Paper ID #12881A Transdisciplinary Approach for Developing Effective Communication Skillsin a First Year STEM SeminarDr. Jeffrey J Evans, Purdue University, West Lafayette Jeffrey J. Evans received his BS from Purdue University and his MS and PhD in Computer Science from the Illinois Institute of Technology. His research interests are in artificial intelligence for music composition and performance and adaptive computing systems, focusing on the effects of subsystem interactions on application performance. He is a member of the ASEE, ACM and a Senior Member of the IEEE.Prof. Amy S. Van Epps, Purdue University, West
apawley@purdue.edu.Dr. Shawn S Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus SHAWN JORDAN, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of En- gineering at Arizona State University. He teaches context-centered electrical engineering and embedded systems design courses, and studies the use of context in both K-12 and undergraduate engineering design education. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2010) and M.S./B.S. in Electrical and Com- puter Engineering from Purdue University. Dr. Jordan is PI on several NSF-funded projects related to design, including an NSF Early CAREER Award entitled ”CAREER: Engineering Design Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society” and
Paper ID #13634ENCOURAGING STUDENTS TO SEE THE ROLE OF SERVICE COURSESIN THEIR MAJORDr. Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University Ken Van Treuren is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at Baylor University. He received his B. S. in Aeronautical Engineering from the USAF Academy in Colorado Springs, Colorado and his M. S. in Engineering from Princeton University in Princeton, New Jersey. After serving as USAF pilot in KC-135 and KC-10 aircraft, he completed his DPhil in Engineering Sciences at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom and returned to the USAF Academy to teach heat transfer and propulsion
Above the st Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, D.C., National Academies Press (2005).3. Duderstadt, J. J., Engineering for a Changing World: A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education. Ann Arbor, Michigan, University of Michigan Press, (2007).4. Bloom, Benjamin S. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (1956). Published by Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA. Copyright (c) 1984 by Pearson Education. Page 26.226.195. Bloom, B. S
some assumptions. Identifies context(s) when presenting a position. May be more aware of others’ assumptions than one’s own (or vice versa).By necessity the rubrics are written such that they can be applied to the broad range of topics thatfall under the FYS umbrella. Particularly relevant to the premise of the FYS Bridge course arethe rubrics that address establishing the background, exploring ambiguity, questioningassumptions, and identifying context, but applied to challenges in engineering, technology, andscience in society. With this in mind, the authors have selected tentatively the following topicsand readings for the course:The questions that science, engineering, and the humanities can answer… and those theycan’t. Selected
would a coherent road map for engineering education emerge, but theindividuals themselves would find themselves as thought leaders down the path towardlarger, global understanding of both current and future directions, as well as failures inengineering education.References 1. American Society of Engineering Education, ‘Transforming the Undergraduate Engineering Experience’, May 9-10, 2013, Arlington, VA. 2. Phase, I. I. (2005). Educating the Engineer of 2020:: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. National Academies Press. 3. Hundley, S., Fox, P., Brown, L. G., Jacobs, A., Didion, C., Sayre, D. R., & Hoyer, H. J. (2012). Attributes of a Global Engineer: Field-Informed Perspectives
://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer102/gaytan102.htm8. Hannafin, M. J. (1984). Guidelines for using locus of instructional control in the design of computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Instructional Development 7(3): 6–10.9. Heinich, R., M. Molenda, J. D. Russell and S. E. Smaldino. (2003). Instructional media and technologies for learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.10. Hijazi, S., Crowley, M., Smith, M. L., & Shaffer, C. (2006). Maximizing learning by teaching blended courses. Proceedings of the ASCUE Conference, 2006.11. Holmberg, B (1987) Growth and structure of distance education. Routledge.12. Johnson, J. L. (2003) Distance education: the complete guide to design, delivery and improvement. NY
memberships.” The boundaries being drawn here are quite clear:politics do not belong in the IEEE, and LGBTQ individuals are ontologically political. It isinteresting that the latter two posters assumed the proposer(s) of the new language were LGBTQ(must be outsiders!), when in fact there was an organized response from the few out LGBTQIEEE members to alter the proposed wording before adoption of the proposed changes, as theproposed language was not truly inclusive of the LGBTQ community.Sexual orientation is private/doesn’t belong in the workplace: A slightly different (thoughrelated) boundary was drawn between professional and private spheres when frequentcommenter Luke Burgess (relation to Barry Burgess unknown) suggested that sexual
traditional curriculum and its numbered course. In this case,the SPOC (Small Private On-Line Course) was blended: the text of the course was madeavailable (accumulatively) in parts at the time of each of eleven video presentations (Skype),which were presented a few days in advance of a seminar/discussion (Skype).The course, its origins, aims and presentation are described, and its limitations and potentialconsidered in the light of current discussions on the integration of engineering and liberaleducation, and developments in the role of technological and engineering literacy.Abstract 225 words.Key words. Blended, Humanities, SPOC, Transdisiplinary.Transdisciplinarity and InterdisciplinarityIn the 1960’s a number of novel degree structures emerged in
urges practitioners to avoid causing harm. 3Indeed, responsibility to hold an ideal paramount is substantively different from responsibility topromote the same ideal. For example, teachers, pilots, and doctors must all hold paramount thehealth and safety of the individuals in their charge, but among them only doctors must dedicatetheir work to the promotion of these individuals’ health and safety. The American MedicalAssociation’s (AMA) Code of Medical Ethics states that physicians are obliged to provide“competent medical care, with compassion and respect for human dignity and rights.”4 TheAmerican Bar Association’s (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct urge lawyers tofunction as “representative[s] of clients, [officers] of the legal system
retention of the concept(s) taught.Neither Trevelyan or Carberry and Ohland discuss what preparation in pedagogy might beuseful in preparing students to teach although for some peer tutoring the students are givetraining and paid. It is argued here that substantial prior training may lead to more effectivelearning exchanges irrespective of whether it is undertaken as a tutor with one or twostudents, perhaps in a cooperative learning group, or as an instructor with a class of twentystudents.However, this brings into question the role that educational studies may have more generallyin engineering programmes.It is argued that students may benefit more if they have to teach an unfamiliar subject and thetraining may be linked to the preparation
et al.’s 2012 PNAS paper (Science Faculty’s Subtle GenderBiases Favor Male Students)8 and Sheltzera and Smith’s 2104 PNAS paper (Elite Male Facultyin the Life Sciences Employ Fewer Women)9.Dr. Kirkmeyer: I cannot honestly say I have considered what strategies to use to help othersbecome aware of these issues, because they are situation-dependent and usually reactive. Ipersonally use humor and self-deprecation to address many issues in a non-threatening manner,and so I know I have done so with these. The reality is that it depends on the context of thesituation related to these issues. In some situations, humor (and particularly sarcasm) hasworked quite well in making others aware of how these issues are being perceived by othersaround them
, (1996). Page 26.1748.13 16. McCabe, Warren L., Julian C. Smith, Peter Harriott, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering, 7th Edition, McGraw-Hill (2005). 1217. Merritt, Frederick S., M. Kent Loftin, Jonathan T. Ricketts, Standard Handbook for Civil Engineers, 4th Edition, Mc-Graw Hill, New York (1996).18. Systems Engineering Fundamentals, Department of Defense, Systems Management College, Defense Acquisition University Press, January (2001).19. Shishko, Robert., et al., NASA Systems Engineering Handbook, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, SP
. American Society for Engineering Education.3. Jecker, J., N. Maccoby, and H. Breitrose, Improving accuracy in interpreting non verbal cues of comprehension. Psychology in the Schools, 1965. 2(3): p. 239-244.4. Neill, S., Classroom Nonverbal Communication. 1991, London: Routledge. 191.5. Gregersen, T.S., Nonverbal cues: Clues to the detection of foreign language anxiety. Foreign Language Annals, 2005. 38(3): p. 388-400.6. Hartley, G. and M. Karinch, I can read you like a book: how to spot the messages and emotions people are really sending with their body language. 2007: Career Press.7. Fisher, D. and N. Frey, Checking for understanding: Formative assessment techniques for your classroom. 2007: ASCD.8