Conference Session

Systems Engineering Learning Outcomes and Assessment

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kamran Iqbal, University of Arkansas, Little Rock; Gary T. Anderson, University of Arkansas, Little Rock

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

, or B to C, etc. Late progress report is not accepted. Midterm report: This report is a compilation of the weekly reports. It is to be submitted by the project team using the “Final Report” format. Each team member prepares his/her section(s) and submits it to the project leader so that s/he can email it to the project advisor(s) by the specified deadline. Midterm report counts as three progress reports. Late midterm report is not accepted. 2 Final report: The final report is to be submitted by the end of the semester before the project presentations. The final project report format requirements are same as the ones used in SYEN 4385, see appendix. Late final report is not accepted

Conference Session

Programs in Support of Systems Engineering Education

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan K Donohue, University of Virginia; Ali Bouabid, Khalifa University of Science and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

education.Mr. Ali Bouabid, Piedmont Virginia Community College Page 23.545.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Establishing A Community College Pathway to Baccalaureate Systems Engineering ProgramsAbstractA fundamental principle guiding engineering course schedules and student advisement atPiedmont Virginia Community College (PVCC) is to offer courses a student would take inhis/her second year at target universities to minimize the chance that s/he would be on the “five(plus) year plan” after transfer. We describe how the model is implemented with respect

Conference Session

Student Development and Assessment in IE Programs

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yaseen Mahmud, Morgan State University; Masud Salimian, Morgan State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

placed ‘on the clock’. This initiated a timeframe, usually a week,within which students had two challenges to complete in order to be eligible to take that topictest.The first challenge, the student needed to acquire a completely worked-out problem thatillustrated the concept of the just completed topic. This problem could be one of the studentsown devising or from a textbook, class web page, or any other source. The student then wouldschedule an appointment with the instructor to do an oral presentation of the problem. Thestudent would explain step by step the procedure(s) used in the solution of the problem. Thisprovides the instructor an opportunity to examine the students’ critical thinking skills. If thestudent is unable to completely

Conference Session

Innovations in the IE Curriculum

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jane M. Fraser, Colorado State University, Pueblo; Abhijit Gosavi, Missouri University of Science & Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

the complete problem.‖ (http://www.incose.org/practice/whatissystemseng.aspx) 2. A sub-field of electrical engineering. ―[E]mphasis is attached to the use of systems theory in applications [and] … tends to emphasize control techniques which are often software- intensive.‖9 3. A sub-field of industrial and systems engineering. The word ―system‖ is often added to industrial engineering to emphasize the interactions of parts of a system to create the overall behavior of the system. 4. A sub-field of engineering management or technology management. ―[S]ystems engineering includes taking into consideration all aspects of the life cycle of the system. Thus the systems engineering approach is said to

Conference Session

SE Capstone Design Projects, Part I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Stansbury, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach; Massood Towhidnejad, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach; Jayson F. Clifford; Michael P. Dop, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering, Systems Engineering

AC 2011-1103: AGILE METHODOLOGIES FOR HARDWARE / SOFT-WARE TEAMS FOR A CAPSTONE DESIGN COURSE: LESSONS LEARNEDRichard Stansbury, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Richard S. Stansbury is an assistant professor of computer science and computer engineering at Embry- Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, FL. He instructs the capstone senior design course for computer and software engineering. His current research interests include unmanned aircraft, certification issues for unmanned aircraft, mobile robotics, and applied artificial intelligence.Massood Towhidnejad, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Massood Towhidnejad is a tenure full professor of software engineering in the department

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cassandra M Birrenkott, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Shaobo Huang, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Marius D Ellingsen, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Karim Heinz Muci-Kuchler, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Mark David Bedillion, Carnegie Mellon University; John Ziadat, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

Very likely) 3. Rank the reasons for you to select a career. Please use consecutive numbers starting with 1 for the most important, 2 for the second important, etc. Select N/A if you think that a factor/skill does not help result in a successful job application.The options for this question included good salary, I have previous experiences relevant to theoccupation, my family member(s) is/are in that field, impact from role model(s) who are not myrelatives, it is personally satisfying to work in that field, it is important to society to havesomebody work in that field, and the job is very interesting to me. 4. Assume you have multiple job offers. What are the top 3 reasons for you to accept a company’s offer?The

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steve E. Watkins, Missouri University of Science & Technology; Randall L Musselman, U.S. Air Force Academy

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

, (2001).2. J. D. Moell and T. N. Curlee, Transmitter Hunting: Radio Direction Finding Simplified, TAB Books, Blue Ridge Summit, PA (1987).3. M. Spencer, “A Transmitter for Fox Hunting,” QST, 33-36, (May 2011).4. M. Batchelder, K. White, and S. Gasper, “Ham Radio and Engineering Education,” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference, (2004).5. J. Villasenor, “”Drones” and the Future of Domestic Aviation,” Proceedings of the IEEE, 102(3), 235-238, (2014).6. D. Erdos, A. Erdos, and S. E. Watkins, "An Experimental UAV System for Search and Rescue Challenge," IEEE Aerospace and Electronics Systems Magazine, 28(5), 32-37, (2013).7. J. Roberts, D. Frousheger, B. Williams, D. Campbell, and R. Walker

Conference Session

SE Capstone Design Projects, Part II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Catherine Skokan, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering, Systems Engineering

means are equal ( p<< .001). Once again, the most gain was made with questions 2 and 5.Due to the differences in point distribution with the removal of quesiton 1 for the second year, itis not possible to perform direct statistical anaylsis between the two years. However it is stillpossible to make some observations. It is surprising to see all the 0’s on question 2 whenlooking at the points distribution for the 2010 post-test. The amount invalid samples (incompletetests) for 2009/2010 was also remarkable. Both years showed improvement on questions 2 and5. Question 2 addressed Quality Function Deployment while question 5 addressed the content ofprogress reports. These are both topics that are directly applied to design projects in this

Conference Session

SED Technical Session: Applications

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John M. Santiago Jr, Colorado Technical University; Jing Guo, Colorado Technical University

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

mechanical drawings and software.7. Test results for your project.8. Analysis of your success measured against the performance specifications and need.Instructional Approach – Methods and ProceduresThe course consists of class discussions and individual/team requirements designed toreinforce the material throughout the quarter and your college tenure. Students should comeprepared to discuss the elements of the design process, including their assignments / project(s),in class and be prepared to contribute to team activities in / out of class to complete that / thoseassigned the project(s). Any exercises or other work must be done in a complete manner,which includes defining problems/processes, providing illustrations and including a

Conference Session

Instructional Design

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Naveen Seth, New Community College at CUNY; Donald P. O'Keefe, Farmingdale State College

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

forrstudents. What were available weere several resources r foccused on thee constructionn industry thhatcould be used to expo ose students to better unnderstand tim me value of m money. Simoonson7 (20055),“Diggingg into Constrruction Dataa” Business Economics-A E April 2005, ddescribes booth free and ppaiddata sourrces. Some free fr resourcees include thee Bureau of Census, the Bureau of E EconomicAnalysis (BEA) and the Bureau of o Labor Staatistics (BLS S). Aside from m a wealth oof informatioon 8about con nstruction laabor in a speccific

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pablo Biswas, Texas A&M International University; Runchang Lin, Texas A&M International University

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

Conference Session

Programs in Support of Systems Engineering Education

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chet Boncek Jr, Raytheon Company

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

Domain/Topic Grade/StrandFramework Figure(s) Significance to 'Power Power to Grades Code Text of The Standard

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jon Sticklen, Michigan Technological University; Natalie Green, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

. That is in line with viewing our curricular asa system in which all of the "modules" have a role(s) and each course in the module furthers thegoal of the module. The arrow in Figure 2 points to the Systems Thinking and SystemsEngineering Core courses for what is required in the Systems Engineering Pathway.One goal was the breadth of engineering disciplinary understanding for the Systems Engineeringstudents. In Figure 2, you can see a graphic showing the engineering core just above the Sys EngCore. The course work in other disciplines of engineering is large, and most of the ABET criteriafor engineering courses lie in these breath areas

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sandy L. Furterer, University of Datyon

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

ComputerSociety.Bonwell, Charles C.; Eison, James A., Active Learning: Creating Excitement in theClassroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. RIEJAN1992Carroll, J.M, and Rosson, M.B., Case studies as minimalist information. IEEE Transactions,Professional Communications, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 297-310.Cudney, E., and Furterer, S., Design for Six Sigma in Product and Service Development:Applications and Case Studies, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2012.Cudney, E., Furterer, S., and Dietrich, D., Lean Systems: Applications and Case Studies inManufacturing. Service, and Healthcare, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2013.Engelman, K., Cizik, A., Ellerbeck E., Women's Satisfaction with Their MammographyExperience: Results of a Qualitative Study, Women & Health, Vol. 42(4

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Suxia Cui, Prairie View A&M University; Lin Li, Prairie View A&M University; Lei Huang, Prairie View A&M University; Yonghui Wang, Prairie View A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

://www.hpcwire.com/hpcwire/2011- 12-01/hpc_going_embedded.html4. P. Decher, “Embedding HPC: A rocket in your pocket”, Embedded, Nov. 29, 2011. http://www.embedded.com/design/prototyping-and-development/4230994/A-rocket-in-your-pocket#5. ICAF Industries Studies 2006 Report, National Defense University.6. ICAF Industries Studies 2001 Report, National Defense University.7. S. Cui, Y. Wang, S. Koay, and Y. Yang, “Revamp Computer Education with Multimedia and Game Technologies,” Proceedings of ASEE 117th Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky, June 20- 23, 2010.8. S. Cui, Y. Wang, F. M. Nave, and K. T. Harris, “Teach Computer Techniques through Multimedia,” Proceedings of the 2010 ASEE Northeast Section

Conference Session

Technology and Equipment to Improve IE Instruction

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard A. Pitts Jr., Morgan State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

field over the next five years. Nearly allstudents (94%, 17 of 18 students) reported that participation in the IRAM course(s) had betterprepared them to work in the IE field. Of the 10 students who provided suggestions on how tofurther improve the IRAM laboratory or the courses, all reported that the both the courses andlaboratory could be improved by providing more access to and use of modern robotics andautomation equipment. One student suggested including guest speakers who are currently Page 25.715.11working in the field as a part of the courses.Early evidence also indicates that students are having some success

Conference Session

SED Technical Session: Instructional Experiences

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kirsten A. Davis, Virginia Tech; Alejandro Salado, Virginia Tech; Thomas A. McDermott, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

creatively,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Design Creativity Workshop, Atlanta, GA, 2008.[19] D. M. Beams, K. Gullings, and C. E. Ross, “Seeking new perspectives: Engineers experiencing design through creative arts,” presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[20] S. B. Shooter and S. Orsborn, “‘Impact! Exploring innovation across disciplines’ - Engaging the university innovation ecosystem through a university-wide course,” presented at the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, 2013.[21] N. W. Sochacka, K. Woodall, J. Walther, and N. N. Kellam, “Faculty reflections on a STEAM-inspired interdisciplinary studio course,” presented at the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference and

Conference Session

Integrating Systems Engineering into the Capstone Project

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vigyan Jackson Chandra, Eastern Kentucky University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering, Systems Engineering

TechnologyIndustry Association (CompTIA), which develops vendor-neutral professional certificationslinked with various Information Technology (IT) areas, recommends a seven-step process27for tackling computer/network related issues. Here, it has been adapted for the capstoneprocess as follows, with different project phases added in parenthesis, linking it with theEngineering is Elementary (EiE)28 design process: (1) Problem identification and information gathering: What, who, where, when, why, constrains, assumptions (“Ask” phase) (2) Formulate a theory to establish probable cause(s) of the problem (“Imagine” phase) (3) Identify suitable ways of testing the theory, and if not confirmed generate a new one (“Imagine” phase) (4

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohammad Sadraey, Daniel Webster College; Nicholas Bertozzi, Daniel Webster College

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

, Fort Worth, Texas, AIAA 2010-90166. Blanchard, B. S. and Fabrycky, W. J., Systems Engineering and Analysis, Fourth Edition, Prentice Hall, 20067. Richard Curran, Michel van Tooren, Liza van Dijk, Systems Engineering as an Effective Educational Framework for Active Aerospace Design Learning, 9th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, 21 - 23 September 2009, Hilton Head, South Carolina, AIAA 2009-69048. Paul S. Gill and Danny Garcia, William W. Vaughan, Engineering Lessons Learned and Systems Engineering Applications, 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 10 - 13 January 2005, Reno, Nevada, AIAA 2005-13259. John C. Hsu, S. Raghunathan, Systems Engineering for CDIO -Conceive, Design, Implement

Conference Session

A Systems-Thinking Approach to Solving Problems

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adeel Khalid, Southern Polytechnic State University; Scott C. Banks, Georgia Tech Research Institute

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

major incidents,tracking assets and resources is hindered by a lack of interoperability between theagencies2. Interoperability3,4,5 encompasses the radio communications between theagencies as well as the coordination of responses and creating a command and controlorganization. Agencies each use their own particular set of communications equipment, Local S Responders Communications P T O A L N Resource I State D

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adeel Khalid, Southern Polytechnic State University; Chyna Kristin Vaughn

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

Transportation Policy: Funding Metro Atlanta’s Transportation Needs, Atlanta Chamber of Commerce, 2010. 2. Goodwill, J. & Hendricks, S. Building Transit Oriented Development in Established Communities. Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR). Tampa, FL. November 2002. Helling, Amy. The Effect of Residential Accessibility to Employment on Men’s and Women’s Travel. George State University. Women’s Travel Issues; Proceedings from the Second National Conference. 3. 2007 Atlanta Regional Commuter Survey, 20-County Nonattainment Area, Survey Key Findings. Georgia Department of Transportation 4. Wolf, J. ,Guensler, R. ,Washington, S. & Lawrence, F. Use of Electronic Travel Diaries and Vehicle

Conference Session

Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Brian Aufderheide, Hampton University; Otsebele E. Nare, Hampton University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

with the students the more standard sensitivityanalysis: change in price of goods, change in price of key raw material(s), change in price ofutilities, change in price of labor. These are the ones sometimes discussed in design textbooks.Ask students if that is all there is to a Financial Operational Model? See what the students answerhere. Get them to understand the sheer power of having the engineering design melded to theeconomics. What does that truly mean? Start to get them to see other types of sensitivities that arenot simply linear changes in slope but can have actual minimum or maximum optimal values.Examples include key design specifications to the product, parameter uncertainty in the modelsfor a piece of equipment such as extent of

Conference Session

Innovations in the IE Curriculum

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Denise H. Bauer, University of Idaho, Moscow; Jessica L. Heier Stamm, Kansas State University; Lesley Strawderman, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

evidenceof certain FE and PE topics in the capstone course. We will also explore the connection betweencapstone course design and student career efficacy to help develop a common guideline for anyIndustrial Engineering capstone course.Bibliography1. Beyerlein, S., Davis, D., Trevisan, M., Thompson, P., & Harrison, K. (2006). Assessment framework for capstone design courses. Proceedings of the 2006 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.2. Dunlap, J.C. (2005). Problem-based learning and self-efficacy: How a capstone course prepares students for a profession. Educational Technology Research & Development, 53(1), 65-85.3. Farr, J.V., Lee, M.A., Metro, R.A., & Sutton, J.P. (2001). Using a

Conference Session

Capstone Design Projects and Courses

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benito Flores, Universidad de Monterrey

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

developed 29 A formal faculty assessor (advisor) is assigned 71 Project carried out in a robust organization 86 An appointed representative from the client organization participates 14 Frequent, regular meetings with the supervising instructor 57 Weekly progress reports and evaluations 71 Formal presentation(s) of progress 29 A final session with the client 57 A final closing presentation to faculty 57 Faculty in earlier courses evaluate 43 Student self-evaluation

Conference Session

SE Capstone Design Projects, Part I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Keith G. Sheppard, Stevens Institute of Technology; John A Nastasi, Stevens Institute of Technology; Eirik Hole, Stevens Institute of Technology; Peter L. Russell, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering, Systems Engineering

engineering capstone educational outcomes.  The timeline to bring the project and students up to speed is longer than for a traditional capstone, including multi-disciplinary ones, as the SE foundation has to be established o first, in terms of SE knowledge acquisition o second, for socialization to and the buy in needed from the students to work on the project in a meaningful systems engineering mode.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Researchand Engineering (ASD(R&E)) STEM Development Office. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 1: Course Design & SE Competencies

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachana Ashok Gupta, North Carolina State University; Greg A. Dunko, NantHealth

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

requirements’ list for the project. The instructortypically shows a case study project example explaining Step 1 tasks, generally in an in-classworkshop, so that each team can take the following actions:1. Break down the project description, recognize and highlight key words and form a list of high-level requirements.2. Share the list with other teams for peer review to refine the list.3. Prepare a list of questions to obtain the instructor/s’ and sponsor’s assistance.The high-level requirement list after this step generally captures key system behavioral featuresand main system functions. Table 2 (page 8) shows the input and output of Step 1 for a casestudy exercise conducted in class.Objectives achieved during this step: 1. Team gets an easy

Conference Session

Developing Systems Engineering Curriculum and Programs

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aaron W. Johnson, Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and Outreach; Sara Willner-Giwerc , Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and Outreach; Paul T Grogan, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

, NY: Springer. 11. Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D.R., & Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer. 12. Mills, J. E. & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Engineering Education - Is Problem-based or Project-based Learning the Answer? Australian Journal of Engineering Education, 3(2), 2-16. 13. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1),103-120. 14. Frank, M. & Elata, D. Developing the Capacity for Engineering Systems Thinking (CEST) of Freshman Engineering Students. Systems Engineering, 8(2), 187

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wolter J. Fabrycky PE, Virginia Tech and AAII

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

progresses.Life-cycle cost is one basis for comparing alternative designs that otherwise meet minimumrequirements specified under performance criteria. The life-cycle cost of each alternative isdetermined based on the activity of estimation and prediction just completed. Arrow J indicatesthe passing of the evaluated candidates to the decision process. The selection of preferredalternative(s) can only be made after the life-cycle cost analysis is completed and aftereffectiveness measures are defined and applied. Page 26.1452.10Design Decision (Block 9). Given the variety of customer needs and perceptions as collected inBlock 2, choosing a preferred

Conference Session

Research Projects, Course Development, and Industry Issues

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wolter J. Fabrycky PE P.E., Virginia Tech and Academic Applications International

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

, Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Louisville, KY, June 21, 2010.2) Educating the Engineer of 2020, National Academy of Engineering, Washington, DC: Page 25.95.14 National Academies Press, 2005.3) Panitz B., Senior Editor, Training Technology’s Maestros, American Society for Engineering Education, PRISM, November, 1997.4) Bode H. W., Report to the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U. S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC, 1967.5) Blanchard, B. S. and W. J. Fabrycky, Systems Engineering and Analysis, Fifth (30th Anniversary) Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, 2011.6) Fabrycky, W. J. and E. A. McCrae, Systems

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Timothy L.J. Ferris, School of Engineering, University of South Australia; Alice F. Squires, Washington State University; Fanny Camelia, University of South Australia

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

are often regarded as only being observable through long-term evidence and not amenable to assessment during the program of study [28].This idea of the place and nature of the affective domain in education programs has a longhistory. Schmidt [29] refers to the idea in the mid 1970’s but only as an author making use anexisting idea. In addition, this perspective, that affective domain development in relation to thecognitive material which is learned, that we are pursuing in systems engineering is a perspectivewhich has a long tradition in both theological education and military academies, where theobjective is to develop people who will behave rightly, not just people who know how to behaverightly. Research about education aimed to