Paper ID #6835Experiential Learning in the Civil Engineering Curriculum: Collaborationsbetween Community Colleges, Research I Universities and National Labora-toriesClaire L. Antaya, Arizona State University theKristen Parrish PhD, Arizona State University Kristen Parrish is an Assistant Professor in the School of Sustainability and the Built Environment at Ari- zona State University (ASU). Kristen’s work focuses on integrating energy efficiency measures into build- ing design, construction, and operations processes. She has published journal articles, conference papers, and technical guides on novel design processes
Paper ID #7380First-Year Engineering Students’ Learning of Nanotechnology through anOpen-Ended ProjectKelsey Joy Rodgers, Purdue University, West Lafayette Kelsey Rodgers is currently a graduate student at Purdue University in the School of Engineering Educa- tion. She is part of the Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) research team. She conducts research within the First-Year Engineering Program to help understand what and how students are learning about nanotechnology.Prof. Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette Heidi A. Diefes-Dux is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering
diagnostic instrument known as MASUS (Measuringthe Academic Skills of University Students – see [9] for more information), which looks at thefollowing four areas related to basic, and rhetorical literacy: “transfer and integration of relevantreference material, use of an appropriate genre structure, academic style and cohesion, andcorrect grammar.”[8] Unfortunately, findings from this study were not presented analytically, butholistically in the form of single scores (from 0-100%) for “academic literacy” on each of threeof the writing samples assessed: practice reports (79.4%), draft reports (74.5%), and final reports(77.6%).In the same year, Johnson presented a model for assessing writing by scoring students’ onlineportfolios using an analytical
detail. 3. In order to measure the impact or the effectiveness of the proposed framework, this framework can be included in the form of PBL-based exercises or within course curriculum in ET departments/schools. After allowing the students to use this framework in classrooms or labs or PBL exercises, the performance metrics of students can be used to evaluate the impact of such visualization systems in studying ET literature. This, in itself, can constitute the focus of a future paper and the authors intend to carry out this study and analyze the performance metrics reported from such analysis.7. Conclusion The goal of this study was to design an innovative framework integrating geometry
course and where presentation of out-‐of-‐context facts is avoided. The paper first examines the basis of traditional classes in order to identify and discuss their main shortcomings and to explain the need for modifications. This explanation will be in part grounded in our findings about teaching technological literacy and competency classes. INTRODUCTION Engineering colleges and programs were very successful in producing a technical workforce and a number of effective leaders in technology in the late 19th and 20th Centuries. During that period, the engineering curriculum in higher education has gone through major changes. The historic launch
independent of the curriculum as is the case with English language?2) Is there a preference in core ICT tools ready to be integrated in the course to enhance students experience?3) Is there any difference in ICT literacy according to the majoring our students choose? Answering these questions will provide us an overview on the approach our students have to theICTs. This overview will allow us to prepare a plan for integrating ITCś in the courses, beyondthe standard use of course related tools.Overview of the Collected DataData Collection Methodology The data was collected using an on-line questionnaire during the first term of 2012. It washosted on a free server dedicated to surveys. Students completed the survey during a 30 minutesperiod in
Integration: In defining “mental integration,” Sorokin states that the “integration of twoor more meanings into one system is an act of creation occurring in the human mind.” (7 p. 63)This treats it as a covert act “in the human mind.” Vanderburg’s description of “invention”includes both covert acts, covert states, and overt acts (8 pp. 135-6), although the acts ofexploring and working out details are usually overt actions, including actions such as writing,calculating, sketching, building physical models, and conversing with others.Empirical Objectification: Sorokin’s characterization of empirical objectification emphasizesthe need for "empirical vehicles through which [new knowledge propositions] can be conveyedto others.” (7 p. 64)These can be
implemented is specific, and does not allow for the "serendipititous" approach-making discoveries by accident.- often found in general database searching. Utilizing a generalsearch engines such as Web of Knowledge or Scopus or others often adds to the to the wideknowledge which can be found and integrate within the students' technological literacy.However, the reviewer’s comment will be implemented in the next study along with alternatetechniques of searching various databases to add to the technological literacy of students.There have been cases where eLearning appeared to have resulted in enhanced performance,when in fact the enhanced performance was due to the careful design of the curriculum anddelivery of it that led to it (Reviewer’s comment
where he worked training engineers and technicians in high-speed transmission system for backbone networks.Dr. Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University Oenardi Lawanto is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State Uni- versity, USA. He received his B.S.E.E. from Iowa State University, his M.S.E.E. from the University of Dayton, and his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Before coming to Utah State, Dr. Lawanto taught and held several administrative positions at one large private university in Indonesia. In his years of teaching experiences in the area of electrical engineering, he has gained new perspectives on teaching and learning. He has developed and
. Loendorf, W. R., 2012: “Using Stories to Promote Technological Literacy,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference, San Antonio, Texas, June 10-13, 2012.11. Loendorf, W. R., & Geyer, T. (2008). Bridging the Historical Technological Gap Between the Past and the Present in Engineering Technology Curriculum. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, June 22-25, 2008.12. Loendorf, W. R., & Geyer, T. (2009). Integrating Historical Technologies and their Impact on Society into Today’s Engineering Curriculum, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference, Austin, Texas, June 14-17