Vazquez, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Amanda Vazquez is a fourth-year mechanical engineering undergraduate student at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. She is working as a research mentee under the R.A.M.P. (Research and Mentorship Program) at UNLV. This research is focused on Nature of Engineering View’s of Professional Engineers. Prior to the R.A.M.P. program she worked on NSF EPSCoR STEM K-12 outreach programs, including: a STEM career
,participants included current graduate students, recently graduated PhDs, and experienced faculty whohad advised multiple PhD students throughout their careers. The disciplines of the participants were notidentified, but, from the nature of the FIE conference, it is assumed that a majority of the participantswere from engineering disciplines. The session leaders, as well as many of the session participants, holdPhDs in Engineering Education from Purdue or Virginia Tech. The session tried to maintain a focus thatwas not exclusively built around the PhD process in Engineering Education at those two institutions,though there was some natural gravitation toward that experience. Participants were asked to leave theirprocess maps on the work tables if they
receive sometoken curricular reward for their efforts, the time and energy spent on such projects dwarf whatstudents would normally spend in formal classes, and many teams don’t receive any formalcurriculum acknowledgement. Such projects are largely a work of love realized by passionateand driven students, primarily on a voluntary basis. Robert Stebbins’ concept of serious leisure is an appropriate frame to examine suchactivity in a range of informal and voluntary settings. According to Stebbins, people engaged ina serious leisure effort show the following characteristics: a) perseverance to accomplish the task at hand; b) the ability to progress along a career-like path; c) the investment of significant investment
their interdisciplinary degree. To aid students in addressing these challenges, thispaper addresses the research question: What are important characteristics of doctoral committeemembers for a student pursuing an engineering education PhD?Literature ReviewFaculty members are an important support system for graduate students, especially a facultyadvisor and the members of a student’s committee [6, 7]. These faculty members not only providethe necessary disciplinary content knowledge, but can also provide personal, career or emotionalsupport[7]. While earning an interdisciplinary degree, as that in engineering education, the role ofthe advisor can become more complex[8]. Co-advisors may be needed to provide the additionalcontent expertise or the
ecosystem model capturesthe broad spectrum of mobilities, relationships and interdependencies that exist within andoutside of the expected engineering career path [3], [4], [5]. Using ecosystem metaphors enablesus to ask questions about the quality of pathways, the availability and flow of resources, and thestructures and processes that create and sustain inequalities. Observing that systems are designedto reproduce themselves, Vanasupa and Schlemer argue that “the apparent problems of lack oflearning and lack of diversity are outcomes of a system functioning as designed rather thansomething ‘going wrong’” [6, pp. 6]. Observable leakage, which is often a primary driver in apipeline metaphor due to projected inefficiencies, is merely the “tip of the
Paper ID #33597Exploring the Team Dynamics of Undergraduate Engineering Virtual TeamsDuring the Rapid Transition Online Due to COVID-19Miss Alexis Rae Walsh, University of Tennessee at Knoxville In May 2021, Alexis completed her fourth year at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville, earning a B.S. in Honors Industrial Engineering with a minor in Reliability & Maintainability Engineering. Beginning in July, Alexis will be starting her career as a Technical Solutions Engineer for Epic Systems.Ms. Sarah E. Norris, University of Tennessee, Knoxville I am majoring in Aerospace Engineering with course work in computer science
Paper ID #31448A Systematized Review of the Students’ Upbringing Influence on theirSpatial ReasoningMr. Hassan Ali Al Yagoub, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Hassan Al Yagoub is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research in- terests include diversity & inclusion, students’ persistence, advising and mentoring, engineering career pathways, and school-to-work transition of new engineers. He holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and a M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology. Prior to
enforcement, and rural highway curve safety.Dr. Shashi S. Nambisan P.E., Iowa State University Since 2007, Shashi Nambisan has been the Director, Institute for Transportation (InTrans) and a Professor of Civil Engineering at Iowa State University (ISU) in Ames, Iowa. He previously served on the faculty at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, for more than 17 years. He is a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Nevada. One of Nambisan’s passions is the development of the future transportation work- force. He enjoys working with students. His advisees have developed successful professional careers at universities or in the private and public sectors. Many of them serve in leadership positions in profes- sional
being course instructors, the TAs learned moreabout the teaching aspect of academia and indicated that they felt better prepared for anacademic position. For example: “[With the role of course instructor]…certainly there‟s a lot of carryover to academia, you know, if I‟m instructing a course…, like the same way I‟m instructing a course now,…I can‟t even over emphasize how much…it‟s helped prepared me to take on that kind of role, so I mean…if I pursue a career in academia, as far as the teaching aspect goes, you know, it‟s invaluable to have been a TA and to be involved with the courses…” (Hank, Individual Interview, 265
learning tool for dynamic systems and control." Proc. of International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition. 1998, pp 71-76.MATILDA HOMatilda Ho is currently pursuing a Master’s in Systems Engineering and Management at the University of Texas atDallas. She was a member of the student team in the paper as an undergraduate student in Mechanical Engineering. Shehas previously participated in research across civil and mechanical engineering labs and hopes to continue her career inindustry.
Marisa K. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.” American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Overcoming Perfectionism: My journey with the Binary MindsetIntroductionSunday -11:00 am: I have my laptop opened and holding my fresh
material is consistent with their future career (Wigfield, 1994; Wigfield &Eccles, 2000). The interest component is based on how students perceive course topics andinstructional methods, interesting (Hidi & Ann Renninger, 2006; Renninger, Hidi, Krapp, &Renninger, 2014). Further, the success component is formed on expectancy for success(Wigfield, 1994; Wigfield & Eccles, 2000). This component reflects students’ self-efficacy aboutthe coursework (Bandura, 1986). The caring component is based on students believes thatinstructors care about their success and well-being (Noddings, 1992).Motivation can be perceived as a student’s intention and engagement in learning as student’saction (Christenson, Reschly, & Wylie, 2012). In other
interactions. The primary capital of Enactusis its active student base who propagate Enactus’ brand and realize its vision of a “moresustainable world” [4]; hence, student motivations within the organization affect its essentialcharacter. Enactus’ goal of fostering a community-centered business environment presumes acommunity-centered motive; however, the drive to gain resume-building experience concurrentlyarises. This career oriented motive has been articulated by both students and the organization tobe a principal factor in choosing to join Enactus.Enactus’ organizational structure prioritizes student exposure to a wide range of positions. Thepotency of Enactus’ allure as an opportunity for practical application and resume strengtheningnearly
Paper ID #16779Investigating the Influence of Micro-Videos used as a Supplementary CourseMaterialMr. Ryan L Falkenstein-Smith, Syracuse University Ryan is a Ph.D. candidate at Syracuse University whose research interest range from carbon sequestration to engineering education.Mr. Jack S Rossetti, Syracuse University I am a second year Ph. D. student. Research interests: How students learn How to make teaching more effective and engagingMr. Michael Garrett, Syracuse University Michael Garrett is an incoming graduate student at Syracuse University. Throughout his undergraduate career he developed an interest in
rat cells and transfected them with a Coder 1 05-Jul-Line polymer and non-viral DNA. After two days 201610 had passed I would observe to see if the genes had transfected into the cell (by turning green) or if the cells had died.Page 1 Student A field/career that I am no longer interested in. Coder 1 05-Jul-Line interest (anti) 201615Page 1 Tedious Its very tedious with very little reward Coder 1 05-Jul-Line 201615Table 2 displays a section of a table of
leadership in their professional guideline series [3]. In AIChE’s body ofknowledge, it lists necessary psychomotor skills of listening and interpreting, speaking andpresenting, communication, leadership, presentation, and teamwork [4]. In general, everyengineering disciple these professional skills for a successful engineer.Despite the standards set by these societies, usually in an engineering curriculum there is noformal course on professional skills. Typically, during the capstone senior design courseundergraduate engineering students are exposed to some of these skills such as presentation andteam work. Occasionally the center of career development at an institution will offer sessions onprofessional skills usually focusing on interviews and
STEMmajor.15–17 In this study, we explore the confidence of undecided engineering students in theirchoice of engineering major by investigating the impacts of student attitudes and confidencetowards first-year math, science, and engineering courses. The impact on their retention duringtheir first semester is also investigated.At Colorado State University, an average retention rate for freshman engineering students fromthe fall to spring semesters is 55.0% (Table 1). Freshman students just starting their collegeeducation can be uncertain about what they would like to study and how those areas of study willimpact their future career path. Even students who choose to study engineering are faced withthe question of what specific engineering major to
Design in the Middle Years," Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, pp. 181-199, 2014. [2] K. Patsavas and B. Caldwell, "Exploring the Development of Undergraduate Research Experience," in 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 2014. [3] R. McCord, C. Hixson, E. Ingram and L. McNair, "Graduate Student and Faculty Member: An Exploration of Career and Personal Decisions ID # 9165," in 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 2014. [4] B. Novoselich, Interviewee, Project Advisor Meetings. [Interview]. June-August 2018. [5] L. Waxman, S. Clemons, J. Banning and D. McKelfresh, "The Library as a Place: Providing Students with Opportunitiies for Socialization, Relaxation
in perceptions of female facultybetween students who attended gender-segregated schools, which are common amongst the localpopulation, and those who graduated from international schools. Finally, religion is expected toinfluence student perceptions because of certain rules and regulations in Islam – the most popularreligion in the Middle East – that restrict mixed-gender interactions.The results may shed light on the potential impact of female faculty on engineering students,especially female students. Based on the results, universities in the region may rethink theirfaculty model to better cater to the needs of students. The study may also encourage females inthe region to pursue a teaching career in Science, Technology, Engineering, or
„disconnect‟ between the graduate students throughout the college. TheGSC saw an opportunity for cross collaboration as well as creating a more united community ofcohorts within its graduate programs. The GSC wanted to provide an opportunity for growthwithin the graduate student community. After a meeting with the dean in January of 2011, it wasdecided that providing a college wide conference for the graduate students to present their Page 25.577.2research would yield great benefits for not only the graduate students, but also the university.Students would profit from improved presentation skills for their future professional careers 2 aswell as
include thin film deposition, interconnect technology, semiconductor manufacturing technology and radiation hardened nanoelectronics. Dr. Ryan joined JSNN after working at the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering (CNSE) of the University at Albany as Associate Vice President of Technology and Professor of Nanoscience from 2005 to 2008. At CNSE, he managed the cleanrooms and numerous consortia involving CNSE and its industrial partners such as IBM, TEL, AMAT, ASML and others. Dr. Ryan joined CNSE after a 25 year career with IBM. From 2003 to 2005, he was a Distinguished Engineer and Director of Advanced Materials and Process Technology Development and served as the site executive for IBM at Albany Nanotech
slightly staggered startand end dates), identification of a weekly time slot convenient to all campuses, scheduling of atelevideo-enabled classroom with archiving capability and the cost of staffing such a facility,travel schedules of lead and guest instructors with active research careers outside the classroom,and the difference in exposure level to certain background information, such as biologyfundamentals, among some students. The challenges were successfully overcome and the modelpopular enough that a third trans-ERC course, led by a researcher (Dr. Yeoheung Yun) fromNCAT, was successfully offered in the Fall 2010 semester. Assessment results for that course areawaited. As an epilogue, the success of these course added impetus to the
societies [18], and industry sectors [19]. Collaborations from thesestakeholders support the translation of novel DDS from laboratory or “benchtop” research through commercialization, clinical trials and regulatory bodies and onto the patient, or “bedside” [20]. As a multidisciplinary field, researchers have contributed to engineering curriculum by developing drug delivery courses to engage engineering students with varied interest in medicine and the desire to pursue biomedical careers in pharmaceutical industries, research intensive institutions, and medical schools [21]. Historically, students enter this course with prior knowledge of chemical engineering fundamentals, and are instructed by bioengineering and chemical engineering
success and well-being of other STEM students. She is currently working on other researches that would help understand the decision-making, and thinking processes of STEM students. Mercy has had the opportunity to work with great minded STEM scholars and researchers in the course of her career and has been exposed to real life experiences that have shaped her perspective on the relevance of STEM professions. Mercy is currently mentored by Dr. Andre Ofori-Boadu who has tremendous achievements in the STEM profession as a resourceful scholar and a researcher. Mercy has a learnt a lot from Dr. Andrea in the little time she has worked with her and still hopes to learn some more. Mercy is determined to find out possible ways
Competition.The primary goal of this study was to provide undergraduate Mechanical Engineering students inMECH 486 an introduction to lean manufacturing goals, tools, and best practices, and betterprepare students for their future careers. A secondary goal was to validate that leanmanufacturing principles can be taught to students in an introductory-level lecture, and thenapplied by students to a variety prototype projects.Background and Literature ReviewTo begin this study, two publications were reviewed to develop baseline knowledge on leanmanufacturing. The first was The Machine That Changed the World, a summary of a five yearresearch study on the automobile industry and differences between Japanese and Westernmanufacturing styles published by Womack
down orally through classes and peergroups, while published strategies tend to be from faculty or administrative perspectives. Thework presented here codifies the successful and unsuccessful strategies that students acrossnumerous technical disciplines and from different backgrounds have used through theiracademic careers. The advice given is from a range of students at Wentworth Institute ofTechnology with a number of engineering and technical programs, gathered and analyzed bya team consisting of students, faculty, and administrators. The work serves as a guidebook forstudents, by students, in a range of rigorous programs. A survey was distributed to recent graduates and upper-level students from variousengineering and science backgrounds
and R. R. McCrae, “Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEOPersonality Inventory.,” Psychological Assessment, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5–13, 1992.[6] D. J. Pittenger, “Measuring the MBTI…and coming up short,” Journal of Career Planningand Employment, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 48-52, 1993.[7] R. Kappe and H. van der Flier, “Using multiple and specific criteria to assess the predictivevalidity of the Big Five personality factors on academic performance,” Journal of Research inPersonality, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 142–145, 2010.[8] R. M. Felder, G. N. Felder, and E. J. Dietz, “The Effects of Personality Type on EngineeringStudent Performance and Attitudes,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 3–17,2002.[9] C. W. Hall, P. J