Asee peer logo
Displaying results 301 - 330 of 480 in total
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Heather Walling Doty, University of Delaware; Robin Andreasen, University of Delaware; Dandan Chen, University of Delaware
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
H12 Mentoring H15 H11 Transparency of & Policies ProceduresFigure 2 Hypothesized Model of Academic Job Satisfaction (Model 2). This figure shows proposed expansions toBilimoria, et al.’s model, with their original hypotheses in light blue. New hypotheses (11-15), which involve thetransparency of policies and procedures, are labeled.• H11, H12: Perceptions of transparency will be positively related to career satisfaction ratings (H11) and to
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Naomi C. Chesler, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Dante Fratta, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Elizabeth C Harris, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Wayne P. Pferdehirt, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Heidi-Lynn Ploeg, Queens University at Kingston; Barry D. Van Veen, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Teacher Observations: Challenges and Opportunities Posed by New Teacher Evaluation Systems, Harvard Educational Review. 83(2): 371-384.[9] Weimer, M. (2010), Guidelines for Effective Classroom Observations, URL: http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/faculty-evaluation/guidelines-for-effective-classroom- observations/ [Accessed on March 23, 2017].[10] Chism, N.V.N. (2007). Peer Review of Teaching: A Sourcebook. 2nd Ed. Bolton, Mass.: Anker.[11] Schön, (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How professionals think in action, Temple Smith[12] Zeichner and Liston (2013), Reflective teaching: An introduction, Routledge[13] Wieman, C. and Gilbert, S. (2014), The Teaching Practices Inventory: A New Tool for Characterizing College and
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Strategies Beyond the Classroom to Tackle Gender Issues
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nora Madjar, University of Connecticut; Bryan Douglas Huey, University of Connecticut; Leslie M. Shor, University of Connecticut
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
external rewards, and others,briefly reviewed below.During the 60’s and 70’s, a deviance hypothesis found some support in studies of work values.Career oriented women “stressed intrinsic features of the work including the kind of people in agiven occupation, the high prestige of the occupation, the opportunity to use special abilities, andwhether the work left enough time to spend with family.”7 By comparison, non-career orientedwomen preferred “more feminine values including working with people rather than things, livingup to their parents' ideas of success, a stable secure future, and helping others.”8Other research at the time, however, showed limited support for a ‘deviance hypothesis’. In afour year longitudinal study of 110 college women (a
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division: Strategies Beyond the Classroom
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alka R. Harriger, Purdue University; Gloria Childress Townsend, DePauw University; Dawn Laux, Purdue University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Engineering Concepts to Harness Future Innovators and Technologists) project. Professor Harriger’s current interests include application development, outreach to K-12 to interest more students to pursue computing careers, applying IT skills to innovating fitness tools, and wearable computing.Dr. Gloria Childress Townsend, DePauw University Gloria Townsend, Professor of Computer Science, has taught at DePauw University for thirty-four years. She was the PI for both NSF-BPC project, the Grace Hopper Regional Consortium, and NSF-S-STEM project, Julian Scholars. Gloria is a member of ACM-W’s Women’s Council, where she founded the concept of small celebrations for women in computing and where she now serves as project leader
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Technical Session
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Samuel Alberto Acuna, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Joseph E Michaelis, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Joshua Daniel Roth, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Joseph Towles, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
, Plano Clark, VL, Clark, Leslie-Pelecky, D, Lu, Y, Cerda-Lizarraga, P. Examining theCognitive Processes Used by Adolescent Girls and Women Scientists in Identifying Science RoleModels: A Feminist Approach. Science Education, 92 (2008): 688–707. doi:10.1002/sce.20257.Cheryan, S, Siy, JO,, Vichayapai, M, Drury, BJ, Kim, S. Do Female and Male Role Models WhoEmbody STEM Stereotypes Hinder Women’s Anticipated Success in STEM? SocialPsychological and Personality Science, 2 (2011): 656–664. doi:10.1177/1948550611405218.Dasgupta, N, Stout, JG. Girls and Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.Policy Insights from Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1 (2014): 21–29.doi:10.1177/2372732214549471.Driver R. Children’s Ideas and the Learning of
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Diane L Peters P.E., Kettering University; Maryam Darbeheshti, University of Colorado Denver; Gloria Guohua Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Karinna M Vernaza, Gannon University; Alexa N. Rihana Abdallah, University of Detroit Mercy; Christina Remucal, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Stephanie G Wettstein, Montana State University; MEERC
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Award for Excellence in Service-Learning. Dr. Vernaza does research in engineering education (active learning techniques) and high-strain deformation of materials. She is currently the PI of an NSF S-STEM. She is the ASEE North Central Section past chair until 2021.Dr. Alexa N. Rihana Abdallah, University of Detroit Mercy Alexa Rihana Abdallah is a professor of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Detroit Mercy, rihanaa@udmercy.eduDr. Christina Remucal, University of Wisconsin-Madison Associate Professor Christy Remucal (n´ee Christina Ren´ee Keenan) leads the Aquatic Chemistry group at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. She is a faculty member in the Department of Civil and En- vironmental
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jiahui Song, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Douglas Eric Dow, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Gloria Guohua Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Weihui Li, Biomedical Engineering, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Lili Ma, New York City College of Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
of femaleprofessionals in the STEM fields.Our future direction would be to track the number of students who enroll in STEM fields afterthey finish the series of STEM Program for Female High School Students.References:[1] Sahin, A., Ayar, M. C., and Adiguzel, T., "STEM Related After-School Program Activities and AssociatedOutcomes on Student Learning", Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(1), 309-322, 2014.[2] Ma, G., and Ma, L., "Retaining Female Students in a Robotics Program", Proceedings of the 2017 AmericanSociety for Engineering Education conference and exposition , 2017.[3] https://www.builtbyme.com/statistics -facts-women-in-stem/, April 20, 2019.[4] Zywno, M. S., Gilbride, K. A., and Gudz, N., "Innovative outreach programs
Conference Session
Issues of Diversity
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Julie Mariga, Purdue University; Alka Harriger, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
: Choices for success (pp. 102-105). New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.11 Sanders, J. (1995). Girls and Technology: Villain wanted. In. S.V. Rosser (Ed.). ) Teaching the majority: Breaking the gender barrier in science, mathematics, and engineering. (pp. 147-159).12 Zeldin, A. L., & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37 (1), 215-46.13 Rosser, S. V. (1997). Re-engineering female friendly science. New York: Teachers College Press.14 Brainard, S. G., & Carlin, L. (1997). A longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science. ASEE/IEEE
Conference Session
The Impact of Curriculum on the Retention of Women Students
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
engineering relate to domestic life inthe 18th and early 19th centuries (Kohlstedt35, 1999). In fact, the study of botany was framedfor and by women in the late 18th century, who used their knowledge in gardening, herbalmedicine and food preparation. Women living in rural areas, through organizations such asthe Women’s Institute in Ontario, shared knowledge about science relating to the home –such as farm work, health, food and hygiene issues. This would give birth to schools such asthe MacDonald Institute at the University of Guelph (McPhedran40, 2003).Engineering was a men’s club until the late 1800’s, at which time very few women took upthe discipline. In 1893, only three women had ever received an engineering degree in theUnited States (Lebold
Conference Session
1st Year Retention Programs for Women Students
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joseph Urban, Arizona State University; Mary Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University; Faye Navabi, Arizona State University; Debra Banks, Consultant
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
to enhance the placement examination througha smart online version that provides tailored tutorial material.1References 1. Tushar Chandra, Gitanjali Gunnam, and Joseph E. Urban, “Smart Online Placement Examination,” Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Web Technologies, Applications, and Services (WTAS 2004), July 4-6, 2005, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, pp. 204-208. 2. James S. Collofello, Joseph E. Urban, Mary R. Anderson-Rowland, Faye Navabi, and Doris Roman, “COOL (Computer Outreach Opportunities for Learning) Project,” Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee, June 22-25, 2003. 3
Conference Session
Retention of Women Students
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Diane Yu Gu, University of California, Los Angeles
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
; Stein, E. L. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? New York, N.Y.: John Wiley & Sons; Austin, A. E. (1990). Faculty Cultures, Faculty Values. New Directions for Institutional Research. 17 (o.), 61-74.)9. Harding, S. G. (2004). The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies. New York: Routledge.10. Bogdan, R. C., Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative Research in Education. An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.11. Maxwell, J. A. (1996) Qualitative Research Design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.12. Nettles, M. T., & Millett, C. M
Conference Session
WIED: Pre-College Student Experiences
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jerry Volcy, Spelman College
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Paper ID #8920Effects of Two Experientially-Correct Introduction To Engineering Moduleson Prospective Female Engineering StudentsDr. Jerry Volcy, Spelman College Jerry Volcy is President of JVLabs, LLC, COO or SoftWear Automation and a part-time member of the faculty at Spelman College. JVLabs is an engineering consultancy specializing in the advanced devel- opment of FPGA designs, microprocessor microcode and O/S device drivers. SoftWear Automation is a DARPA funded startup chartered to automate the manufacture of sewn goods through robotic automation. Dr. Volcy is a graduate of the Georgia Institute of Technology and
Conference Session
WIED: Strategies Beyond the Classroom
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kerry Meyers, Youngstown State University; Leo H. McWilliams, University of Notre Dame; Catherine F. Pieronek, University of Notre Dame
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Conference Session
WIED Olio
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Natalie C.T. Van Tyne P.E., Colorado School of Mines; Chester J. Van Tyne, Colorado School of Mines; Kathryne Van Tyne, University of Chicago
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Effective Teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2: 9-34.4. R. Marra, K. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, 2009. Women Engineering Students and Self-Efficacy: A Multi- Year, Multi-Institution Study of Women Engineering Student Self-Efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 98: 27-38.5. A. Bandura, 1977. Self- Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84: 191-215.6. A. Carberry, H-S Lee, and M. Ohland. 2010. Measuring Engineering Design Self-Efficacy. Journal of Page 22.739.8 Engineering Education, 99: 71-79.7. R. Felder, G. Felder, M. Mauney, C. Hamrin, and E
Conference Session
Myths About Gender and Race
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amy E. Slaton, Drexel University
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.3. Bandura, A. "Social Cognitive Theory in cultural context." Applied Psychology: An International Review. 51,2002, pp. 269-290.4. Concannon, James P. and Lloyd H. Barrow. "A Cross-Sectional Study of Engineering Students' Self-Efficacy byGender, Ethnicity, Year and Transfer Status." Journal of Science, Education and Technology 18 (2), 2009, pp. 163-172.5. Ponton, Michael K., Julie Horine Edmister, Lawrence S. Ukeiley, and John M. Seiner."Understanding the role ofself-efficacy in engineering education." Journal of Engineering Education 90 (2), 2001, pp. 247-251.6. Pajares, Frank. "Current directions in self-efficacy research." In M. Maehr and P.R. Pintrich, eds., Advances inmotivation and achievement 10, 2007
Conference Session
WIED Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jorja Kimball, Texas Engineering Experiment Station; Margaret Hobson, Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
of “why” women departengineering.References1. Schneider, C.G. and D. Humphreys, Putting Liberal Education on the Radar Screen. Chronicle of Higher Education, 2005. 52(5): p. B20-B20.2. Nationl Center for Education Statistics, Persistence and Attainment of 2003-04 Beginning Postsecondary Students: After 6 Years, T. Hunt-White, Editor. 2010, U S Department of Education: Washington, DC.3. Brainard, J. and A. Fuller, Graduation Rates Fall at One-third of 4-Year Colleges, in The Chronicle of Higher Education. 2010: Washington, DC.4. Atman, C.J., et al., Enabling engineering student success: The final report for the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education. 2010, San Rafel, CA: Morgan &
Conference Session
Faculty Career Development
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Students’ Financial Support Patterns Affect Their Times toDegree and Completion Probabilities? Journal of Human Resources. 30: 581-610.9 Lovitts, B. 2001. Leaving the Ivory Tower The Causes and Consequences of Departure from Doctoral Study.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. p.131.10 Nettles, M. & C. Millett. 2006. Three Magic Letters Getting to Ph.D. Baltimore, MD: The Johns HopkinsUniversity Press.11 Ehrenberg, R, Zuckerman, H., Groen, J. and S. Brucker. 2010. Educating Scholars Doctoral Education in theHumanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.12 Bandura, A. 1986. Fearful expectations and avoidant actions as coeffects of perceived self-inefficacy. AmericanPsychologist 1389-1391.13 Gibson, D.E. 2004. Role models
Conference Session
WIED: Strategies Beyond the Classroom
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Raquel Perez-Castillejos, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Priya Radhi Santhanam, New Jersey Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Paper ID #10147Student-led Mentoring Program Fostering Retention of Female Undergradu-ate Students in STEM FieldsDr. Raquel Perez-Castillejos, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Raquel Perez-Castillejos is an assistant professor of Biomedical Engineering at the New Jersey Insti- tute of Technology (NJIT). Her research (www.tissuemodels.net) focuses on the development of tools for cell and tissue biology using micro- and nanotechnologies. Raquel obtained her Ph.D. with the National Center of Microelectronics in Barcelona. She was a postdoctoral fellow at the Laboratory of Miniaturized Systems (Univ. S˜ao Paulo, Brasil
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Victoria Beth Sellers, University of Florida; Idalis Villanueva, University of Florida
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2021,” Alexandria, 2021.[2] I. Villanueva, M. Di Stefano, L. Gelles, K. Youmans, and A. Hunt, “Development and assessment of a vignette survey instrument to identify responses due to hidden curriculum among engineering students and faculty,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1–21, 2020.[3] S. Nieto, Affirming diversity : the sociopolitical context of multicultural education. Longman, 1992.[4] I. Villanueva, M. Di Stefano, L. Gelles, P. V. Osoria, and S. Benson, “A race re-imaged, intersectional approach to academic mentoring: Exploring the perspectives and responses of womxn in science and engineering research,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 59, p. 101786, Oct
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division: Panel on Advocacy and Allyship by Men for Women
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Brian Kirkmeyer, Miami University; Michael D. Johnson, Texas A&M University; Lisa Abrams, The Ohio State University; Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University; Lyndsey McMillon-Brown, NASA Glenn Research Center; Sharon A. Jones P.E., University of Washington Bothell; Philip Ritchey, Texas A&M University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
," Social and Personality Psychology Compass, vol. 13, no. 3, Mar 2019, Art no. e12436, doi: 10.1111/spc3.12436.[2] W. Ng, S. M. Ware, and A. Greenberg, "Activating Diversity and Inclusion: A Blueprint for Museum Educators as Allies and Change Makers," Journal of Museum Education, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 142-154, 2017, doi: 10.1080/10598650.2017.1306664.[3] M. A. Craig, V. Badaan, and R. M. Brown, "Acting for whom, against what? Group membership and multiple paths to engagement in social change," Current Opinion in Psychology, vol. 35, pp. 41-48, Oct 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.002.[4] H. R. M. Radke, M. Kutlaca, B. Siem, S. C. Wright, and J. C. Becker, "Beyond Allyship: Motivations
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division: Retaining and Developing Women Faculty in STEM
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Quincy Brown, American Association for the Advancement of Science; Renetta G. Tull, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Lourdes A. Medina, University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez; Michelle Beadle Holder, University of Maryland, College Park; Yarazeth Medina, University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
"biological clock" that imposes genuine constraints when women bear children. As anexample, Assimaki et al.’s 1 study of issues that affect the retention and professionaldevelopment of female faculty in Electrical and Computer Engineering in universities in Greecenoted that there are difficulties related to “the demands of an academic career due to the paralleldemands of the role of the woman as wife and mother.” Similarly, women’s perceptions andprofessional issues in Civil Engineering include concerns with the level of commitment that anacademic career requires in comparison to their family obligations.10 Females also take careerbreaks due to their partner’s relocation or to take care of an elder family member.11 Researchsuggests that some females
Conference Session
Reports from ADVANCE Institutions
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Marisol Mercado Santiago, Purdue University; Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jordana Hoegh, Purdue University; Dina Banerjee, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
AC 2011-1956: INSTITUTIONAL ETHNOGRAPHY AS A METHOD TOUNDERSTAND THE CAREER AND PARENTAL LEAVE EXPERIENCESOF STEM FACULTY MEMBERSMarisol Mercado Santiago, Purdue University Marisol Mercado Santiago is a doctoral student in the School of Engineering Education, Purdue Univer- sity, and a research assistant in the Research in Feminist Engineering (RIFE) group. She has a M. E. in Computer Engineering and a B. S. in Computer Science (with honors). Among her research interests are (1) culturally responsive education, (2) engineering studies, and (3) art and engineering education. Address: School of Engineering Education, Armstrong Hall, 701 W. Stadium Ave., West Lafayette, IN 47907. mercado@purdue.edu.Alice L. Pawley
Conference Session
WIED Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lisa M Frehill, National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Conference Session
Potpouri
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nehal I. Abu-lail, Washington State University; Fatin Aliah Phang, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Ashley Ater Kranov, ABET; Khairiyah Mohd-Yusof, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Robert G. Olsen, Washington State University; Rochelle Letrice Williams, ABET; Azizan Zainal Abidin, Universiti Teknologi Petronas
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
has contributed publications on women in engineering in collaboration with the College of Engineering at Pukyong National University. She is a postgraduate student at Universiti Sains Malaysia where she is pursuing her doctorate. Page 25.1036.7The Case in the USIn the 1950’s women represented less than 5% of the graduating classes in schools of law,medicine and engineering in the US. 8 During the intervening years, despite overt and covertdiscrimination, US women fought in both the courts and public opinion forums to be admittedinto schools of law and medicine (human and veterinary) without funding by the federalgovernment or professional
Conference Session
ADVANCE Grants and Institutional Transformation
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Christine Grant, North Carolina State University; Jessica Decuir-Gunby, North Carolina State University; Barbara Smith, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
new projects, simply because they cannot pronounce your name; it keeps us from getting the recognition we deserve. (Gonzalez & Musielak, 2002)The article goes on to report: Hispanic women also are underrepresented in higher education. Of the 39,400 women employed as S&E faculty and researchers at universities in 1997, only 1,300 were Hispanic – accounting for just 3.3 percent of all female professors and less than 1 percent of the S&E faculty in the nation. (Gonzalez & Musielak, 2002)Dr. Evelyn Hammonds, a pioneer in issues related to minority women on science andengineering and a professor at Harvard University is quoted as saying that she “was surprisedthat even in 2002, these women (faculty
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division: Faculty and Gender Issues
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Canan Bilen-Green, North Dakota State University; Jenna P. Carpenter, Louisiana Tech University; Stacy Doore, University of Maine; Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University; Karen J. Horton P.E., University of Maine; Kristen L. Jellison, Lehigh University; Sharon Melissa Latimer, West Virginia University; Marci J. Levine, Lehigh University; D. Patrick O'Neal, Louisiana Tech University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Marcela Alejandra Silva, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile; Angeles Dominguez, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico and Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
desde la perspectiva del estudiante. (Assessment of online courses from a student's perspective)," Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 23-38, Jan. 2016. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1607-40412016000100002[2] S. Sundararajan and T. Heindel and B. Ganapathysubramanian and S. Subramaniam, “Women in Mechanical Engineering: A Departmental Effort to Improve Recruitment, Retention, and Engagement of Women Students,” 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, San Antonio, Texas. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--22240, 2012, pp. 25.1483.1 - 25.1483.15. https://www.jee.org/22240[3] E. P. Deess and K. Joshi and V. Briller and R. Calluori, Predicting Engineering
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 8
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Alexa Tannebaum, Duke University; Sophia T. Santillan, Duke University; Rebecca Simmons, Duke University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
.[6] Hunt, J.M., Goodner, R.E., & Jay, A. (2019, October), Comparing Male and Female Student Responses on MIT Maker Survey: Understanding the Implications and Strategies for More Inclusive Spaces Paper presented at 2019 International Symposium on Academic Makerspace, New Haven, Connecticut.[7] Kilgore, D., & Sheppard, S., & Atman, C. J., & Chachra, D. (2011, June), Motivation Makes a Difference, but is there a Difference in Motivation? What Inspires Women and Men to Study Engineering? Paper presented at 2011 ASEE Annual Conference Exposition, Vancouver, BC. 10.18260/1-2–18816[8] Lewis, J. (2015). Barriers to Women’s Involvement in Hackspaces and Makerspaces. The Uni- versity of Sheffield.[9] Robinson, J., &
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Beth McGinnis-Cavanaugh, Springfield Technical Community College; Isabel Huff, Springfield Technical Community College
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
onnational rates of educational achievement and retention in STEM, especially for populationsunderrepresented in STEM. The National Science Board (NSB) reports that “About 18% ofrecent (2009–13) U.S. citizen and permanent resident S&E [Science and Engineering] doctorateholders reported earning some college credit from a community or 2-year college,” and thatincludes 32% of American Indian or Alaska Natives, 21.8% of Hispanics or Latinos, 18.1% ofBlacks or African Americans, and 21.5% of mixed race people. [16] Looking at those whoreceived science and engineering bachelor’s degrees between 2007 and 2011, the NSB reportedthat about 18% had associates degrees--which does not account for the students who transferredtheir community college credits
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Leanne Kallemeyn, Loyola University Chicago; Gail Baura, Loyola University Chicago; Francisca Fils-Aime, Loyola University Chicago; Jana Grabarek; Pete Livas Jr, Loyola University Chicago
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Outcomes Related to Lifelong Learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2012. 28(3): p. 606-620.17. Borrego, M., J.E. Froyd, and T.S. Hall, Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 2010. 99(3): p. 185-207.18. Kirkpatrick, A., S. Danielson, and R.O. Warrington, Reduction to Practice. Mechanical Engineering, 2012. 134(11): p. 38-39.19. National Academies. Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation. 2011; National Academies: Washington, D.C., 270 p. Available from: http://www.nap.edu/read/12984/chapter/1.20. Seymour, E. and N.M. Hewitt, Talking about leaving : why undergraduates