- Conference Session
- Engineering Identity and Student Support (Features 2 papers of STDT)
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Brandon Wilson, California State University, Los Angeles; Corin L. Bowen, California State University, Los Angeles
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
ColorAbstractThis WIP paper intends to supplement our current understanding of political awareness andethical disengagement among engineering undergraduates. As an integral part of the productionof globally-sold technology and weaponry [1-6], engineers in the United States need to have anactive and informed interest for global public welfare as well as the political applications of theirwork [7]. Part of developing this informed interest is supposed to occur as they get theirbachelor’s degree, as ABET expects graduates to be able to “recognize ethical and professionalresponsibilities in engineering situations” (Criterion 3: Student Outcomes) and make decisionsthat give weight to the global and societal impact of their work [8]. In spite of this effort
- Conference Session
- Tools, Identities, and Personality in Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Imran Parvez, Texas A&M University at Qatar ; Osama Desouky, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Marwa AbdelGawad, Hamad Bin Khalifa University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
learning experiences through curriculum and course design. Her primary teaching objective is to foster a lifelong learning mindset in her students by promoting critical thinking and problem-based learning. Dr. AbdelGawad’s teaching philosophy integrates real-life ethical dilemmas to encourage students to think deeply, challenge their opinions, and integrate ethics into their coursework to help shape them into successful, professional and socially responsible engineers. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Engineering Excellence through Strategic Team Management Shell Eco-Marathon STRATEGIES
- Conference Session
- Tools, Identities, and Personality in Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Karen Elizabeth Nortz, University of Michigan; Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan; Susan M Lord, University of San Diego
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
elements effectively and creating content tailored to both students andinstructors.IntroductionThe majority of engineering undergraduate programs lack sufficient guidance on social andethical responsibility in the field of engineering. Both the U.S. National Academy of Engineeringand ABET accreditation emphasize the necessity to embed ethics and social responsibility toaddress ethical, global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic impacts [1]-[3] Researchhas consistently demonstrated the value of sociotechnical awareness in engineers. For instance,engineers must prioritize public well-being and ethical responsibilities in their work [4]-[8],understand the societal impacts of engineering solutions [9]-[12], and challenge cultural normsthat
- Conference Session
- Industry and Technical Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Aakash Alpesh Patel, University of Georgia; Taiwo Raphael Feyijimi, University of Georgia; Sarah Jane Bork, University of Georgia
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
, and maintenance of electricalElectrical Systems systems and equipment. Proficiency in concepts from trigonometry, calculus, chemistry, physics, andMathematics & Physics electromagnetic principles. Broad engineering principles, including thermodynamics, computer programming, andEngineering Knowledge advanced specializations like signal processing and optics.Hands-On Skills Gaining practical experience through projects, internships, or experimentation.Problem-Solving Ability to analyze and solve real-world problems using engineering principles. Professional Competencies Commitment to ethical practices
- Conference Session
- Engineering Identity and Student Support (Features 2 papers of STDT)
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Naqash Gerard, University of Florida; Idalis Villanueva Alarcón, University of Florida; Isabella Victoria, University of Florida; Minji Yun, University of Florida; Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., University of Florida; Jasmine E. McNealy, University of Florida
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
, both from a cross-cultural andintra-racial standpoint, in engineering. The methodology was carefully designed to capture thenuanced experiences and perspectives of faculty advisors and/or graduate students whilemaintaining scientific rigor and ethical considerations. The methodology presented is mindfulof all the complexities of mentoring relationships and connected constructs, particularly inunderstanding how emotional intelligence manifests in these relationships.2.1 Research Design The research design selected for this study follows a participatory research approach [31],[32]. The first study on cross-country cultural mentoring was conducted using a collaborativeautoethnography between a faculty advisor and their graduate students (the
- Conference Session
- Tools, Identities, and Personality in Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Kylee Shiekh, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Ernesto Cuesta Alvear, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Summer S. Stevens, Virginia Tech
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
Summer Stevens became doctoral student in Virginia Tech’s Engineering Education program after obtaining a BS in Civil Engineering from the University of Utah. She also looks forward to completing an MS in Structural Engineering at Virginia Tech. Summer’s career goals revolve around becoming a civil engineering or engineering education professor, or conversely, a university outreach program coordinator. Her current research interests include validating crochet as a form of tinkering, K-12 engineering identity, artistic understandings of engineering, family rights for engineers, engineering student mental health, engineering ethics education, and mass timber construction. ©American Society for
- Conference Session
- Industry and Technical Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Ruidong Ma, University of Washington; Frank Gao, University of Washington; Renee M. Desing, University of Washington
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
curriculum at the University of Michigan. Journal of Engineering Education, 2001. 90(3): p. 437-444.2. Karimi, A. Implementing a New Mechanical Engineering Curriculum to Improve Student Retention. in 2001 Annual Conference. 2001.3. Medical Devices Market Size, Share & Industry Analysis, By Type (Orthopedic Devices, Cardiovascular Devices, Diagnostic Imaging, In-vitro Diagnostics, Minimally Invasive Surgery, Wound Management, Diabetes Care, Ophthalmic Devices, Dental Devices, Nephrology, General Surgery, and Others), By End-User (Hospitals & ASCs, Clinics, and Others), and Regional Forecast, 2024-2032. 2024, Fortune Business Insights. p. 180.4. Bunnik, E.M., Ethics of allocation of donor organs. Current
- Conference Session
- Motivation and Engagement in Engineering Students
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Leo Kimura, Shibaura Institute of Technology; Hatsuko Yoshikubo Ph.D., SHIBAURA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY; Sumito Nagasawa Ph.D. in Engineering, Shibaura
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
low engagement,only instructors were given access to the peer assessment results. This allowed students toprovide candid feedback without fear of judgment from their teammates.Regarding the ethical considerations of this study involving human subjects, due to the use ofpersonal data from participants in an international collaborative program, the study wasconducted in compliance with established research ethics guidelines, including ethicalstandards, codes of conduct, and responsibilities. Specifically, (1) prior consultation was heldwith program coordinators to obtain permission for conducting the survey and using studentdata, and (2) students were informed of the research purpose and content, and their consentwas obtained before
- Conference Session
- Motivation and Engagement in Engineering Students
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Hang Zhang, Jining Normal University,China; Hao He; Ming Li, Beijing Foreign Studies University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
. For the qualityassurance in engineering education in American universities, some of the initialchallenges and pressures may be influenced by technical factors, but they are notlimited by simple technical difficulties, and also involve more important issues suchas ethics, culture, and fairness. In the process of vigorously promoting programaccreditation of engineering education, clear requirements have also been put forwardfor the evidence-support capability. The transformation of outcome-basedaccreditation paradigm will be constrained and hindered to some extent by theprevious one overemphasis of the input and process. Many colleges and universitiesare still struggling to adapt to this transformation, mainly manifested in the singularityof