Conference Session

The Impact of Curriculum on the Retention of Women Students

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Keathly, University of North Texas; Robert Akl, University of North Texas; Ryan Garlick, University of North Texas

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Rugarda, A. The future of engineering education II: teaching methods that work. Chem. Engr. Education, vol. 34, no. 1, 2001, pp. 26-39.5. McKeachie, W. J., Pintrich, P.R., Lin, Y. and Smith, D.F.A. Teaching and Learning in the College Classroom: A Review of the Research Literature. ED340272 Sep 91 Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ERIC Digest, 1986.6. Pollock, L., McCoy, K., Carberry, S., Hundigopal, N., and You, X. “Increasing high school girls’ self confidence and awareness of CS through a positive summer experience,” Proceedings of the Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education, 2004

Conference Session

The Pipeline

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cortney Martin, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Tonya Smith-Jackson, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

University of Pennsylvania.11. O'Hare, S. (1995). Freshman women in engineering: Comparison of their backgrounds, abilities, values, and goals with science and humanities majors. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 2, 33- 47.12. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.13. Smith-Jackson, T. L. (2002, June 10-13). Child-Centered Safety Research Issues. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the XVI Annual International Occupational Ergonomics and Safety Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, June 10-13.14. Martin, C. V. (2007). Usability of pictorial assembly instructions for young children. University Libraries

Conference Session

Perspectives for Women Faculty

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stacy Birmingham, Grove City College

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, J. J., Chou, K. C., Yates, J. K., and Stalnaker, J., Women Faculty in Engineering: Changing the Academic Climate, J. Engineering Education, 85, 45 (1996).5. Ambrose, S., Lazarus, B., and Nair, I., No Universal Constants: Journeys of Women in Engineering and Computer Science, J. Engineering Education, 87, 363 (1998).6. Trower, C. A., Women without Tenure, Part II: The Gender Sieve, January 25, 2002. Retrieved from the World Wide Web on January 17, 2006: www.sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_development/previous_issues/articles/1400/women_without_tenure _part_ii_the_gender_sieve/ Page 12.1014.9

Conference Session

K-12 Programs (Co-sponsored by K-12 Division)

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lynn Fujioka, isisHawaii and Women in Technology; Sheryl Hom, isisHawaii and Women in Technology; Leslie Wilkins, Maui Economic Development Board

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Technology Ms. Hom is Vice-President and Director of Content Development for isisHawaii. She has served as editor and media specialist for the MEDB Women in Technology Project since 2004, lending her writing skills to WIT¹s broad range of programs statewide. As President and Owner of HomCreative, a creative marketing company, she knows firsthand the challenges and rewards of a women-owned business. She holds a B.A./Journalism from the University of Hawaii and an M.A./Journalism from the University of Oregon.Leslie Wilkins, Maui Economic Development Board Ms. Wilkins is Vice President of the Maui Economic Development Board and is the Founder and Director of its Women Technology Project

Conference Session

K-12 Programs for Recruiting Women

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Firouzeh Keshmiri, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Ann Bloor, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Mary Jo Wellenstein, Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

successful, diverse partnerships with local organizations with a strongknowledge of the community and local resources. Ownership of the program(s) at the local levelis extremely important for sustainability. Utilizing XXX alumni working in local industry is akey to enlisting the financial support of industry that will depend on the professionaldevelopment of girls for future economic stability. Facilitating relationships between femaleserving organizations, industry and universities is vital to maintaining the life of the programs.WIT will piggyback on existing programs such as school systems adopting Project Lead theWay. These school systems have already committed funding to this curriculum, have submittedproposals to the Kern Family Foundation for

Conference Session

The Impact of Curriculum on the Retention of Women Students

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rose Marra, University of Missouri; Barbara Bogue, Pennsylvania State University; Kelly Rodgers, University of Missouri; Demei Shen, University of Missouri

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

self-efficacy.Highly validated instruments for self-efficacy have produced different results. Hackett et al.’s 18work examined SME vocational self-efficacy and academic milestones self-efficacy for 197students and found no significant gender differences for either construct. Meinholdt andMurray’s study 19 was based on Hackett’s instrument and found a trend (p < .07) that favoredmen for academic self-efficacy but no gender differences for vocational self-efficacy.Although researchers seem to agree that it is an important concept, the research results show amixed view of gender differences for engineering self-efficacy. Further, these studies vary basedon the degree of validation of the instruments used, the number of institutions examined

Conference Session

Panel Discussion: Off the Record

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cheryl B. Schrader, Missouri University of Science and Technology; Janelle Brown; Lynn Lubamersky, Boise State University; Leslie Madsen-Brooks, Boise State University; Patricia Pyke, Boise State University; Heidi Reeder, Boise State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb23490.x12. Giroux, R. P. “Relevance of Roebling,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 23 no. 2 (2009): 2-4.13. Portrait of Emily Warren Roebling, Brooklyn Museum.14. Eagleton, Mary. “When Old is New: Diana Athill and Literary Value. Contemporary Women's Writing,” 5 no. 3 (2011): 172-187. doi: 10.1093/cww/vpr00115. Montagu, Lady Mary Wortley. Selected Letters. Isobel Grundy, ed. London, England: Penguin Classics, 1997.16. Bear, Risa S., transcriber. Selected Prose and Poetry of Lady Mary Wortley Montagu. accessed January 9, 2012, http://ebooks.gutenberg.us/Renascence_Editions/montagu.html17. Prose and Poetry of Lady Mary Wortley Montagu. Electronic Text Center, University of Virginia Library

Conference Session

WIED: Medley

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ahmed M. El-Sherbeeny, King Saud University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

). Alriyadh.com. 16633: January 07, 2014. Available online: http://www.alriyadh.com/2014/01/07/article898968.html. Last accessed: February 21, 2014.15. [“Increase in the Interest of Saudi Females in Employment is a New Challenge for ‘Saudization’ Programs in 2014.”] (2014). al-jazirah.com. 15081: January 12, 2014. Available online: http://www.al- jazirah.com/2014/20140112/ec4.htm. Last accessed: February 21, 2014.16. Maffeo, L. (2013). “Saudi Girls are More Likely to Study Science Than American Girls. Here's Why.” Policymic (online). December 5, 2013. Available online: http://www.policymic.com/articles/75819/saudi-girls- are-more-likely-to-study-science-than-american-girls-here-s-why. Last accessed: January 13, 2014.17

Conference Session

WIED Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Beth M Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Teri Reed-Rhoads, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Lorie Groll, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

within eachcohort.The cohort each year is defined as the first-time, full-time freshmen officially enrolled for the fallsemester in the College of Engineering. A student is considered retained for a year if s/he is stillenrolled in the College of Engineering in subsequent fall semesters at the time of the census(typically 21 days into the fall semester). For example, the number of first-year students stillenrolled at the time of the census of the second year would measure first year retention, and thenumber of second year students still enrolled at the time of the census of the third year wouldmeasure second year retention.The data consisted of 10 cohorts entering the university between 2000 and 2009. The number ofmen in the entering class sized

Conference Session

Recruitment & Retention of Women I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew J Miller, University of Maryland; Robert Lent, University of Maryland, College Park; Paige E Smith, University of Maryland, College Park; Bevlee A. Watford, Virginia Tech; Gregory M. Wilkins, Morgan State University; Matthew M. Jezzi, University of Maryland; Kayi Hui, University of Maryland, College Park; Robert H Lim, University of Maryland, College Park; Nicole A Bryan, University of Maryland, College Park; Helena Mimi Martin, University of Maryland, College Park

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

bepremature. Finally, the experiences of our study participants might not reflect the experiences ofracially diverse students in other engineering programs across the country.References1. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance [Monograph]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79-122.2. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (2007). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2007, .NSF 07-315.3. WEPAN (2006). Engaging America’s intellectual talent: The status of women and minorities in engineering. www.wepan.org4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought

Conference Session

Effective Methods for Recruiting Women to Engineering

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donna Milgram, Institute for Women in Trades, Technology and Science (IWITTS); Daniella Severs, Institute for Women in Trades, Technology and Science (IWITTS)

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

HelpfulThe ―big idea‖ or theorywas given before starting 91.5% 8.5% 47 100.0% 0.0% 8to learn specific conceptsTook an extra course(s)that helped build my skills 89.3% 10.7% 28 66.7% 33.3% 27needed for the course orprogramWorked in small groups 87.8% 12.2% 41 86.7% 13.3% 15Provided with lab timewith female staff or extra 83.3% 16.7% 24 54.8% 45.2% 31lab timeHad a mentor (virtual or 83.3% 16.7% 30 64.0% 36.0% 25in-person)Partnered with other 77.8% 22.2% 27 51.7% 48.3% 29females in

Conference Session

Retaining and Developing Women Faculty in STEM

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tamara Bush, Michigan State University; Laura J Genik, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

ofcontemporary leadership theory, The Leadership Quarterly, Volume 12, Issue 4, Winter 2001, Pages 419-450, ISSN1048-9843, 10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00090-X.3. Colleen Chesterman, Anne Ross-Smith, Margaret Peters, “Not doable jobs!” Exploring senior women's attitudesto academic leadership roles, Women's Studies International Forum, Volume 28, Issues 2–3, May–June 2005, Pages163-180, ISSN 0277-5395, 10.1016/j.wsif.2005.04.005.4. O’Bannon, D., Garavalia, L., Renz, D., and McCarther, S. (2010). Successful Leadership Development forWomen STEM Faculty, Leadership Manage. Eng. 10, SPECIAL ISSUE: Women in Civil Engineering, 167–173.doi:10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.00000805. Naomi Chesler, Peg Single, Borjana Mikic, On Belay: Peer-Mentoring and Adventure Education

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kathrine Ehrlich-Scheffer, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, exploring the world of craft cocktails, and making a fuss over her Boston Terrier, Gatsby. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Understanding Gen Z’s Declining Engagement with WE@RIT, a Woman in Engineering ProgramIntroductionAround 2016-2017 we began noticing sharp declines in current student engagement with ourwomen in engineering program, WE@RIT, within Rochester Institute of Technology’s KateGleason College of Engineering. The program itself was launched in the early 2000’s during theMillennial era, and the programming playbook was one of large, one-off events spearheaded byone full-time Director, and a handful of student employees. That

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sara Hillman, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Ghada Salama, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Emilio Ocampo Eibenschutz, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Saly Mohamed Ali Awadh, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Lara El Said, Texas A&M University at Qatar

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

).Iversen, E. (2016). "Arab women make a charge into engineering." Start Engineering. 10 06. Accessed 01 19, 2017. http://start-engineering.com/start-engineering- now/2016/10/6/arab-women-make-a-charge-into-engineering.Kantor, J. (2016). "To grow their participation In STEM, women need to come together ." Entrepreneur Middle East. 08 30. Accessed 01 20, 2017. https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/281567.Karlin, S. (2008). "Qatar University opens EE doors to women." IEEE Spectrum.Koushki, P. A., Al-Sanad, H. A. and Larkin A. M.. (1999). "Women engineers in Kuwait: Perception of gender bias." Journal of Engineering Education, 88 (1).Mannan, M. (2016). "Middle East female STEM graduates turning their backs on the

Conference Session

Recruitment and Retention Topics

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Godfrey, University of Auckland

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Conference Session

Interactive Panel on Perspectives and Practical Skills for Men as Advocates for Gender Equity

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lawrence J. Genalo, Iowa State University; Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University; Beth M Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Archie L Holmes Jr., University of Virginia; Brian P Kirkmeyer, Miami University; Klod Kokini, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Daniel Lopresti, Lehigh University; Adrienne Minerick, Michigan Technological University; Beena Sukumaran, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division, Minorities in Engineering, Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering, Women in Engineering

et al.’s 2012 PNAS paper (Science Faculty’s Subtle GenderBiases Favor Male Students)8 and Sheltzera and Smith’s 2104 PNAS paper (Elite Male Facultyin the Life Sciences Employ Fewer Women)9.Dr. Kirkmeyer: I cannot honestly say I have considered what strategies to use to help othersbecome aware of these issues, because they are situation-dependent and usually reactive. Ipersonally use humor and self-deprecation to address many issues in a non-threatening manner,and so I know I have done so with these. The reality is that it depends on the context of thesituation related to these issues. In some situations, humor (and particularly sarcasm) hasworked quite well in making others aware of how these issues are being perceived by othersaround them

Conference Session

K-12 Programs (Co-sponsored by K-12 Division)

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Virnoche, Humboldt State University; Elizabeth Eschenbach, Humboldt State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Conference Session

Issues of Outreach and Interest in Engineering

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sara A. Atwood, Elizabethtown College; Joshua M Frey, Elizabethtown College

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

pertaining to the diversity of the engineering field and young people’s awareness of engineering • Now What (are you going to do)? o How did this activity relate to --------’s motto “Educate for Service”? o Will you continue outreach and life long learning about the engineering field/ diversity after you graduate? If so, how? All of the responses were coded and tallied using Excel for the quantitative survey resultsand using custom software to detect and tally themes for the qualitative results. Identifiers wereused to maintain anonymity of the respondents, and data was stored on a password-protectedcomputer. Specific themes were identified and coded with

Conference Session

Retention Programs for Women Students

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kieran Sullivan, Santa Clara University; Ruth Davis, Santa Clara University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/tables/tabb-9.xls 8. Sullivan, Kieran, "Educational Assessment," a presentation by Dr. Sullivan at the NSF Workshop on Improvingand Assessing the Impact of Programs to Encourage Girls to Pursue Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (STEM), available online at the workshop website: http://www.scu.edu/SCU/Projects/NSFWorkshop99/.9. Tabachnick, Barbara G. and Fidell, Linda S. Using Multivariate Statistics, 4th Edition. Needham Heights, MA:Allyn & Bacon . 2001. 10. Willemsen, Eleanor, "Motivating Girls to Persist in EMS," a presentation by Dr. Willemsen at the NSFWorkshop on Improving and Assessing the Impact of Programs to Encourage Girls to Pursue Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM

Conference Session

An International Perspective

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hasmik Gharibyan, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. Gharibyan, H. and Gunsaulus, S., “Gender Gap in Computer Science Does Not Exist in One Former Soviet Republic: Results of a Study”, Proceedings of the ACM SIGCSE conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE06), Bologna, Italy, June 27-29, 2006, pp. 222-226 (also published in ACM journal Inroads: SIGCSE Bulletin, 38(3), 2006, pp. 222-226).7. Federal Research Division, The Library of Congress, Country Studies. http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/amtoc.html8. CIA – The World Factbook. https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/am.html9. OSEAS Europe (Professional Educators Group within NAFSA: Association of International Educators). http://www.bibl.u-szeged.hu/oseas/armedu.html10. De jure population

Conference Session

Mentoring

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Terri Camesano, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; David DiBiasio, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Kristen Billiar, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Marsha Rolle, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Susan Zhou, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. Page 13.733.1016. Pai, S., N.J. Gunja, E.L. Dupak, N.L. McMahon, J.C. Coburn, J.F. Lalikos, R.M. Dunn, N. Fancalancia, G.D. Pins, and K.L. Billiar, A mechanical study of rigid plate configurations for sternal fixation. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2007. 35: p. 808-816.17. Liu, Y., A.M. Gallardo-Moreno, P.A. Pinzon-Arango, Y.R. Reynolds, G., and T.A. Camesano, Cranberry changes the physicochemical surface properties of E. coli and adhesion with uroepithelial cells. submitted for publication. Page 13.733.11

Conference Session

Focus on High School Girls in Engineering

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Brake, Eastern Michigan University; Kaninka Bhatnagar, Eastern Michigan University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

of control. New York: W.H. Freeman11. Eccles, Jacquelynne S, & Wigfield, Allen (2002). Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annual Review ofPsychology, 53, 109-32.12. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk taking behavior, Psychological Review, 64, 359-372.13. Eccles (Parsons), J., Adler T., & Meece, J. (1984). Sex differences in achievement: a test of alternatetheories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 26-43.14. Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement andachievement motives (pp. 75-146). San Francisco: Freeman15. Parsons, J.E., J.L. Meece, T.F. Adler and C.M. Kaczala, Sex differences in attributions and learned helplessness,Sex Roles 8

Conference Session

Attitudes, Self-Confidence, and Self-Efficacy of Women Engineering Students

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Holly Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Ruth Streveler, Purdue University; Ronald Miller, Colorado School of Mines; Barbara Olds, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. 153-191.20. Clark, M., et al. Academic Pathways Study: Processes and realities. In Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. 2008. Pittsburgh, PA.21. Sheppard, S., et al. Studying the engineering student experience: Design of a longitudinal study. In Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. 2004. Salt Lake City, UT.22. Loshbaugh, H.G., R.A. Streveler, and K.R. Breaux. Research design becomes research reality: Colorado School of Mines implements research methodology for the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education. In Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. 2005. Portland, OR.23. ABET, Criteria for

Conference Session

Focus on Faculty

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristen Constant, Iowa State University; Sharon Bird, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Transforming Science and Engineering: Advancing Academic Women, edited by A. J. Stewart, J. E. Malley, and D. LaVaque-Manty. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.5 Valian, Virginia. 2006. "Beyond Gender Schemas: Improving the Advancement of Women in Academia." Pp. 30-332 in Removing Barriers: Women in Academic Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, edited by J. M. Bystydzienski and S. R. Bird. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.6 Peterson, Trond. 2004. “The Opportunity Structure for Discrimination.” American Journal of Sociology 109 (4): 852-901.7 Reskin, Barbara. 2002. "Including Mechanisms in Our Models of Ascriptive Inequality." American Sociological Review 68:1-218 Bird, Sharon R

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kaitlin I Tyler, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Yanfen Li, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Nicole D. Jackson, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Wan-Ting Chen, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign; Chaoyang Liu, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Rohit Bhargava, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

projects that the participant would like to conduct in the 1-3, 3-5, and beyond five-yearrange.The “Motivation/Background of Research” peer review was added to help participates begin todraft the introductory portion of their research statement. Participants would receive constructivefeedback to help hone in on what research problem(s) they identified and would seek to addressin their future research.We have added both a peer review and panel session for “Outlining Specific Aims”. The goal ofthese sessions is to help participants begin to begin to identify the broad research themes in theirstatements. We have scheduled the peer review before the panel session so that participantscould receive constructive feedback and guidance from faculty after

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christina K. Lam , Arizona State University; Samantha N. Cruz, Arizona State University; Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State University; Brooke Charae Coley, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

uniqueness of gender in experiencing themakerspace, it will be necessary to also investigate the experiences that the gender majoritygroup has in the makerspace. Future work will focus on comparing the experiences andperceptions of female and male engineering students in the makerspace, which will support amore complex understanding of the role of gender in makerspaces.References[1] J. S. McIlwee and J. G. Robinson, Women in Engineering: Gender, Power and Workplace Culture. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1992.[2] G.E. Miller, “Frontier masculinity in the oil industry: The experience of women engineers,” Gender, Work & Organization, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 47–73, Jan. 2004.[3] D. N. Beede, T.A. Julian, D. Langdon

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Pre-college Programs for Women

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donna C. Llewellyn, Boise State University; Janet Callahan, Boise State University; Amy J Moll, Boise State University; Catherine Rose Bates, Institute for STEM & Diversity Initiatives

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division, Women in Engineering

Engineering Programs. Paperpresented at the 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition.2. Chesler, N.C. & Chesler, M.A. (2002). Gender-informed mentoring strategies for women engineering scholars:On establishing a caring community. Journal of Engineering Education, 91. 49-55.3. Darwin, A., & Palmer, E. (2009). Mentoring circles in higher education. Higher Education Research andDevelopment, 28, 125-136.4. Kram, K.E., & Isabella, L.A. (1985). Mentoring alternatives: The role of peer relationships in careerdevelopment. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 110-132.5. Bhatia, S., Asce, M. & Amati, J. P. (2010). “If these women can do it, I can do it too”: Building womenengineering leaders through graduate peer mentoring. Leadership &

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division: Retaining and Developing Women Faculty in STEM

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenna P. Carpenter, Louisiana Tech University; D. Patrick O'Neal, Louisiana Tech University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

2008.8. Hegab, H.E. and Hall, D.E., “Increasing Experiential Learning in FreshmanEngineering through a Microfabrication Project,” ASME International MechanicalEngineering Congress and Exposition, 2007. Page 26.495.119. Etzkowtiz, H., Kemelgor, C., Neuschatz, M. and Uzzi, B., Athena unbound: Barriers towomen in academic science and engineering. Science and Public Policy 19 (1992, 157–179).10. Bandura, A., Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory,Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.11. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D. and Hackett, G., “Toward a unifying social cognitive theoryof career and academic interest, choice, and

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Celine Manoosingh, Georgia Southern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, J., Giles, D. E., Jr., Stenson, C. M., & Gray, C. J. (2001). At a glance: What we know about theeffects of service-learning on college students, faculty, institutions and communities, 1993-2000 (3rd ed.).Nashville, TN:Vanderbilt University. Jacoby and Associates (1996). Securing the Future of Service-Learning in Higher Education: A Mandatefor Action.” 317-35 in s. Service-Learning in Higher Education: Concepts and Practices. San Francisco,CA: Jossey-Bass, 1996.Oakes, William C. (2004), Service-Learning in Engineering: A Resource Guidebook, Campus Compact,download at http://www.compact.org/publications/detail2.php?id=19Oakes, W., Leone, L., Gunn, C., Dilworth, J., Young, M., Diefes, H., Flori, R, Potter, M., Engineering:Your Future, 3rd

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Strategies Beyond the Classroom to Tackle Gender Issues

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eddie L Jacobs, University of Memphis; Amy L de Jongh Curry, University of Memphis; Russell J. Deaton, University of Memphis; Carmen Astorne-Figari, University of Memphis; Douglas Clark Strohmer, University of Memphis

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Science and Engineering: Issues, Problems, and Solutions. Gender & Society, 25(5):589–615, 2011. [6] Allison Godwin, Geoff Potvin, Zahra Hazari, and Robynne Lock. Understanding engineering identity through structural equation modeling. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, pages 50–56, 2013. [7] Holly M Matusovich, Ruth a Streveler, and Ronald L Miller. Why Do Students Choose Engineering? A Qualitative , Longitudinal Investigation of Students’ Motivational Values. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4):289–303, 2010. [8] J. S. Eccles. Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In Handbook of competence and motivation, pages 105–121. 2005. [9] Lisa Benson, Adam Kirn