Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Shelly Gulati, University of the Pacific

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, J.P. Liu, K.J. Cappaert, and C. Figuereido, “Stemming the tide: Predicting women engineers' intentions to leave,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 281–294, 2013.[3] K.R. Buse, D. Bilimoria, and S. Perelli, “Why they stay: women persisting in US engineering careers,” Career Development International, vol. 18, no. 2, pp.139–154. 2013.[4] K.R. Buse and D. Bilimoria, “Personal vision: enhancing work engagement and the retention of women in the engineering profession,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 5, Dec 2014. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01400.[5] T. Mohr, Playing Big. New York, NY: Penguin Random House LLC, 2014.[6] S. Sandberg, Lean in: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf, 2013.[7] T

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Beverly Louie, University of Colorado Boulder, College of Engineering & Applied Science; JoAnn Silverstein, University of Colorado, Boulder; Robyn Sandekian, University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

?” American Economic Review, vol. 108.9, pp 2420-41,2018.[21] S. Kamerman and P. Moss, eds., The politics of parental leave policies: Children,parenting, gender and the labour market. Policy Press, 2009.[22] V. Valian, “What works and what doesn’t: How to increase the representation of women inacademia and business,” GenderChange in Academia, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp.317-328, 2010.[23] A. Wright, L. Schwindt, T. Bassford, V. Reyna, C. Shisslak, P. Germain and K. Reed,“Gender differences in academic advancement: patterns, causes, and potential solutions in oneUS College of Medicine,” Academic Medicine, vol. 78.5, pp. 500-508, 2003.[24] C. Demetry and E. Lingo, “Transforming the Associate-to-Full Promotion System:Wrestling with Strategic

Conference Session

Potpourri Session

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danny Bee, University of Wisconsin-Stout; Brenda Puck, University of Wisconsin, Stout; Peter Heimdahl, University of Wisconsin-Stout

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

College. He is currently a Ph.D. student in mechanical engineering at Michigan Technological University, developing research in the area of environmentally responsible design and manufacturing.Brenda Puck, University of Wisconsin, Stout BRENDA S. PUCK is a lecturer in the Technology Department at the University of Wisconsin-Stout. She teaches a variety of courses in support of the Technology Education and Engineering Technology programs. She received her M.S. in Technology Education from the University of Wisconsin-Stout. She has been on the “STEPS for Girls” faculty since the programs inception and will become the “STEPS for Girls” Camp Executive Director in the future.Peter Heimdahl, University

Conference Session

At The Institutional Level

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Judy Loveless-Morris, University of Washington; Priti Mody-Pan; Robert Embrey, Highline Community College; Kali Kuwada, Seattle Central Community College; Marisela Mendoza, Columbia Basin College; Robert Olsen, Washington State University; Eve Riskin, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

exception of one institution, a representative from each of the six institutionswas interviewed.The structured interviews were mostly centered around Kanter’s (1994) “CollaborativeAdvantage,” which will be further discussed in the literature review 8. Sample questions include: • Which of the following description(s) best describes the relationships among the partners. After choosing the best description(s), please provide an example that demonstrates the relationship you chose. For example, if one chose option B, and example for why one chose this option might be: Institution A has the ability to reach more minority students, while Institution B has the ability to connect students with real- world internships

Conference Session

Money and People; Resource Management for Recruitment and Retention

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

engineering and computer science students who made up close to 60% of the totalenrollment in the program. Through the programming, the CIRC students were exposed totopics not normally found in the classroom such as portfolios, writing a good resume, and talksby practicing engineers on what it is “really like in industry”. The program has been determinedto be very successful and is being continued with an NSF S-STEM grant.II. Program HistoryThis first group was composed of 12 transfer students, 9 women, 5 minority students, and 2freshman minority students who were unable to attend Arizona State University withoutscholarship assistance. All of the students had at least a 3.0 GPA and all were in need offinancial assistance as determined by their FAFSA

Conference Session

Trends in Engineering Education

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lynette Osborne, The George Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

sample size offemales in the present study, and thus the general lack of statistical power in major analysis,these differences were not deemed detrimental to the study.Table 2. Percentages of females and males in each major, by those enrolled in the Universityprogram and by those participating in the study. FEMALE MALE Major Enrolled Participant Enrolled Participant Total (By Major) s s N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) Enrolled Participant sAerospace/ 16 (8%) 2 (13%) 98 (11

Conference Session

Focus on Faculty

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charlie Law, Pennsylvania State University, Schuykill; David Younger, Rice University; Ann Saterbak, Rice University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

winners.Other Teaching AwardsThe Nicholas Salgo Distinguished Teaching Award and the Phi Beta Kappa Teaching Prize aretwo other teaching awards at Rice University. Each year, the Beta of Texas chapter of Phi BetaKappa at Rice University recognizes a non-tenured Assistant Professor for outstanding teachingperformance. An ad hoc committee of the general membership of Phi Beta Kappa reviewsstudent evaluations for non-tenured Assistant Professors and typically selects one (oroccasionally two) winner(s) each year. Each year, the Nicolas Salgo Award is awarded forexcellence in teaching to a faculty member at any rank. Voting for this award, which is normallygiven to one faculty member, is by the current junior and senior classes. Ballots are distributedand

Conference Session

K-12 Programs for Recruiting Women

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karen White, Purdue University; Mara Wasburn, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

adult is naive and uninformed, if he's never learned to be a mapmaker. (p.10)The intent of the CareerQuesting model is that boys and girls will be taught to be “mapmakers”as part of the regular curriculum. A quest usually refers to a long journey of discovery andlearning, with a person seeking an important goal or treasure at the end. Students need a map forthis inevitable “career” quest each must embark upon. They need to know how to make such amap, and how to use the map. The goal of evaluating websites is to provide teachers with betteraccess to some of the best tools and resources to help create a generation of mapmakers that willbe comprised of both boys and girls.References1. Jackson, S. A. (2004). The quite crisis: Falling short

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chloe Wiggins, Designing Education Lab; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, SKG Analysis; Benedikt von Unold, Stanford University; Tua A. Björklund, Aalto University Design Factory; Michael Arruza Cruz

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, practices, and cultures that reflect expandedperspectives on gender, diversity, and intersectional identities. In order to better understand the role(s) of such a course in an engineering student'seducation and how engineering education considers these issues, the instructor team invited twoundergraduate researchers to undertake projects in support of these goals. One of these students(Amber Levine) was tasked with identifying other courses across the U.S. with similar subjectmatter and learning objectives (“EEL Related Courses Study”); she found 13 courses acrosstwelve institutions that connected issues of diversity and culture to engineering and were targetedto engineering students (Levine, 2016). The other student (Chloe Wiggins, who is

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Quiles-Ramos, Virginia Tech; Ellen K. Foster, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Donna M Riley, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & society, 4(2), 139-158.Acker, J. (1992). Gendering organizational theory. Classics of organizational theory, 6, 450-459.Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & society, 20(4), 441-464.Adams, R., Evangelou, D., English, L., De Figueiredo, A. D., Mousoulides, N., Pawley, A. L., ... & Wilson, D. M. (2011). Multiple perspectives on engaging future engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 48-88.Alinsky, S. D. (1989). Rules for radicals: A practical primer for realistic radicals. Vintage.Baillie, C., Ko, E., Newstetter, W., & Radcliffe, D. F. (2011). Advancing diverse and inclusive

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Horstman, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Danielle Jamie Mai, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Yanfen Li, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign; Rohit Bhargava, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

4institutions. To assess whether the program content matched the interests of the participants,participants were asked to indicate the type of institution(s) to which they plan to apply.Institutions were categorized into four groups: research intensive, research and teachingintensive, teaching intensive, and community college. Participants were also asked to indicate ifthey were interested in tenure or non-tenure track positions. As shown in Figure 2, participants’interests shifted throughout the program. Although no conclusive tends were observed with theparticipants’ change in the type of institution to which they were interested in applying, this datadoes reflect the sentiment of indecision that was observed in the post program interviews

Conference Session

Research on Diversification & Inclusion

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University; Michael Haungs, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

the Ninth Annual International ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, ACM, New York, NY, USA, ICER ’13, ISBN 978-1-4503-2243-0, pp. 19–26.21. Riley, D. (2013). ASEE Distinguished Lecture: Rigor/Us: Merit Standards and Diversity in Engineering Education Research and Practice, Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Atlanta, GA.22. Walsh, D. and Breitenbach, S. (2007). A BA Engineering and Liberal Studies Degree at a Polytechnic Institute. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education.23. Traver, C., Klein, J.D., Mikic, B., Akera, A., Shooter, S., Epstein, A. and Gillette, D. (2011). Fostering Innovation through the Integration of Engineering

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Pre-college Programs for Women

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shawna Fletcher, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division, Women in Engineering

Identity Formation, Research in Science Education, vol. 43, issue 5, p.1979-2007 (October, 2013).17. Schultz, L.A., Barriers for Wilmot High School Female Students not Enrolling in the Mechanical Design Technology Program at Gateway Technical College, Thesis, University of Wisconsin, http://www2.uwstout.edu/content/lib/thesis/2011/2011schultzl.pdf (2011).18. Tully, D., Jacobs, B., Effects of Single-Gender Mathematics Classrooms on Self-Perception of Mathematical Ability and Post-Secondary Engineering Paths: An Australian Case Study, European Journal of Engineering Education, 35:4, 455-467 (2010).19. Wee, S.; Cordova-Wentling, R.M.; Korte, R.F.; Larson, S.M.; Loui, M.C., Why Many Smart Women Leave Engineering: A

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Strategies Beyond the Classroom to Tackle Gender Issues

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jason Bazylak, University of Toronto; Ruth A Childs, University of Toronto; Aimy Bazylak, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, 139(1), 49-68.[9] J. Mills et al., “Introduction: Why we need Gender Inclusive Engineering Education,” in Gender InclusiveEngineering Education, New York, Routledge, 2010.[10] J. Archer and S. Freedman, “Gender-Stereotypic perceptions of academic disciplines,” Br. J. educ. Psychol, 59,306-313, 1989.[11] J. Calnan and L. Valiquette for Engineers Canada. (2010, March, 31). Paying heed to the canaries in the coalmine: Strategies to attract and retain more women in the engineering profession through green light leadership[Online]. https://www.engineerscanada.ca/sites/default/files/w_Canaries_in_the_Coal_Mine.pdf[12] I.H. Settles et al, “Derogation, Discrimination, and (Dis)Satisfaction With Jobs in Science: A GenderedAnalysis,” Psychology of

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Development Opportunities for Diverse Engineering Students

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Allie Copeland, Texas A&M University; Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering

. Couper, Mick P., et al. "Noncoverage and nonresponse in an Internet survey." Social Science Research 36.1 (2007): 131-148.10. Shih, T. and X. Fan. 2008. “Comparing Response Rates From Web and Mail Surveys: A Meta Analysis.” Field Methods 20:249-71.11. Adachi, Tomoko. "OCCUPATIONAL GENDER STEREOTYPES: IS THE RATIO OF WOMEN TO MEN A POWERFUL DETERMINANT? 1, 2, 3."Psychological reports 112.2 (2013): 640-650.12. Gottfredson, Linda S. "Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription and compromise." Career choice and development 3 (1996): 179-232.13. Gottfredson, Linda S. "Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations." Journal of Counseling psychology 28.6 (1981): 545.14. Benson, Greg. "Why Do So Few

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 10

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Huma Shoaib, Purdue University ; Monica E Cardella, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v12.i2-3.10.[5] Cech, Erin A. 2013. “The Self-Expressive Edge of Occupational Sex Segregation 1.”American Journal of Sociology 119 (3): 747–789. https://doi.org/10.1086/673969.[6] Ceci, Stephen J., and Wendy M. Williams. 2011. “Understanding Current Causes ofWomen’s Underrepresentation in Science.” Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences of the United States of America 108 (8): 3157–62.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014871108.[7] Coyle, Emily F., and Lynn S. Liben. 2018. “Gendered Packaging of a STEM ToyInfluences Children’s Play, Mechanical Learning, and Mothers’ Play Guidance.” ChildDevelopment. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13139.[8] “ENGINEERING AT HOME.” 15. Purdue University Press.https://www.jstor.org

Conference Session

Perceptions of Women's Success in STEM

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maria Brunette, University of Massachusetts-Lowell; paula rayman, University of Massachusetts-Lowell; meg bond, University of Massachusetts-Lowell; Lu Yuan, University of Massachusetts-Lowell

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

First questionnaire (Q1) Delphi Panel of Experts Q1 sent out by 7/05/06 (between 16-20) Open ended questions about each Responses received by 7/15/06 Selected U.S. scholars from identified research themes 70's and 90's generation evaluate data Project Second questionnaire (Q2) Directors Q2 sent out by 8/07/06 Structured questions based on Responses received by 8/17

Conference Session

ADVANCE Grants and Institutional Transformation

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristen Constant, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

accessed Jan. 1, 2010 http://www.advance.iastate.edu/resources/fac_search.shtml.15. Iowa State University’s ADVANCE Website Resources for Work Life Balance http://www.advance.iastate.edu/worklife/worklife.shtml16. Iowa State University’s ADVANCE Website Resources for Pathways to Promotion http://www.advance.iastate.edu/17. Bird, Sharon R. in press. (March 2011, volume 18, issue 2). “Unsettling the University’s ‘Incongruous, Gendered Bureaucratic Structures’: A Case Study Approach.” Gender, Work and Organization. Page 15.817.1018. Iowa State University’s ADVANCE Website, National Conference Presentations by S. Carlson and

Conference Session

WIED Olio

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peggy Layne, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Molly R. Hall, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

different kinds of evidence are convincing todifferent people. Engineers like tables and graphs, but scholars in other disciplines respond tomore qualitative data. Finally, institutional transformation requires changes to policies, practices,norms, and culture – and faculty norms and culture are very difficult to change.References1. Long, J.S., From Scarcity to Visibility: Gender Differences in the Careers of Doctoral Scientists and Engineers. 2001, Washington DC: National Academies Press.2. Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. 2006, National Research Council: Washington.3. Burrelli, J., Thirty-three Years of Women in S&E Faculty Positions, Directorate for

Conference Session

Climate Issues for Women Students

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yong Zeng, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign; John R. Duncan, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

category, four emergent themes were identified. Besides familyinfluence, the other three are Faculty/TA support, teaching quality, and department environment.Faculty/T.A. SupportThe vast majority of the participants cited their positive experience with both faculty membersand T.A.’s. One industrial engineering persister had regularly attended the professor’s officehours in the reliability engineering class, and found that he would “stay extra just to help” her. Page 12.1614.14And consequently, she “did well on the homework,” understood it conceptually, and “did well onthe test as well.” There are, however, several students who didn’t feel they

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retention Programs for Diverse Students

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer L. Groh, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division: Student Issues as Related to Culture

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Beth A. Powell, Tennessee Technological University; Joanna Wolfe, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

National Science Foundation under GrantNo. 1262274. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.” Page 26.1434.17 References:1. Fouad, N. A., and Singh, R. (2011). Stemming the tide: Why women leave engineering. Retrieved from Center for the Study of the Workplace website: http://www.studyofwork.com/2011/10/stemming-the-tide- women-engineers-report/.2. Riley, D. (2008). Engineering and Social Justice. Morgan & Claypool.3. Geek. (12

Conference Session

MentorNet

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Jo Wellenstein, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Sandra Courter, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Susannah Sandrin, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh; Karen Showers, Wisconsin Technical College System; Leslie Wilkins, Maui Economic Development Board; Jennifer Chou-Green, MentorNet; Carol Muller, MentorNet; Laurie Mayberry, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Ann Bloor, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Isla Yap, Maui Economic Development Board

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Conference Session

Recruitment & Retention of Women I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lois Calian Trautvetter, Northwestern University; Rose M. Marra, University of Missouri, Columbia; Lisa R. Lattuca, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Katie L. Piacentini, University of Missouri - Columbia; David B. Knight, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

University and is a graduate research assistant on two NSF-funded engineering education projects. His research interests include STEM education, interdisciplinary teaching and research, organizational issues in higher education, and leadership and administration in higher education. Email: dbk144@psu.edu Page 22.1185.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Pr ogr ams and Pr actices Making a Differ ence: A Cr oss-Case Analysis Identifying Pr ogr ams and Factor s that Influence Recr uitment and Retention of Women Engineer ing StudentsAbstr act

Conference Session

Panel: Opportunities & Methods to Encourage More Women Toward Research Commercialization

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adrienne Minerick, Michigan Technological University; Babs Carryer, National Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance (NCIIA); Mary Raber, Michigan Technological University; Abby Thompson, Mississippi State University ; Louise C. Dunlap, DunlapBrowder

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation, Women in Engineering

, Maryland. Publications, Louise Dunlap”An analysis of the Legislative History of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1975,”Twenty-First Annual Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Institute, Matthew Bender, 1976”Environmental Perspectives on the Effectiveness of SMCRA” (with James S. Lyon), West Virginia LawReview, Spring, 1986”From Kitchen Tables They Changed the Law,” USA Today guest column, August 3, 1987”Environmental Protection, Competition, and Changes in World Energy Markets” (with Joe Browder),Papers, Volume II, American Mining Congress, April 1988 Page 23.955.3 c American Society for Engineering Education

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Erica Haugtvedt, South Dakota School of Mines & Technology; Duane Lewis Abata, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. Jacquard’s Web: How a Hand-Loom Led to the Birth of the Information Age.Oxford University Press, 2007.[22] Wikipedia, "Jacquard Machine," https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacquard_machine, (accessed 12June 20, 2020).[23] E. Hobsbawm, The Age of Revolution 1789-1848, Random House, 2008.[24] W. Newton, The London Journal of Arts and Sciences; A Record of the Progress andInvention as Applied to the Arts, Vol 23, Sec 24, p. 334, June1866 (accessed July 2020).[25] A. Lovelace, “Notes on Translation.” Bibliothèque Universelle de Genève, October, 1842,No. 82. https://www.fourmilab.ch/babbage/sketch.html (accessed 5 September2019).[26] S. Target, Sinclair. “What Did Ada Lovelace’s Program Do?” Two Bit History.https

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christina L. Carmen, University of Alabama, Huntsville; Deborah Lynn Fraley, Women in Defense, TN Valley Chapter

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

4.67 1.79 product?7. Did you enjoy working with the 0 0 2 0 4 4.33 1.79 customer(s)?remaining responded “fairly well.” It is interesting to note that the CDC team was observed bythe instructor to have significant communication issues during the first semester. However,during the second semester, the team performed with much greater cohesion. When the studentswere asked if working on the wind tunnel project had given them more confidence prior toentering the workforce, 2 students replied “yes/very much” and 4 replied “fairly well.” All CDCteam members were proud of the final product with 4 responding “yes/very much” and 2responding “fairly well.” Finally, 4

Conference Session

Women & New Faculty Development

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie Jessop, University of Iowa

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

ticking, and you’re getting antsy. You’ve delayed starting a family because youwanted to get settled into your academic position; however, that doesn’t seem such a good ideanow that you’re approaching your mid-30’s. What factors should you consider in making thedecision to start your family? Once you’ve decided to take the plunge into family life, what arestrategies you can use to strike a balance between your family and career? Here, personalexperiences of several female engineering faculty members from the University of Iowa will beshared, along with tips from other resources. Topics include: (1) Negotiating with your supervisor [how will baby’s arrival affect your contributions to the department/college?]; (2

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Technical Session 4: Environmental Issues and the Impacts of Intersectionality

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford University; Angela Harris, North Carolina State University; Christina Martin-Ebosele, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering, Women in Engineering

” education to haveinsufficient curricular coverage at the undergraduate and graduate levels. Research is less clearas to if and how considerations of gender and race are integrated into environmental engineeringlearning frameworks (e.g., it is possible that these considerations are included within the “socialjustice” or “engineering and poverty” topics in Bielefeldt et al.’s [13] survey, but not known ornamed precisely). Many faculty members and cross-sector partners have strong interest increating learning settings that highlight the human health, cultural, social, and justice relateddimensions of environmental studies [5], [8], [14]. Yet course experiences that aim to expandunderstanding of how different gender and racial groups enter

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kaitlin I. Tyler, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Nicole Johnson-Glauch, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Jessica A. Krogstad, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

achievement and higher-education representation of under-represented groups in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields: a review of current K-12 intervention programs. J Women Minor Sci Eng. 2012;18(1).3. Glass JL, Sassler S, Levitte Y, Michelmore KM. What’s so special about STEM? A comparison of women’s retention in STEM and professional occupations. Soc forces. 2013;92(2):723-756.4. Sadler PM, Sonnert G, Hazari Z, Tai R. Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Sci Educ. 2012;96(3):411-427.5. Hill C, Corbett C, St Rose A. Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.; 2010. doi:10.1002/sce.21007.6. Ceci SJ, Williams WM