ASEE PEER - Search Results

Displaying results 1 - 30 of 67 in total

← Previous
1
2
3
Next →

Weekly Professional Development Lunches to Build Community Among an S-STEM Cohort

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 7: Teaching and Learning Practices
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Caroline Cresap, Louisiana Tech University; Ashtyne Klair Monceaux; David Hall, Louisiana Tech University; Krystal Corbett Cruse, Louisiana Tech University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

Paper ID #42369Weekly Professional Development Lunches to Build Community Among anS-STEM CohortCaroline Cresap, Louisiana Tech University Caroline Cresap is a second-year chemical engineering major from Zachary, Louisiana. She is a Louisiana Tech University College of Engineering and Science S-STEM SUCCESS Scholar with Ashtyne Monceaux. Along with her ASEE research, she is also an undergraduate researcher in Dr. Yang Xiao’s Reaction Engineering and Catalysis Science Laboratory. Caroline enjoys staying involved in her university and is a member of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), the Honors Student

Relevance Score: 2.7212687

Work in Progress: Bridging the Gap in Doctoral Engineering Education—Critically Investigating Factors Influencing Performance Outcomes on First Doctoral Degree Milestones

Conference Session: Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 6: Underserved Student Experiences
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Nicole Adia Jefferson, Virginia Tech ; Jeremi S. London, Virginia Tech
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

. I am excited about having the opportunity to become a better ENGR/ENGE researcher. In the future, I aspire to be an engineering education policy advocate and have plans to develop a research preparation consortium.Dr. Jeremi S. London, Virginia Tech Dr. Jeremi London is an Associate Professor in the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Poly- technic Institute and State University. London is a mixed methods researcher with interests in research impact, broadening participation and instructional change. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Work in Progress: Bridging the Gap in Doctoral Engineering Education: Critically Investigating Factors InfluencingPerformance Outcomes

Relevance Score: 0.630402

Board 187: Poster: WIP: Neurodivergent Engineering Students’ Sense of Belonging at the University, Major, and Course Levels: A Mixed Methods Study

Conference Session: Student Division (STDT) Poster Session
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Candice W. Bolding, Clemson University; Robert M O'Hara, Clemson University; Penny S Edwards; Katherine Mulholland, Clemson University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

students.Penny S EdwardsKatherine Mulholland, Clemson University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Exploring Neurodivergent Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Sense of Belonging: A Proposed Mixed Methods StudyBACKGROUND STUDY TIMELINE RESULTS • Recent increase in enrollment of neurodivergent students enrolling in undergraduate engineering programs • Neurodivergent students in engineering

Relevance Score: 0.50432163

Examining Imposter Syndrome and Self-Efficacy Among Electrical Engineering Students and Changes Resulting After Engagement in Department’s Revolutionary Interventions

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 5: Self- Efficacy
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jeffrey Luke Morrison, University of South Florida; Chris S Ferekides, University of South Florida; Dhinesh Balaji Radhakrishnan, Purdue University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

Paper ID #44125Examining Imposter Syndrome and Self-Efficacy Among Electrical EngineeringStudents and Changes Resulting After Engagement in Department’s RevolutionaryInterventionsMr. Jeffrey Luke Morrison, University of South Florida Jeffrey Luke Morrison is an undergraduate student pursuing his bachelors in Electrical Engineering at the University of South Florida with focuses in wireless circuits and nano-scale systems. He is an IEEE member and also a member of the USF Honor’s College. In addition to pursuing his EE degree, he is also pursuing a BS in Quantitative Economics and Econometrics.Dr. Chris S Ferekides, University

Relevance Score: 0.50432163

Team Dynamics in Student Engineering Design Teams: Correlations to Women Retention and Careers in Mechanical and Motorsport Professions

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 6: Belonging
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Brigid McCormack, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Jessica E S Swenson, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

Paper ID #44337Team Dynamics in Student Engineering Design Teams: Correlations to WomenRetention and Careers in Mechanical and Motorsport ProfessionsBrigid McCormack, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Brigid McCormack, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Brigid McCormack is an undergraduate student studying Mechanical Engineering at the University at Buffalo.Dr. Jessica E S Swenson, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Jessica Swenson is an Assistant Professor at the University at Buffalo. She was awarded her doctorate and masters from Tufts University in mechanical

Relevance Score: 0.44128144

An Autoethnography of the Student Experience Solving an Open-Ended Statics Problem

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 1: Student Experiences and Support
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Katelyn Churakos, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Jayden Mitchell, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Jessica E S Swenson, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

Paper ID #42562An Autoethnography of the Student Experience Solving an Open-Ended StaticsProblemKatelyn Churakos, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Katelyn Churakos is an undergraduate research assistant in the Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. She is majoring in Mechanical Engineering with a minor in Law and is expected to graduate in December 2025. After graduation, Katelyn plans to pursue employment in the mechanical engineering field, preferably in project management.Jayden Mitchell, University at Buffalo, The State University of New YorkDr. Jessica E S Swenson

Relevance Score: 0.315201

Enhancing Student Participation in Online Global Project-Based Learnings (gPBLs) Through a Slack-Based Evaluation: A Student Perspective

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 4: Project-based Learning
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Yujiro Iwata, Shibaura Institute of Technology; Leo Kimura, Shibaura Institute of Technology; Hatsuko Yoshikubo Ph.D., Shibaura Institute of Technology; Sumito Nagasawa Ph.D. in Engineering, Shibaura Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

against MGUDS-S global competence scores, also using MATLAB.⚫ To propose methods for identifying key factors for enhancing levels of student engagement and satisfaction in group activities, in the context of international, collaborative workshop involving students from diverse backgrounds.During the online robotics workshops in AY2022 and 2023, the study's authors, Iwata andKimura, were undergraduate students in the Department of Engineering Science andMechanics at the College of Engineering at SIT, and had been serving as Student TeachingAssistants (TAs) on the Online Robotics workshop; they were then chosen to also be part ofthe team carrying out Slack-based evaluation. They worked under the supervision of thestudy authors, Prof. Nagasawa and

Relevance Score: 0.030160658

Work in Progress: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence Educational Resources for Pre-College Education

Conference Session: Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 3: Student Innovative Practice
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Eisa A. Khawaja, Alpharetta High School; Hoda Ehsan, The Hill School
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

Lab., 2019.[3] D. S. Touretzky, C. Gardner-McCune, F. L. Martin, and D. Seehorn, “Envisioning AI for K-12: What Should Every Child Know about AI?,” In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press, 2019.[4] J. McCarthy, “From here to human-level AI,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 171, no. 18, pp. 1174–1182, 2017.[5] S. Akgun, and C. Greenhow, “Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings, AI and Ethics, pp. 1-10, 2021.[6] J. Su, and Y. Zhong, “Artificial Intelligence (AI) in early childhood education: Curriculum design and future directions,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, 2022.[7

Relevance Score: 0.022158355

Engineering Pathways from High School to Workplace: A Review of the Literature

Conference Session: Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 5: Motivation and Support for Success
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: D'Andre Jermaine Wilson-Ihejirika, University of Toronto, Canada; Qin Liu, University of Toronto, Canada; Joanna Meihui Li, University of Toronto, Canada; Mustafa Nisar, University of Toronto, Canada; Jiawen Lin, University of Toronto, Canada
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

Relevance Score: 0.020344049

Twenty-Four Hours in a Day: A Systematized Review of Community College Engineering Students with Outside Responsibilities

Conference Session: Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 6: Underserved Student Experiences
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Anne Victoria Wrobetz, Front Range Community College, Colorado
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

maintaining transfer momentum - full-time student status was oneof the strongest predictors of transfer in an analysis of 2003-2009 data from community collegesacross the U.S., doubling the probability that a student will transfer to a 4-year program (LaSotaand Zumeta, 2016). While maintaining academic momentum is a factor in improving graduationrates, scholarships also allow for greater opportunity to engage in campus activities outside ofclass, increasing students’ engagement with their institution (Marra et al., 2015). Several studiesat the Community College of Baltimore County showed that targeted scholarship programs (likeNSF’s Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Program (S-STEM))can increase the number of

Relevance Score: 0.018575398

Work in Progress: Assessing the Need for Mental Health Curricula for Civil, Architecture, and Construction Engineering

Conference Session: Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 5: Motivation and Support for Success
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Sepehr Khorshid, University of Alabama; Siyuan Song, University of Alabama
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

from a variety of sources such as faculty members, counseling centers, andindustry professionals could be beneficial. Furthermore, to create a curriculum that has asignificant impact with measurable outcomes on a particular subject, it is essential to determinethe most appropriate delivery method for the target audience.References[1] American College Health Association (ACHA), “NCHA- II_Fall_2017_Reference_Group_Executive_Summary.pdf.” Accessed: Nov. 13, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.acha.org/documents/ncha/NCHA[2] Lipson, S. K., Zhou, S., Abelson, S., Heinze, J., Jirsa, M., Morigney, J., ... & Eisenberg, D., “Trends in college student mental health and help-seeking by race/ethnicity: Findings from the national healthy

Relevance Score: 0.017262498

Attracting Black Students to Undergraduate Engineering Programs: A Rapid Review for Broadening Participation

Conference Session: Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 4: Minoritized Student Experiences
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Micaha Dean Hughes, North Carolina State University, Raleigh; John Roberts, UK College of Engineering
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

to an over-representation of 104% (percent change) compared to anover-representation of whites by just 4.8% (percent change)” (p. 271). While this seems to be,and arguably is, problematic, as Pippert and colleagues point out, this could potentially be aresult of the aspirations of IHEs – by depicting greater diversity, more diverse students may wantto enroll, which will create more diverse campuses. To that notion, Gibbs [68] argues – and weagree – that “persuasive marketing” by IHEs is unethical, and that colleges should resistemploying such strategies.This concept of disingenuous marketing was reproduced in Henslee et al.’s 2017 mixed methodsstudy examining undergraduate, first-year student perceptions of the college viewbook at

Relevance Score: 0.01714855

Work in Progress: Investigation of Student-Faculty Micro-Interactions on Students’ Sense of Belonging through Organized Student-Faculty Lunches

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 1: Student Experiences and Support
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Tiffany Chan, University of California, Davis; Tate L Chatfield, University of California, Davis; Xianglong Wang, University of California, Davis
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

informal interactions between students and faculty. Our research uses Driscoll et al.'s[14] student-faculty interaction assessment model to evaluate students' sense of belonging,incorporating Likert-scale questions and free-response inquiries to capture nuanced aspects oftheir experiences. By focusing on both immediate and lasting impacts, our investigation seeks toidentify improvements in students' perceptions and assess the sustainability of these positiveoutcomes over time.This study contributes to the broader discourse on student engagement, community building, andretention strategies in engineering or higher education in general with the translation from BMEeducation. The findings not only provide insights into the effectiveness of informal

Relevance Score: 0.01665886

A Quantitative Study of Factors Predicting High-Achieving Engineering Students’ Progress towards Desired Educational Outcomes

Conference Session: Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 1: Student Success and Mentoring
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Ibukun Samuel Osunbunmi, Utah State University; Ning Fang, Utah State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

Assessment Program, 2003.[2] C. R. Pace and G. G. Stern, “An approach to the measurement of psychological characteristics of college environments,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 269–277, Oct. 1958, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0047828.[3] P. T. Terenzini and E. T. Pascarella, “Twenty Years of Research on College Students: Lessons for Future Research,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 83–92, 1991.[4] C. Kandiko Howson and F. Matos, “Student Surveys: Measuring the Relationship between Satisfaction and Engagement,” Education Sciences, vol. 11, no. 6, Art. no. 6, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11060297.[5] P. C. Wankat and F. S. Oreovicz, Teaching Engineering

Relevance Score: 0.015841153

WIP: Using Games and Robotics to Teach Computer Programming in High School STEM Classes: A Collective Case Study

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 3: Student Experiences and Support
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Leslie Anna Brown, Utah State University; Marissa A Tsugawa, Utah State University
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

Teachers Association (NSTA), 2016. https://ngss.nsta.org/About.aspx (accessed Aug. 12, 2023).[2] Next Generation Science Standards Lead States, Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2013.[3] W. Aminger et al., “Preservice secondary science teachers’ implementation of an NGSS practice: Using mathematics and computational thinking,” J. Sci. Teacher Educ., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 188–209, Feb. 2021.[4] R. S. N. Lindberg, T. H. Laine, and L. Haaranen, “Gamifying programming education in K‐ 12: A review of programming curricula in seven countries and programming games,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1979–1995, Jul. 2019.[5] Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S

Relevance Score: 0.014935182

WIP: Examining the Multifaceted Significance of Scholarship Programs in STEM

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 6: Belonging
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Skylar Hubbarth, Clemson University; Anna Grace Hunter; Shannon Conner, Clemson University; D. Matthew Boyer, Clemson University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

Significance of Scholarship Programs in STEMIntroductionIn this Work-in-Progress paper, we share our ongoing work with an NSF Scholarships in STEM(S-STEM) program related to an iteration of analysis that looked across specific aspects in amore summative manner than our typical analyses during the five years of the project that aremore formative. As the project will soon enter an extension into a sixth year to use existingscholarship funds, we took this opportunity to begin to reflect on overarching goals toward thedevelopment and submission of a new S-STEM proposal to continue this work. The StudentPathways in Engineering and Computing for Transfers (SPECTRA) program in the ClemsonUniversity College of Computing, Engineering

Relevance Score: 0.014935182

Board 173: Fostering Community of Practive (CoP): The Impact on Self-Efficacy and Belonging of Undergraduate Students

Conference Session: Student Division (STDT) Poster Session
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Vivian H Nguyen, City Colleges of Chicago ; Anthony Jesus Blanco, City Colleges of Chicago; Andrew Steppan, City Colleges of Chicago; Juan Munoz, City Colleges of Chicago ; Guadalupe Pina-Castillo, City Colleges of Chicago; Shlesha Patel, City Colleges of Chicago; Melvin Cabrera, City Colleges of Chicago; Tobias Wimmer; Doris J. Espiritu, City Colleges of Chicago
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

importance of creating theseopportunities for college retention.VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE-1832553. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. The authors would like to acknowledge Jason Osei-Tutu, Dr. RuzicaTodorovic and Bridget O’ Connell for supporting our research and facilitating the Center ofExcellence for Engineering and Computer Science at Wilbur Wright College, City Colleges ofChicago. This research is derived from the research “Building Bridges into Engineering andComputer Science” that is approved by the City

Relevance Score: 0.0148180425

The Effect of Ego Network Structure on Self-efficacy in Engineering Students

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 5: Self- Efficacy
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: David Myers, Rowan University; Matthew Currey, Rowan University; Luciano Miles Miletta, Rowan University; Darby Rose Riley, Rowan University; Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

Foundation, 2018.[2] T. Jungert and M. Rosander, “Self-efficacy and strategies to influence the study environment,” Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 647–659, Dec. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.522080[3] A. Ahmad and T. Safaria, “Effects of Self-Efficacy on Students’ Academic Performance,” Journal of Educational, Health and Community Psychology, vol. 2, no. 1, 2013.[4] R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, J. Schmidt, B. Brenner, H. Lyons, & D. Treistman, "Relation of contextual supports and barriers to choice behavior in engineering majors: Test of alternative social cognitive models," Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 458–465, 2003.[5] D. R. Schaefer, S

Relevance Score: 0.0148180425

Push and Pull: Exploring the Engineering Retention Problem for Underrepresented Groups and Gauging Interest in Interdisciplinary Integration into Undergraduate Curriculum

Conference Session: Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 6: Underserved Student Experiences
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Anastasia M. K. Schauer, Georgia Institute of Technology; August Kohls, Carnegie Mellon University; Katherine Fu, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

only to benefit engineering retention as a whole, but alsoto begin to close the retention gap for underrepresented minorities in engineering. Our resultssupport our hypothesis, suggesting that interdisciplinary studies are appealing to URMs and mayhelp alleviate the push-pull pressure by bridging engineering with careers they better identifywith. These interdisciplinary interventions have not yet been implemented or assessed for actualimpact on URM recruitment and retention.References[1] M. M. Camacho and S. M. Lord, “‘Microaggressions’ in engineering education: Climate for Asian, Latina and White women,” in 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2011, pp. S3H-1- S3H-6. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2011.6142970.[2] A. J. Koch, P. R

Relevance Score: 0.014279022

Supporting Students with Minoritized Gender Identities in Research: the Design and Assessment of an Initiative in Electrical and Computer Engineering

Conference Session: Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 4: Minoritized Student Experiences
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Mei-Yun Lin, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Hsinju Chen, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Holly M. Golecki, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Leah Espenhahn; Erin Marie Raftery; Alyssa Huang; Mayura Kulkarni
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

Education, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 340–352, 09 2021. [Online]. Available: https: //www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/s-dude-culture-students-with-minoritized/docview/2348348625/se-2[13] J. Misra, J. H. Lundquist, E. Holmes, S. Agiomavritis et al., “The ivory ceiling of service work,” Academe, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 22–26, 2011.[14] N. A. Fouad, W.-H. Chang, M. Wan, and R. Singh, “Women’s reasons for leaving the engineering field,” Frontiers in psychology, p. 875, 2017.[15] J. Walther, N. W. Sochacka, and N. N. Kellam, “Quality in interpretive engineering education research: Reflections on an example study,” Journal of engineering education, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 626–659, 2013.[16] K. J. Cross, S. Farrell, and B. Hughes, Queering STEM

Relevance Score: 0.014001733

Board 176: Work in Progress: Case Study of Factors Affecting Reverse-Transfer Students’ Degree Completion

Conference Session: Student Division (STDT) Poster Session
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Perla Abigail Bran, City Colleges of Chicago; Casey Mikaela Tan, City Colleges of Chicago; Jason Kwame Frimpong Osei-Tutu, City Colleges of Chicago; Luis Vicente Villanueva, City Colleges of Chicago; Brenda Najjuma, City Colleges of Chicago; Doris J. Espiritu, City Colleges of Chicago
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

]. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531255.pdf[2] V. Y. T. Liu, “The Road Less Traveled: Degree Completion and Labor Market Impact of Reverse Transfer on Non-High-Achieving Students,” The Review of Higher Education, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2021, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2021.0006.[3] L. Anderson, “Reverse Transfer: The Path Less Traveled,” May 2015. https://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/01/18/77/11877.pdf (accessed Oct. 08, 2023).[4] National Center for Education Statistics, “National Center for Education Statistics,” nces.ed.gov, Jul. 27, 2020. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.aspid=900[5] S. Devilbiss, “DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska –Lincoln: The Transition

Relevance Score: 0.013970584

Board 177: Work in Progress: The Development of a Research-Based Application for Effective Mentor-Mentee Matching

Conference Session: Student Division (STDT) Poster Session
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Alondra Gonzalez Quintana, City Colleges of Chicago; Alexis Alvarez, City Colleges of Chicago; Amara Moreno, City Colleges of Chicago; Alessandra Romero, City Colleges of Chicago; Lourdes Beatriz Johnson, City Colleges of Chicago; Bohan Ren, City Colleges of Chicago; Kendrit Tahiraj, City Colleges of Chicago; Anthony Jesus Huerta, City Colleges of Chicago; Doris J. Espiritu, City Colleges of Chicago
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

application.IV. ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE-1832553. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. This research is part of the research “Building Bridges into Engineering andComputer Science” that is approved by the City Colleges of Chicago District IRB protocolIRB2018007.The researchers would also like to acknowledge Ahmed Sozzer, Dominika Panek, Zhiyi Zhu fortheir contributions.REFERENCES[1] G. Crisp and I. Cruz, “Mentoring College Students: A Critical Review of the Literature Between 1990 and 2007,” Research in Higher

Relevance Score: 0.013970584

A Review of Career Development Theories and Their Applications in Engineering

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 2: Career Development and Employability
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Mandana Ashouripashaki, The Ohio State University; Krista M Kecskemety, The Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

behaviors.The foundation of the MBTI lies in four fundamental dimensions, each represented by a pair ofopposing traits: • Extraversion (E) – Introversion (I): This dimension focuses on where individuals direct their attention and energy. Extraverts gain their energy from external sources and thrive on social interaction, while introverts find solace in their inner world and prefer reflection. • Sensing (S) – Intuition (N): This aspect relates to how individuals process information. Sensing types rely on concrete details and present realities, while intuitive types prioritize abstract concepts and future possibilities. • Thinking (T) – Feeling (F): This dimension highlights decision-making styles. Thinkers

Relevance Score: 0.013607238

Predicting Engineering Students' Employment Aspirations: Roles of Students’ Satisfaction and Career Guidance

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 2: Career Development and Employability
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Fangyuan Chai; Yi Wang; Zhaoping Feng; Jing Jin; Jun Zhu
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

Psicología/Annals of Psychology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 268-279, 2015.[11] L. Hsu, “Work motivation, job burnout, and employment aspiration in hospitality and tourism students—An exploration using the self-determination theory,” J. Hosp. Leis. Sport Tour. Educ., vol. 13, pp. 180–189, 2013.[12] W. Bao, “The Measurement and Determinants of Student Satisfaction in Higher Education Institution,” Res. Educ. Dev., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 22–29+55, 2014.[13] Z. Abdullah, S. A. Alsagoff, M. F. Ramlan, and M. S. Sabran, “Measuring student performance, student satisfaction and its impact on graduate employability,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 108–124, 2014.[14] W. Bao, “The Measurement and Determinants of Student

Relevance Score: 0.013134791

Work in Progress: A Correlation Analysis of Engagement of First-Generation College Students in Engineering

Conference Session: Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 6: Underserved Student Experiences
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Abigail Nichole Lehto, American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE); Ning Fang, Utah State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

. 3, pp. 276–300, 2005.[2] G. M. Bettencourt, C. A. Manly, E. Kimball, and R. S. Wells, “STEM Degree Completion and First-Generation College Students: A Cumulative Disadvantage Approach to the Outcomes Gap,” The Review of Higher Education, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 753–779, 2020.[3] “About NSSE,” Evidence-Based Improvement in Higher Education. https://nsse.indiana.edu/nsse/about-nsse/index.html[4] M. W. Ohland, S. D. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Chachra, and R. A. Layton. “Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 259-278.[5] S. Hopkins, J. Workman, and W. Truby, “The Out-of-Classroom Engagement Experiences of First

Relevance Score: 0.012934248

Why Should You Join? Exploring the Role of Engineering Clubs on the Undergraduate Engineering Experience

Conference Session: Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 2: Student Success and Resources
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Katherine Drinkwater, Duke University; Karis Boyd-Sinkler, Duke University; Rebecca Simmons, Duke University
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

collected in the survey was gender, race/ethnicity, major(s), graduation year, and minor(s). The authors selected these demographics to identify possible correlations between these variables and student engagement in engineering clubs and any concomitant increases or decreases in skill development and self-efficacy.A complete list of survey questions can be found in Appendix A. 2) Data CollectionSurvey participants were recruited through email and listservs. The survey was distributed byfaculty members to undergraduates in all engineering majors and class years. In soliciting surveyresponses, the Directors of Undergraduate Study were contacted to help with dissemination.Professors in Mechanical Engineering and Biomedical

Relevance Score: 0.012523532

Board 175: Poster: Strategies for Empathy Instruction and Assessment in Biomedical Engineering Education: A Review

Conference Session: Student Division (STDT) Poster Session
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Tahlia Altgold, The Ohio State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

thechanging design. Finally, they note that providing students with contextual information beyond medicalneeds supported innovation. This suggests that teaching students to be socially aware of their role andwork as engineers beyond technical efficacy is important in developing their empathic design ability.Thus, Kong et al.’s [12] work provides specific instructional activities designed to teach students how toactively incorporate empathic tendencies into their design process.Eliciting Empathy Through Personal ReflectionWhile the instructional methods previously discussed are embedded in elements of traditional BMEcurriculums (design, teamwork, and ethics), Lunn et al. [13] and Morgan et al. [14] describe a standaloneBME course based on story-driven

Relevance Score: 0.012224261

Board 172: Engineering Electromagnetics Laboratory Development

Conference Session: Student Division (STDT) Poster Session
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Narangoo Tumur, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville; Amardeep Kaur, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville
Tagged Divisions: Student Division (STDT)

dynamic and participatory learningenvironment. This optimized the efficiency of the learning process and enriched the overalleducational journey by providing a balance between theoretical knowledge and practicalapplication.References[1] C. Saviz and K. Schulz, (2003, June), Learning Design In Lab Paper presented at 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee. 10.18260/1-2--12134.[2] P. C. Wankat,, and P. S. Oreovicz, Teaching Engineering. McGraw-Hill, NY, 1993.[3] Bloom, B. S., M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. MacKay, NY, 1956.[4] “Kahoot!,” (Accessed 2024). Available: https://kahoot.com/.[5