Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Neelam Prabhu Gaunkar, Iowa State University; Mani Mina, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

Paper ID #23366Improvements in Undergraduate Electromagnetism Courses by DesigningExperiences of Inquiry and ReflectionMiss Neelam Prabhu Gaunkar, Iowa State UniversityDr. Mani Mina, Iowa State University Mani Mina is with the department of Industrial Design and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Iowa State University. He has been working on better understanding of students’ learning and aspects of tech- nological and engineering philosophy and literacy. In particular how such literacy and competency are reflected in curricular and student activities. His interests also include Design and Engineering, the human side

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Neelam Prabhu Gaunkar, Iowa State University; Mani Mina, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

Paper ID #23608Developing Self-awareness in Learning Practices: Designing and Implement-ing a Survival Tool for Freshmen in EngineeringNeelam Prabhu Gaunkar, Iowa State UniversityDr. Mani Mina, Iowa State University Mani Mina is with the department of Industrial Design and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Iowa State University. He has been working on better understanding of students’ learning and aspects of tech- nological and engineering philosophy and literacy. In particular how such literacy and competency are reflected in curricular and student activities. His interests also include Design and Engineering, the

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alyson Grace Eggleston, The Citadel; Robert J. Rabb P.E., The Citadel

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

represents a cross-disciplinary effort between engineeringand humanities, but it differs from other similar efforts in terms of content and focus [3]. Thiscourse prioritizes familiarity with engineering content and technical style, while also invitingengineering students to reflect upon, evaluate, and defend their organizational, design, andwriting decisions.Implementing a STEM-specific technical writing course also provides students with theopportunity to further engage with their disciplines and the opportunity improve upon any(accurate or inaccurate) negative self-perceptions of general written and verbal ability [2].Goldsmith and Willey note in another study note that if sustainable writing practices were to besuccessfully introduced into

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Soheil Fatehiboroujeni, University of California, Merced

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

illustratedgraphically.theoretical foundation. It is also conceivable to erect a sophisticated philosophical edifice withoutmuch practical relevance. A balanced and rational relationship between philosophy and practiceis that of informing and qualifying 8 . Just as philosophy learns from practice and in turn can refineit, matters of practice gain justification by and provide feedback to theory. This mutualrelationship is what we will reflect upon in the following, vis-a-vis engineering.The subject matter of engineering (what can be called the first-order knowledge of engineering) isthe object of study for philosophy of engineering and philosophy of engineering (what can becalled the second-order knowledge of engineering) is a necessary element in the curriculum ofteacher

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joakim Sigurd Wren, Linköping University, Sweden

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

canfertilize the learning of these subjects as well as engineering in general, the inclusion ofwriting/communication in the curriculum should become easier.Writing as a cognitive processIn order to write about something, we need to understand in depth what we write about - writingis therefore a learning strategy for reaching deeper knowledge and new insights. The writingprocess has been shown to have positive aspects besides that writing itself, for example toimprove student reflection [12, 13], and to improve critical thinking skills [14]. As noted earlier,both integration in regular courses and progression over the entire curriculum is important.Towards this aim, it is beneficial to break down ”writing” to units that can be distinguished

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katie Estridge Schneider, Colorado School of Mines; Amy Charlotte Martin P.E., Colorado School of Mines; Terri S. Hogue, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

, while identifying the cohort of the participant. All survey questions wereapproved by an external program evaluator (per NSF requirements) before they wereadministered using the free Google Forms product. The pre-program surveys were completedprior to WE2NG orientation, weekly surveys were completed at the end of each week, and, toallow time for reflection, post-program surveys were completed within two weeks after theprogram-end. For purposes of consistency, master teachers did not participate in these surveys.Surveys included both qualitative (written, non-numerical) and quantitative (raked, numerical)responses. The results presented in this study only consider numerical responses presented asaverage responses, representing the arithmetic

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

grades obtained in ‘A’ level examinations(as used for entry to University), was higher than students seeking entry to technologysubjects. It is not without significance that Huitching’s first publication was titled “Why sopure? (Item 27). It reflected a deeply held division in English culture. But of greatersignificance to the thesis offered here is the fact that the term “technology” is used in hismajor report (item 29), and this is taken to be synonymous with “engineering”. At the timethere were very few departments with technology in their titles in the universities but verymany departments of engineering of one kind or another. Given that schools were repeatedly asked to address the attention of the shortage ofengineers it might have been