Ph.D. in Engineering & Science Education at Clemson University. Prior to her Ph.D. work, she received her B.S. in Bioengineering at Clemson University and her M.S. in Biomedical Engineering at Cornell University. Courtney’s research interests include epistemic cognition in the context of problem solving, researcher identity, and mixed methods. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Lessons learned from a pilot study: Understanding the processes preservice teachers use to write lesson plansAbstractAn important part of any teacher preparation program is the process of planning and writinglessons. Lesson planning is important to the growth of preservice
Paper ID #17830From graduate students to faculty: portraits of balance in the professionaldevelopment plans of engineering graduate studentsMr. Juan David Ortega-Alvarez P.E., Purdue University, West Lafayette / Universidad EAFIT, Medellin,Colombia ´ Juan David Ortega Alvarez is an assistant professor at Universidad EAFIT (Medellin, Colombia). He holds a bachelor’s degree in Process Engineering from EAFIT and an M.S. in Process Engineering and Energy Technology from Hochschule Bremerhaven (Germany). Juan David is currently a third-year doc- toral student of the Engineering Education Program at
Superman Iron Man The aim of this study was to develop, implement, and evaluate a student-centered learning project "Striking the Superhero Landing" Landing from height Deadpool for students to create a video and lesson plan that could be used or recreated by high school teachers "Target Practice" Projectile Motion Arrow
robots with applications in new drug design. The other aspect of her research is engineering education.Sr. Mary Ann Jacobs Ed.D., Manhattan College Mary Ann Jacobs, scc is an assistant professor in the School of Education. She prepares secondary teacher candidates in all content areas through her courses in secondary pedagogy. Her areas of interest include STEM education, brain compatible strategies, and action research in the classroom.Ms. Alexandra Emma Lehnes, Manhattan College Alexandra Lehnes is a graduate student planning on graduating in 2017 from Manhattan College with a M.S. in Mechanical Engineering and a certificate in aerospace and propulsion. She is also the coordinator of the Engineering STAR Center and
Paper ID #20374Student Paper: Small Team Agile Systems Engineering For Rapid Prototyp-ing of Robotic SystemsMr. Charles Avery Noren, Texas A&M University Vehicle Systems & Control Laboratory Charles Noren is an undergraduate research assistant at the Texas A&M University Vehicle Systems & Control Laboratory and task leader for the rail-based robotic system project. He is expected to graduate with a Bachelor of Science in Aerospace Engineering in May of 2018, and plans to continue his education at Texas A&M University with a Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering.Kendra Lynne Andersen, Texas A&M
and developing my research question, myassistantship supervisor asked me to form an undergraduate research project through the CreativeInquiry program. She wanted the students to develop a business plan for starting a makerspaceon the university campus. This makerspace would provide students with access to prototypingequipment, such as 3D printers, at little to no cost.As I started planning the makerspace student project, I soon realized that a cross-disciplinaryteam with training in business, marketing, and engineering would be necessary to effectivelyaddress the overall goal of the project. This cross-disciplinary team of undergraduate studentswould be a good participant group for me to investigate, in real-time, the experiences of
, ease of use, and easy integration to other core subjects. Allmore compatible with the Next Generation Science Standards. The course there is scarcely any attention in elementary school settings. For these misconceptions in science, concept mapping, teaching science through reflective essays were positive and encouraging about the inclusion ofin its modified form includes engineering design component. Specifically, reasons, we need more trained and well-equipped elementary educators inquiry, 5-E lesson planning, integrating science, engineering and language educational robotics in elementary classrooms, but they found thethe engineering design component was addressed with the use of
-intensive institution to build a robust teaching portfolio toprepare for a future academic role. The opportunities discussed in this document are basedlargely on personal anecdotes and are directed towards students that would not have theopportunity to take courses related to or invest significant doctoral research efforts inengineering pedagogy. Readers should take the suggestions as a buffet of possibilities and selectthose that are accessible at their current institution, that meet the time-constraints of theirschedule, and that will provide the most value for the type of institution they plan to join asfaculty.Capitalizing on the Teaching Assistant RoleThere are several major reasons that drive faculty to employ their graduate students as
results, electronic notes (i.e. reflections), and design artifacts are of the selected terms, explain why. collected through automatic, unobtrusive logging as students design. Analyzing data Gathering Information Planning
have plans to investigate the relationship between reasons for selectinga major and retention. This analysis will provide further implications for engineering faculty tobetter understand the reasons that are associated with persistence in the major. ReferencesBandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. NY.: Prentice-Hall.Beggs, J. M., Bantham, J. H., & Taylor, S. (2008). Distinguishing the factors influencing college students' choice of major. College Student Journal, 42, 381-394.Brown, S. D., Lent, R. W., Telander, K., & Tramayne, S. (2011). Social cognitive career theory, conscientiousness, and work performance: A meta-analytic
identified in Lean Manufacturing. 18.4% What are the 5 major goals or principles of lean manufacturing? 15.4% What does 5S stand for? 11.2%In the first survey only a small number of students were able to apply actual lean manufacturingideals to their project. Most of the responses stated that teams could reduce material waste andscrap, design for easier manufacturing, or make cost effective decisions when procuringmaterials. Additional responses also included being more environmentally conscious, makinglightweight designs, and planning more effectively.Overall, the results from the second survey demonstrated that comprehension was muchimproved when
, another non-present character, or as not present.The perceived timing of the humorous event was also classified as either spontaneous,predetermined, or indeterminate. Humor that was part of the planned class material wasclassified as predetermined, while events that occurred due to student interactions or classdiscussion were considered spontaneous.FindingsThroughout the videos, 42 separate cases of humor use were identified in 18 different classes; nohumorous events were identified in the other 30 videos. 63% of the observed instructors used nohumor, while 21% used a single case, 10% used 2 to 5 cases, and 6% used greater than 6 casesduring the recorded class. 6
the design andmachined the horse-shoes, culminating in the completion of the project by welding the createdparts together. The female participants for the welding project were given time to design and drawout their plans. They then were given a class on set up of the MIG welding machines and giventime to practice welding on coupons. After they felt sufficiently comfortable with their skills, thestudents began to shape the horseshoes under the guidance of a technician. The technicians wereallowed to alter the students designs, if they felt welding would be too complicated. The studentsthen welded the pieces together creating a completed design to take home. The bolt and nutmachining project was more time intensive and thus design was not part
know you well. Determine application deadlines for schools where you are interested in applying. Draft application statement(s).Most graduate programs in engineering expect that you will apply 9-12 months in advance of thesemester in which you wish to begin graduate school. Thus, during the fall term of your finalyear of undergraduate studies, you should complete the following tasks: Narrow your list of places to apply; generally 3-8 completed applications is a good goal. Ideally, you will apply to a range of schools (size, location, ranking, etc.) where you can make a strong case that you are a good investment and “fit” for their program. Identify your backup plan – “safety” school, work, volunteering
. Studentssubmitted “revised” resumes after the seminar, and comparing the “initial” and “revised”documents indicated that while most students’ resumes improved over time, there was a strongerimprovement in the treatment group (who received individual advising).IntroductionDeveloping an effective resume is essential for students transitioning from undergraduateprograms to the workplace or graduate school. Prior research has indicated that providingengineering students with guidance on developing strong resumes can support the developmentof personal identity [1] as engineers and encourage career planning [2]. Yet the most commontype of resume support provided to undergraduate engineering students is through careeradvising centers, which frequently focus on
disciplines for increased professional and social collaborativeopportunities. Due to both the large number of members and committees, WISE is currently ableto support one event a week. These events may be small, such as our Friday Coffee and WellnessChat (with topics on how to ask for help and identifying your communication style), or largerevents which have career development programming applicable to the whole membership.Best PracticesEvents that have had both high turnout (greater than 20% of the organization) and high feedbackscores include workshops on creating an individual development plan, improving publicspeaking with theatrical improvisation, and fellowship opportunities with examples fromsuccessful applicants and peer review of
Paper ID #19864Utilizing a Student Led Program to Make Major Leaps in PersistenceLt. James Blake Gegenheimer, STEP James Gegenheimer is an MSME Candidate in Mechanical Engineering at LSU. James is a Second Lieu- tenant in the United States Air Force. He will be stationed at Hill Air Force Base in Salt Lake City, Utah. He plans to pursue a Ph.D. through the Air Force and work with the Air Force Weapons Research Labora- tory. James is currently the Supplemental Instruction Coordinator at LSU for the College of Engineering. He also served as a Supplemental Instructor in Thermodynamics for over three years. He has worked to
members of the research team to consistently analyzethe remaining open-ended survey documents and eliminate inconsistencies due to who wascoding. More information about our coding process and the development of the codebook can befound in a recent paper by the researchers (Kajfez, McAlister, Faber, Ehlert, Lee, Benson, &Kennedy, 2017). Table 1: Excerpt of codebook used to define codes Code Name Code Definition Code Includes Code Excludes Includes performing, Student discussion of doing experiments or Not planning experiments,Experimenting performing experiments or testing things. Trial and collecting or analyzing
chemical engineering instruction begins in the first year of engineeringeducation, whereas at his US home institution, lab instruction typically does not begin until thesecond semester of the third year of the four-year undergraduate plan. In addition, CPE practical lab experience related to the lecture-based class is incorporatedinto each core French chemical engineering class, from transport phenomena and separationprocesses to chemical kinetics and reactors. At US NCSU, on the other hand, these core classesinclude no practical component; instead, all practical experience is received later in twoexclusively lab-based junior/senior courses. With plenty of hands-on instruction and analysis guided by a professor, he found performingthe
the teaching duties UTFs would encounter inENES100.Episode ContextThe context of our design review role-play episodes began during the seminar’s second class ofthe fall semester, with the theme of “Facilitating Classroom Discourse and Constructive DesignReviews”.6 Drawing from the course instructors’ collaborative weekly lesson plans, the learninggoals of this seminar period were: ● Facilitating the connection between concepts in assigned reading to UTFs’ design reviews experiences in ENES100. ● Acknowledging multiple UTF instructional goals as legitimate. ● Facilitating UTFs’ classroom discourse to articulate multiple possible goals/purposes. ● Building more experiences for the UTFs to notice student ideas in classroom
planning toupgrade its existing products through environmentally responsible design. The eventual designwill be used for the household garbage pickup work. The main objective of environmentallyresponsible drone design at Company X is to determine new product architecture, materials,manufacturing processes, and suppliers while considering their possible environmental impacts.For the household garbage pickup drone, Company X needs to design a new attachment for acontemporary drone to carry a garbage bag. New drones should satisfy design requirements forminimal energy use and reduction in hazardous by-products/pollutants both from themanufacturing system and throughout the drone’s useful life. Modules in new drones should beprovided by suppliers (for
. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basic of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing Grounded Theory. 2014: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.19. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.20. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition.21. Meyer, M., & Marx, S. (2014). Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of why undergraduates leave engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(4), 525-548.22. Bean, J., & Eaton, S. B. (2001). The psychology underlying successful retention practices. Journal of College Student
Paper ID #19870Closing the Gap: Using Supplemental Instruction as a Tool to Assist Minori-ties in EngineeringLt. James Blake Gegenheimer, STEP James Gegenheimer is an MSME Candidate in Mechanical Engineering at LSU. James is a Second Lieu- tenant in the United States Air Force. He will be stationed at Hill Air Force Base in Salt Lake City, Utah. He plans to pursue a Ph.D. through the Air Force and work with the Air Force Weapons Research Labora- tory. James is currently the Supplemental Instruction Coordinator at LSU for the College of Engineering. He also served as a Supplemental Instructor in Thermodynamics for over