Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Corin L. Bowen, University of Michigan; Aaron W. Johnson, University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

Social Class Include ethics, policy, and social justice [2,8] Give assignments and hold in-class discussions on ethical issues [8]same social class. Critical Theory: Feminist Critical Race Queer Theory

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Bala Vignesh Sundaram, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State University; Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

are four main attributeswithin this dimension: 1) The epistemological openness attribute captures the inclination of anengineer to “recognize and value the subjective experiences and perspectives of others as validand important source of knowledge” [1, p. 135]. Epistemological openness allows a researcher tocapture the thought process behind the various actions of an engineer. 2) The second attribute isthe micro to macro focus which informs the need for an engineer to consider the systems-levelimplications of their action along with the individual level implications. 3) The reflective valueawareness attribute covers the need for ethical and professional impact of an engineer’s action.The ability to reflect on their own values and improve

Conference Session

Student Division Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jordan E. Trachtenberg, Rice University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

within the Biology Curriculum. Journal of College Science Teaching, 33 (7): 34-37. 3f an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility Student Formative Etkina Exam, Gantt Chart, Summative Saterbak College Learning Assessment Formative, Frank 15. Lave, J. (1988) Cognition in practice. New York: Cambridge University Press

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jayanta K. Banerjee, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

in engineering practice, is selected as amentor and is given three (3) credit hours of release time per semester for helping the students intechnical as well as ethical issues related to engineering profession. More senior professors areencouraged to lead this role. The ME department at the University of Florida (UF) in Gainesville iscomparable in size with that of the University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez (UPRM) in the sense of boththe undergraduate student population as well as the faculty strength. Hence, some similarities can beobserved and inferred. Qualitative results of educational research in both the institutions suggestsatisfactory implementation of mentoring by the dedicated senior faculty members [5]. Also, in both theME

Conference Session

Student Division Diversity and Persistence Related Technical Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeannie Marie Purchase, Virginia Tech ; Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

Organization’s Lisa Tabor Award for Community Service. Using deep insights from a fourteen-year industry career and her strengths as a systems thinker, she is now developing and disseminating empirically-grounded models and strategies for improved human competence, motivation, and learning as it relates to the civil engineering profession and the construction industry. She is a discipline-based education researcher who passionately pursues research to develop an agile, ethical, diverse construction workforce enabled to lead, design, and build sustainable, intelligent infrastructure. Her mission is to transform the construction workforce and sustain change. To this end, she undertakes research that enables her to influence

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Felicity Bilow, Clarkson University; Jan DeWaters P.E., Clarkson University; Gordon D. Hoople, University of San Diego

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

process to solve an unfamiliar problem.4 I am capable of becoming an engineer. Understanding of Engineering5 The role of engineers is limited to technical problem solving.6 Ethical problem solving is an important part of engineering design.7 Engineering decisions are influenced by the societal context in which they take place.8 I understand the relationship between engineering and the society in which it is practiced.9 Engineers are responsible for solving technical problems with little to no collaboration with other professionals.10 I understand how engineers work with other professionals and technicians to solve problems. Satisfaction with Engineering/Sense

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Niloofar Kamran, Cornell College; Qingbao Wang, Cornell College ; Andy Grove; William Nitschke Dragon II, Cornell College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

, and different workshops are offered to students on research ethics, the job market,fellowship programs at Cornell, and applying to graduate school. Students also attend a TED talksession where faculty talk about their current research interests.1.1. Choosing the Project:Based on the background and interest of the students our team looked for different projects and wecame across the project designed by Andy Grove on instructables.com. It is an open-source projectcalled “Ultrasonic Pi Piano with Gesture Controls!” [1] We treated this opportunity as a tinkeringchallenge. Grove’s project is a gesture-controlled piano that uses ultrasonic sensors to determinethe distance and to generate corresponding notes to each length. The goal was to have a

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Regina Palero Aleman, University of San Diego; Mireya Becker Roberto; Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego; Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego; Laura Ann Gelles, University of Texas at Dallas; Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego; Gordon D. Hoople, University of San Diego

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

a postdoctoral research associate at the University of Texas at Dallas within the Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science where she is studying retention of undergraduate engineering students. She has extensive experience using qualitative and mixed-methods research in Engineering Education. Before joining UTD in September 2020, Laura worked at the University of San Diego on their RED grant to study institutional change efforts and redefine the engineering canon as sociotechnical. She has a background in environmental engineering and received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Utah State University with a research focus on the ethical and career aspects of mentoring of science and engineering

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade - Reflections and Advice on the Educational Process

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christopher Emmanuel Early, The University of Houston-Clear Lake; Jose Daniel Velazco, University of Houston-Clear Lake; Miguel Rosales, University of Houston-Clear Lake; Edgar Cantu, AutoSol Inc.

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

scavenger hunt. We also provided lunch andgave freebies to students. The BSC mentors gave a presentation as the initial event for the first day of the orientation. Itwas designed to help incoming students succeed at our university. Throughout the presentation,the BSC mentors discussed different personal techniques used to succeed at UHCL, gainedthrough practical and personal experience. Apart from the main ethical and professional points ofavoiding cheating, laziness, and procrastination, we shared very specific tips for various courses.We believe that with this presentation, we were able to give the students an insight as to what lifeas a university student is like. They learned about their professors before meeting them, aboutwhat courses to take

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Alexis Rae Walsh, University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Sarah E. Norris, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Nathaniel Blalock, Enlite Research Group Led by Dr. Faber: University of Tennessee - Knoxville; Daniel Patrick Mountain, University of Tennessee - Knoxville; Courtney June Faber, University of Tennessee at Knoxville

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

success of the project. For example, Robert originally did not evaluate eachindividual’s strengths and instead assigned each person parts without a specific direction. Helater found that the roles had to be redistributed because group members did not know how to dotheir parts, so the tasks were then divided by strengths and were more successfully completed.Similarly, Stanley noted that when delegating tasks for their virtual team project, pairing teammembers with tasks that fit their major helped in keeping the project going smoothly by havingcomputer science majors complete the website and the mechanical engineering majors focus onproduct design and feasibility. When team member strengths and weaknesses, work ethic, andcommunication expectations

Conference Session

Student Division Diversity and Persistence Related Technical Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Blake Gegenheimer, Louisiana State University STEP ; Charles Algeo Wilson IV, Louisiana State University; Adrienne Steele, Louisiana State University; Warren N. Waggenspack Jr., Louisiana State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

% MACT 0% 1-33% 34-100% Figure 18 – Passing Rates for High Socioeconomic Students with SI Attendance by Math ACT4.4 Minority Cross-Group Examination What about the overlap between students who fit into multiple underrepresented groups?Little difference is found between the gender minority and the ethnic minority, with 4.2% of thepopulation being female and of an ethic minority. Further overlap is found when examiningsocioeconomic status. Figures 19 and 20 show students of low and high socioeconomic statusbroken down by ethnic minority. In addition to the ethnic minority overlap, females make up23.1% of LSES students and 16.1% of

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Beau Vezino, University of Arizona; Alexander M Alvarez, University of Arizona Department of Biomedical Engineering; Byron Hempel, University of Arizona; Christina Julianne Loera, University of Arizona; Samantha Davidson, University of Arizona; Savannah Boyd, University of Arizona; Vignesh Subbian, University of Arizona

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

level.University of Arizona Student Chapter. Here, at the University of Arizona, the ASEE chapterwas formed on an interdisciplinary model that includes a network of faculty, staff, and studentsfrom several disciplines across the university. The purpose of this cross-college, interdisciplinaryapproach is to promote engineering education at all levels. The mission of the ASEE Chapter atUniversity of Arizona are as follows: 1. To encourage collaboration between engineering undergraduate and graduate students through service, research, and professional development opportunities 2. To encourage and prepare engineering graduate students to pursue careers in academia 3. To increase awareness and understanding of societal, ethical, and public policy

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Maral Kargarmoakhar, Florida International University; Stephanie Jill Lunn, Florida International University; Monique S. Ross, Florida International University; Zahra Hazari, Florida International University; Mark A. Weiss, Florida International University; Michael Georgiopoulos, University of Central Florida; Ken Christensen P.E., University of South Florida; Tiana Solis, Florida International University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

FIU students participating in the Florida-Georgia Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (FGLSAMP). She is a past adviser of the Women in Computer Science (WICS) student club. From 2008 to 2010, Ms. Solis was a programmer analyst at the Department of the Attorney General in Hawaii, a member of the team revamping the State Juvenile Justice Information System. Her research and instructional Interests include software development, computer ethics and student success and development. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Impact of Social and Programmatic Experiences on Students’ Interest in Pursuing a Graduate Degree in a

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Soheil Fatehiboroujeni, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sarah Appelhans, University at Albany-SUNY; Joerene Acerrador Aviles, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Eva Dibong; Beatrice Mendiola, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Michelle Murray, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Melissa Shuey, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Marta Tsyndra, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Makayla Wahaus, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

their own language. This was done in two rounds to ensure proper alignment ofthe interview questions with the analytic framework described above.1 Active debate regarding the difficulty and ethics of conducting interviews across powerdifferentials, including race, gender and class, continues in scholarly discussions of interviewmethodologies [16-19]. O’Brien [17] argues that race-matching alone is insufficient inaccounting for the multiple layers of difference and power differentials that exist betweenresearcher and interviewee. Instead, she contends that the most important objective for theresearcher is instead to “activate” race by addressing it specifically, indicating to intervieweesthat it is acceptable to discuss race openly (p. 79). In