department climate on the promotion and tenure process?Sample: In this study, institutions were chosen before the participants were selected. Theinstitutions were selected from the listing of “R1: Doctoral Universities-Highest ResearchActivity” public institutions on the Carnegie Classification Institutions of Higher Educationwebsite and limited to academic institutions in the United States from different geographicalareas containing all four STEM departments- Science, Technology, Engineering andMathematics. For purposes of this study, a science department was classified as “naturalsciences” and technology departments included “computer science or engineering technology.”The college where the STEM discipline was located was irrelevant to this study
Mathematics from The Georgia Institute of Technology. She has been admitted to the PhD program in Higher and Postsecondary Education at New York University and will start in September of 2015 with her research focusing on living-learning programs.Dr. Helen M. Buettner, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Dr. Helen M. Buettner is a professor of Chemical & Biochemical Engineering and of Biomedical Engi- neering at Rutgers University. She holds a B.S. from the University of Minnesota and a Ph.D. from the University of Pennsylvania, both in chemical engineering. In addition to serving as the faculty advisor for DELLC she is the undergraduate program director in Chemical and Biochemical Engineering. She is
Paper ID #6781Broadening Participation: A Report on a Series of Workshops Aimed atBuilding Community and Increasing the Number of Women and Minoritiesin Engineering DesignDr. Katherine Fu, MIT Kate Fu is Postdoctoral Fellow at MIT and Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD). In May 2012, she completed her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. She received her M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon in 2009, and her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Brown University in 2007. Her work has focused on studying the engineering design team process through cognitive studies
Morgan & Claypool Publisher, La Porte, Colo. Page 25.1481.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Women Becoming WiSE: Gender, Professional Development and Programming for SuccessAbstractWhile women have made great strides in science, technology, engineering and mathematics(STEM) disciplines, considerable gender based inequalities persist. The Women in Science andEngineering Future Professionals Program (WiSE-FPP) at Syracuse University (SU) is aprogram for women STEM doctoral students developed by Women
gains from the last 5-10 years may becompletely undone during this pandemic season. References[1] National Center for Education Statistics, “Digest 2017”,https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d17/. (assessed October 12, 2019).[2] C. Poor and S. Brown, “Increasing retention in women in engineering at WSU: A model for awomen’s mentoring program”, College Student Journal, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 421-428, September2013.[3] Catalyst, “Research Women in STEM”. https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-in-science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem/, (assessed October 12, 2019).[4] F.M. Haemmerlie and R. Montgomery, “Gender differences in the academic performance andretention of undergraduate engineering
factors that may influence the well-being of gifted and perfectionistic populations.Erin Kube, Arizona State University Erin Kube is a first-year School Psychology doctoral student at Arizona State University. She is currently working as a graduate research assistant for CareerWISE, an NSF-funded project that evaluates persistence of women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics doctoral programs. She has a BA in Clinical Counseling Psychology from Washington College. Her research interests include women’s academic persistence, success, and self-perceived ability.Brandon Yabko, Arizona State University Brandon A. Yabko is pursuing his doctorate in Counseling Psychology at Arizona
other words, we are attempting to encourage faculty toconsciously evaluate the assumptions they make and the practices they engage in whenevaluating faculty candidates.Iowa State University of Science and Technology is a land grant institution with a 150-yearhistory of strength in science and engineering. The university, with about 27,000 students and1,700 faculty, has 8 colleges, the second largest of which is the college of engineering with afaculty of 190 and a student population of 5,600. National faculty data show that the fraction ofwomen in engineering faculty positions has increased in the last 6 years from 9 to over 11%,though that remains dominated by assistant professors (almost 20% of all faculty), and associateprofessors (13
-Champaign with affiliations in several departments (Primary – Bioengineering: Affiliated - Electrical and Computer Engineering, Mechanical Science and Engineering, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and Chem- istry) as well as the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology. Rohit received dual B.Tech. degrees (in Chemical Engineering and Polymer Science and Engineering) from the Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi in 1996 and his doctoral thesis work at Case Western Reserve University (De- partment of Macromolecular Science and Engineering) was in the area of polymer spectroscopy. He then worked as a Research Fellow at the National Institutes of Health (2000-2005) in the area of biomedical
increase the number and success of women faculty in science and engineering. She is currently Assistant Provost reporting to the Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs, where her responsibilities include faculty recruitment, development, and reporting. Prior to accepting her current position, Ms. Layne worked as a diversity consultant for the American Association of Engineering Societies and as director of the program on diversity in the engineering workforce at the National Academy of Engineering. She also spent a year as an AAAS Science and Technology Policy Fellow in the office of Senator Bob Graham. Ms. Layne has degrees in environmental and water resources engineering and science and technology studies. She spent 17
women's abilities) aswell as institutional policies and practices. Studies have shown that a chilly climate can have anegative impact on cognitive development and can also influence women’s desire to stay andpersist within a science, technology, engineering, or math (STEM) field. At The Ohio StateUniversity College of Engineering (COE), women are currently 20% of the overallundergraduate student population within the College.Improving women’s retention in engineering fields requires a multifaceted approach. Both directsupport for women, along with the development of allies, are crucial to promoting a long-lasting,positive climate for women studying in this field. Allies for Women Engineers (AWE) at TheOhio State University is a pilot cohort of 11
TransitionAbstractPeer mentoring has been shown to be an effective means of improving the retention of women inengineering, but few studies have explored the impact of participation on the development of theleadership abilities of undergraduate women. Transitioning to a leadership mentality as a peermentor has the potential to foster self-efficacy in science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) and socially stable academic relationships that may be replicated in post-graduate study and/or the workplace. This one-year study explored the experiences of junior andsenior female students in STEM majors (N=11) serving as mentors to first-year students in theWomen in Science and Engineering Honors Program (WISE) at Stony Brook University, a largeresearch
AC 2010-1512: NDSU ADVANCE FORWARD: ENHANCING RECRUITMENT,RETENTION, AND ADVANCEMENT OF WOMEN FACULTY IN ENGINEERINGAT NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITYCanan Bilen-Green, North Dakota State University Canan Bilen-Green is an Associate Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at North Dakota State University. Bilen-Green holds Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in Statistics from the University of Wyoming and a M.S. degree in Industrial Engineering from Bilkent University, Turkey.Elizabeth Birmingham, North Dakota State University Elizabeth Birmingham is an Associate Professor of English at North Dakota State University. Birmingham has a Ph.D. degree in Rhetoric and Professional Communication and
AC 2011-851: IMPACT OF AN NSF ADVANCE INSTITUTIONAL TRANS-FORMATION GRANT AT A STEM-DOMINANT UNIVERSITYPeggy Layne, Virginia Tech Peggy Layne, P.E., joined Virginia Tech in 2003 as director of the AdvanceVT program, a National Science Foundation sponsored program to increase the number and success of women faculty in science and engineering. Prior to accepting her current position, Ms. Layne worked as a diversity consultant for the American Association of Engineering Societies and as director of the program on diversity in the engineering workforce at the National Academy of Engineering. She also spent a year as an AAAS Science and Technology Policy Fellow in the office of Senator Bob Graham, where she was
Construction En- gineering Technology (CET) and master’s of construction engineering management (MCEM) in the De- partment of Civil Engineering at Montana State University. She received her B.S. in construction and a master’s in science in construction management from Arizona State University. Her professional con- struction career spans from 1988 to 2000, working for two commercial general contractors and owning her own design-build firm in Phoenix, Ariz. She joined the faculty at Montana State University in Jan. 2000 as an Adjunct Instructor in CET/MCEM and has risen through the ranks to a tenured professional practice track faculty member. Knoll has won three Teaching in Excellence awards during her tenure at MSU and
expansion phase, have the greatest opportunity tochange climate and shape culture in the shortest amount of time. It is these institutions wherecreative solutions can be implemented, often out of necessity, and a large degree of influenceobserved.Equally as important in S&E is the value placed on technology in the community surrounding agiven university, which can prevent feelings of isolation and marginalization by faculty typically Page 13.713.10underrepresented in academe. Boise State University is located at the center of one of thenation’s notable high technology areas. Engineers and scientists form a large percentage of theworkforce, and
Paper ID #25894Understanding the Intersection of First-Generation Degree Seeking Women,Engineering, and Public UniversitiesDr. Jessica Ohanian Perez, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Jessica Ohanian Perez is an assistant professor in Electromechanical Engineering Technology at Califor- nia State Polytechnic University, Pomona with a focus on STEM pedagogy. Jessica earned her doctorate in education, teaching, learning and culture from Claremont Graduate University. Her research focuses on broadening participation of marginalized group in engineering and investigating alternate paths to the field
, academic and social integrationincreases [23], [27].Research ContextThe study participants (N = 51) were WISE undergraduate first year students declaring science (n= 32) or engineering (n = 19) majors at Stony Brook University in the 2016-2017 academic year(Figure 1). Stony Brook is a large research intensive university enrolling 17,000 undergraduates,with slightly more than half of all students enrolled in STEM-related disciplines. Student genderdistribution is 54% male and 46% female. The ethnicities of undergraduate students in 2017were reported as 36% White, 23% Asian, 11% Hispanic/Latino, 14% Non-Resident Alien, 7%Black or African American, and 9% Other.The WISE Honors Program offers educational and professional science, technology
Paper ID #11658Graduate Women ”Lean In”: Building Community and Broadening Under-standingJulie RojewskiDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Initiatives at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she earned Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engineering from the University of Michigan. She has published more than two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her interests in educational technology and enhancing undergraduate
physicalwellbeing.2 Further, it has been identified as an important 21st century skill and one of theprimary attributes that employers desire in new hires, including the science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields.3 In STEM careers and graduate programs, teamresearch and interdisciplinary groups are increasingly common. Such groups requirecollaboration facilitated by strong interpersonal communication skills. In engineeringspecifically, teamwork and communication are two of the five principal skills necessary forsuccess.4 Aside from the employment sector, communication skills are critical to the success ofgraduate students in STEM fields. Such skills are particularly salient in the advisor-adviseerelationship. In one study, a lack
Paper ID #17160Gaining Insights into the Effects of Culturally Responsive Curriculum onHistorically Underrepresented Students’ Desire for Computer ScienceMs. Omoju Miller, UC Berkeley Omoju Miller is the lead researcher on the ”Hiphopathy” project at UC Berkeley. She has an undergrad- uate degree in Computer Science (2001) and a Master’s degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering (2004) from the University of Memphis. She has over a decade of experience in the technology indus- try. She is currently a doctoral candidate at UC Berkeley in Computer Science Education. Omoju also served in a volunteer capacity as an advisor to
. Archer, J. DeWitt, J. Osborne, J. Dillon, B. Willis, B. Wong.”“Balancing acts'': Elementary school girls' negotiations of femininity, achievement, and science”, Science Education, 96(6):967-89, Nov 2012.[2] C. Hill, C. Corbett, A. St Rose. “Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics”, American Association of University Women, 1111 Sixteenth Street NW, Washington, DC 20036, 2010.[3] E. Smith. “Women into science and engineering? Gendered participation in higher education”, STEM subjects. British Educational Research Journal, 37(6):993-1014, Dec 2011.[4] Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2017. Available: www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd.[5] A. Johnson, J. Brown
Paper ID #30451Assessment of the Effects of Participation in a Summer Bridge Experiencefor WomenDr. Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University Dr. Laura Bottomley, Teaching Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Elementary Education, is also the Director of Women in Engineering and The Engineering Place at NC State University. She has been working in the field of engineering education for over 20 years. She is dedicated to conveying the joint messages that engineering is a set of fields that can use all types of minds and every person needs to be literate in engineering and technology. She is an ASEE and
Information Systems, Technologies, and Applications (EISTA), Orlando, FL, July 9-12, 2013.3. C.Bradford, Z.Balgeman, M.King, S.Khorbotly, M.M.Budnik, "A Multidisciplinary Course for Developing, Nurturing, and Strengthening Student Creativity," Education and Information Systems, Technologies, and Applications (EISTA), Orlando, FL, July 15-18, 2014.4. C.Bradford, Z.Balgeman, F.Aguilar, S.Khorbotly, M.M.Budnik, “A Problem-Solving Approach to Teaching Creativity for Engineering and Other Disciplines", Journal on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, vol. 12, no. 4, 2014, pp. 13-17.5. S.Khorbortly, M.M.Budnik, "Creative Engineering for 2020," Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, vol. 12, no
science,technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields, then we turn to the notion of culturalmodels, which will be a frame through which to examine the beliefs students have about theadmission process at UWest.In the last 30-40 years, attempts have been made to increase the number of women who go intothe field of engineering. Accompanied by these attempts has grown a large body of researchinvestigating factors contributing to the disparity between the numbers of men and women whomajor in STEM.3-19. These attempts can largely be categorized in two major ways: One categoryof research identifies or prescribes a remedy for a presumptively inherent difference betweenwomen and men that prevents women from entering STEM fields in numbers equal
Engineering,Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 95, No.1, 2006, p. 53.2 Seymour, E. & Hewitt, N. Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences, Colorado: WestviewPress, 1997, p. 15.3 Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology Colleges, 2006 Edition, Washington D.C.: American Societyfor Engineering Education.4 Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology Colleges, 2006 Edition, Washington D.C.: American Societyfor Engineering Education. Page 13.1260.125 Harvard Business School Press, Managing Change and Transition, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2003.pp. 33-45.6 Knapp, M. & Hall. J. Nonverbal
rewarding it has been. Thestudents toured the facility and saw the cakes being made and packaged, a highly automatedprocess. Students saw real world applications of science, math, technology and engineering usedin product production. The students also saw women in challenging engineering roles which isimportant to help visualize themselves in those roles.Day 4 – Keep Moving On UpThe teams finished their projects from day 2 which was to design, construct and program anelevator system. Teams who finished early were challenged with adding another floor to theirelevator project. This twist increased the problem solving challenge and provided an additionalprogramming challenge relative to the operation of the elevator for multiple floors.After the
Renner is the Program Coordinator for the NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation for Faculty Diversity initiative at the University of Texas at El Paso. Prior to this, she was the Assistant Director for the UTEP Model Institutions for Excellence Program. She currently serves on the UTEP President's Advisory Committee on Women. Page 11.647.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Focusing the Lens on Women Faculty Issues: Three Years of ADVANCE at the University of Texas at El PasoTwenty-five years since Congress first initiated the Women in Science and Technology EqualOpportunity
power in shifting the balance ofparticipation in intercollegiate athletics from 15 percent women in 1972 to more than 40 percenttoday. This has inspired some to look to Title IX to similarly transform science, technology,engineering and mathematics (STEM) educational programs and activities to achieve similargains. But Title IX in the athletic context differs markedly from Title IX in the academiccontext, and similar tactics likely cannot produce similar results.This paper looks at Title IX in the academic context, differentiates it from Title IX in the athleticcontext and explores how successes in one area do not necessarily portend similar successes inthe other. It also examines issues raised in a recent report by the U.S
reasons.Female participation in the project istraditionally low. The studentcompetition has existed for almost 30years and the project guidelines are wellestablished. The rules of thecompetition allow a school to bring twoteams, which means that an all-women’steam does not preclude maleparticipation in the competition. Theproject is technologically challengingand requires the application of soundengineering principles. The project isalso very rewarding since the studentseventually get to drive a vehicle that Figure1: SAE Mini-Baja Vehiclethey have designed and built fromscratch.Since the inception of the all-women mini baja team coincided with the formation of theMechanical Engineering program in 2005, there is currently not a lot of data on
Technology, where she also created and taught a year-long, design-based engineering course for seniors. Forbes earned her PhD in civil engineering, with an engineering education research focus.Dr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the ABET assessment coordinator in the CEAE department since 2008. Professor Bielefeldt is the faculty director of the Sustainable By De- sign Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E